NASA’s Interests in Bioregenerative Life Support
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The slides will be used for talking points for a press conference on May 4, 2021 with DLR. These slides and photos are all publicly available and have been released before in related talks.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The words reliability, robustness, and resilience are often used interchangeably to describe tough and dependable systems but the distinctions between them suggest how to design more serviceable space systems. Reliability is simply the quality of consistently performing well. A system that dependably meets its design requirements in the specified environment is reliable. The designers may not consider themselves responsible for failures under unanticipated conditions. Robustness is the capability of performing without failure under a wide range of conditions, which can go beyond the expected range to include possible off-nominal conditions. Resilience is the ability to recover from or adapt to unanticipated damaging events, such as failures, accidents, external disruptions, and repurposing. Such changes can invalidate the usual operating assumptions and cause system failure. Reliability, robustness, and resilience describe dependable performance under increasingly difficult conditions, first the specified environment, then a wider possible environment, and finally unanticipated damaging conditions. These three qualities are increasingly desirable and increasingly difficult to achieve. Engineering for resilience would design systems that can ignore or repair failures, survive accidents, and recover from unanticipated disruptions. Increasing the resilience of space systems would greatly increase space crew safety. Improving reliability and robustness requires dealing with known problems, but improving resilience requires implementing a general approach to reducing the impact of unknown future events. The need for robustness and resilience has been stated for decades but little has been done. Systems designers often assume that they understand everything they need to know. The potential failures caused by changes, failures, accidents, unknown environments, and unknown unknowns can be ignored. Such overconfidence can lead to neglect of reliability, robustness, and resilience.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nov 20th, 2022 marks the 24th anniversary of the beginning of construction of the International Space Station(ISS). The ECLS system is constantly changing to meet the needs of current missions and future exploration. The ISS has become the laboratory that was always envisioned, allowing for an ever-growing class of exploration level technologies that will propel the stage forward as humanity advances beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This paper will review the past year, and look towards the future for each U.S. ECLS subsystem. The impacts, challenges, and successes related to the intermingling of incumbent and cutting edge technologies are summarily discussed in this paper.
The NASA led Artemis campaign will take humanity back to the Moon and serve as an analog for continued deep space exploration to Mars. Artemis utilizes crewed vehicles and habitats on both the Lunar surface and in Lunar orbit. The exploration of the Lunar surface and buildup of a basecamp is meant to be a “Mars forward” approach to testing and refining new technologies and techniques for living and working far outside of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and preparing for future Mars missions. The Lunar Surface Habitat is planned as a primary element for long duration crew habitation on the Moon and will be the primary testbed for ECLS system hardware in a partial gravity environment. The Mars Transit Habitat will be the crew vehicle for the roundtrip from Earth to Mars and spend a significant amount of time docked to the Gateway outfitting and testing its systems prior to making the first Mars mission transit. The Mars Transit Habitat will utilize closed loop ECLS system technologies while a Mars Surface Habitat could use either open loop, closed loop, or a mix of both. Better understanding the needs of both these system architectures operating for extended periods in the Lunar environment and outside LEO will help to establish the ECLS system architecture for the future Mars surface mission. There are many aspects to consider such as length of crew stay, level of autonomy and dormancy between crewed missions, power requirements, system mass, and overall system reliability and maintainability. Other considerations will include Mars gravity vs. Lunar gravity, Mars atmospheric pressure vs. hard vacuum, and possible use of in-situ resource utilization.
Nov 20th, 2022 marks the 24th anniversary of the beginning of construction of the International Space Station (ISS). The ECLS system is constantly changing to meet the needs of current missions and future exploration. The ISS has become the laboratory that was always envisioned, allowing for an ever-growing class of exploration level technologies that will propel the stage forward as humanity advances beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This paper will review the past year and look towards the future for each U.S. ECLS subsystem. The impacts, challenges, and successes related to the intermingling of incumbent and cutting-edge technologies are summarily discussed in this paper.
The NASA led Artemis campaign will take humanity back to the Moon and serve as an analog for continued deep space exploration to Mars. Artemis utilizes crewed vehicles and habitats on both the Lunar surface and in Lunar orbit. The exploration of the Lunar surface and buildup of a basecamp is meant to be a “Mars forward” approach to testing and refining new technologies and techniques for living and working far outside of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and preparing for future Mars missions. The Lunar Surface Habitat is planned as a primary element for long duration crew habitation on the Moon and will be the primary testbed for ECLS system hardware in a partial gravity environment. The Mars Transit Habitat will be the crew vehicle for the roundtrip from Earth to Mars and spend a significant amount of time docked to the Gateway outfitting and testing its systems prior to making the first Mars mission transit. The Mars Transit Habitat will utilize closed loop ECLS system technologies while a Mars Surface Habitat could use either open loop, closed loop, or a mix of both. Better understanding the needs of both these system architectures operating for extended periods in the Lunar environment and outside LEO will help to establish the ECLS system architecture for the future Mars surface mission. There are many aspects to consider such as length of crew stay, level of autonomy and dormancy between crewed missions, power requirements, system mass, and overall system reliability and maintainability. Other considerations will include Mars gravity vs. Lunar gravity, Mars atmospheric pressure vs. hard vacuum, and possible use of in-situ resource utilization.
November 20th, 2023 marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of construction of the International Space Station (ISS). The ECLS system is constantly changing to meet the needs of current missions and future exploration. The ISS has become the laboratory that was always envisioned, allowing for an ever-growing class of exploration level technologies that will propel the stage forward as humanity advances beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This paper will review the past year, and look towards the future for each U.S. ECLS subsystem. The impacts, challenges, and successes related to the intermingling of incumbent and cutting edge technologies are summarily discussed in this paper.
X-ray diffraction / X-ray fluorescence (XRD/XRF) analysis provides the most comprehensive mineralogical / compositional characterization of rocks and soils of any flight-capable technique. XRD data provide quantitative mineralogy (including abundance of X-ray amorphous materials) and crystal chemistry (structure, elemental composition and valence state), and XRF data provide complimentary major, minor, and some trace element abundances. Both types of data are important in evaluating habitability (environment of formation) and biosignature preservation/degradation (post-depositional diagenetic change). Whether or not a relict biosignature is detected, the mineral assemblage and its geochemistry can be used to determine the habitability of an ancient environment (e.g., salinity, pH, temperature), and to identify potential sources of energy for life (e.g., elements in different redox states). In this respect, a null result (a habitable environment lacking evidence of life) can play an important role in constraining the parameters of the search. Conversely, diagenetic alteration (taphonomic change) resulting from post-depositional variations in temperature, pressure or fluid chemistry can preserve evidence of biogenicity, erase such evidence completely or indeed can provide for post-depositional habitable conditions in the subsurface. XRD / XRF data are critical to these determinations. The CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover is the first XRD instrument flown in space. CheMin operates in transmission geometry with a Co X-ray source to minimize fluorescence from iron. Diffracted photons are collected with an energy-sensitive charge-coupled device (CCD). The position of the diffracted photons provides structural information for minerals, whereas the energy of sample-generated X-ray fluorescence photons provides elemental information, though these XRF data are qualitative. Mineralogical data from the CheMin XRD identified the three circumstances above: habitable depositional environments (e.g., Yellowknife Bay), habitable subsurface/diagenetic environments (e.g., throughout the Murray formation), and diagenetic conditions that may destroy evidence of habitability (e.g., oxidative and acidic environments at Vera Rubin ridge). Technological advances in X-ray technology and lessons learned from the operation of CheMin on Mars have resulted in a next-generation XRD/XRF, called CheMinX. Replacement of CheMin’s CCD with an array of hybrid pixel detectors and improvements in focusing optics dramatically decrease analysis time (15 minutes vs. 22 hours for MSL-CheMin) and result in a better angular resolution (0.18 vs. 0.30 °2θ for MSL-CheMin). This increased resolution improves mineral detection, including discrimination between types of pyroxenes, which is not possible with MSL-CheMin data. The hybrid pixel detectors do not require cooling like the MSL-CheMin CCD, therefore reducing the power needed to operate CheMinX. CheMinX has a silicon-drift detector (SDD) to measure fluoresced photons, enabling the quantification of major, minor, and some trace elements via XRF. XRD/XRF data are collected simultaneously in CheMinX, obviating the need for multiple compositional instruments. The CheMinX design also improves upon MSL-CheMin’s sample handling. Instead of sample cells on wheel, which are often not reusable and add complexity in commanding the instrument, CheMinX has single-use cells in a cartridge/dispenser configuration. Because of these improvements, CheMinX is an ideal instrument for Discovery-class life-detection missions, including Mars Life Explorer that was recommended for development in the Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032.
Nov 20th, 2023 marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of construction of the International Space Station (ISS). The ECLS system is constantly changing to meet the needs of current missions and future exploration. The ISS has become the laboratory that was always envisioned, allowing for an ever-growing class of exploration level technologies that will propel the stage forward as humanity advances beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This paper will review the past year, and look towards the future for each U.S. ECLS subsystem. The impacts, challenges, and successes related to the intermingling of incumbent and cutting edge technologies are summarily discussed in this paper.
Nov 20th, 2023 marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of construction of the International Space Station (ISS). The ECLS system is constantly changing to meet the needs of current missions and future exploration. The ISS has become the laboratory that was always envisioned, allowing for an ever-growing class of exploration level technologies that will propel the stage forward as humanity advances beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This paper will review the past year, and look towards the future for each U.S. ECLS subsystem. The impacts, challenges, and successes related to the intermingling of incumbent and cutting edge technologies are summarily discussed in this paper.