Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Axial Staging”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1972

Performance and control study of a low-pressure-ratio turbojet engine for a drone aircraft

The results of analog and digital computer studies of a low-pressure-ratio turbojet engine system for use in a drone vehicle are presented. The turbojet engine consists of a four-stage axial compressor, single-stage turbine, and a fixed area exhaust nozzle. Three simplified fuel schedules and a generalized parameter fuel control for the engine system are presented and evaluated. The evaluation is based on the performance of each schedule or control during engine acceleration from a windmill start at Mach 0.8 and 6100 meters to 100 percent corrected speed. It was found that, because of the higher acceleration margin permitted by the control, the generalized parameter control exhibited the best dynamic performance.

Seldner, K.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Evaluation of a low aspect ratio small axial compressor stage, volume 1

A program was conducted to evaluate the effects of scaling, tip clearance, and IGV reset on the performance of a low aspect ratio compressor stage. Stage design was obtained by scaling an existing single stage compressor by a linear factor of 0.304. The design objective was to maintain the meanline velocity field of the base machine in the smaller size. Adjustments were made to account for predicted blockage differences and to chord lengths and airfoil edge radii to obtain reasonable blade geometries. Meanline velocity diagrams of the base stage were not maintained at the scaled size. At design speed and flowrate the scaled stage achieved a pressure ratio of 1.423, adiabatic efficiency of 0.822, and surge margin of 18.5%. The corresponding performance parameters for the base stage were 1.480, 0.872, and 25.2%, respectively. The base stage demonstrated a peak efficiency at design speed of 0.872; the scaled stage achieved a level of 0.838. When the scaled stage rotor and stator tip clearances were doubled, the stage achieved a pressure ratio of 1.413, efficiency of 0.799, and surge margin of 16.0% at the design flowrate. The peak stage efficiency at design speed was 0.825 with the increased clearance. Increased prewhirl lowered the stage pressure ratio as expected. Stage efficiency was maintained with ten degrees of increased prewhirl and then decreased substantially with ten additional degrees of reset.

Sawyer, C. W., III↗