SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The final review for the FY16 ASC Computational Systems and Software Environment (CSSE) L2 Milestone #5676 was conducted on August 17, 2016 at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The review panel unanimously agreed that the milestone has been successfully completed
This letter report documents the completion of the Off-Gas Sigma Team–Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) work package (FT-19OR03010702) Level 4 milestone M4FT-19OR0301070218 “Conduct additional tests and provide technical review support for reengineered silver-functionalized aerogel.” This milestone was completed on time. The report associated with ORNL’s Level 3 milestone M3FT-19OR030017025 “Complete extended duration (3 month) vessel off gas (VOG) test using reengineered silver functionalized aerogel” was transmitted to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). A teleconference was held on August 7, 2019, between ORNL and PNNL to review the report and its associated findings. One of the most notable findings was that bed compaction was observed with both the original and reengineered silver functionalized aerogel. During the teleconference, ORNL informed PNNL that recent test results showed that exposure to 2% NO 2 at 150°C caused physical degradation of the original aerogel material, reflected by a loss in weight during exposure to the NO 2 -bearing gas stream. Visual inspection indicates that the material was degrading to fines that were carried by the gas stream. A path forward was established, and PNNL requested that ORNL test the reengineered aerogel material under similar conditions to assess whether NO 2 -related degradation also occurred with the reengineered silver-functionalized aerogel.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is working to have an effective and efficient mission readiness for reactors that differ considerably from those currently licensed. Micro-reactors, that is, reactors that have a power of roughly no more than 10 MW, are one class of these advanced reactors. This report is one of the first steps taken to articulate the many technical and regulatory issues that will need to be addressed for NRC to have the ability to review license applications for micro-reactors. Many of the issues center around the fact that a) these reactors may be operated remotely or semi-autonomously and b) it will be difficult to analyze risk from new, unique, technologies. Initial thoughts are given on how probabilistic methods could be used to determine risk and how the current approach for reviewing non-power reactors could be useful for micro-reactors.
Due to a number of recent events where access control into or out of a hazardous area or operation was a factor, the Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) director requested a review of access control events occurring at Sandia National Laboratories from 2015 to January 2019. The purpose of the review was to determine the extent of access control as an ES&H issue, draw preliminary conclusions from the data, and identify recommendations for improvement, if appropriate. Using the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) database, nine events from 2015 through January 2019 were identified as situations involving access control of personnel into or out of a hazardous area or operation. Supplemental records from the Assurance Information System (AIS) database and the occurrence management team's repository in Electronic Integrated Management System (EIMS) were sought to confirm this dataset of access control events and to gather details concerning the causal factors associated with each event.
This paper examines the persistent problem of high energy burdens among low-income households, based on a review of more than 180 publications that pointed to several promising opportunities to address energy affordability including inclusive solar programs, leveraged health care benefits, and behavioral economics. using an equity and affordability lens. Even after decades of weatherization and bill-payment programs, low-income households, on average, continue to spend a higher share of their income on electricity and natural gas bills than any other income group. Energy burden for low-income households is not declining, and it remains persistently high, particularly in the South, in rural America, among minority households, and those with children and elderly residents. On a per household basis, utility companies spend less on energy-efficiency programs for low-income households than for other income groups. In addition, government and utility programs that promote rooftop solar power, electric vehicles, and home energy storage are largely inaccessible to low-income households. Our review identifies promising opportunities to address energy affordability including inclusive solar programs, leveraged health care benefits, behavioral economics, data analytics, advanced information and communication technologies, and grid resiliency. Scalable approaches require linking implementing agencies, programs and policies to tackle the complex web of causes and impacts on low-income households with high energy burdens.
The Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) is the Office of Science’s high-performance network user facility, delivering highly reliable data transport capabilities optimized for the requirements of data-intensive science. In essence, ESnet is the circulatory system that enables the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) science mission by connecting each and every DOE lab and its user facilities. ESnet is funded and stewarded by the Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) Program, and managed and operated by the Scientific Networking Division at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). ESnet is widely regarded as a global leader in the research and education networking community. ESnet connects DOE national laboratories, user facilities, and major experiments so scientists can use remote instruments and computing resources as well as share data with collaborators, transfer large data sets, and access distributed data repositories. While ESnet provides network connectivity, it cannot be characterized as an internet service provider as it is specifically built to provide a range of network services that are tailored to meet the unique requirements of DOE’s data-intensive science. In short, ESnet’s mission is to enable and accelerate scientific discovery by delivering unparalleled network infrastructure, capabilities, and tools. ESnet’s vision is summarized by these three points. 1. Scientific progress will be completely unconstrained by the physical location of instruments, people, computational resources, or data. 2. Collaborations at every scale, in every domain, will have the information and tools they need to achieve maximum benefit from scientific facilities, global networks, and emerging network capabilities. 3. ESnet will foster the partnerships and pioneer the technologies necessary to ensure that these transformations occur. In May 2019, ESnet and the Office of Nuclear Physics (NP) of the DOE Office of Science organized an ESnet requirements review of NP-supported activities. Preparation for this event included identification of key stakeholders to the process: program and facility management, research groups, technology providers, and a number of external observers. These individuals were asked to prepare formal case study documents about their relationship to the NP program to build a complete understanding of the current, near-term, and long-term status, expectations, and processes that will support the science going forward. A series of pre-planning meetings better prepared case study authors for this task and facilitated a smooth transition to the in-person review.
In May 2019, ESnet and the Office of Nuclear Physics (NP) of the DOE Office of Science organized an ESnet requirements review of NP-supported activities. Preparation for this event included identification of key stakeholders to the process: program and facility management, research groups, technology providers, and a number of external observers. These individuals were asked to prepare formal case study documents about their relationship to the NP program to build a complete understanding of the current, near-term, and long-term status, expectations, and processes that will support the science going forward. A series of pre-planning meetings better prepared case study authors for this task and facilitated a smooth transition to the in-person review.
This report provides information about the DOE Office of Electricity Energy Storage Peer Review held in 2019 and includes posters reviewed in these categories: postdoctoral, validated reliability and safety performance, equitable regulatory environment and analytics, applied materials (Materials I), power electronics, industry acceptance, partnerships, and Materials I.
This presentation provides an overview of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR)m Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan (SSMP), and the Nuclear Posture Review and Stockpile Stewardship Management Plan group project.
Program managers' questions and researchers' answers are provided, documenting this review. The technical aims of the project being reviewed were to establish additively manufactured (AM) scintillator metamaterial designs that can perform in nonproliferation applications, to quantify that performance using simulations, and to justify that simulated performance using prototyping.
One of the key new features of connected lighting systems (CLS) is their ability to collect data from various types of integral sensors and share that data with other lighting or building systems. Occupancy and vacancy sensors have been widely adopted as an energy-saving strategy in buildings, yet published test methods for reproducibly characterizing their performance remain few and limited in their sophistication. As a result, it has been difficult to predict their performance in a specific application, and in practice, they frequently do not meet energy-savings expectations. Occupants at times remove or otherwise bypass occupancy sensors that hinder their work or otherwise do not perform as expected, thereby compromising the sensors’ potential to reduce energy consumption. Poor performance can result from multiple causes – ranging from fundamental limitations of the sensor technology, to misconfiguration, to poor placement in the room or space. Innovative occupancy sensors, some of them combining multiple sensing technologies, have come on the market over the years, with claims of improved performance compared to their predecessors; yet in practice, their performance has led to neither high deployment nor high user satisfaction in any significant application, nor has it differed enough from the performance of previous products to necessitate a test method that facilitated comparison between them. While the performance of both common and novel occupancy sensors has been the subject of many published research articles, the test methods that have been employed for them have typically been loosely described and incorporated custom equipment or techniques that render them difficult to reproduce, or have been limited in their ability to fairly characterize devices that utilize varying sensor technology. The lack of a well-described, technology-agnostic test method that yields reproducible results across different implementations has been a barrier to the commercial success of new occupancy sensor products, as users and specifiers who have been disappointed with previous products are often unwilling to take a chance with new ones. Motivated by a desire to fairly characterize new technologies that continue to enter the market and claim not only improved occupancy detection but, in some cases, also additional capabilities (e.g., the ability to measure traffic or discern between different object types), this report presents the results of a literature review of recent published, well-described test methods for characterizing occupancy sensor performance, as well as research articles containing ad-hoc test methods. The review also identifies and consolidates the best techniques for characterizing sensor performance in indoor spaces and identifies test method gaps that need to be filled in order to evaluate emerging technologies and products.
A thorough review of the Module Reduction and Monitoring (MRM) process was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of processing. The degree of reduction was calculated using the mass balance of oxygen contained in carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) removed from all fuel processed between January 2014 through August 2019. The plutonia was slightly reduced from O/Pu ratio of 2.0 to a range of 1.991 to 1.999. The review evaluated publications generated when MRM processing was developed and performed at the Mound Laboratory. A similar degree of reduction was measured at Mound in the 1982 paper authored by Ernie Johnson as well as MRM processing of IHS-60 and some Cassini-era fuel. The original 1982 paper documenting the reduction process reported a mass balance reduction to 1.9931 yet reported a total reduction to ~1.98 (Johnson 1990). The IHS-60 and Cassini reductions were calculated at 1.995 and 1.997 using the number of moles of CO and CO 2 removed as published in a clad pressurization investigation report (Merten, et all 1995). MRM process changes are recommended to improve the accuracy of the CO partial pressure calcualtion.
One of the key new features of connected lighting systems (CLS) is their ability to collect data from various types of integral sensors and share that data with other lighting or building systems. Occupancy and vacancy sensors have been widely adopted as an energy-saving strategy in buildings, yet published test methods for reproducibly characterizing their performance remain few and limited in their sophistication. As a result, it has been difficult to predict the performance of such sensors in a specific application, and in practice, they frequently do not meet energy-savings expectations. Occupants at times remove or otherwise bypass occupancy sensors that hinder their work or otherwise do not perform as expected, thereby compromising the sensors’ potential to reduce energy consumption. Poor performance can result from multiple causes – ranging from fundamental limitations of the sensor technology, to misconfiguration, to poor placement in the room or space. Innovative occupancy sensors, some of them combining multiple sensing technologies (i.e., multimodal), have come on the market over the years, with claims of improved performance compared to their predecessors. However, in practice, their performance has neither differed enough from the performance of previous products to necessitate a test method that facilitated comparison between them, nor has it led to high deployment or high user satisfaction in human-occupied spaces with persistent presence. While the performance of both common and novel occupancy sensors has been the subject of many published research articles, the test methods that have been employed for them typically have been loosely described and have incorporated custom equipment or techniques that render them difficult to reproduce, or have been limited in their ability to fairly characterize devices that utilize varying sensor technology. The lack of a fully described, technology-agnostic test method that yields reproducible results across different implementations has been a barrier to the commercial success of new occupancy-sensor products, as users and specifiers who have been disappointed with previous products are often unwilling to take a chance with new ones. Motivated by a desire to fairly characterize new technologies that continue to enter the market and claim not only improved occupancy detection but, in some cases, additional capabilities (e.g., the ability to measure traffic or discern between different object types), this report presents the results of a literature review of recently published fully described test methods for characterizing occupancy-sensor performance, as well as research articles containing ad-hoc test methods. The review also identifies and consolidates test conditions for characterizing sensor performance in indoor spaces and identifies apparent test method gaps that need to be filled in order to evaluate emerging technologies and products. The identified test-method conditions are intended to enable the development of a future technology-agnostic test method that facilitates occupancy-sensor performance characterization more-accurately representing performance in buildings.
The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)Radioactive Material Packaging and Transportation Review Team (herein referred to as ‘LLNL Staff’) was tasked with the technical review and confirmatory analysis of the containment analysis and corresponding leakage test implementation procedure for the CASTOR®THTR/AVR radioactive material transportation package with the AVR contents.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State is a complex of multiple facilities where historical release events in the Central Plateau area have resulted in subsurface contamination of the vadose zone, a perched-water zone, and underlying aquifer. Although some contaminants have already migrated through the vadose zone into the groundwater, contaminants remaining in the unsaturated zone are a potential long-term risk as a source for further groundwater contamination. Moreover, a perched-water zone located in the 200-DV-1 Operable Unit at Hanford creates further remediation difficulties. Remediation options are limited for contaminants located in the vadose and perched-water zones within the Central Plateau due to considerable depth, co-located contaminants, and complexities associated with physical and biogeochemical heterogeneities. Existing comprehensive reviews discuss potential remedial technologies relevant to Hanford Site conditions (e.g., deep vadose zone and perched water) and provide treatment technology recommendations. Many of the recommended in situ remediation technologies rely on introduction of amendments into the subsurface to achieve remedial goals. However, there are currently few review or guidance documents that provide a comprehensive look at mechanisms and considerations related to amendment delivery and distribution. This document summarizes amendment types, delivery techniques, subsurface access methods, and the applicability of delivery methods and amendments for specific subsurface target zones, including in the context of Hanford Central Plateau applications. Guidance on the appropriateness of a remedial technology for a specific site and contaminant is not included within this document. Rather, this document is intended to be used when considering remediation technologies and the associated amendments. An overview of amendment types (i.e., liquid, gas, and solids) and access/distribution methods used in subsurface remediation is provided, along with discussion of the maturity level (low, medium, or high), advantages, and limitations that relate to the potential effectiveness of each approach in the context of site-specific factors (subsurface geology, geochemistry, contaminant properties, etc.). There are many Hanford Site-specific factors that influence the suitability and appropriateness of amendment delivery strategies. Excluding amendment delivery approaches that are unsuitable for the Hanford context, each approach was assessed for applicability to the following target zones: unsaturated high permeability, unsaturated low permeability, perched water, saturated high permeability, and saturated low permeability zones. This compilation and discussion related to amendment delivery mechanisms provides a useful resource for evaluating remedial alternatives for source area contamination in the Hanford Central Plateau.
Understanding the friction behavior between two sliding bodies can inform the design of machines, processing of materials, and simulation of dynamic processes. Kinetic friction is a complex phenomenon that depends on a multitude of factors such as sliding velocity, normal force, contact area, surface roughness, material properties, lubrication conditions, and thermal effects. This literature review covers the major known effects of sliding velocity, normal load, and surface roughness on the measured kinetic friction coefficient in the context of microscopic friction phenomena. Classic macroscale friction models are reviewed to illustrate approaches for simulating friction behavior. Prominent experimental friction setups within the literature are discussed with respect to achievable velocity and pressure regimes. The background information gathered here will be used to inform experimental procedures and modeling strategies of the exploratory research (ER) project titled “Measurement of Dynamic Friction via Kolsky Bar” (20200418ER).
The Sri Lanka Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission (AERC) and the United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) co-hosted the 6th Regional Review Meeting on Radiological Security involving representatives from over 20 countries, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), and the World Institute for Nuclear Security. The purpose of the event was to discuss the implementation of, and plans for, high-activity radioactive source security (RSS). The U.S. DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Radiological Security (ORS) fully sponsored this review meeting. Participants were welcomed to Colombo, Sri Lanka, and the meeting was formally opened by Nirmali Karunarathna of the Sri Lanka Atomic Energy Regulator Council who emphasized the strong partnerships among the participants. The opening Ceremony and Lamp Lighting included dignitaries from the sponsoring countries. Robert Hilton, Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Colombo, and Kristin Hirsch of the ORS gave other opening remarks that highlighted the social benefit from radiological sources in medicine, industry, and agriculture, while stressing the importance of addressing the risks associated with the malicious use of radiological sources. Emphasis was placed on the importance of partnerships among all the participants to help ensure the success of securing radiological materials throughout the world and the opportunity to share information and experiences. AERC was acknowledged with special thanks for hosting this event. A participant list is included as Attachment A, and the meeting agenda is provided as Attachment B. All presentations were made available to participants. The following sections summarize the meeting’s presentations, discussions, issues, suggestions, and recommendations.
The review was conducted on May 8-9, 2017 at the University of Utah. Overall the review team was impressed with the work presented and found that the CCMSC had met or exceeded the Year 3 milestones. Specific details, comments, and recommendations are included in this document.