Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fuels”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,207 records · Page 67
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

A Design and Fabrication Options Trade Study for Metallic Fuel without Internal Sodium Bonding

Nuclear fuels using alloys of uranium, or metallic fuels, have many beneficial properties. The classical metallic fuel design uses a loose fitting cylindrical “slug” of fuel placed inside stainless-steel cladding tubes where the gap is filled with sodium. This sodium bond is liquid at operating temperature and conducts heat from the slug to the cladding, especially in early life before fuel swells into contact with the cladding. Despite the benefits of sodium bonding, there is a desire to develop metallic fuel technologies without it chiefly to reduce chemical reaction hazards in spent fuel storage from sodium fast reactors operating on once-through fuel cycles. Elimination of the sodium bond may also help unlock potential benefits for fuel fabrication, reactor neutronics, and compatibility with other types of reactors. Creating a sodium-free metallic fuel revolves around the problem of manufacturing fuel slug geometries which are in close contact with the cladding at beginning of life to facilitate heat transport while alleviating fuel-cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) at this interface and providing enough free volume to accommodate fuel swelling. Accelerating development and qualification of this fuel system will require careful selection of design and manufacturing options. To this end, a design trade-off study was performed to evaluate candidate options. Several design and manufacturing options were assessed, weighted, scored, and ranked with respect to fabrication, normal reactor operation, off-normal scenarios, and back-end considerations. This effort was performed both for “baseline” needs, which represented a once-through fuel cycle at temperatures and burnups known to be viable for sodium-bonded metallic fuel, and for “enhanced” needs to represent opportunities for closed fuel cycles and/or more aggressive temperatures/burnups. The outcomes of this study prioritized a baseline technology using U-Zr alloy with additives to mitigate FCCI, produced in annular slug geometry by continuous casting, clad in austenitic stainless-steel alloy, and followed by a final step to swage the cladding down to close the gap. This study prioritized an enhanced fuel technology using U-Mo alloy, also produced by continuous casting into an annular geometry, followed by coating/plating with an FCCI barrier on the slug, again with a final step to swage the cladding diameter down using oxide dispersion strengthened steel. It was noted that development of the enhanced fuel technology would entail more risk, thus U-Zr alloy was put forth as a backup to U-Mo if challenges are encountered with FCCI barriers, and advanced ferritic/martensitic steels are put forth as a backup to oxide dispersion strengthened steels if swaging and welding are found unworkable.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

The Impact of Furnace-Testing on the Microstructure of an Irradiated U-Mo Fuel Plate

The Material Management and Minimization Program (formerly known as the Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactor Program) is responsible for converting research reactors that use highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels to ones that use low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuels. As part of the development of LEU fuels, a variety of irradiation experiments are being conducted using the Advanced Test Reactor. In addition to the reactor tests, there is interest in generating information about the transient behavior of irradiated fuel plates. For example, it is of interest to determine the temperature at which a blister will form on the surface of a fuel plate, due to fission gas release from the fuel meat, for a particular fuel plate design. Since in-pile testing to determine the 'blister threshold' (the temperature where a blister forms on the surface of a fuel plate) in plate-type fuel is very difficult and expensive and has historically been deemed impractical for fuel qualification testing, an out-of-pile 'blister test' has been developed and employed. This post-irradiation blister anneal test was developed as a conservative simulation of in-pile behavior and has been routinely used for many research reactor fuel designs currently in use. In this test, the irradiated fuel plate is inserted into a furnace at a given temperature, soaked for a period of time, and removed for inspection. If no visible blisters appear, the furnace temperature is increased, and the plate is soaked and inspected again. This process continues until blisters are observed. Recently, a section from an irradiated U-7Mo dispersion fuel plate with Al-4043 matrix, which has a nominal composition of 4.81Si-0.20Fe-0.14Ti-0.16Cu-0.01Cr 0.01Mn-bal Al, was tested in a furnace located in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility, located at the Idaho National Laboratory, up to 500 deg. C, at which point blisters were observed on the surface of the fuel plate section. A sample near the blistered region of the fuel plate section was then characterized using scanning electron (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This paper discusses the results of this characterization and how they compare to those generated for a similar sample characterized after fabrication but before irradiation and for a sample characterized after irradiation but before furnace testing. One goal of this work is to identify the changes in the microstructure during blister testing that contribute to the eventual release of fission gas that results in the development of blisters. SEM analysis of the furnace-tested sample showed that in some locations of the U-7Mo particles, Al-4043 matrix constituents (primarily Si) had penetrated the microstructure along grain boundaries. This provided potential pathways for increased fission gas migration in the fuel meat microstructure during the furnace heating process. Some attack of these boundaries was also observed in the as-fabricated U-7Mo/Al-4043 sample, but there appeared to be additional attack during the furnace annealing. Besides the changes observed in grain boundary features, the TEM analysis showed that the fission gas bubbles that are typically present in the intra-granular regions of the as-irradiated U-7Mo microstructure as a fission gas bubble superlattice had changed in size, morphology, and distribution. The result of this may be an increase in the mobility of the fission gas in intra-granular regions of the fuel. The complete implications of the changes in fission gas morphology and distribution in the fuel meat microstructure and their impact on blistering continues to be investigated. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Results from the DOE Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program

Modular HTGR designs were developed to provide natural safety, which prevents core damage under all design basis accidents and presently envisioned severe accidents. The principle that guides their design concepts is to passively maintain core temperatures below fission product release thresholds under all accident scenarios. This level of fuel performance and fission product retention reduces the radioactive source term by many orders of magnitude and allows potential elimination of the need for evacuation and sheltering beyond a small exclusion area. This level, however, is predicated on exceptionally high fuel fabrication quality and performance under normal operation and accident conditions. Germany produced and demonstrated high quality fuel for their pebble bed HTGRs in the 1980s, but no U.S. manufactured fuel had exhibited equivalent performance prior to the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The design goal of the modular HTGRs is to allow elimination of an exclusion zone and an emergency planning zone outside the plant boundary fence, typically interpreted as being about 400 meters from the reactor. To achieve this, the reactor design concepts require a level of fuel integrity that is better than that claimed for all prior US manufactured TRISO fuel, by a few orders of magnitude. The improved performance level is about a factor of three better than qualified for German TRISO fuel in the 1980’s. At the start of the AGR program, without a reactor design concept selected, the AGR fuel program selected to qualify fuel to an operating envelope that would bound both pebble bed and prismatic options. This resulted in needing a fuel form that could survive at peak fuel temperatures of 1250°C on a time-averaged basis and high burnups in the range of 150 to 200 GWd/MTHM (metric tons of heavy metal) or 16.4 to 21.8% fissions per initial metal atom (FIMA). Although Germany has demonstrated excellent performance of TRISO-coated UO2 particle fuel up to about 10% FIMA and 1150°C, UO2 fuel is known to have limitations because of CO formation and kernel migration at the high burnups, power densities, temperatures, and temperature gradients that may be encountered in the prismatic modular HTGRs. With uranium oxycarbide (UCO) fuel, the kernel composition is engineered to prevent CO formation and kernel migration, which are key threats to fuel integrity at higher burnups, temperatures, and temperature gradients. Furthermore, the recent poor fuel performance of UO2 TRISO fuel pebbles measured in Chinese irradiation testing in Russia and in German pebbles irradiated at 1250°C, and historic data on poorer fuel performance in safety testing of German pebbles that experienced burnups in excess of 10% FIMA [1] have each raised concern about the use of UO2 TRISO above 10% FIMA and 1150°C and the degree of margin available in the fuel system. This continues to be an active area of study internationally.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

INITIAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT POWER TIME LAG DUE TO HETEROGENEITY WITHIN THE TREAT FUEL MATRIX.

The topic Nuclear Safety encompasses a broad spectrum of focal areas within the nuclear industry; one specific aspect centers on the performance and integrity of nuclear fuel during a reactivity insertion accident (RIA). This specific accident has proven to be fundamentally difficult to theoretically characterize due to the numerous empirically driven characteristics that quantify the fuel and reactor performance. The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility was designed and operated to better understand fuel behavior under extreme (i.e. accident) conditions; it was shutdown in 1994. Recently, efforts have been underway to commission the TREAT facility to continue testing of advanced accident tolerant fuels (i.e. recently developed fuel concepts). To aid in the restart effort, new simulation tools are being used to investigate the behavior of nuclear fuels during facility’s transient events. This study focuses specifically on the characterizing modeled effects of fuel particles within the fuel matrix of the TREAT. The objective of this study was to (1) identify the impact of modeled heterogeneity within the fuel matrix during a transient event, and (2) demonstrate acceptable modeling processes for the purpose of TREAT safety analyses, specific to fuel matrix and particle size. Hypothetically, a fuel that is dominantly heterogeneous will demonstrate a clearly different temporal heating response to that of a modeled homogeneous fuel. This time difference is a result of the uniqueness of the thermal diffusivity within the fuel particle and fuel matrix. Using MOOSE/BISON to simulate the temperature time-lag effect of fuel particle diameter during a transient event, a comparison of the average graphite moderator temperature surrounding a spherical particle of fuel was made for both types of fuel simulations. This comparison showed that at a given time and with a specific fuel particle diameter, the fuel particle (heterogeneous) simulation and the homogeneous simulation were related by a multiplier relative to the average moderator temperature. As time increases the multiplier is comparable to the factor found in a previous analytical study from literature. The implementation of this multiplier and the method of analysis may be employed to remove assumptions and increase fidelity for future research on the effect of fuel particles during transient events.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

The MELCOR Analysis of Chinshan Nuclear Power Plant Spent Fuel Pool for Fukushima-like Accident

The safety analysis of the nuclear power plant (NPP) is very important work in the NPP safety. Especially after the Fukushima NPP accident occurred, the importance of NPP safety analysis has been raised and there is more concern for the safety of NPPs in Taiwan. Because the earthquake and tsunami occurred, the cooling system of spent fuel pool failed and the safety issue of spent fuel pool generated in Japan's Fukushima NPP. Chinshan NPP is the first NPP in Taiwan which is BWR/4 plant and OLTP (Original Licensed Thermal Power) for each unit is 1775 MWt. Chinshan NPP finished SPU (stretch power uprate) and the operating power is 103.66% of the OLTP, which is 1840 MWt now. After Fukushima NPP accident occurred, in order to concern the safety of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool, we performed the safety analysis of spent fuel pool by using MELCOR/SNAP which also assumed the cooling system of spent fuel pool failed. The geometry of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool is 12.17 m x 7.87 m x 11.61 m and the initial condition is 60 deg. (water temperature) / 1.013 x 10{sup 5} Pa. And, the total power of the fuels is roughly 8.9 MWt initially. MELCOR is developed by Sandia National Laboratories. MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor NPPs, including containment response and leakage of activity to the environment. A broad spectrum of severe accident phenomena in both BWRs and PWRs is treated in MELCOR in a unified framework. These include thermalhydraulic response in the reactor coolant system, reactor cavity, containment, and confinement buildings; core heatup, degradation, and relocation; core-concrete attack; hydrogen production, transport, and combustion; fission product release and transport behavior. Current uses of MELCOR include estimation of severe accident source terms and their sensitivities and uncertainties in a variety of applications. According to Dr. Carbajo's paper, MELCOR was used to perform the study of spent fuel pool of Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4. Niina E. Koenoenen used MELCOR to establish the spent fuel pool model of a Nordic BWR. The loss-of-pool-cooling accidents was simulated and analyzed by this model. The above studies indicate that MELCOR is capable of handling the simulation of the spent fuel pool. An increasing number of researchers are using MELCOR code to analyze test facilities and nuclear power plants. Jun Wang et al. used MELCOR to perform core degradation simulation and MELCOR results were compared with CORA experimental data. Through this work, they reviewed the performance of MELCOR COR package in detail. Tae Woon Kim et al. developed MELCOR model of APR1400 (an advanced pressurized water reactor). They used this model to perform the LBLOCA transient simulation and sensitivity study. Longze Li et al. established the MELCOR model of CPR1000 (a Chinese pressurized reactor 1000-MW power plant). The station blackout (SBO) with failure of the steam generator (SG) safety relief valve (SRV) transient was simulated and analyzed by this model. SNAP is a graphic user interface program that processes the inputs and outputs of MELCOR. In addition, there is an animation function in SNAP which can present the animation of analysis results. There are two main steps in this research. The first step was the establishment of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool MELCOR/SNAP model. And the transient analysis of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool MELCOR/SNAP model under the cooling system failure condition was performed. The next step was the comparison among the MELCOR, TRACE and CFD data. TRACE and CFD data were from INER reports. In addition, the animation model of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool was presented by using the animation function of SNAP with MELCOR/SNAP analysis results. This study has developed MELCOR/SNAP model of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool successfully. By using the above model, the safety analysis of the spent fuel pool was performed under the cooling system of spent fuel pool failed condition. The analysis results of MELCOR, TRACE and CFD were similar in this case. It indicated that there was a respectable accuracy in MELCOR/SNAP model. The analysis results depicted that the uncovered of the fuels occurred at 2.6 day and the metal-water reaction of fuels occurred roughly at 3.7 day after the cooling system failed. The above results indicated that the failure of cladding occurred after 3.7 day. This study's results can help to evaluate the safety issue of Chinshan NPP spent fuel pool. In addition, the cooling system and some mitigation measures of spent fuel pool is not simulated in the above model. However, we will do it in the future. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Statistical Analysis in Support of Fuel Temperature Control in the Advanced Gas Reactor Experiments

There are four completed tests among a series of Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiments that are being conducted within the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The main objectives of the fuel experimental campaigns are to provide the necessary data on fuel performance to support fuel process development, qualify a fuel design and fabrication process for normal operation and hypothetical accident conditions, and support development and validation of fuel performance and fission product transport models and codes. Since this tri-structural isotropic fuel is qualified to be used in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), it is essential that the testing conditions of fuel irradiations are designed to mimic those in the conceptual gas reactors. As a result, temperatures of the AGR test fuel have to be maintained within a specified range that is typical of the HTGRs. In each AGR capsule, the test fuel temperature is controlled independently using a variable fraction neon and helium gas mixture that fills the gap volume for each capsule. The temperature as measured by a thermocouple (TC) terminated in the graphite holder (which houses fuel compacts) is used as a feedback for the gas flow controllers. Direct temperature measurement for fuel compacts is not possible because contact between a TC head and fuel particle could lead to undesirable failures. Therefore, an ABAQUS-based finite element thermal model was created to predict the daily average fuel temperatures during the entire irradiation period. It is well-known that extended exposure to neutron irradiation and high temperatures leads to changes in geometries of fuel compacts and graphite holder, which results in changes of the gas gap, leading to a change in the relationship between TC and fuel temperatures. In addition, TCs are expected to drift and sometimes fail under irradiation conditions. These facts make maintaining test fuel temperature within a specified range challenging. This paper describes how the regression analysis methods are used in conjunction with calculated fuel temperatures from early irradiation periods (when the irradiation effect is relatively small) to effectively control fuel temperature for the remaining irradiation (when the irradiation effect became profound). This is particularly important in the event when all TCs in a capsule fail.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Strategy for Fuel Rod Receipt, Characterization, Sample Allocation for the Demonstration Sister Rods

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The UFDC Storage and Transportation staffs are responsible for addressing issues regarding the extended or long-term storage of UNF and its subsequent transportation. The near-term objectives of the Storage and Transportation task are to use a science-based approach to develop the technical bases to support the continued safe and secure storage of UNF for extended periods, subsequent retrieval, and transportation. While low burnup fuel [that characterized as having a burnup of less than 45 gigawatt days per metric tonne uranium (GWD/MTU)] has been stored for nearly three decades, the storage of high burnup used fuels is more recent. The DOE has funded a demonstration project to confirm the behavior of used high burnup fuel under prototypic conditions. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is leading a project team to develop and implement the Test Plan to collect this data from a UNF dry storage system containing high burnup fuel. The Draft Test Plan for the demonstration outlines the data to be collected; the high burnup fuel to be included; the technical data gaps the data will address; and the storage system design, procedures, and licensing necessary to implement the Test Plan. To provide data that is most relevant to high burnup fuel in dry storage, the design of the test storage system must closely mimic real conditions high burnup SNF experiences during all stages of dry storage: loading, cask drying, inert gas backfilling, and transfer to an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) for multi-year storage. To document the initial condition of the used fuel prior to emplacement in a storage system, “sister ” fuel rods will be harvested and sent to a national laboratory for characterization and archival purposes. This report supports the demonstration by describing how sister rods will be shipped and received at a national laboratory, and recommending basic nondestructive and destructive analyses to assure the fuel rods are adequately characterized for UFDC work. For this report, a hub-and-spoke model is proposed, with one location serving as the hub for fuel rod receipt and characterization. In this model, fuel and/or clad would be sent to other locations when capabilities at the hub were inadequate or nonexistent. This model has been proposed to reduce DOE-NE’s obligation for waste cleanup and decontamination of equipment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Monte Carlo fuel burnup analyses of the Accelerator-Driven Subcritical systems

Here, we discuss the Monte Carlo fuel burnup analysis performed for the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) Accelerator-Driven Subcritical (ADS) conceptual design. The ANL ADS conceptual design was determined to dispose of the 131 tons of Minor Actinides (MA) fuel of the current United States Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) inventory. It uses a neutron source from 1 GeV 25MW proton beam with the liquid lead target to drive the subcritical fission assembly. It utilizes the liquid metal slurry fuel concept to load the MAs fuel. The subcritical fission assembly has a neutron multiplication factor of 0.98. The total fission power generated in the system is about 2.67 GW. The system is designed to operate for 35 full power years. Monte Carlo fuel burnup analyses were performed to calculate the amount of MAs consumed by the ANL ADS conceptual design. The MCNP6 computer program was used to simulate the high energy physics of the protons striking the liquid lead target for generating the neutron source. The MCB5 and SERPENT Monte Carlo burnup computer programs were used to simulate the fuel burnup during the ADS operation. In the ANL ADS conceptual configuration, the reactivity loss during the fuel burnup is compensated by adding fresh fuel into the subcritical assembly. In this paper, both batch and continuous fueling modes are examined. The fresh fuel particles are loaded into the slurry fuel carrier at the beginning of each burnup step of the batch-fueling mode and loaded continuously into the slurry fuel carrier during the operation in the continuous fueling mode. Monte Carlo fuel burnup analyses show that one ANL ADS conceptual design can consume about 25.7 tons of MAs fuel during the 35 full power years with the continuous fueling mode. About five units is required to dispose of the 131 tons of MAs

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Development of Metallic Fuels for Actinide Transmutation

Research and development activities on metallic fuels are focused on their potential use for actinide transmutation in future sodium fast reactors. As part of this application, there is also a need for a near zero-loss fabrication process and a desire to demonstrate a multifold increase in burnup potential. The incorporation of Am and Np into the traditional U-20Pu-10Zr metallic fuel alloy was demonstrated in the US during the Integral Fast Reactor Program of the 1980’s and early 1990’s. However, the conventional counter gravity injection casting method performed under vacuum, previously used to fabricate these metallic fuel alloys, was not optimized for mitigating loss of the volatile Am constituent in the casting charge; as a result, approximately 40% of the Am casting charge failed to be incorporated into the as-cast fuel alloys. Fabrication development efforts of the past few years have pursued an optimized bottom-pour casting method to increase utilization of the melted charge to near 100%, and a differential pressure casting approach, performed under an argon overpressure, has been demonstrated to result in essentially no loss of Am due to volatilization during fabrication. In short, a path toward zero-loss fabrication of metallic fuels including minor actinides has been shown to be feasible. Irradiation testing of advanced metallic fuel alloys in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) has been underway since 2003. Testing in the ATR is performed inside of cadmium-shrouded positions to remove >99% of the thermal flux incident on the test fuels, resulting in an epi-thermal driven fuel test that is free from gross flux depression and producing an essentially prototypic radial temperature profile inside the fuel rodlets. To date, three irradiation test series (AFC-1,2,3) have been completed. Over 20 different metallic fuel alloys have been tested to burnups as high as 30% with constituent compositions of Pu up to 30%, Am up to 12%, Np up to 10%, and Zr between 10 and 60%. In general, the performance of all of these substantially disparate metallic fuel alloys has been observed to be excellent, and their irradiation behaviors are generally consistent with historic norms for metallic fuels without minor actinide additions and having lower Pu or Zr contents. Future work is being undertaken with a view toward increasing the burnup potential of metallic fuels even more. Design innovations under investigation include: 1) lowering the fuel smear density in order to accommodate more swelling, 2) annular fuel geometry to eliminate the need for a sodium bond, 3) minor alloy additions to stabilize lanthanide fission products inside the fuel and prevent their transport to the cladding where they can participate in fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI), and 4) coatings/liners on the cladding inner surface to mitigate FCCI and enable higher temperature operation. This paper will present the current state of development of metallic fuels for actinide transmutation in the US. Highlights will include recent results from metallic fuel casting experiments, experiments to identify alloy additions to immobilize lanthanide fission products, and postirradiation examinations of annular metallic fuels at low burnup.

actinide transmutation↗
DOE OSTI2017

The characterization of microstructure and chemistry of transmutation fuels

The goal of the fast reactor development programs is fabrication and certification of a nuclear fuel system that performs all functions of a conventional fuel while destroying recycled actinides. Metal fuels, such as U-Pu-Zr fuels, are considered to be candidates for this application. The physical and mechanical properties, as well as behavior laws and correlations of metal alloy fuel, all of which define the behavior and performance of metal alloy fuels has been investigated in detail. The results indicated that the prospect for fueling a future fast spectrum reactor using metal fuels is excellent. There are several challenges associated with the fuel implementation in reactor environment. One of the limiting factors in lifetime and safety of thermal and fast reactor systems is fuel swelling and resulting fission product transport to cladding. Understanding diffusion kinetics and phases formed between metal fuel and cladding upon exposure to high temperatures typical in reactor environment is critical for ensuring integrity, safety, and performance of the material, advancement of this type of fuel in the future, and securing long-term success of the nuclear fleet. The first step to understanding fuel-cladding interaction is investigation of an as-cast fuel microstructure. Despite the importance of these fuels, detailed description of microstructures in these materials is extremely limited. The majority of published results are based on characterization of as-cast microstructures of these fuels in scanning electron microscopes (SEM). In this work, we present the results from microstructural characterization of metallic Pu-based fuels, which is essential in the validation of current and future atomistic and meso-scale modeling efforts. A firm understanding of microstructural evolution in reactor materials is imperative and will lead to deeper understanding of in-reactor degradation behavior, creating a new generation of radiation-resistant materials and fuels with the potential for significant increases in burn-up.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Apparatus and method for mixing fuel in a gas turbine nozzle

A nozzle includes a fuel plenum and an air plenum downstream of the fuel plenum. A primary fuel channel includes an inlet in fluid communication with the fuel plenum and a primary air port in fluid communication with the air plenum. Secondary fuel channels radially outward of the primary fuel channel include a secondary fuel port in fluid communication with the fuel plenum. A shroud circumferentially surrounds the secondary fuel channels. A method for mixing fuel and air in a nozzle prior to combustion includes flowing fuel to a fuel plenum and flowing air to an air plenum downstream of the fuel plenum. The method further includes injecting fuel from the fuel plenum through a primary fuel passage, injecting fuel from the fuel plenum through secondary fuel passages, and injecting air from the air plenum through the primary fuel passage.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2014

Subtask 3.11 - Production of CBTL-Based Jet Fuels from Biomass-Based Feedstocks and Montana Coal

The Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Accelergy Corporation, an advanced fuels developer with technologies exclusively licensed from Exxon Mobil, undertook Subtask 3.11 to use a recently installed bench-scale direct coal liquefaction (DCL) system capable of converting 45 pounds/hour of pulverized, dried coal to a liquid suitable for upgrading to fuels and/or chemicals. The process involves liquefaction of Rosebud mine coal (Montana coal) coupled with an upgrading scheme to produce a naphthenic fuel. The upgrading comprises catalytic hydrotreating and saturation to produce naphthenic fuel. A synthetic jet fuel was prepared by blending equal volumes of naphthenic fuel with similar aliphatic fuel derived from biomass and 11 volume % of aromatic hydrocarbons. The synthetic fuel was tested using standard ASTM International techniques to determine compliance with JP-8 fuel. The composite fuel thus produced not only meets but exceeds the military aviation fuel-screening criteria. A 500-milliliter synthetic jet fuel sample which met internal screening criteria was submitted to the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at Wright–Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, for evaluation. The sample was confirmed by AFRL to be in compliance with U.S. Air Force-prescribed alternative aviation fuel initial screening criteria. The results show that this fuel meets or exceeds the key specification parameters for JP-8, a petroleum-based jet fuel widely used by the U.S. military. JP-8 specifications include parameters such as freeze point, density, flash point, and others; all of which were met by the EERC fuel sample. The fuel also exceeds the thermal stability specification of JP-8 fuel as determined by the quartz crystalline microbalance (QCM) test also performed at an independent laboratory as well as AFRL. This means that the EERC fuel looks and acts identically to petroleum-derived jet fuel and can be used interchangeably without any special requirements and thus provides a pathway to energy security to the U.S. military and the entire nation. This subtask was funded through the EERC–DOE Joint Program on Research and Development for Fossil Energy-Related Resources Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26- 08NT43291. Nonfederal funding was provided by Accelergy Corporation.

Sharma, Ramesh↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of the high-performance reactors to operate with LEU fuels. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel.The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR.The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-regulated reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification.

Shokes, Tamara↗
DOE OSTI2017

Statistical Analysis in Support of Control Fuel Temperature for the Advanced Gas Reactor Experiments

There are four completed tests among a series of Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiments that are being conducted within the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The main objectives of the fuel experimental campaigns are to provide the necessary data on fuel performance to support fuel process development, qualify a fuel design and fabrication process for normal operation and hypothetical accident conditions, and support development and validation of fuel performance and fission product transport models and codes.1 Since this tristructural isotropic fuel is qualified to be used in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), it is essential that the testing conditions of fuel irradiations are designed to mimic those in the conceptual gas reactors. As a result, temperatures of the AGR test fuel have to be maintained within a specified range that is typical of the HTGRs. In each AGR capsule, the test fuel temperature is controlled independently using a variable fraction neon and helium gas mixture that fills the gap volume for each capsule. The temperature as measured by a thermocouple (TC) terminated in the graphite holder (which houses fuel compacts) is used as a feedback for the gas flow controllers. Direct temperature measurement for fuel compacts is not possible because contact between a TC head and fuel particle could lead to undesirable failures. Therefore, an ABAQUS based finite element thermal model was created to predict the daily average fuel temperatures during the entire irradiation period.2,3 It is well-known that extended exposure to neutron irradiation and high temperatures leads to changes in geometries of fuel compacts and graphite holder, which result in changes of the gas gap leading to a change in the relationship between TC and fuel temperatures. In addition, TCs are also expected to drift and sometimes fail under irradiation conditions. These facts make maintaining test fuel temperature within a specified range challenging. This paper describes how the regression analysis methods are used in conjunction of calculated fuel temperatures from early irradiation periods (when irradiation effect is relatively small) to effectively control fuel temperature for the remaining irradiation, when irradiation effect became profound. This is particularly important in the event of all TCs in a capsule fail.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Effects of Coolant Void Condition on Melt Fragmentation using Simulants in Initial Phase of Metal-fueled SFR Severe Accident

Metal fuel has inherent safety characteristics, especially in severe accident conditions. However, the metal-fueled SFR severe accident scenarios need to be categorized since overall severe accident mitigation strategies have not been prepared. In addition, these mitigation strategies should be classified in specific phases. In an initial phase of metal-fueled SFR severe accident scenarios, fuel melting, and cladding failures would occur. After the occurrence of the cladding breach, the molten metal fuel would be ejected into a coolant channel due to fission gas in fuel cavity or rapid evaporation of sodium bond. This is called Ex-pin phenomena. There are few studies considering the Ex-pin phenomena of metal fuel. Related representative studies are transient reactor test facility (TREAT) M series tests. The TREAT M series tests provided fundamental metal fuel performance in transient condition. They informed partial experimental data such as the amount of melt ejected into coolant channel after the cladding failure. However, these experimental data did not examine the melt behavior during the Ex-pin phenomena. In metal-fueled SFR, it is a known fact that the negative reactivity feedback occurs in the initial phase of severe accident. In an unprotected loss-of-flow (ULOF) accident, the void-reactivity feedback may be positive depending on where in the reactor core the sodium voiding occurs. However, molten metal fuel would be better dispersed upward compared to those of an oxide fuel and significant negative reactivity feedback could be induced through such behaviors. Thus, a key safety strategy to mitigate the accident progression at the initial phase of severe accident is to discharge melt upwards out of the core. In this paper, the upward discharge of melt is defined as melt levitation. Such melt levitation could ensure early termination of severe accident. There could be different melting behaviors inside the pin depending on reactor types or the type of fuel. In case of pressurized water reactor (PWR) oxide fuel-water system, the rapid power excursion would initiate melting of fuel at the surface of the pellets. In this paper, the ULOF accident for the metal-fueled SFR is considered as an accident scenario. To induce the melt levitation, the driving force should be clarified. Heo et al. observed a built-up vapor pressure was suggested as one of the driving forces for the upward dispersion of the molten materials. The following factors also have the potential to induce the melt levitation; the pressure induced by fission gas in the cavity or rapid boiling of sodium bond, natural circulation flow of the sodium, the sodium vapor flow generated by the difference between inlet and outlet plenum in the reactor core, the built-up vapor pressure due to the fuel-coolant interaction etc. These factors are balanced each other. They should be examined through the Ex-pin experiments. Before conducting a parametric study for each factor, the general behavior of the molten metal fuel should be investigated in the coolant channel. Since rapid sodium coolant boiling could occur in the initial phase of severe accident scenarios, the molten fuel would be ejected and fragmented in voided channel. Unlike previous studies concerning an un-voided channel, differences in melt behavior in the voided channel are expected. In present study, molten material behavior was evaluated to reveal their characteristics in voided channel. The Ex-pin experiments were performed in both un-voided and voided channel, thus such behavior differences were explicitly observed. In the lab-scale experiments, the un-voided and voided channel were reflected by coolant-filled and air-filled channel, respectively. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Evaluation of PBR Spent Fuel Criticality and Dose Rate Compliance for Storage and Transportation

Spent tri-structural isotropic (TRISO)–based fuels have a strong track record in storage and transportation without documented incidents. This work seeks to reduce uncertainty to aid in more informed spent fuel management of TRISO-based fuels by modeling both fresh and spent pebble bed reactor (PBR) fuel and comparing the results to the regulatory standards from 10 CFR 71. SCALE was used for all modeling due to it having fast and accurate methods for handling PBR fuel modeling, as well as having an efficient method for shielding calculations in monaco with automated variance reduction using importance calculations (MAVRIC), which utilizes the consistent adjoint-driven importance sampling (CADIS) and the forward-weighted consistent adjoint-driven importance sampling (FW-CADIS) methods. KENO-VI was used for all criticality calculations, TSUNAMI was used for uncertainty quantification on k-effective, TRITON and the Oak Ridge isotope generation code (ORIGEN) were both used for depletion of the fuel, and MAVRIC was used for shielding calculations. For criticality assessments, this study focused on the requirement that the value of the neutron multiplication factor, k-effective (k-eff), would not exceed a peak value of 0.95, including uncertainty, with 95% confidence. Criticality was initially examined by modeling fresh fuel from three different designs—HTR-10 fuel, PBMR-400 fuel, and demonstration fuel representative of a TRISO-fueled modern high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) design, henceforth referred to as Demo HTGR—and placing them into various sized containers with conditions described in 10 CFR 71 to quantify the peak k-eff state. When the peak value of 0.95 k-eff was exceeded, mitigation methods were examined in those scenarios. Burnup credit, pebble displacement in areas of strong neutron multiplication, and random pebble replacement using pebbles of various compositions and replacement fractions were examined. In summary, the criticality of PBR fuels can be well accounted for by restricting container size, taking credit for burnup, or by displacing/replacing pebbles. Uncertainty of the k-eff due to nuclear data uncertainties was recorded at ~0.6644%Δk/k, or roughly 664% mil (pcm). The nuclear data–induced uncertainty was relatively small and should not require significant modification in the design to be accounted for. Revisions to the evaluated nuclear data file values have been shown to have a larger impact than nuclear data–induced uncertainty. For dose rate aspects, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations require a maximum dose rate of 10 millirem per hour (mrem/h) at 2 meters. In examining the dose rate behavior of spent PBR fuel, the representative Demo HTGR fuel was modeled exclusively due to it possessing the highest target burnup of the examined fuels. Equilibrium cycle modeling methods were used to produce a higher-fidelity discharge isotopic composition than simple assumptions, such as reflected pebbles. The discharge composition was used as a source term in the fixed-source transport shielding calculations, and dose rates were calculated at 2 m for the shortest possible cooling time. The low concentration of fuel material led to dose rates that were in line with regulatory limits, despite the high burnup when compared to traditional light water reactor fuels. In conclusion, the methods employed in this study would require more work to further verify and validate and are limited to the criticality and dose rate analyses performed.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Overview of the SAS4A Metallic Fuel Models and Extended Analysis of a Postulated Severe Accident in the Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor

The SAS4A safety analysis code, originally developed for the analysis of postulated severe accidents in oxide fuel sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs), has been significantly extended to allow the mechanistic analysis of severe accidents in metallic fuel SFRs. The SAS4A metallic fuel models simulate the metallic fuel thermomechanical and chemical behavior and track the evolution and relocation of multiple fuel and cladding components during the pretransient irradiation and during the postulated accident, allowing an accurate description of the changes in the local fuel composition. The local fuel composition determines the fuel thermophysical properties, such as freezing and melting temperatures, which in turn affect the fuel relocation behavior and ultimately the core reactivity and power history during the postulated accidents. Models describing the fuel-cladding interaction and eutectic formation, the effects of the in-pin sodium on the in-pin fuel relocation, and the postfailure reentry of the molten fuel and fission gas from the pin plenum have also been added. This paper provides an overview of the SAS4A key metallic fuel models emphasizing the postfailure metallic fuel relocation models included in the LEVITATE-M module of SAS4A. The capabilities of the SAS4A metallic fuel models are illustrated through an extended SAS4A analysis of a postulated unprotected loss-of-flow and transient-overpower accident in the metallic fuel prototype Gen-IV sodium fast reactor. The results show that the maximum relative power reached during the postulated accident is 1.19 P 0 . The favorable characteristics of the metallic fuel cause a significant decrease in net reactivity and relative power due to prefailure in-pin fuel relocation. Furthermore, negative net reactivity values persist after cladding failure, and the postfailure fuel relocation events occur at low and decreasing power levels.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2013

Strategy for Used Fuel Acquisition

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The Storage and Transportation staffs within the UFDC are responsible for addressing issues regarding the extended or long-term storage of UNF and its subsequent transportation. The near-term objectives of the Storage and Transportation task are to use a science-based approach to develop the technical bases to support the continued safe and secure storage of UNF for extended periods, subsequent retrieval, and transportation. While both wet and dry storage have been shown to be safe options for storing UNF, the focus of the program is on dry storage at reactor or centralized locations. Because limited information is available on the properties of high burnup fuel (exceeding 45 gigawatt-days per metric tonne of uranium [GWd/MTU]), and because much of the fuel currently discharged from today’s reactors exceeds this burnup threshold, a particular emphasis of this program is on high burnup fuels. Since high burnup used fuels have only been loaded into dry storage systems in the past decade or so, these materials are available to the UFDC for testing in only very limited quantities. Much of what is available has come via NRC testing programs. Some of these fuels may have achieved "high burnup," but that does not mean they were designed for high burnup use (e.g. lower enrichments, smaller plenum spaces, extra reactor cycles). The handling and transfer of these materials from utility to laboratory has not always been prototypical of how used nuclear fuel is prepared for dry storage; these fuels are not subjected to the same vacuum drying conditions that can lead to changes in hydride morphology that will affect the mechanical properties of the fuel. It is recognized that sources of used high burnup fuel that can be handled in a manner consistent with how fuel is readied for dry storage is essential to the mission of the UFDC. This report documents what types of fuel are of interest to the campaign, and how those fuels could be acquired and shipped to the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for incorporation into the campaign R&D mission. It also identifies any gaps in INL capabilities that might preclude working with one fuel type or another.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗