Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “STARTING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Realization of the National Disposal Facility for Radioactive Waste in Bulgaria - 16611

Radioactive waste is generated in the Republic of Bulgaria from the operation and decommissioning of the country's nuclear power plants and from other sources in research, medical applications, and the industry. The need for building a National Disposal Facility (NDF) is recognized by the Bulgarian government and described and justified in its Environment Impact Assessment Decision. The Bulgarian State Enterprise for Radioactive Waste Management (SERAW) is endeavoring to build a near-surface repository for short-lived low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (SL-LILW) to discharge its statutory responsibilities in waste management is. The European Union (EU) finances the establishment of the NDF through the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund (KIDSF). After an international tendering procedure, SERAW placed a contract for the development of the design of the NDF to the Consortium of Westinghouse Electric Spain S.A.R and DBE Technology GmbH of Germany, with ENRESA, the Spanish National Waste Management Agency providing technical review and support. Two Bulgarian companies participate also in the project as subcontractors - EQE Bulgaria and to a lesser extent KK-Project. The repository project official name is 'Technical Design and ISAR Preparation for the National Disposal Facility at Bulgaria', usually abbreviated as 'R-Project 5'. After obtaining SERAW's approval for the preferred repository conceptual design variant, the R Project 5 focused on developing the Technical Design on the one hand, and on preparing the Intermediate Safety Analysis Report (ISAR) to demonstrate the safety and suitability of the proposed NDF design on the other. These documents were handed over to the Bulgarian Nuclear Regulatory Authority (BNRA) as well as to the different authorities involved in the comprehensive licensing process required for nuclear facilities in the country. The corresponding permits have mostly been received or are expected for early 2016. In the last quarter of 2015 the procurement procedure for repository construction as turn-key project was started with the pre-qualification of possible constructors for the Phase I repository realization on a lump sum contract basis. Repository construction is now expected to start in 2016, with the start of waste disposal now scheduled for around 2020. With the realization of the Bulgarian National Disposal Facility an important milestone for waste disposal in the European Union is about to be achieved. This paper is a sequel of previously presented papers on the NDF construction, now including details of the complex licensing process that this disposal facility underwent, now in its final stages. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

The Evolution of Chemical Waste Treatment in the Nuclear Industry Simple Solutions for Complex Problems - 16694

The U.S. nuclear waste treatment industry was born in the 1980s and early 1990s with the end of the Cold War, the peak of commercial nuclear power, and after implementation of federal regulations that drove new disposal requirements for radioactive waste generators. New regulations resulted in soaring costs for radioactive waste disposal, and thus an industry was born that focused on recycling, volume reduction, and waste form improvement. New treatment facilities and technologies were started that primarily dealt with low-level radioactive wastes; however, there was little to no treatment capacity for wastes commingled with hazardous chemicals. Large volumes of 'mixed wastes', of which many became known as 'orphan wastes', were being stored on U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites with no path for disposal and thus posed a risk to workers, the public, and the environment. Perma-fix Environmental Services, Inc. (Perma-Fix), which started in the hazardous waste industry in 1990 and had developed facilities and technologies to treat hazardous wastes, evolved in the late 90's to meet this mixed waste market opportunity. By adapting our technologies and collaborating with waste generators to understand their needs, we successfully developed treatment and disposition solutions for some of the most challenging mixed wastes in the U.S. By establishing a pathway for treatment and disposal of orphan wastes, Perma-Fix played an important role in the safe treatment and disposition of orphan wastes, which facilitated closure of DOE sites such as Rocky Flats, Mound, and Fernald. We found that understanding chemistry and having experience in managing the hazardous constituents of mixed wastes allowed us to apply solutions that were not overly complex and expensive. Further, by adapting proven hazardous waste treatment solutions to wastes commingled with contaminants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, and organics we were able to safely manage even more problematic mixed wastes. During the 1980's, commercial low-level radioactive waste treatment and disposal solutions were being developed. At the same time, the federal government began dealing with increasing stakeholder demands for permanent solutions of more complex radioactive wastes such as high-level waste (HLW) and transuranic (TRU) wastes. HLW and TRU waste disposal became a contentious political issue between the federal government, regulatory agencies, and the public. As a result, DOE was mandated to develop treatment and disposal methodologies to address these wastes. DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) facility solved most issues with disposition of TRU wastes; however, for HLW (for example tank wastes at Hanford, Savannah River, and Idaho) the complexity of the wastes and the fact that government entities were developing political solutions for waste treatment resulted in a variety of complex and expensive solutions. Decades later we still do not have a permanent solution for HLW. Whether some simple commercial approaches are possible, what regulatory changes should occur, and what the implications may be if we do not change our current path, will be discussed. After two decades, we see the low-level nuclear waste industry maturing and replicating the path of the hazardous waste industry. When new hazardous waste federal regulations were enacted in the 1970's and 1980's, the hazardous waste industry began to boom with new company start-ups and construction of numerous treatment and disposal facilities. Initially, this was a good business to be in, managing dangerous wastes in an environmentally safe and responsible manner, and it was profitable. However, over-capacity and fierce competition drove down pricing, and companies failed. This ultimately led to a major consolidation within the hazardous waste industry. Similarly and more recently in the nuclear industry, over-capacity and competition has driven down profitability, companies have failed, and there is a major consolidation occurring within sectors of the industry. For consolidation to be successful and healthy for either industry, a leader must emerge to set the direction for the others and establish a sustainable path that is acceptable for waste generators, stakeholders, and investors. This was the case for the hazardous waste industry. This paper will examine the parallels between the hazardous and nuclear waste industries as they have matured and evolved, and what discuss the long term implications of consolidation within the nuclear industry. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Peculiarities of Transition from Operation to Decommissioning for the Chernobyl NPP - 18486

Usually the transition period is supposed to last around 5 years and to cover the eventual defueling of the reactor and the reactor cooling pool, completion of the characterization survey and preparation of all necessary documents to start the decommissioning activities in accordance with the decommissioning strategy chosen and the decommissioning plan approved. It was not the case for the Chernobyl NPP due to a number of reasons and obstacles, including delayed defueling due to unavailability of the storage capacities, lack of preparatory work due to prescheduled decommissioning, luck of experience of RBMK-type reactors decommissioning, influence of the destroyed Chernobyl-4 Unit and related works on site. All these factors not only delayed the completion of the characterization survey, but added complications to development of the decommissioning strategy and the decommissioning plan. De facto the issue of end state is still open as the end state for the destroyed Chernobyl-4 as well as the prospects of the exclusion zone transformation need further clarifications and justifications. As a result, the need to reconsider the standard concept of transition period was recognized already by the end of 2000, when Chernobyl-1 and Chernobyl-2 were out of operation for a few years. It was clear that the personnel had generally a bad perception of the prescheduled permanent shutdown decision and a low motivation to change and to learn. The first signs of organizational degradation were visible and the framework of the operational license did not fit well to prevent it. So it was decided to start the legal and organizational transformation into the decommissioning mode without waiting for polishing of the decommissioning strategy and decommissioning plan as in this case both documents seemed to need further adjustments anyway. The transition period (or the termination of operation as it called in the national nuclear safety regulations) was considered as the first phase of decommissioning to be covered by the decommissioning license. The detailed plan of activities for the transition period with proper safety justification documents was the main part of the relevant license application. Human resource management plan and adoption of the management system were important constituents as well. It was also considered reasonable to start some dismantling works already at this phase to avoid further delays and degradation, the works being carefully justified. Eventually such approach added to streamlining the decommissioning process and to avoid further organizational and technical degradation. Flexibility in transition from operation to decommissioning seems necessary in cases of prescheduled or post-accidental decommissioning but may be also beneficial for a scheduled decommissioning case. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Decommissioning Status and Preliminary Engineering Planning for Chinshan NPP in Taiwan - 19114

The Chinshan Nuclear Power Plant, which consists of two BWR units and was owned by Taiwan Power Company (TPC), has an electrical output of 636 MWe for each unit. Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2 were licensed till December 2018 and July 2019, respectively. According to regulations of decommissioning in Taiwan, decontamination and dismantling of a NPP should be completed within 25 years. Therefore, TPC had started compiling the decommissioning plans (DP, 17 chapters) with INER, national engineering companies and international consultants since 2012. The DP of Chinshan NPP has been approved by the regulator, Atomic Energy Council (AEC), in the end of June, 2017. There are 17 chapters in the decommissioning plans, which deal with all aspects of safety-related considerations during the decommissioning period, such as spent fuel management, waste management, personnel/workers planning, schedules/working items, environmental management and monitoring. Those items are discussed in detail in this paper in accordance with the approved DP. The implementation of decommissioning will be started while the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is still under approval by EPA, which is expected to be completed in the end of 2018 or the mid of 2019. Once the decommissioning be started, all dismantling, decontamination, management teams, and preparation would be kicked off simultaneously in a very short period of time. In this paper, the planning assumptions, strategies from INER and TPC, management of radioactive waste, conversion of Turbine Building and detailed description of turbine-generator set are discussed. For the Turbine Building dismantling, inventories of equipment, cutting technology determination, storage logistics, container options and radwaste treatment and reduction would be important factors to be evaluated in the beginning. Afterwards, WBS (work breakdown structure) would be determined and be the basis for working bids, construction of a new storage warehouse, an incinerator and a super high pressure compactor. This preliminary engineering planning would be applied in the decommissioning of Chinshan NPP for the first time and be duplicated in Kuosheng NPP and Maanshan NPP in Taiwan as well. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Lessons Learned from the Development of the DGR Konrad - 19619

The Federal Republic Germany builds the deep geological repository Konrad. The repository is suitable for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LAW and MAW) and it is the first German repository site, which is not located in a salt geological formation. Konrad is a former iron ore mine in Salzgitter (in southeast Lower Saxony) with an active production time between 1961 and 1976. In 2007, the BGE started with the conversion of the mine infrastructure above and underground to build the repository while using the shafts and some roadways of the former mine. The experiences gained from ten years project progress with its complexities and difficulties can be used for similar repository projects in the future. The Konrad repository is designed for 303,000 m{sup 3} of LAW and MAW, which will be emplaced in chambers. The emplacement chambers are located outside of the existing mine, so an impairment by the old mine workings can be excluded. So far, the first area with emplacement chambers has been excavated. In order to be able to start repository operations in 2027, a wide range of work in building construction, civil engineering, shaft sinking and infrastructure development above and below ground has been necessary and will be completed in the next years. The main activities are focused on the Konrad 1 and 2 sites and the part of the infrastructure located in the future control area, which is used for repository operations. There are still many challenges to overcome in the Konrad repository project, although many processes have been put on the right track in recent years. Looking back on past activities and in the cautious preview, this paper gives some indications from which lessons can be drawn and should be applied to similar projects in the future. - Prefer small dimensions for the infrastructure, such as insets and roadway cross-section, and the appropriate machinery and handling equipment; - Detailed process planning for construction in existing infrastructure in the run-up to implementation; - Intensive communication with contracted partners on the preparation of planning documents for nuclear examination procedures and ensuring an excellent contract management; - Early start of the implementation planning for projects under nuclear law, taking into account the relevant boundary conditions; - Ensuring the support of the project by the local community and other stakeholders. Overall, the use of parts of the existing above and underground infrastructure for the construction of a new repository is more difficult than for a complete new construction. But using the shafts of an existing mine delivers the advantage of very good knowledge about the underground environment. In addition, the areas necessary for the construction and operation of the buildings and facilities are already available and secured and do not compete with other projects.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Challenges and Solutions in Operation and Lay-Up of the Modular Caustic- Side Solvent Extraction Unit - 20078

The Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) Unit (MCU) was designed and constructed to provide interim salt waste processing so that the Liquid Waste Disposition Program (LWDP) could continue waste removal and tank closure until start-up of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). MCU processes Clarified Salt Solution (CSS), or salt solution (SS) that has undergone actinide removal/filtration, to produce two waste streams: the cesium laden Strip Effluent (SE), which is incorporated into glass at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), and the cesium depleted Decontaminated SS (DSS), which is incorporated into grout at the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). MCU completed start-up in 2008 with an initial operating life of 3 years and design life of 5 years. Prior to reaching the end of the design life, multiple critical components were upgraded and/or replaced to mitigate risks associated with any delays in SWPF start-up. During the remainder of operation (until June 2019), MCU was challenged to maximize processing with minimal additional modifications to repair/improve aging infrastructure, while maintaining low levels of risk to workers and the environment. Notable challenges during the extended operating life of the facility involved both mechanical and operational issues. Two of the most significant issues were the increased frequency of Process Vessel Ventilation (PVV) High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter change-outs and the biofouling of the SE coalescer (SEC). The major impacts of both issues were that replacement of these components 1) resulted in high exposure to workers, and 2) required substantial downtime, thus hindering achievement of processing goals. PVV HEPA filter replacements are required based on dose rate and differential pressure (dP) limits. After introducing a higher-curie feed to MCU, the operating time between change outs was reduced by approximately half. SEC replacements are required based on dP limits. After restarting from an extended outage, the operating life of the SEC was significantly reduced by more than half due to biofouling. As a result of extensive troubleshooting and process improvements, the facility was able to recover performance and extend the operating life of the PVV HEPA filters and the SEC media. Through troubleshooting both of these issues, the facility was also able to learn from prior experience and adapt in order to minimize down time and maintain throughput. Although the facility took advantage of short periods of downtime to perform nonintrusive troubleshooting and minor corrective/preventative maintenance activities, longer outages were periodically required for corrective maintenance involving process cell entry. During these outages, remote tools and specialized shield plates were employed to minimize dose to workers. Mock-ups of non-routine maintenance activities were critical to early identification of potential issues and improvements, which shortened outage duration. Consistent with the facility's operational strategy, evolutions needed for MCU layup were identified and sequenced to ensure safe conditions within the facility, meet pre-defined criteria for lay-up configuration, and protect workers, while minimizing the impact to SWPF integration. De-inventory and flushing of process areas was prioritized so that the total residual inventory was reduced as efficiently as possible. This paper discusses lessons learned and best practices from troubleshooting unique issues, performing complex maintenance activities, and implementing a layup strategy that best supports the overall system mission. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Feedback from International Decommissioning Planning Projects - 20269

Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants is an increasing reality in many countries with nuclear power. Already many years before final shutdown, planning of the decommissioning work is usually started in order to understand for example the costs, waste volume capacity and licensing work needed. In many countries it is required to have a final decommissioning plan before any decommissioning work is allowed to start. Westinghouse has been involved in international decommissioning planning for more than 30 years, where the first 20 years was mostly funding and preliminary plans due to that decommissioning was many years away. However, as many more plants are now moving into decommissioning, the focus has shifted to final decommissioning plans with budgets instead of funding plans, strategic decisions instead of choices, waste volume specifications instead of estimates and a defined approach instead of what ifs. Westinghouse has developed a methodology based on the planning and execution of many decommissioning projects in Europe, America and Asia. That international experience and understanding helps the customers to adopt a systematic planning process where strategy development is done with the end state in mind, where the goals are clearly outlined and the starting point described. The process and steps to reach the desired end state need to be clearly defined and all options/alternatives evaluated from a cost/benefit point of view. This is followed by a thorough and quantitative risk analysis in order to give solid recommendations and credible conclusions. One important feedback has been that real decommissioning experience from reference projects is invaluable for an efficient and timely progress in order not to spend unnecessary time and effort on understanding the barriers and links between different activities in decommissioning. Skilled project managers or engineers can drive the project forward, but without decommissioning experience previously gained, valuable lessons learned are not used and the same mistakes can be made again. Many utilities have invested in knowledge transfer from other decommissioning projects through site visits, exchange programs and supplier meetings, which is a valuable asset and way of implementing lessons learned from performed decommissioning projects into the planning process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

System Health and Status Reporting is Used to Improve Infrastructure Systems at the Hanford Site - 20449

Reliable physical infrastructure systems are vital to completing the clean-up mission and the start-up and commissioning of new nuclear waste processing facilities at the Hanford Site. Key infrastructure systems at Hanford include water, sewer, and electrical utilities, roads, telecommunications/network systems, and fire systems. All of the infrastructure systems are non-nuclear, General Service systems that are being maintained under formal engineering configuration control and none are specifically credited in any documented safety analysis (DSA). Starting in calendar year 2017, the Hanford Site's infrastructure and services contractor started producing system health and status reports for a total of 15 critical infrastructure systems as means to get a better understanding of each system's health and how it could be improved to ensure better and more reliable service delivery. As the reporting, tracking, and use of the metrics has matured, the number of systems for which reports are being developed has been expanded to a total of 23. Each of the critical infrastructure systems are assigned primary and alternate design authorities that complete qualifications on each assigned system. The design authorities actively manage and maintain configuration control on each of their systems and track metrics associated with availability, maintenance (corrective and preventive), and configuration of the technical baseline. The metrics are based on the principles established in Chapter V of DOE O 420.1C, Facility Safety, [1] and have been tailored as appropriate to each of the key infrastructure systems. An overall assessment of system health is performed and documented on a routine basis (e.g., quarterly). Included in this documentation is a quantitative score for each of the metrics (i.e., availability, maintenance, configuration management) along with results of system walk-downs, description of any permanent design modifications, identification of new or emerging issues and vulnerabilities affecting the system, and an assessment by the design authority of actions necessary to improve the system health score. The overall status scores are calculated using a formula and based on a pre-determined grading scale, a color is assigned for simple presentation. The information gained from developing the reports is being used to (1) assist with making timely and better informed decisions through the use of solid technical bases that are increasing the overall reliability and capabilities of the Site's infrastructure systems as new expense and capital projects in the Reliability Projects Investment Portfolio (RPIP) are prioritized and executed; (2) feed the risk management program, and (3) integrate the technical content of Master Plans that describe the Site's needs for the system and the system's capabilities to meet those future needs. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Status of Triso fuel irradiations in the advanced test reactor supporting high-temperature gas-cooled reactor designs - 18468

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program is irradiating up to seven experiments on low-enriched uranium tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel. Irradiations and fuel development are being accomplished at Idaho National Laboratory s Advanced Test Reactor to support development of the next generation of reactors in the United States. The experiments are being irradiated over several years to demonstrate and qualify new TRISO-coated particle fuel for use in high-temperature gas reactors, with goals of providing irradiation performance data to support fuel process development, qualifying fuel for normal operating conditions, supporting development and validation of fuel performance and fission product transport models and codes, and providing irradiated fuel and materials for post-irradiation examination and safety testing. The experiments are irradiated in an inert sweep gas atmosphere, with individual online temperature monitoring and control of each capsule and online fission product monitoring of effluent to track individual capsule fuel performance. The first experiment (AGR-1) started irradiation in December 2006 and was completed in November 2009. The second experiment (AGR-2) started irradiation in June 2010 and completed in October 2013. The third and fourth experiments have been combined into a single experiment (AGR-3/4), which started its irradiation in December 2011 and completed in April 2014. Because the purpose of this experiment was to provide data on fission product migration and retention in the next generation reactor, the design of this experiment was significantly different from the first two experiments. The final experiment (AGR-5/6/7) is scheduled to begin irradiation in early summer 2017. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Preliminary results of AGC-4 irradiation in the advanced test reactor and design of AGC-5 - 18469

The U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Reactor Technologies Program will irradiate up to six nuclear graphite creep experiments in Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The graphite experiments are being irradiated over an approximate 8-year period to support development of a graphite irradiation performance database on new nuclear grade graphites now available for use in high-temperature gas reactors. The goals of the irradiation experiments are to obtain irradiation performance data, including irradiation creep, at different temperatures and loading conditions to support design of the very high-temperature gas reactor and other future gas reactors. Each of the experiments consist of a single capsule that contains six stacks of graphite specimens, with half of the graphite specimens in each stack under a compressive load and the other half of specimens not subjected to a compressive load during irradiation. The six stacks have differing compressive loads applied to the top half of the diametrically opposite pairs of specimen stacks. A seventh specimen stack in the center of the capsule does not have a compressive load. The specimens are being irradiated in an inert sweep gas atmosphere with online temperature and compressive load monitoring and control. Also, samples are taken of sweep gas effluent to measure any oxidation or off-gassing that may occur during initial startup of the experiment. The first experiment Advanced Graphite Capsule (AGCJ-I started irradiation in September 2009 and completed in January 2011; the second experiment AGC-2 started irradiation in April 2011 and completed in May 2012; the third experiment AGC-3 started irradiation in late November 2012 and completed in April 2014; and AGC-4 is currently being irradiated in ATR. This paper will briefly discuss preliminary irradiation results from the AGC-4 experiment and design of AGC-3. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

GSI 191 Closure Issue for EDF PWR Fleet: The Fuel Assembly Test Results

EDF has re started recirculation studies within the international GSI 191 framework by 2002, when EDF decided to join the NEI sump strainers task force. All the EDF PWR fleet have been upgraded, with major strainer modifications, according to the NEI 04-07 guideline. The so-called chemical effects have been carefully studied by EDF and demonstration have been released that there are no chemical effects on EDF fleet, owing to the nature of our debris. The study of strainer downstream effects started by 2009, with decoupling Downstream Sump Debris Source Term (DST) and by the end of 2016, all the equipment have been successfully qualified. At a previous ANS meeting,it was said that core fuel tests were scheduled. They have started at the beginning of 2014 and they have been closed by mid 2016 for AREVA Fuel type at ERLANGEN facility (Germany). The present presentation is aimed at describing the test facility, the test specifications and the main results. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Estimation of Core Recovery Time with TRACE

Following the severe accident in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan, safety related concerns about the zirconium based claddings used in current light water reactors have increased. High corrosion resistance and low neutron absorption cross section make zirconium a suitable cladding material for normal nuclear plant operational conditions. However, for nuclear accident scenarios when safety functions of the plant are lost, Zr claddings undergo exothermic reaction with steam and exacerbate the accident conditions. The exothermic reaction increases the temperature of the cladding and accelerates core melting in severe accident progression. And the generation of explosive hydrogen gas accumulates and challenges the structural integrity. The accident tolerant fuel (ATF) concept is the fuel and cladding system that gives a longer time margin, compared to standard Zr claddings, to cope with the accident when core cooling systems are lost in a nuclear power plant. The ATF cladding should have slower oxidation kinetics and less hydrogen generation than Zr to alleviate consequences of cladding interaction with steam at high temperatures. The maximum time available to mitigate progression of severe accident is an important measure to evaluate benefits of ATF claddings. For this work, the maximum time available to mitigate progression of severe accident is selected as the time at which cladding melting reaction starts. Melting reaction is selected as an upper limit because of the degradation of coolable geometry. Maintaining the coolable geometry is a regulation criteria for both loss of coolant (LOCA) analyses and outside the LOCA analyses. Once the melting of the cladding starts, it exacerbates the deformation of the fuel assembly and hottest rods within the core cannot be cooled by water reflood and results in fuel melting progression. The aim of this work is to evaluate time margin gain of ATF cladding in a severe accident scenario of LOCA without safety injections and station blackout considering oxidation kinetics only. Also it is assumed that safety injections are recovered before melting of the claddings start and the sensitivity of safety injection actuation time on core recovery is analyzed. The core recovery time is the time when makeup water from safety injections quench the fuel rods and halt the progression of the severe accident. This time is estimated by initiating safety injections at different times and observing the hot rod behavior which represents 1/5. of the core in this work. It is considered that core is not recoverable when 20% of the core is damaged.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

MICROREACTOR APPLICATIONS, RESEARCH, VALIDATION, AND EVALUATION (MARVEL) REACTOR ? STATUS, CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING

The paper presents the current status of the Microreactor Applications, Research, Validation, and Evaluation (MARVEL) microreactor design, qualification testing, fabrication, and high-level construction schedule. An overview of initial criticality, low power physics testing, and start-up testing is included, as well as an overview of the envisioned processes in which end-users can engage the project for access to operational data or specific demonstrations. Designed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) under the auspices of the US Department of Energy’s Microreactor Program for construction and operation at the INL, MARVEL is a small, fully functional advanced reactor with UZrH fuel and thermal output of 85 kW. It offers a unique opportunity for scaled demonstrations that can dramatically accelerate the design, licensing, and deployment of commercial microreactors for power production or process heat applications. MARVEL’s objective is to build a small liquid-metal thermal reactor at the INL to demonstrate design and operating processes for microreactors, microgrid integration, and process heat applications. MARVEL finished 90%-final-design in September 2023 and completed an independent project assessment in early 2024. Fabrication of long-lead components and fuel, safety analysis review, and procurement for construction are underway. MARVEL assembly and construction will start in 2025 and fuel loading is expected in mid- 2027. Initial criticality will be performed in a dry condition in late 2027, followed by loading of NaK coolant and start-up testing. Approximately six months later, release for unrestricted operations will enable subsequent testing of microreactor characteristics, microgrid integration and select heat extraction applications.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

ZEUS: An Efficient GPU Optimization Method Integrating PSO, BFGS, and Automatic Differentiation

We introduce a novel, efficient computational method, ZEUS, for numerical optimization, and provide an open-source implementation. It has four key ingredients: (1) particle swarm optimization (PSO), (2) the use of the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method, (3) automatic differentiation (AD), and (4) GPUs. Our approach addresses the computational challenges inherent in high-dimensional, non-convex optimization problems. In the first phase of the algorithm, we get a potentially good set of starting points using PSO. Thereafter, we run BFGS independently in parallel from these starting points. BFGS is one of the best-performing algorithms for numerical optimization. However, it requires the gradient of the function being optimized. ZEUS integrates automatic differentiation into BFGS thus avoiding the need for the user to calculate derivatives explicitly. The use of GPUs allows ZEUS to speed up the calculations substantially. We carry out systematic studies to explore the trade-offs between the number of PSO iterations taken, starting points, and BFGS iteration depth. We show that a handful of iterations of PSO can improve global convergence when combined with BFGS. We also present performance studies using common test functions. The source code can be found at https://github.com/fnal-numerics/global-optimizer-gpu.

Soos, Dominik [Old Dominion U.]↗
DOE OSTI2022

Plasma Ignition and Combustion Stabilization Technology to Improve Flexible Operation, Reliability and Economics of an Existing Coal-Fired Boiler

GE Steam Power, Inc. (GE) proposed to improve reliability, flexibility, and economics of an existing coal-fired power plant by applying a new advanced technology developed by GE, a plasma-assisted pulverized fuel firing system. The objective of this program is to demonstrate the achievement of lower load by improved flame stabilization and therefore lower operating costs in a full-scale field installation at coal-fired electric utility. GE’s Plasma Ignition and Combustion Stabilization System is designed to operate continuously to support low load operation. With the plasma on, the flame will be attached and stable, removing the firing system as a limitation to low load operation. In addition, GE’s exclusively from ABENZ company licensed AC based technology has a 90+% system efficiency compared to all other systems at which are DC and operate with ~75% efficiency. Plant operating costs are lowered by eliminating use of expensive support fuel as well as the ability to operate at lower loads. The utilities’ ability to better match the demand curve will result in significant savings. Maintenance is lower for an AC system than a DC system as it operates at lower current. This eliminates the need for a demineralized cooling water system and provides longer electrode life which translates into both material and labor savings. It is the objective of GE to not only demonstrate the additional low load achievable with a plasma system after best achievable tuning, sensor and software approach has been exhausted, but also the increased stability of the flame at all loads with plasma assistance as well as cost savings at all low loads using plasma instead of oil. Upon successful completion of this project, GE will have sufficient field experience to rapidly deploy the Plasma Technology. The project objectives were achieved through the implementation of plasma ignitor technology at PacifiCorp Hunter Station Unit 3. A plasma ignitor system was retrofitted on ten wall-fired burners, Mill 3-4 combustion system. The Plasma Ignitors installed at Hunter proved that this GE technology is a direct and complete replacement for the original oil ignitors. The Hunter Unit 3 burner management system allows the plasma system to be used in all applications that originally required oil to be burned. This includes any time the Mill 3-4 is started or stopped for any reason including boiler starts, load changes, and low load support.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2012

First results on disruption mitigation by massive gas injection in Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research

Massive gas injection (MGI) system was developed on Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) in 2011 campaign for disruption studies. The MGI valve has a volume of 80 ml and maximum injection pressure of 50 bar, the diameter of valve orifice to vacuum vessel is 18.4 mm, the distance between MGI valve and plasma edge is {approx}3.4 m. The MGI power supply employs a large capacitor of 1 mF with the maximum voltage of 3 kV, the valve can be opened in less than 0.1 ms, and the amount of MGI can be controlled by the imposed voltage. During KSTAR 2011 campaign, MGI disruptions are carried out by triggering MGI during the flat top of circular and limiter discharges with plasma current 400 kA and magnetic field 2-3.5 T, deuterium injection pressure 39.7 bar, and imposed voltage 1.1-1.4 kV. The results show that MGI could mitigate the heat load and prevent runaway electrons with proper MGI amount, and MGI penetration is deeper under higher amount of MGI or lower magnetic field. However, plasma start-up is difficult after some of D{sub 2} MGI disruptions due to the high deuterium retention and consequently strong outgassing of deuterium in next shot, special effort should be made to get successful plasma start-up after deuterium MGI under the graphite first wall.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

The study of capability natural uranium as fuel cycle input for long life gas cooled fast reactors with helium as coolant

The objective of the present research is to assess the feasibility design of small long-life Gas Cooled Fast Reactor with helium as coolant. GCFR included in the Generation-IV reactor systems are being developed to provide sustainable energy resources that meet future energy demand in a reliable, safe, and proliferation-resistant manner. This reactor can be operated without enrichment and reprocessing forever, once it starts. To obtain the capability of consuming natural uranium as fuel cycle input modified CANDLE burn-up scheme was adopted in this system with different core design. This study has compared the core with three designs of core reactors with the same thermal power 600 MWth. The fuel composition each design was arranged by divided core into several parts of equal volume axially i.e. 6, 8 and 10 parts related to material burn-up history. The fresh natural uranium is initially put in region 1, after one cycle of 10 years of burn-up it is shifted to region 2 and the region 1 is filled by fresh natural uranium fuel. This concept is basically applied to all regions, i.e. shifted the core of the region (i) into region (i+1) region after the end of 10 years burn-up cycle. The calculation results shows that for the burn-up strategy on “Region-8” and “Region-10” core designs, after the reactors start-up the operation furthermore they only needs natural uranium supply to the next life operation until one period of refueling (10 years).

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Transient Stability Study of a Real-World Microgrid with 100% Renewables

This paper performs a transient stability study of a real-world microgrid that can operate with 100% renewables to better understand the stability and reliability of the microgrid under various dynamic scenarios. In particular, the operation of multiple grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) inverters in such a power system is not well understood under dynamic operation conditions, such as islanding and black start; therefore, in this paper, an electromagnetic transient model of the microgrid is developed to investigate the stability of the system under various dynamic operating conditions and to identify potential reliability risks. The PSCAD/EMTDC simulation with the high-fidelity model provides helpful insights into the optimal operation modes of GFM and GFL inverters as well as the stability and reliability of the microgrid. It can also inform field deployment in terms of inverter control parameters and coordination as well as the expected performance of black start and unplanned islanding.

black start↗