Successful In Situ Remediation of Cr(VI)-Impacted Deeper Vadose Zone Soils for Groundwater Protection - 18603
Shallow soil at a former industrial wood treating facility was impacted with chromium, arsenic, and copper above cleanup goals and shallow soil has been excavated for protection of direct contact exposure pathways. Deeper vadose zone soil was predominantly impacted with chromium and was undergoing remediation for long-term groundwater protection. The 920-meter (m) long Cr(VI) groundwater plume has undergone full-scale remediation with groundwater recirculation and in situ bioremediation. Following approximately 4 years of operation, the Cr(VI) groundwater plume, with former source area groundwater concentrations over 10,000 micrograms per liter (μg/L), has been reduced to below the laboratory method reporting limit (0.50 μg/L). Approximately 23,000 cubic meters (m{sup 3}) of deeper (4.5 m - 11 m below ground surface, bgs) vadose zone soil required Cr(VI) remediation. The remediation strategy relied on reduction of Cr(VI) and geochemical fixation as trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and iron hydroxide precipitates. Chromium reduction was facilitated by a carbon source (corn syrup and methanol) to establish and maintain biogeochemical reducing conditions and ferrous iron to support direct Cr(VI) chemical reduction. Combined, the injected soil moisture, carbon source and ferrous iron supported fast and sustained ferrous/ferric iron cycling and Cr(VI) reduction. Remedy performance monitoring included time-series water quality data from a network of vacuum lysimeters and confirmation soil borings. Reagent was applied either through liquid injection wells and direct-push injection points, or by deep soil mixing methodology in areas with difficult geology (i.e., fine-grained soils and discontinuous iron-silica hardpan layer). Following both phases of deep soil remediation, soils met long-term protection of groundwater remediation action objectives. In situ treatment of soils provides a cost-effective remedial solution compared to excavation, specifically when impacts are deep and long-term protection of groundwater is a primary remediation goal. The delivery methods employed in this case study can be applied to sites impacted with a broad range of contaminants amendable to geochemical fixation (e.g., chromium, uranium, strontium, nitrate, etc.). (authors)