SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DECONTAMINATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2018

In Backyards and Bedrooms: Challenges and Successes in Gaining Access to Homes for Radiological Testing - 18204

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is a federal environmental clean-up program. Its mandate is the remediation and local, long-term, safe management of approximately 1.7 million cubic metres of historic low-level radioactive waste in the adjacent communities of Port Hope and Port Granby in Southern Ontario, Canada. The PHAI is being undertaken by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), on behalf of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, a federal Crown corporation. It is currently one of the largest environmental remediation projects in Canada The safety of workers, the public and the environment while delivering the PHAI on time and within budget is CNL's number one priority. The PHAI is being carried out as two projects - the Port Hope Project and the Port Granby Project. The Port Hope Project is the larger of the two and includes the cleanup of approximately 1.2 million cubic metres of historic waste from various locations within the community. The Port Hope Project includes a unique and important component - the Property Radiological Survey. This survey involves the interior and exterior investigation of approximately 4,800 small-scale properties - primarily residential - in the Municipality of Port Hope for the presence or absence of historic low-level radioactive waste. The Property Radiological Survey began in 2012 and is being conducted in five campaigns with between 450 and 1,250 properties in each campaign. The survey begins with radon monitoring, followed by interior and exterior gamma radiation tests, and concludes with exterior borehole drilling/soil sampling. The full suite of tests take approximately 18 - 24 months to complete at each property. This paper will describe the communications strategy implemented to obtain consent from thousands of property owners for CNL's contractor to conduct radiological testing in private living spaces such as bathrooms, bedrooms and closets, as well as front yards, backyards and outbuildings. This strategy incorporates tactics used to secure consent from residents who are reluctant to participate in the survey for reasons including privacy issues, family situations, life events and misapprehensions about the survey and/or the PHAI in general. The paper will include information about how residents' concerns are addressed, the stepped approach to securing access from owners who do not respond to repeated attempts at contact, and the importance of close coordination with the contractor to ensure that all components of the investigations are aligned so that work is conducted in a safe, timely and systematic manner. The authors will also describe the process for keeping the regulator and the municipality informed of survey outreach efforts, challenges and successes, and will outline the process for notifying the approximately 800 owners of properties on which historic low-level radioactive waste is expected to be identified and transitioning those owners from the survey to the remediation phase. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Waste Retrieval and Inspection Operations in Hanford Tank 241-AY-102 - 18234

In August 2012, a periodic annulus inspection of tank 241-AY-102 (AY-102) identified a leak from the primary tank into the secondary containment. A pumping plan was developed in 2013 to provide a path forward for recommended remediation actions to be implemented as part of the AY-102 Recovery Project. On March 21, 2014, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued an Administrative Order requiring Washington River Protection Solutions and the United States Department of Energy to conduct actions related to and including the removal of waste from AY-102. The parties agreed to resolve the appeal of the Administrative Order through a Settlement Agreement which addressed the remaining requirements and implemented enforceable milestone dates, including completion of waste removal operations, and performance of an inspection aimed at determining the cause of the leak. The AY-102 Recovery Project was developed to address the Settlement Agreement requirements. While retrieval of waste from Single-Shell Tanks has been performed at Hanford for decades, retrieval from Double-Shell Tank AY-102 required adaptation of the existing technologies to a new environment on a larger scale than previously encountered. Despite countless challenges and obstacles encountered throughout, the project successfully completed system design, fabrication, installation, testing, and retrieval operations within a highly compressed, aggressive schedule. Waste removal activities in AY-102 completed in February 2017. Subsequent inspection activities were completed as part of a multi-step process aimed at determining the likely cause of failure and assessing the feasibility of repair. A variety of input data were used in evaluating the likely failure mechanism, such as video examinations that revealed numerous through-floor penetrations and significant degradation across the visible surface area. Based on the operational history of the tank, corrosion testing and analysis, and the visual appearance of the confirmed leak sites, service-induced pitting corrosion due to the historic waste composition and operating conditions appears to be the primary degradation mechanism leading to failure of the tank. The inspection data has demonstrated that repairing and returning AY-102 to service would likely introduce substantial technical, logistical, and financial challenges due to the extent of bottom-plate damage. As a result, tank AY-102 will ultimately be closed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

3D Reconstruction, Augmented Reality, and Telerobotic Operation - 18297

For nuclear facility decommissioning and waste cleanup, it is necessary to deploy simple and robust robots in remote sites performing precise and dexterous manipulation under teleoperation. To meet the challenge, this paper presents a new remote operation method based on augmented reality for intuitive and efficient teleoperation. The enhanced teleoperation system incorporates three technology components - 3D sensing and reconstruction, augmented reality, and teleoperation. The 3D reconstruction technology utilizes 3D cameras and constructs a 3D geometric model of the environment. Compared to the state-of-the- art technology, the presented 3D reconstruction has greater spatial precision and dynamic object tracking capability, which enhances the precision of manipulation tasks in a dynamic environment. The augmented reality technology entails generation of virtual surfaces of various geometries and dynamic characteristics, as well as consistent perceptual overlay in camera, robot and operator hand control spaces. Teleoperation is demonstrated with a dual-arm robot system operated under Robot Operating System (ROS). (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Waste Information Management System with 2017-18 Waste Streams - 18302

The Waste Information Management System (WIMS) 2017-18 was updated to support the Department of Energy (DOE) accelerated cleanup program. The schedule compression required close coordination and a comprehensive review and prioritization of the barriers that impeded treatment and disposition of the waste streams at each site. Many issues related to waste treatment and disposal were potential critical path issues under the accelerated schedule. In order to facilitate accelerated cleanup initiatives, waste managers at DOE field sites and at DOE Headquarters in Washington, D.C., needed timely waste forecast and transportation information regarding the volumes and types of radioactive waste that would be generated by DOE sites over the next 35 years. Each local DOE site historically collected, organized, and displayed waste forecast information in separate and unique systems. In order for interested parties to understand and view the complete DOE complex-wide picture, the radioactive waste and shipment information of each DOE site needed to be entered into a common application. The WIMS application was therefore created to serve as a common application to improve stakeholder comprehension and improve DOE radioactive waste treatment and disposal planning and scheduling. WIMS allows identification of total forecasted waste volumes, material classes, disposition sites, choke points, technological or regulatory barriers to treatment and disposal, along with forecasted waste transportation information by rail, truck and intermodal shipments. The Applied Research Center (ARC) at Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Florida, developed and deployed the web-based forecast and transportation system and is responsible for updating the radioactive waste forecast and transportation data on a regular basis to ensure the long-term viability and value of this system. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Mercury Cleanup at the Y-12 Nuclear Security Complex - 18304

The Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) is one of the nation's most important national security assets. The facility played a key role in producing the world's first atomic bomb during the Manhattan Project and since World War II has been a vital contributor to America's nuclear deterrent capability. Historically, mercury was used extensively in operations at Y-12 in connection with production of components for nuclear weapons. During peak usage - from 1950 to 1963 - approximately 11 million kilograms of mercury were used. Over the years, large quantities of mercury - as much as 330,000 kilograms -- were lost within buildings and to soil and surface water. Today, mercury is considered the greatest environmental risk on the Oak Ridge Reservation and mercury cleanup is a high priority for the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OREM). Remediation of Y-12 and East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) to mitigate the mercury risk is based on a phased, adaptive management approach. The approach to address surface water includes treatment actions in the short term and research and technology development to evaluate longer-term solutions in the downstream environment. A number of formidable challenges must be addressed in order to assure safe, effective cleanup of mercury contamination at Y-12 and in EFPC. In the long term, understanding how mercury moves in the EFPC system is essential to the development of new technologies and remedial options and strategies for mercury contamination in the creek. OREM has developed and is currently executing a Mercury Technology Development Plan to address these long term needs. As a major component of the short term actions, UCOR has completed the design of the Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility. Outfall 200 is the point at which the west end Y-12 storm drain system discharges to Upper East Fork Poplar Creek (UEFPC). Outfall 200 is consistently the largest single source of mercury to UEFPC. Construction and operation of this facility is critical to reduce mercury in UEFPC, and operation of this facility will be required before demolition of mercury contaminated facilities can begin. Once operational, the Mercury Treatment Facility will have a treatment capacity of 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm), a storm water capture rate of 40,000 gpm, and two million gallons of storm water storage capacity. The headworks with transfer pipeline is designed to capture flow from Outfall 200 and move it to the treatment facility. A contract for construction of the Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility is expected to be awarded in 2018. Early site preparation began in 2017. The early site preparation scope includes utilities relocation, small structure demolition and creek bank secant wall installation. Initial operation of the Mercury Treatment Facility is planned for 2022. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Progress Updates for the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - 18327

The Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project is vital to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) mission to cleanup radioactive waste at the Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State. The overall WTP Project objective is to design, build, and commission the facilities and systems that will treat and immobilize approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste stored in Hanford's 177 underground storage tanks. The combination of technologies in the WTP makes it a first-of-a-kind facility at a scale larger than ever, built for radioactive waste processing. DOE is proceeding with its approach to complete the WTP Project in phases, which includes the following principal actions: - Completing construction of the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, Balance of Facilities (BOF), and Analytical Laboratory (LAB) (collectively referred to as LBL); - Implementing a direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) process to treat low-activity waste independent of the Pretreatment (PT) Facility; - Resolving the technical issues associated with primarily the PT Facility; - Completing the design and construction of the High-Level Waste (HLW) and PT facilities to enable integrated WTP operations. In March 2016, a federal judge amended the 2010 Consent Decree 1 completion milestones for the Hanford WTP, which generally aligns with DOE's plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence: - Complete LAW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2023; - Complete HLW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Complete PT Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Achieve initial plant operations for the WTP: December 31, 2036. Having established milestones for completing the WTP facilities has enabled DOE to formally implement its plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence, starting with the LAW Facility. In December 2016, DOE executed a contract modification and approved a change to the project's performance baseline to complete the LBL facilities and incorporate modifications needed to allow direct feed of low-activity waste to the LAW Facility. Significant progress has been made toward completing the design, construction, and planning for commissioning of the facilities needed to enable the DFLAW operations to commence as early as January 2022. In 2012, DOE partially suspended production work on the WTP's PT Facility and to a lesser degree the HLW Facility because of unresolved technical issues associated with those facilities. In September 2017, DOE acknowledged the WTP contractor had met all the criteria for full resumption of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) activities for the HLW Facility. By December 2017, DOE had completed the actions needed to resolve the six of the eight primary technical issues associated with the PT Facility, with the remaining two issues expected to be resolved in the first quarter of 2018. Although significant progress has been made to prepare for resuming production activities for the HLW and PT facilities, DOE has made the decision to constrain EPC work on those facilities in the near term based on DOE's higher priority of completing the WTP facilities needed to begin DFLAW operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Hexavalent Chromium Remediation: Hybrid Approach with Adsorption and Chemical/Biological Reduction - 18357

In this research the coupling of hexavalent chromium -Cr (VI)- removal technologies is investigated for remediation of contaminated sites. The process proposed in this research has two steps, with multiple treatment options investigated for each step to yield a variety of possible combinations. For the first step, Cr(VI) removal with ion exchange and granular activated carbon is investigated. Both chemical and biological technologies were investigated for the second step. Calcium polysulfide, ferrous sulfate, emulsified oil, fruit juice, and molasses, zero valent iron (ZVI) were used. The results show that: a selective ion-exchange resin removed 7 and 11 times more Cr (VI) than a non-selective resin and a granular activated carbon, respectively; Both calcium polysulfide and ferrous sulfate resulted in > 99% removal of Cr (VI). A lower dosage of CaSx (2 x stoichiometric ) is needed as compared to ferrous sulfate (5 x stoichiometric); Biological reduction of chromium using various substrates, including fruit juice, emulsified oil and molasses was found to be highly effective in supporting Cr (VI) reduction.. All substrates studied promoted chromium reduction from 14,000 μg/L to < 10 μg/L within 36 days; Cr(VI) removal with ZVI was shown to be highly effective, Nitrate reduction at nearly 50% was observed followed by diminishing reductions; The coupling of several types of separation technologies with brine treatment for Cr (VI) remediation represents an integrated approach and the selection of technologies has to consider the concentration of Cr (VI), site specific conditions, cost, presence of co-contaminants, and limitations of each technology. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Innovation in Contracting Strategy for a Master Services Agreement for Remediation of Low Level Radioactive Waste - 18381

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is a federal environmental clean-up program. Its mandate is the remediation and local, long-term, safe management of approximately 1.7 million cubic metres of historic low-level radioactive waste in the adjacent communities of Port Hope and Port Granby in Southern Ontario, Canada. The PHAI is being undertaken by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), on behalf of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, a federal Crown corporation. It is currently one of the largest environmental remediation projects in Canada. The safety of workers, the public and the environment while delivering the PHAI on time and within budget is CNL's number one priority. The PHAI is being carried out as two projects - the Port Hope Project and the Port Granby Project. The Port Hope Project is the larger of the two and includes the cleanup of approximately 1.2 million cubic metres of historic waste from several locations, including the Port Hope Harbour, a closed municipal landfill and approximately 800 residential properties. This complex project requires contracting the services of qualified, skilled and experienced environmental remediation contractors to meet the diverse needs of the myriad tasks that comprise the remediation and restoration of all properties. This paper will highlight how the CNL contracting services team developed an innovative approach to a contracting strategy designed to deliver the safe execution of work and keep the project on time and within budget. The approach addresses the complexities of a scope of work that consists of multiple work packages to be executed both concurrently and in tandem, and that require highly specialized trades/skills, as well as high-level project management expertise to ensure seamless coordination among the various contractors. The author will discuss CNL's strategy to engage the market with a Request for Expression of Interest to identify potential qualified suppliers and gauge their level of interest, issue a Request for Prequalification (RFPQ) to determine eligible contractors and, ultimately, issue a Request for Proposal for a Master Services Agreement (MSA) that would competitively evaluate each contractor's direct experience, technical expertise, quality management programs, safety systems compliance and track record. Using CNL's experience as a case study, the paper will highlight how an innovative approach can positively affect project timelines by describing how CNL addressed the challenge associated with the limited time available to implement procurement processes and deliver a series of executed agreements while ensuring that work would begin on time and key project milestones would be met. The author will summarize how CNL's strategy put the project back on schedule, without compromising the process guideline/requirements, and ensured that a qualified and experienced set of contractors, committed to a strong safety culture, will be available to perform the work required when the cleanup in the Port Hope community begins in 2018. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Natural Attenuation Progress, Plume Movement, and Source Reduction for the SRS CMP Pits VOC Plume - 18384

Monitoring the effectiveness of natural attenuation for remediating the Savannah River Site (SRS) Chemical, Metals, and Pesticides (CMP) Pits plume fringe has focused intensive sampling of shallow groundwater for different reaches of Pen Branch from 2005 to 2017. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were analyzed for the critical hyporheic zone beneath Pen Branch and adjacent floodplain. These sampling efforts assisted larger-scale compliance monitoring in accordance with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines. When applicable, EPA has found natural attenuation to be an acceptable mode of achieving regulatory compliance. While natural attenuation can include any ecosystem function that reduces contaminant loads, it is focused on microbial biochemical pathways. The study plume originated from CMP Pits, a waste disposal area in operation from 1971 to 1979, when the pits were closed and backfilled. In 1984, excavations of source material and contaminated soils were removed up to a depth of 7.6 m below the trenches. However, monitoring well data indicated that perchloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) had seeped beneath the vadose zone and formed groundwater plumes reaching the Pen Branch valley below. Although 'hot spots' of TCE were found within the Pen Branch floodplain, it was unknown just how the flow pattern was entering Pen Branch and to what degree natural attenuation was reducing the contaminant load. For this reason, our stations were located along the Pen Branch reach bordering the modelled plume fringe. In general, VOCs were highest at station piezometer holes in the middle study zone. Moderate VOC levels were detected at upstream stations and lowest VOC levels were found at downstream stations. Electrical resistance heating (ERH) with soil vapor extraction (SVE) conducted by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) from 2008 to 2009 at the filled CMP Pits helped to remove contaminants trapped in clay horizons beneath the CMP Pits and to reduce overall new plume concentrations. Collectively PCE, TCE, and their degradation products displayed a favorable yearly trend of contaminant natural attenuation. Additionally, phytoremediation actions by native bamboo, Arundinaria gigantea, added to VOC removal from wetlands soils. Total VOC concentrations at some stations declined by >25% and concentrations of vinyl chloride (VC), a nearly-final stage degradation product increased from 0.0 ppb to >20 ppb. Temporal patterns displayed a continued reduction of VOCs, while spatial patterns indicated a possible slow progression of the plume downstream along Pen Branch. Conclusions about plume export into surface waters must address the seasonal and geological complexities of this system. Hydrological patterns are complex and plumes do not directly outcrop into Pen Branch surface waters, but emerge into the stream through pathways in the porous hyporheic zone. For this reason, continued sampling must identify critical depths and downstream locations where plume flows may be more intense. During drought periods with no surface flow in Pen Branch, subsurface plume flows may be flowing downslope in the hyporheic zone. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Achieving the Vision: An Update on Cleanup, Closure, and Reindustrialization of the East Tennessee Technology Park - 18401

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Addressing Excess Contaminated Facilities and Mercury Cleanup At the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Reservation - 18408

The U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OREM) and its prime cleanup contractor, URS | CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR) are executing an aggressive program of cleanup and risk reduction in excess contaminated facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). Across the complex, DOE has designated more than 2,300 of its facilities 'excess'. Excess means 'nonoperational' and refers to a facility for which DOE no longer has a mission need. Many of these facilities pose high risk to workers and/or the environment. Delayed cleanup increases risk as well as cost. OREM and UCOR initiated a Working Group on Excess Facilities to identify and prioritize activities that are needed to enhance worker safety, minimize further degradation of the facilities, and reduce the environmental risk. Six Excess Contaminated Facilities projects on the ORR were identified as priorities. Three of the projects are located at ORNL - the Building 7500 Homogenous Reactor Experiment, the Building 3026 Radioisotope Development Laboratory and Buildings 3028/3029 Isotope Facilities. At Y-12, priority excess facilities include the Column Exchange Equipment (COLEX), the Alpha-4 Lithium Enrichment Facility and the Biology Complex Research Facilities. Work on these projects is aimed at stabilization of degraded higher risk facilities, characterization of conditions and hazards, removal of hazardous materials and placement of the facility in the lowest risk condition possible pending demolition. At the same time, DOE and UCOR are preparing to undertake a comprehensive program to remediate the presence of mercury in the water stemming from historical operations at the Y-12 National Security Complex. Over decades of operations, mercury migrated into the environment. Deteriorating conditions of large post-operation mercury-use buildings may be contributing to additional releases. Mercury cleanup is a high priority for Y-12 and the Oak Ridge Reservation. UCOR is completing the final design on a new Mercury Treatment Facility with construction expected to begin in late 2017. When constructed the treatment facility will reduce the amount of mercury in local waters, lower environmental contamination levels and serve as a guard against future releases. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Sodium and Lithium Hydride Shields At the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Reservation - 18412

URS-CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR) is responsible for cleanup of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Formerly known as the K-25 site, the facility enriched uranium for major defense and energy programs for more than 40 years. DOE is seeking the safest, most environmentally protective and fiscally responsible treatment for its large inventory of radioactive-contaminated metals known as 'shields'. The 66 sodium and lithium shields were constructed for use in experiments at the Tower Shielding Facility (TSF), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The TSF operated from 1954 to 1992 and was designed and built for radiation-shielding studies. The shield containers are constructed of aluminum or stainless steel of varying sizes and shapes that were then filled with either sodium metal or lithium hydride material. The historical records indicate the sodium shields were constructed at the Molten Salt Reactor for use in experiments in the 1971 time frame, while the lithium shields were constructed at the Y-12 site and were used in experiments as early as 1961. A subset of the sodium and lithium shields contain depleted uranium. The sodium and lithium shields were initially used at the TSF to perform in-depth measurements of the neutron transport through the shield materials. Based on process knowledge, the shields are managed as radiologically contaminated containers. Efforts have been made over the last fifteen years to find recycle markets for both the sodium and lithium hydride shields. This includes an onsite operation that was initiated at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in 2004. After an operational exothermic reaction incident occurred soon after startup, the onsite ETTP recycling action was discontinued and a search for offsite recycling facilities was initiated. In 2016, the Y-12 National Security Complex was contacted regarding recycle/repurpose of the lithium shields; however, the lithium was determined to not be acceptable for their current repurpose process. To date, no offsite recycling outlets have been identified. Recent progress on the waste disposal actions, a shipment of 22 small sodium shields have been shipped and treated offsite. Therefore, the current shield inventory consists of 29 sodium shields located at ETTP and 15 sodium and lithium hydride shields staged at ORNL. The time period needed to reasonably identify safe disposition or recycling outlets for the shields was expected to exceed the one-year Land Disposal Restrictions storage time limit; therefore, approval was received to add the shields to the Site Treatment Plan (STP) in March, 2017. Until a disposition path is found, the shields will continue to be stored in a safe configuration that is protective of human health and the environment. This engineering evaluation identifies and screens the alternatives for dispositioning the shields at the Oak Ridge(ORR). Four alternatives were evaluated including; (1) macro-encapsulation, (2) deactivation, (3) recycle and (4) leave-in-place. An initial screening was performed, and the alternative passing the initial screening are then evaluated in more detail. The evaluation criteria used included environmental risk, technical feasibility, administrative feasibility, worker safety, nuclear safety, transportation safety, and cost. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Dounreay (UK) Shaft and Silo Decommissioning - Remote Handling in an Extreme and Uncertain Environment - 18420

DSRL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Cavendish Dounreay Partnership Ltd, a consortium of Cavendish Nuclear, CH2M and AECOM. It is funded by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) to deliver the site closure programme. Today, Dounreay is a site of construction, demolition and waste management, all of it designed to return the site to an interim end state. Dounreay is recognised as the most complex nuclear site closure project in Europe. The experimental nature of many of the sites redundant facilities means the clean-up and demolition requires innovation as well as great care. It is driving innovation in the approach to remote handling and robotics in the highly complex, hazardous and uncertain environment, all within tight financial constraints by UK Government. Veolia Nuclear Solutions (VNS) is instrumental in delivery of the overall solutions for the shaft and silo decommissioning project working with other members of industry and directly for DSRL to deliver the overall concept design for waste treatment as well as specialised equipment to recover highly hazardous and uncertain materials in this unique project. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Technical Advances for Sustainable Remediation: In Situ Monitoring and Climate Resiliency - 18436

Recent advances in sustainable remediation techniques show promise as solutions for contaminant removal in soil and groundwater media. Although passive remediation (or natural attenuation) has gained momentum as an acceptable technique, there are still challenges in regulatory frameworks as well as in public acceptance. Leaving contaminants in subsurface requires increased burden of proof to show that plumes are stable and residual contaminants do not pose a significant health risk. Climate changes and frequent extreme climate events contribute another level of complexity and make it difficult to demonstrate system stability and predict future plume conditions. In this study, we show two coupled approaches to tackle this challenge: (1) in situ groundwater monitoring based on advanced sensor and data analytics technologies (i.e., Big Data), and (2) state-of-art modeling for optimizing monitoring and site closure strategies. In the new monitoring approach, in situ sensors are used to continuously measure the key variables that control contaminant plume mobility and its spatial and temporal distribution (such as pH, redox potential, electrical conductivity, and groundwater level). Coupled with a limited number of groundwater sampling, the data analytics methods - data mining and machine learning - allow us to estimate contaminant concentrations, and also to detect any significant changes associated with the plume mobility. In parallel, the state-of-art numerical flow and reactive transport model - ASCEM software under DOE Office of Environmental Management - provides a physical and mechanistic understanding of the system behavior, and predicts the long-term plume migration for optimizing the monitoring and closure strategies. In particular, we focus on the effects of extreme precipitation or drought on the site closure as well as monitoring strategies. We demonstrate this approach at the Savannah River Site (SRS) F-Area, where groundwater is contaminated by various radionuclides, including uranium, tritium and technetium. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

ATLAS: Story Maps for Communicating Groundwater Cleanup Status - 18510

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manages one of the largest groundwater cleanup efforts in the world in terms of the number of plumes, diversity of contaminants, volume of affected groundwater, and diversity of hydrogeologic settings. The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) has been collecting site-specific data on plume sizes, remedial approaches, exit strategies, long-term stewardship requirements, and regulatory drivers at all DOE sites, and summarizing them in a single document to communicate high-level information on groundwater contamination and cleanup status to DOE managers. Recently, EM has sponsored an effort to transfer the document-based information to an online resource for collating information on groundwater plumes that is easily accessible by interested parties. Specifically, Web GIS story maps have been developed to provide a robust geospatial visualization of plumes at DOE sites using an intuitive interface that allows users to explore plume maps, explanatory text, photographs, and video provided within the story maps. This collection of story maps is called ATLAS (Assembly of Tools for Learning Actions and Status), and not only communicates groundwater plume data for each individual site, but also summarizes pertinent metrics across all EM sites. With ATLAS, sites with similar settings, contamination, or remedial approaches can be easily identified, facilitating effective communication among DOE sites and sharing of individual successes and lessons learned. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Five Years of 200 West Pump and Treat Facility Operation Success - 18519

The 200 West Pump and Treat (P and T), on the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site, in Richland, Washington has a 9,464 liters per minute capacity designed to capture and treat an 8 km{sup 2} contaminated groundwater plume and reduce the mass of contaminants of concern (COCs) by 95 percent in 25 years. Treatable contaminants include both radioactive and non-radioactive compounds. After five years of continuous operation, the 200 West P and T treated over 17 billion liters of contaminated groundwater and removed over 337,000 kg of nitrate, 12,800 kg of carbon tetrachloride, 180 kg of uranium, and 10 curies of technetium-99 activity. Thirty one extraction wells strategically installed across the plumes pull contamination in from surrounding areas directing contaminated groundwater to the 200 West P and T for treatment. The 200 West P and T successfully removes contaminants to below cleanup levels which are at (or lower than) the drinking water standard. Twenty eight injection wells return treated water to the aquifer providing flow-path control to mitigate migration of contamination toward the Columbia River, a source of drinking water to the communities downstream. Contaminant concentrations in most monitoring wells are declining and the remedy is on target for accomplishing the mass removal goal ahead of schedule. In 2015, the 200 West P and T was expanded to include treatment for uranium from other operable units. With the uranium treatment expansion, the 200 West P and T is capable of cost-effectively treating contaminated groundwater beneath the 194 square kilometer (km{sup 2}) Central Plateau. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board - How a Recommendation Comes to Life - 18523

The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) is a federally appointed citizens' panel that provides independent advice and recommendations to the DOE's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OREM). To provide unbiased evaluation and recommendations on DOE's cleanup efforts related to the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), the board seeks opportunities for input through collaborative dialogue with the communities surrounding the Oak Ridge Reservation, Governmental regulators, and other stakeholders. This paper describes how a recommendation from the ORSSAB comes to life. There are two stages to the board's process, the planning stage and the execution stage. The planning stage begins several months prior to the start of the fiscal year (FY). During this planning stage OREM develops a list of issues that it would like input from the community on. The EPA and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) act as consulting parties and provide their input in the form of letters to the board. ORSSAB holds a planning meeting in August, where DOE EM, EPA and TDEC present their suggestions to the board. The board members have opportunity to ask questions and hold discussions on the issues presented but can also present issues of their own. DOE then takes the input from the meeting and develops the ORSSAB Work Plan for the next FY. The execution stage begins with the ORSSAB Work Plan which sets the issues for each month and the specific dates of the activities associated with each issue. The remaining elements of the execution stage include: presentations by DOE OREM at the monthly ORSSAB Meetings, field trips (as appropriate), and additional discussion at the monthly subcommittee meeting of the EM/Stewardship Committee. Early in the FY, members of the ORSSAB are given the opportunity to sign up to be involved with the potential development of a recommendation for the various issues on the Work Plan that interest them and to provide support as an issue manager. Then at the EM/Stewardship Committee Meeting the issue manager is assigned to lead the issue group and a decision is made as to whether to make a recommendation on the specific issue. The issue group prepares the recommendation for discussion and approval by the EM/Stewardship Committee. Once the EM/Stewardship Committee has reached consensus on the wording for the recommendation, the EM/Stewardship Committee Chair presents the recommendation to the ORSSAB Executive Committee for discussion and approval. The Executive Committee then approves the recommendation for presentation and discussion at the next month's ORSSAB General Meeting, providing opportunity for discussion by the full board. The ORSSAB may approve the recommendation as is, approve it with changes, or it may send the recommendation back to the EM/Stewardship Committee for further consideration. Once approved by the full ORSSAB, the recommendation is sent to DOE OREM for consideration. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Incorporation of 40 CFR 192 as an ARAR when Implementing MARSSIM (USACE Input to the MARSSIM Committee for MARSSIM Revision 2) - 18526

One example special case for Final Status Surveys (FSSs) occurs at Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA) sites at which the radioactive materials are from the processing of uranium or thorium ores for their source material content. At these sites, EPA's Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings, in 40 CFR 192, are applicable. Also, 40 CFR 192 may be invoked at non-UMTRCA sites through the CERCLA as an Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement (ARAR) due to the presence of radium (Ra)-226 or Ra-228, even though the source of residual radioactive material was not a uranium or thorium mill tailings facility. However, the regulatory requirements in these standards infringe on some of the recommendations in the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). Specifically, the soil cleanup standards for Ra-226 or Ra-228 are specified as averages over an area of 100 square meters (m{sup 2}). Note that in the 40 CFR 192 rulemaking, an averaging area of 100 m{sup 2} was used as a reasonable footprint for a home. One goal of the 40 CFR 192 standards was to protect future homes from indoor radon, and the specified averaging area was a component implemented for the protection of health. In addition, 40 CFR 192 is silent regarding elevated measurement criteria (EMC)-type requirements for smaller areas of elevated radioactive material within the 100-m{sup 2} footprint. At UMTRCA sites and CERCLA sites where UMTRCA is an ARAR, the following approach for FSSs is acceptable: - Survey units (SUs) may be classified, as appropriate, and survey activities may be adjusted accordingly for Class 1, Class 2, or Class 3 SUs. - Class 1 soil SUs should provide for evaluation of portions that are no greater than 100 m{sup 2} in size, consistent with the 40 CFR 192 standards. - Class 2 and 3 soil SUs are not expected to exceed the 40 CFR 192 soil cleanup standard, so they do not require evaluation of portions that are no greater than 100 m{sup 2} in size. - Compliance with 40 CFR 192 can be demonstrated through analysis of soil samples or composite soil samples from each SU, in conjunction with gamma radiation scanning or in situ gamma radiation measurements of each SU. When appropriate, these gamma radiation scans or in situ measurements correlated to soil sampling may be used in place of soil sampling. - By demonstrating that the average over 100 m{sup 2} meets the 40 CFR 192 soil cleanup standard, the EMC criteria for small elevated areas of activity are not required for the purposes of MARSSIM, but may be developed. These minor modifications to the standard MARSSIM radiological survey approach are acceptable for UMTRCA sites or CERCLA sites where UMTRCA is an ARAR. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗