DOE OSTI2020
Nuclear fusion science is an example of a scientific field with a rich history of expert involvement and scientific publications, which together, form an expert-knowledge base. One example of a nuclear fusion formalism is the utilization of published reaction rates from a variety of authors. Investigators for Deuterium- Tritium (D-T) ion fusion can choose from using frequently cited methods: the Bosch and Hal reactivity, thermonuclear reaction rates from Caughlan and Fowler, and the reactivity evaluation from Miley, Towner & Ivich which forms the basis of the Naval Research Lab (NRL) formulary. There are other choices available. Each of the reactivity formulations considered here, are based upon the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution for D-T fusion ion reactants. Numerical methods for computer codes simulating hot, energetic plasmas, include tabulations of the reactivity, and the first moment of energy. This report continues the step toward building understanding of nuclear fusion reactivity formalisms. It is part of a series of reports with the same goal, [5-10] and is the continuation of the Part I paper for defining the mathematical relationship of the first moment of D-T fusion ion kinetic energy, <$E$>, with the fusion cross-section, fusion reactivity and its derivative with ion-temperature. In Part I, three variants of the first moment <$E$> were analytically developed and explored: 1) constant cross-section, 2) a normalized first moment, and 3) a particular function of the first moment from Brysk. In Part II, attention is given to the definition of <$K$>, originally described as a ratio of moments from Brysk, and its relationship to the first moment definitions from Part I. One measure of the progress made in these documents is the identification that Brysk’s ratio of the second moment to the first moment ratio, <$K$>, does not correspond to his provided solution of the first moment of energy. Another measure of (our) progress from this work is the comparison of first moment variants. That comparison includes confirming the importance of cross sections defined in terms of energy. The analytical relationships we have developed among important physics quantities are useful tools in validation and verification (V&V). For example, we can calculate the kinetic energy as a mean or as a first moment, or as a function of the first moment. These analytically-determined values can be compared directly with numerically-determined values, supplied to the authors, representing <$E$>.
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗