Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Award”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

SBIR Phase I Final Technical Report FAST AND DENSE OXIDE GLASS FOR HEP Award Number DE-SC0024589 Program Manager Dr. Helmut Marsiske Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, SC-1 For the Period July 10, 2023 – April 9, 2024 Report Date April 26th, 2024. Submitted by Lakshmi Soundara Pandian, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Report Contributors: Dr. Lakshmi Soundara Pandian, Dr. Pijush Bhattacharya, Mr. Jared Schott, Dr. Jarek Glodo RMD Dr. Renyuan Zhu, Caltech Dr. Rastgo Hawrami, XI Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. 44 Hunt Street, Watertown, MA 02472

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Soundara Pandian, Lakshmi↗
DOE OSTI2024

Phase II Final Technical Report | Neutron Dose Tolerant Solid-State Photomultiplier for Nuclear Imaging | Award Number DE-SC0021560 | Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, SC-1 | For the Period April 4, 2022 – April 3, 2024 | Report Date July 31, 2024 | Submitted by Erik Johnson, Ph.D., Principal Investigator | Report Contributors Erik Johnson, Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc., 44 Hunt Street, Watertown, MA 02472

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Johnson, Erik↗
DOE OSTI2024

DOE Phase II Final Technical Report Bright Electron Source for X-ray Free Electron Lasers Award Number DE-SC0020607 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, SC-1 For the Period May 3, 2021 – August 2, 2024 Report Date November 25, 2024 Submitted by Harish B. Bhandari, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Report Contributors Dr. Oleg Maksimov, RMD Inc. Dr. Bryan Rachmilowitz, RMD Inc. Dr. Jared Maxson, Cornell University Dr. Hisato Yamaguchi, LANL

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bhandari, Harish↗
DOE OSTI2024

SBIR Phase I Final Technical Report MODULAR NEUTRON DETECTOR ARRAY FOR PROTEIN CRYSTALLOGRAPHY BEAM LINES Award Number DE-SC0024828 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, SC-1 For the Period July 22, 2024 – April 21, 2025 Report Date November 22, 2024 Submitted by Vivek V. Nagarkar, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Report Contributors Mr. Nicholas Anastasi, Dr. Charles Sosa, Dr. Jun Wang, Dr. Lakshmi Soundara Pandian and Dr. Vivek V. Nagarkar

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Nagarkar, Vivek V.↗
DOE OSTI2025

SBIR Phase I Final Technical Report LOW-COST, LIGHTWEIGHT DOPED POLYMER COATINGS FOR MICROELECTRONICS VIA 3D PRINTING Award Number DE-SC0025167 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, SC-1 For the Period July 22, 2024 – April 21, 2025 Report Date May 5, 2025 Submitted by Jun Wang, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Report Contributors Dr. Jun Wang, Dr. Charles Sosa

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Wang, Jun [Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc., Wat↗
NASA NTRS1990

Summary data on all NASA procurement actions

Summary data on all NASA procurement actions and detailed information on contracts, grants, agreements, and other procurements over $25,000 awarded by NASA during the first six months on fiscal year 1990 are presented. Areas addressed include competition in NASA awards, awards to business firms, awards to educational and other nonprofit institutions, contract for operation of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and awards through other government agencies. Other topics covered are the U.S. geographical distribution of awards, awards placed outside the U.S., and procurement activity by installation.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1992

Measuring quality progress

The study by the American Productivity & Quality Center (APQC) was commissioned by Loral Space Information Systems, Inc. and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to evaluate internal assessment systems. APQC benchmarked approaches to the internal assessment of quality management systems in three phases. The first phase included work conducted for the International Benchmarking Clearinghouse (IBC) and consisted of an in-depth analysis of the 1991 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria. The second phase was also performed for the IBC and compared the 1991 award criteria among the following quality awards: Deming Prize, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, The President's Award for Quality and Productivity Improvement, The NASA Excellence Award (The George M. Lowe Trophy) for Quality and Productivity Improvement and the Shigeo Shingo Award for Excellence in Manufacturing. The third phase compared the internal implementation approaches of 23 companies selected from American industry for their recognized, formal assessment systems.

Lambert, Larry D.↗
NASA NTRS2005

NASA's Radio Frequency Bolt Monitor: A Lifetime of Spinoffs

This story begins in the 1970s, when Dr. Joseph Heyman, a young scientist at NASA s Langley Research Center, was asked to support the investigation of a wind tunnel accident at a sister center. Although the work was outside of his physics background, it sparked a research focus that guided his lengthy NASA career and would earn him a slew of accolades, including NASA s highest award medals for Exceptional Leadership, Exceptional Achievement, and Exceptional Service; the coveted Silver Snoopy Astronaut Award for Space Shuttle Return to Flight; and the Arthur Fleming Award for being one of the Top Ten Federal Scientists in Government Service. He won 30 additional NASA awards, including the Agency s Invention of the Year and the Agency s highest award for technology transfer, and was the only person to ever win 4 R&D 100 Awards. Back in 1973, though, Heyman was a young civil servant with a background in physics who was asked to sit on an accident review panel. The panel met at Ames Research Center, in Moffet Field, California, and after considerable investigation, concluded that a high-pressure pebble heater used for heating gas had failed, due to improperly tightened bolts in a 1,000-pound gate valve control section. The accident showered the facility with incendiary ceramic spheres and nearly a ton of metal, but, luckily, caused no injuries. Heyman returned to Langley and began work on a solution. He developed an ultrasonic device that would measure bolt elongation, as opposed to torque, the factor typically measured in testing bolt preload or tension. Torque measurement can lead to load errors, with miscalculations as high as 80 percent that can be passed over during installation. Bolt stretch, however, is nearly always accurate to 1 percent or better. Within 1 month, he had an acoustic resonance solution that accurately determined bolt elongation. He assumed his work on this project had ended, but it was actually the start of nearly 15 years of work perfecting, improving, inventing, and modifying the "bolt monitor", all the while, filing numerous patents, presenting papers, and holding demonstrations as the technology matured. Industry engineers challenged Heyman s inventiveness, and reminded the physicist that most bolts are not perfect resonators, and that early devices required that the bolt have reasonably flat and parallel faces. The U.S. Geological Survey asked NASA for help in determining the load in mine roof bolts, which are 8- to 10-feet-long and rough cut. To solve that problem, Heyman modified the original device to operate at a lower frequency and to generate propagation modes that could be used to "lock" the instrument on a particular mode. Further work in this vein led to the development of the Pulsed Phase Locked Loop (P2L2) that worked on the mine bolts. The next set of problems involved high-strength bolts with head markings. For this solution, Heyman invented a modified P2L2 that tracked a specific phase point in the measurement wave. This class of instrumentation, well suited to measuring small changes in acoustic velocity, won the NASA "Invention of the Year" award in 1982. Other scientists and engineers have continued the evolution of this technology both inside NASA and outside of the Agency. Within NASA, the technology has been improved for medical applications, with a particular focus on intercranial pressure (ICP) monitoring.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2022

Theoretical Particle Physics in the Data-Driven Era (Final Report)

DOE award DE-SC0021447 supports theoretical research in high energy physics. PI and students are not a part of any experimental collaboration, even if some works were done in collaboration with experimental colleagues. All research products are in the form of research articles and they are publicly available under inspirehep.net and arxiv.org, which are typical publication methods in high energy physics. No invention or patent is involved with this research. No equipment or hardware is involved with the research under this award. Research outcomes are used by colleagues in high energy physics, including both theorists and experimentalists. Therefore the outcome of research topics under this award supported the High Energy Physics experimental research program, both in understanding the data and in finding new directions for experimental exploration. The research materials are used to train undergraduate students, graduate students and postdoctoral scholars. We summarize research activity under this award in the following section and major products are listed in section 3. Section 4 contains professional presentations given by PI. Other products developed during the award period are in section 5. Students’ activities are summarized in section 6.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Offshore Testing Facility – Small Scale Turbine Testing and Development Final Technical Report

In July 2010 funding for an award was made available under contract DE-EE0004200 which is the focus of this report. Under this funding, The U.S. Department of Energy’s (USDOE) designated Florida Atlantic University’s (FAU) state of Florida marine renewable energy focused Center of Excellence for Ocean Energy Technology as the Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center (SNMREC). The award was advertised in 2008, when the USDOE Wind and Water Program issued a funding opportunity announcement (DE-PS36-08GO98030) to establish university-led National Marine Renewable Energy Centers (NMRECs). Although FAU was selected for this opportunity, funding did not become available until 2010 at which time three of the original five years of performance remained and scope was adjusted accordingly. This award was divided into two phases. The first phase focused on marine energy turbine system enhancement and research while the second phase aimed to advance offshore capabilities and testing opportunities for small-scale demonstration turbines. The project’s objective was to increase the nation’s capabilities, knowledge, and competitiveness with respect to ocean current energy technology. This project successfully achieved these goals by advancing marine energy technology testing opportunities and capabilities. This report details these accomplishments by phase and task. Descriptions include any relevant results, challenges, achievements, and outcomes. Additional intellectual products and publications are listed in the Appendix where detailed technical explanations can be found. Further, because this award designated SNMREC as a USDOE center, it challenges FAU to continue providing value for the marine energy sector in the long term. The direct accomplishments of this project, though noteworthy, are also the seeds for a greater partnership between the USDOE and FAU. SNMREC, leveraging its designation as an NMREC under this award, will expand these contributions for decades to come as a coordinated sustainable program that can serve the marine energy sector’s needs as they arise.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗
NASA NTRS2004

Operating The Central Process Systems At Glenn Research Center

As a research facility, the Glenn Research Center (GRC) trusts and expects all the systems, controlling their facilities to run properly and efficiently in order for their research and operations to occur proficiently and on time. While there are many systems necessary for the operations at GRC, one of those most vital systems is the Central Process Systems (CPS). The CPS controls operations used by GRC's wind tunnels, propulsion systems lab, engine components research lab, and compressor, turbine and combustor test cells. Used widely throughout the lab, it operates equipment such as exhausters, chillers, cooling towers, compressors, dehydrators, and other such equipment. Through parameters such as pressure, temperature, speed, flow, etc., it performs its primary operations on the major systems of Electrical Dispatch (ED), Central Air Dispatch (CAD), Central Air Equipment Building (CAEB), and Engine Research Building (ERB). In order for the CPS to continue its operations at Glenn, a new contract must be awarded. Consequently, one of my primary responsibilities was assisting the Source Evaluation Board (SEB) with the process of awarding the recertification contract of the CPS. The job of the SEB was to evaluate the proposals of the contract bidders and then to present their findings to the Source Selecting Official (SSO). Before the evaluations began, the Center Director established the level of the competition. For this contract, the competition was limited to those companies classified as a small, disadvantaged business. After an industry briefing that explained to qualified companies the CPS and type of work required, each of the interested companies then submitted proposals addressing three components: Mission Suitability, Cost, and Past Performance. These proposals were based off the Statement of Work (SOW) written by the SEB. After companies submitted their proposals, the SEB reviewed all three components and then presented their results to the SSO. While the SEB does not select the company receiving the contract, they can make recommendations based on their findings to the SSO, who actually awards the contract. The SEB began work for this contract in July 2003 by writing the SOW and the selection will tentatively occur July 30, 2004. Contract awarding will take place Aug. 15. Following the awarding, the winning company has a 30-day Phase-in Period beginning Sept. 1,2004 and full performance will begin October 1.

Weiler, Carly P.↗