Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64

A Concept for the Deployment of a Large Lunar Crater Radio Telescope Using Teams of Tethered Robots

Kilometer-scale craters on the far side of the Moon have unique potential as future locations for large radio telescopes, which can observe the universe at wavelengths and frequencies (> 10 m, < 30 MHz) not possible with conventional Earth or orbital-based approaches. Distinct advantages of building a Lunar Crater Radio Telescope (LCRT) on the far side include i) isolation from radio noise due to the Earth’s ionosphere, orbiting satellites, and the Sun, ii) days of uninterrupted dark/cold sky viewing during lunar night, and iii) terrain geometry naturally suited for constructing the largest mesh antenna structure in the Solar System. A key challenge to constructing LCRT on the Moon is related to the complexity of deploying a 1-km diameter antenna and hanging receiver within a lunar crater whose diameter, depth, and slope are 3-5 km, 1 km, and ~30 degrees respectively. In this paper, we first evaluate the trade space for deploying a large, complex structure within a crater, and then provide a more detailed concept evaluation of our favored approach, which employs coordinated teams of tethered rovers to extract and suspend a folded antenna from a lander at the base of a crater. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in collaboration with California Institute of Technology (Caltech) have developed a novel robotic system for accessing extremely steep terrains; the Axel rover is a two-wheeled rugged terrain vehicle that is supported by an electro-mechanical tether that provides power, data, and tensile support from a top-side anchor location. Recently, a pair of Axel robots have been used in a DuAxel configuration that allows for four-wheel driving and repeated passive anchoring at different locations. The DuAxel system has unique advantages for deploying an LCRT antenna, including the ability to deploy from a lander near a crater, drive a distance to the crater rim to deploy an Axel, and later, retract the deployed Axel in order to sequentially lift up sections of the antenna. Our proposed concept involves delivering a packaged antenna and receiver to the bottom-center of a crater floor on a lander, then later sending a team of multiple DuAxel rovers to retrieve guide wires from the lander, which are pulled to the top of the crater. We explore this concept in detail and provide some initial quantitative analysis to demonstrate the feasibility of our system with respect to the spatial and mass properties of the antenna as juxtaposed to DuAxel capabilities. Finally, we outline next steps towards validating our concept on the way to a future lunar deployment opportunity.

Hallinan, Greg↗

Mineralogical, Elemental, and Tomographic Reconnaissance Investigation for CLPS (Metric)

Geological solids are characterized by their mineral structure, elemental composition, and morphology. The Mineralogical, Elemental, and Tomographic Reconnaissance Investigation for CLPS (METRIC) is an instrument payload that will quantify all three. METRIC comprises a suite of instruments in a lander to perform X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineral structure, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for elemental composition, and X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (XCT) for 3D internal micromorphology. The instruments are accompanied by an Infrared Spectrometer (IRS) provide geologic context. A Honeybee Robotics pneumatic sampling and transfer system [e.g., 1] will be positioned under the lander to deliver sieved regolith to the X-ray instruments for analysis. This payload is envisioned for deployment to the lunar surface on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander but could be carried on a lander or rover to any solid surface in the solar system.

E B Rampe↗

NASA’s Human Landing System: A Sustaining Presence on the Moon

For more than a decade, efforts have been ongoing at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in Huntsville, Alabama, to land humans and cargo on planetary bodies like the Moon and Mars and today this work continues under the Center’s Lander Programs (LP) office. In August of 2019, NASA stood up the Human Landing System (HLS) program to be responsible for spacecrafts that will land astronauts on the Moon under Artemis. Work is well underway with the historic Artemis III mission to land the first Americans on the lunar surface in more than 50 years through the Appendix H Option A [1] contract with SpaceX. In November, NASA awarded SpaceX an Option B modification to its existing HLS Appendix H contract, which will further develop its Starship HLS to meet NASA’s sustaining lander requirements for lunar missions beyond Artemis III. In September of 2022, NASA issued an HLS Sustaining Lunar Development solicitation under the NextSTEP-2 Appendix P Broad Agency Announcement [2] asking a second provider, in addition to SpaceX, to develop and demonstrate a lander that meets the program’s extended set of requirements for missions beyond Artemis III. Under the umbrella of Sustaining Lunar Development [3], these requirements will meet NASA’s needs for recurring, long-term access to the lunar surface. Proposals were received from industry late last year and NASA is planning to award an Appendix P contract in the summer of 2023. This paper will provide an update of the Lander Program office’s progress and will discuss how the program is bridging from the initial demonstration phase of development for the Human Landing System program to the Sustaining Lunar Development phase. The paper will include publicly available information on SpaceX’s Starship HLS design as well as near-term and future milestones for HLS and the Artemis program.

Lisa Watson-Morgan↗

Developing New Tools for Modeling Rocket Plume-Surface Interactions

With NASA’s goal to land the next human on the lunar surface in the next few years, it has become vitally important that we have a better understanding of how future landing spacecraft will interact with the unique properties of regolith¬¬––the layer of loose, unconsolidated dust and rock on the lunar surface¬¬––which can cause hazards like visual obstructions, particulate clouds, and cratering of the landing zone. Researchers from the Fluid Dynamics Branch at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center are performing plume-surface interaction (PSI) simulations between lander engine plumes and unprepared regolith surfaces, and have developed new tools to provide predictive PSI environments for various NASA projects and missions, including the Human Lander System (HLS), Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS), and future Mars landers. These tools allow the researchers to determine how to best meet the simulation and time requirements for each project by varying model fidelity. The highest fidelity tool is the Gas Granular Flow Solver (Loci/GGFS) that models gas-particle multi-phase interactions to predict regolith cratering and ejection of particles into the immediate surroundings of the lander. At its highest fidelity, it can model microscopic regolith particle interactions with a particle size/shape distribution that statistically replicates actual regolith, however, to be most effective with today’s computing resources, it is currently run using only one to three equivalent particle sizes/shapes. The team also incorporated engineering models into their software suite to create production-ready hybrid tools with reduced fidelity. At the lowest fidelity, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Loci/CHEM+DIGGEM can predict crater depth over time by relating local CFD-predicted surface shear stresses to a model of erosion mass flux.

plume surface interaction↗

Temporary Atmospheres Produced By Human Activities on the Moon

Outgassing from materials, whether through the ascent/descent stages of lunar vehicles, airlock depressurizing, rover or astronaut suit outgassing, may cause an effect of unwanted accumulation of volatiles at the surface and exosphere. This is especially important at (or proximal) to permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) at the lunar poles. Herein, we provide estimates of expected outgassing from various human-landed objects on the Moon, including backpacks, airlocks, rovers, landers, trash and mining operations. Astronaut suits produce some level of oxygen outgassing (Helou et al., 2022), which may transport and condense in these PSRs, even in micro- cold traps (Glavin et al., 2010).We estimate the outgassing from drill mining and trash-to-gas conversion assuming a specific technology is operating. These outgassing systems can create local, temporary atmospheres in the vicinity (∼100 km radius) of the sources. The atmosphere may be particularly high within meters of the source. To obtain column densities for these temporary atmospheres, we first bracket ranges for the gas number loss as a function of time. We then derive the maximum distance traveled and the time the released molecules remain in the exosphere for a single ballistic hop, assuming the molecules are ejected from the surface of the object at its surface temperature. In some cases, such as the astronaut backpack and the rover, the temperature is that of the source. Given this information, an average and peak local exospheric density and column density can be estimated. We find that backpacks, airlock releases, and the Starship lander can create relatively high-density local atmospheres, with local near-lander outgassing water densities exceeding 107/cm3. This local water exosphere is over 106 times greater than the LADEE-derived lower limit of the natural water exosphere at ∼3/cm3. Thus, the anthropogenic temporary water exosphere will likely dominate the environment near the lander, making an assessment of the natural exospheric water environment difficult.

Rosemary M Killen↗

Lithium-ion cell technology demonstration for future NASA applications

NASA requires lightweight rechargeable batteries for future missions to Mars and the outer planets that are capable of operating over a wide range of temperatures, with high specific energy and energy densities. Due to their attractive performance characteristics, lithium-ion batteries have been identified as the battery chemistry of choice for a number of future applications, including planetary orbiters, rovers and landers. For example, under the Mars Surveyor Program MSP 01 lithium-ion batteries were developed by Lithion (each being 28 V, 25 Ah, 8-cells. and 9 kg) and fully qualified prior to mission cancellation. In addition to the requirement of being able to supply at least 90 cycles on the surface of Mars, the battery demonstrated operational capability (both charge and discharge) over a large temperature range (-2O'C to +4OoC), with tolerance to non-operational excursions to -30nd 50Currently, JPL is implementing lithium-ion technology on the 2003 Mars Exploration Rover (MER), which will be coupled with a solar array. This mission has similar performance requirements to that of the 2001 Lander in that high energy density and a wide operating temperature range are necessitated. In addition to planetary rover and lander applications, we are also engaged in determining the viability of using lithium-ion technology for orbiter applications that require exceptionally long life (>20,000 cydes at partial depth of discharge). To assess the viabili of lithium-ion cells for these applications, a number of performance characterization tests have been performed (at the cell and battery level) on state-of-art prototype lihium- ion cells, induding: assessing the cycle life performance (at varying DODs), life characteristics at extreme temperatures (< -10nd >+4OoC), rate capability as a function of temperature (-30' to 4OoC), pulse capability, self-discharge and storage characteristics, as well as, mission profile capability. This paper will describe the current and future NASA missions that are considering lithium ion batteries and will contain results of the cell testing conducted to-date to validate the technology for these missions.

lithium-ion batteries Mars landers Mars rovers↗

Austere Human Missions to Mars

The Design Reference Architecture 5 (DRA 5) is the most recent concept developed by NASA to send humans to Mars in the 2030 time frame using Constellation Program elements. DRA 5 is optimized to meet a specific set of requirements that would provide for a robust exploration program to deliver a new six-person crew at each biennial Mars opportunity and provide for power and infrastructure to maintain a highly capable continuing human presence on Mars. This paper examines an alternate architecture that is scaled back from DRA 5 and might offer lower development cost, lower flight cost, and lower development risk. It is recognized that a mission set using this approach would not meet all the current Constellation Mars mission requirements; however, this 'austere' architecture may represent a minimum mission set that would be acceptable from a science and exploration standpoint. The austere approach is driven by a philosophy of minimizing high risk or high cost technology development and maximizing development and production commonality in order to achieve a program that could be sustained in a flat-funded budget environment. Key features that would enable a lower technology implementation are as follows: using a blunt-body entry vehicle having no deployable decelerators, utilizing aerobraking rather than aerocapture for placing the crewed element into low Mars orbit, avoiding the use of liquid hydrogen with its low temperature and large volume issues, using standard bipropellant propulsion for the landers and ascent vehicle, and using radioisotope surface power systems rather than a nuclear reactor or large area deployable solar arrays. Flat funding within the expected NASA budget for a sustained program could be facilitated by alternating cargo and crew launches for the biennial Mars opportunities. This would result in two assembled vehicles leaving Earth orbit for Mars per Mars opportunity. The first opportunity would send two cargo landers to the Mars surface to preposition a habitat, supplies, and exploration equipment. The next opportunity, two years later, would send to Mars orbit 1) a lander with a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) and 2) a crewed Mars Transit Habitat with an Orion CEV for Earth return. The following opportunity, two years after the first crew, would go back to cargo-only launches. This alternation of cargo and crew opportunities results in a sustainable launch rate of six Ares V launches every two years. It is notable that four of the six launches per Mars opportunity are identical, build-to-print, Tran-Mars Injection stages. This type of production rate could lend itself well to a COTStype service provider, and would make it feasible to have a live spare in place in the event of a single launch failure.

landers↗

Atmospheric Mining in the Outer Solar System: Interplanetary Transfer Vehicles, In-Situ Resource Utilization, and Moon Mining Issues

Atmospheric mining in the outer solar system has been investigated as a means of fuel production for high energy propulsion and power. Fusion fuels such as Helium 3 (3He) and deuterium can be wrested from the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune and either returned to Earth or used in-situ for energy production. Helium 3 and deuterium were the primary gases of interest with hydrogen being the primary propellant for nuclear thermal solid core and gas core rocket-based atmospheric flight. A series of analyses were undertaken to investigate resource capturing aspects of atmospheric mining in the outer solar system. This included the gas capturing rate, storage options, and different methods of direct use of the captured gases. While capturing 3He, large amounts of hydrogen and 4He are produced. With these two additional gases, the potential for fueling small and large fleets of additional exploration and exploitation vehicles exists. Analyses of orbital transfer vehicles (OTVs), landers, and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) mining factories are included. Preliminary observations are presented on near-optimal selections of moon base orbital locations, OTV power levels, and OTV and lander rendezvous points. Aerospacecraft with closed cycle gas core propulsion are used to capture the 3He and deuterium from the outer planet atmospheres. Water ice on the outer planet moons has been identified as critical resources for refueling the moon landers and the nuclear electric OTVs. The numbers of interplanetary transfer vehicles (ITVs) and the launch vehicles will be presented. Preliminary design parameters for the ITVs and their payload limits will be assessed. The number of mining machines and their associated issues are addressed.

chemical propulsion↗

Quantitatively Monitoring Bubble-Flow at a Seep Site Offshore Oregon: Field Trials and Methodological Advances for Parallel Optical and Hydroacoustical Measurements

Two lander-based devices, the Bubble-Box and GasQuant-II, were used to investigate the spatial and temporal variability and total gas flow rates of a seep area offshore Oregon, United States. The Bubble-Box is a stereo camera–equipped lander that records bubbles inside a rising corridor with 80 Hz, allowing for automated image analyses of bubble size distributions and rising speeds. GasQuant is a hydroacoustic lander using a horizontally oriented multibeam swath to record the backscatter intensity of bubble streams passing the swath plain. The experimental set up at the Astoria Canyon site at a water depth of about 500 m aimed at calibrating the hydroacoustic GasQuant data with the visual Bubble-Box data for a spatial and temporal flow rate quantification of the site. For about 90 h in total, both systems were deployed simultaneously and pressure and temperature data were recorded using a CTD as well. Detailed image analyses show a Gaussian-like bubble size distribution of bubbles with a radius of 0.6–6 mm (mean 2.5 mm, std. dev. 0.25 mm); this is very similar to other measurements reported in the literature. Rising speeds ranged from 15 to 37 cm/s between 1- and 5-mm bubble sizes and are thus, in parts, slightly faster than reported elsewhere. Bubble sizes and calculated flow rates are rather constant over time at the two monitored bubble streams. Flow rates of these individual bubble streams are in the range of 544–1,278 mm 3 /s. One Bubble-Box data set was used to calibrate the acoustic backscatter response of the GasQuant data, enabling us to calculate a flow rate of the ensonified seep area (~1,700 m 2 ) that ranged from 4.98 to 8.33 L/min (5.38 × 10 6 to 9.01 × 10 6 CH 4 mol/year). Such flow rates are common for seep areas of similar size, and as such, this location is classified as a normally active seep area. For deriving these acoustically based flow rates, the detailed data pre-processing considered echogram gridding methods of the swath data and bubble responses at the respective water depth. The described method uses the inverse gas flow quantification approach and gives an in-depth example of the benefits of using acoustic and optical methods in tandem.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

An analysis of the facsimile-camera response to radiant point sources

In addition to imaging the surrounding terrain, planetary lander cameras may also be used to survey the stars to aid in locating the lander site. The response of the facsimile camera, which was selected for the Viking lander missions to Mars, to a radiant point source is formulated and shown to result in a statistical rather than deterministic signal. The signal statistics are derived and magnitudes are evaluated for the brighter visual and red stars. The probability of detecting the resultant statistical signals in photosensor and preamplifier noise and the associated probability of false alarms are also determined.

Huck, F. O.↗

A conceptual design and operational characteristics for a Mars rover for a 1979 or 1981 Viking science mission

The feasibility of a small Mars rover for use on a 1979 or 1981 Viking mission was studied and a preliminary design concept was developed. Three variations of the concept were developed to provide comparisons in mobility and science capability of the rover. Final masses of the three rover designs were approximately 35 kg, 40 kg, and 69 kg. The smallest rover is umbilically connected to the lander for power and communications purposes whereas the larger two rovers have secondary battery power and a 2-way very high frequency communication link to the lander. The capability for carrying Viking rovers (including development system) to the surface of Mars was considered first. It was found to be feasible to carry rovers of over 100 kg. Virtually all rover systems were then studied briefly to determine a feasible system concept and a practical interface with the comparable system of a 1979 or 1981 lander vehicle.

Darnell, W. L.↗

The Viking Orbiter and its Mariner inheritance

The orbiter system of the Viking spacecraft performs the functions of transporting the lander into orbit around Mars, surveying the proposed landing sites, relaying lander data to earth, and conducting independent scientific observations of Mars. The orbiter system is a semiautomatic, solar-powered, triaxially stabilized platform capable of making trajectory corrections and communicating with earth on S-band. Its instruments for visual imaging, detecting water vapor, and thermal mapping are mounted on a separate two-degree-of-freedom scan platform. Radio science is conducted at three frequencies, using the main S-band system, a separate X-band derived from the S-band, and the UHF one-way link with the lander.

Wolfe, A. E.↗

Summary report on the Viking 1975 DSN telecommunications compatibility test program

The system design tests and test results that provided the basis for establishment of telecommunications design between the DSN and Viking 1975 were described. The Viking 1975/DSN Telecommunications Compatibility Test Program Consisted of three phases: subsystem design, system design, and system verification tests which were performed at JPL and at the Air Force Eastern Test Range and Kennedy Space Center complexes. Subsystem design tests were performed with the Viking Orbiter (VO) and the Viking Lander (VL) during 1973. System design compatibility tests were performed with the Viking Proof Test Orbiter, Viking Spacecraft Test Lander, and a multiple Viking spacecraft configuration during the summer of 1974. System verification tests were performed with the Viking Orbiter, Viking Lander and Viking spacecraft during the spring and summer of 1975.

A. I. Bryan↗

Mars dynamics, atmospheric and surface properties - Determination from Viking tracking data

Approximately three months of radio tracking data from the Viking landers have been analyzed to determine the lander locations, the orientation of the spin axis of Mars, and a first estimate from Viking data of the planet's spin rate. Preliminary results have also been obtained for atmospheric parameters and radii at occultation points and for properties of the surface in the vicinity of lander 1.

Michael, W. H., Jr.↗

Using the Shuttle for future advanced planetary missions

Advantages of using the STS for advanced planetary missions are considered. Several factors are analyzed with relation to a proposed exploration of the Jupiter System. Information relating to a Martian expedition for retrieving surface samples and also calculations pertaining to a landing on Titan are presented. The components of the suggested Jupiter System exploration facility include an orbiter, subsatellite, deep probes, Callisto lander, Io lander, and rough landers. Data concerning the STS injection mass possibilities and Ganymede orbiter mass potential are provided.

Friedman, L. D.↗

Geochemical and mineralogical interpretation of the Viking inorganic chemical results

The current status of geochemical, mineralogical, petrological interpretation of refined Viking Lander data is reviewed, and inferences that can be drawn from data on the composition of Martian surface materials are presented. The materials are dominantly fine silicate particles admixed with, or including, iron oxide particles. Both major element and trace element abundances in all samples are indicative of mafic source rocks (rather than more highly differentiated salic materials). The surface fines are nearly identical in composition at the two widely separated Lander sites, except for some lithologic diversity at the 100-m scale. This implies that some agency (presumably aeolian processes) has thoroughly homogenized them on a planetary scale. The most plausible model for the mineralogical constitution of the fine-grained surface materials at the two Lander sites is a fine-grained mixture dominated by iron-rich smectites, or their degradation products, with ferric oxides, probably including maghemite and carbonates (such as calcite), but not such less stable phases as magnesite or siderite.

Toulmin, P., III↗

Thermal tides in the dusty martian atmosphere - A verification of theory

Major features of the daily surface pressure oscillations observed by the Viking landers during the two great dust storms on Mars in 1977 can be explained in terms of the classical atmospheric tidal theory developed for the earth's atmosphere. The most dramatic exception is the virtual disappearance of only the diurnal tide at Viking Lander 1 just before the second storm. This disappearance is attributed to destructive interference between the usually westward-traveling tide and an eastward-traveling diurnal Kelvin mode generated by orographically induced differential heating. The continuing Viking Lander 1 pressure measurements can be used with the model to monitor future great dust storms.

Zurek, R. W.↗

Spectral properties /0.04 to 0.75 microns/ of soils exposed at the Viking 1 landing site

The bidirectional reflectance and photometric function (Hapke, 1981) was determined for seven patches of soil located near the Viking Lander 1 spacecraft. The soil photometric function has a prominent opposition effect in addition to a phase function that is strongly backscattering. The ratio of reflectances at a 1 deg phase angle to that at a 10 deg phase angle averages 1.25, 1.24, and 1.19 for blue, green, and red wavelengths respectively. The photometric function has a wavelength dependence, which causes color ratios to vary by up to 33% as a function of phase angle. Estimates of soil reflectance at a 5 deg phase angle averaged over the blue and green passbands of the Viking Lander cameras are 0.11 and 0.17, respectively, while estimates over the red channel range from 0.30 to 0.39. Brightness and color variations within the soil can be correlated with particle size, finer-grained soil being brighter and redder than coarser-grained soil. Lander soils, homogeneous in nature, are typical of brighter soils covering a large portion of the Martian surface.

Guinness, E. A.↗