Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,135 records · Page 63

Design of Novel Flash Ironmaking Reactors for Greatly Reduced Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions

The development of a novel ironmaking technology based on fine iron ore concentrate in a flash reactor is summarized. The design of potential industrial reactors for flash ironmaking based on the computational fluid dynamics technique is described. Overall, this simulation work has shown that the size of the reactor used in the novel flash ironmaking technology (FIT) can be quite reasonable vis-à-vis the blast furnaces. A flash reactor of 12 m diameter and 35 m height with a single burner operating at atmospheric pressure would produce 1.0 million tons of iron per year. The height can be further reduced by either using multiple burners, preheating the feed gas, or both. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based design of potential industrial reactors for flash ironmaking pointed to a number of features that should be incorporated. The flow field should be designed in such a way that a larger portion of the reactor is used for the reduction reaction but at the same time excessive collision of particles with the wall must be avoided. Further, a large diameter-to-height ratio that still allows a high reduction degree should be used from the viewpoint of decreased heat loss. This may require the incorporation of multiple burners and solid feeding ports.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Modeling the First Hydrogen Direct Reduction Pilot Reactor for Ironmaking in the USA Using Finite Element Analysis and Its Validation Using Pilot Plant Trial Data

Direct reduction of hematite pellets with hydrogen (H 2 ) was used to produce directly reduced iron (DRI) in a pilot scale reactor at a pellet feed rate of 21.4 kg/h. At a steady state, operational parameters of the pilot plant (gas recycling rate and inlet temperature) along with key reactor output parameters, the pellet metallization, and the internal temperature profile of the reactor were reported for two scenarios with high recycle and low recycle rate of H 2 . Scenario 1, with a high recycle rate of 400 L/min H 2 along with external heating of 870 °C, gave an average metallization of 91.8%, while Scenario 2, with low recycle rate of 100 L/min H 2 and external heating of 850 °C gave a metallization of 67.8% due to the higher moles of H 2 available for reduction and the external energy required for the endothermic reduction reaction in Scenario 1 as compared with Scenario 2. Finite element analysis was used to build a model of the shaft reactor, which was validated against the metallization and internal temperature profile data. The average metallization values predicted by the model were very close to the metallization values obtained from the pilot plant samples, with 90.9% average metallization for Scenario 1 and 65.6% average metallization for Scenario 2. The internal temperature profiles in the lower region of the reactor obtained from the model were very close to these pilot plant data, with a maximum difference of 52.7 °C and 67.6 °C for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. The pilot plant reactor model was used extensively in the commissioning of the pilot plant and to predict the startup outcomes for a given set of operating parameters.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Advanced Reactors Thermal Energy Transport for Process Industries

The operation temperature of advanced nuclear reactors is generally higher than commercial light water reactors and thermal energy from advanced nuclear reactor can be used for various purposes such as liquid fuel production, district heating, desalination, hydrogen production, and other process heat applications, etc. Some of the major technology challenges that must be overcome before the advanced reactors could be licensed on the reactor side are qualification of next generation of nuclear fuel, materials that can withstand higher temperature, improvement in power cycle thermal efficiency by going to combined cycles, SCO2 cycles, successful demonstration of advanced compact heat exchangers in the prototypical conditions, and from the process side application the challenge is to transport the thermal energy from the reactor to the process plant with maximum efficiency (i.e., with minimum temperature drop). The main focus of this study is on doing a parametric study of efficient heat transport system, with different coolants (mainly, water, He, and molten salts) to determine maximum possible distance that can be achieved.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Annular core liquid-salt cooled reactor with multiple fuel and blanket zones

A liquid fluoride salt cooled, high temperature reactor having a reactor vessel with a pebble-bed reactor core. The reactor core comprises a pebble injection inlet located at a bottom end of the reactor core and a pebble defueling outlet located at a top end of the reactor core, an inner reflector, outer reflector, and an annular pebble-bed region disposed in between the inner reflector and outer reflector. The annular pebble-bed region comprises an annular channel configured for receiving pebble fuel at the pebble injection inlet, the pebble fuel comprising a combination of seed and blanket pebbles having a density lower than the coolant such that the pebbles have positive buoyancy and migrate upward in said annular pebble-bed region toward the defueling outlet. The annular pebble-bed region comprises alternating radial layers of seed pebbles and blanket pebbles.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

The Need for Cyber-Informed Engineering Expertise for Nuclear Research Reactors

Engineering disciplines may not currently understand or fully embrace cyber security aspects as they apply towards analysis, design, operation, and maintenance of nuclear research reactors. Research reactors include a wide range of diverse co-located facilities and designs necessary to meet specific operational research objectives. Because of the nature of research reactors (reduced thermal energy and fission product inventory), hazards and risks may not have received the same scrutiny as normally associated with power reactors. Similarly, security may not have been emphasized either. However, the lack of sound cybersecurity defenses may lead to both safety and security impacts. Risk management methodologies may not contain the foundational assumptions required to address the intelligent adversary’s capabilities in malevolent cyber attacks. Although most research reactors are old and may not have the same digital footprint as newer facilities, any digital instrument and control function must be considered as a potential attack platform that can lead to sabotage or theft of nuclear material, especially for some research reactors that store highly enriched uranium. This paper will provide a discussion about the need for cyber-informed engineering practices that include the entire engineering lifecycle. Cyber-informed engineering as referenced in this paper is the inclusion of cybersecurity aspects into the engineering process. A discussion will consider several attributes of this process evaluating the long-term goal of developing additional cyber safety basis analysis and trust principles. With a culture of free information sharing exchanges, and potentially a lack of security expertise, new risk analysis and design methodologies need to be developed to address this rapidly evolving (cyber) threatscape.

CCE↗

Systems and methods for enhancing isolation of high-temperature reactor containments

A high-temperature containment-isolation system for transferring heat from a nuclear reactor containment to a high-pressure heat exchanger is presented. The system uses a high-temperature, low-volatility liquid coolant such as a molten salt or a liquid metal, where the coolant flow path provides liquid free surfaces a short distance from the containment penetrations for the reactor hot-leg and the cold-leg, where these liquid free surfaces have a cover gas maintained at a nearly constant pressure and thus prevent high-pressures from being transmitted into the reactor containment, and where the reactor vessel is suspended within a reactor cavity with a plurality of refractory insulator blocks disposed between an actively cooled inner cavity liner and the reactor vessel.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Fail-safe reactivity compensation method for a nuclear reactor

The present invention relates generally to the field of compensation methods for nuclear reactors and, in particular to a method for fail-safe reactivity compensation in solution-type nuclear reactors. In one embodiment, the fail-safe reactivity compensation method of the present invention augments other control methods for a nuclear reactor. In still another embodiment, the fail-safe reactivity compensation method of the present invention permits one to control a nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor through a method that does not rely on moving components into or out of a reactor core, nor does the method of the present invention rely on the constant repositioning of control rods within a nuclear reactor in order to maintain a critical state.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Reactivation of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Neutron Radiography Program

Reactivation of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Neutron Radiography Program The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility is a 19,000 MW reactor located at the Idaho National Laboratory designed to perform transient testing on nuclear fuel experiments and materials. A neutron radiography facility was installed with the first radiograph being produced in 1967 that utilized the indirect (or transfer) method of neutron radiography to examine irradiated nuclear fuels and experiment test loops. The TREAT neutron radiography facility performed approximately 5,000 radiographs by the spring of 1977. The original radiography facility was upgraded in 1974-1975 to correct previous deficiencies and to improve capabilities. In 1986, an upgraded aperture was installed to increase the resolution of images followed by a major reactor upgrade completed in 1988. Overall, the existing neutron radiography system was in good working order. Originally built in 1958, the TREAT Facility was in operation until it was placed in a shutdown status in 1994. Following the Fukishima disaster and seeing a need for enhanced accident tolerant fuels, the United Stated Department of Energy decided to restart the TREAT facility and resume transient operations. In November 2017, the TREAT reactor was successfully restarted and is currently performing operational testing in preparation for initial experiment irradiations and transient testing. This paper reports on efforts to reactivate the TREAT neutron radiography station. A few minor shielding and system improvement upgrades have been completed along with the installation of a dedicated room for computed radiography equipment. Detailed beam characterization work was not performed following the last reactor upgrade. To characterize the neutron beam, gold foil activation measurements were made to determine an average neutron flux and flux profile. Additional multi-foil activation measurements will be made to calculate the energy spectrum. An open beam image will be taken that will provide the information about variations in the beam profile. A series of system qualification shots will also take place to accurately determine the effective image quality and image acquisition parameters. Full operational status of the TREAT neutron radiography system is scheduled for late summer of 2018.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Core and Fuel Cycle Performance of a Molten Salt Fast Reactor

This paper discusses the reactor core design and modeling approaches for a specific molten salt fast reactor (MSFR) design that is started up with high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) within a chloride fuel salt and focuses on the technical assumptions and design choices. These include the fuel salt properties, first core and make-up heavy metal requirements, fuel composition evolution, equilibrium fission product concentration, etc. This MSFR concept was developed as part of a wider study that sought to compare the fuel cycle performance tradeoffs between deploying a fleet of sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs) and deploying a fleet of MSFRs. MSFRs that use flowing liquid fuel salt and on-line salt processing are of particular interest because these technology characteristics are significantly different from those of SFRs and can lead to major differences in fuel cycle impacts. The goal of this study was not to draw general conclusions based on a direct comparison of two very specific point designs for an SFR and MSFR, but rather to use this example MSFR design and associated parametric studies to gain insight into the key technology characteristics that impact fuel cycle performance as it relates to resource utilization (i.e., uranium consumption). The MSFR reactor physics, fission product removal, and fuel salt mass flows were modeled using Argonne’s recently-developed molten salt reactor (MSR) analysis tools while the time-dependent fuel cycle performance of this specific reactor was compared to that of a representative SFR design using the fuel cycle system dynamics code DYMOND.

chloride salt↗

A Revised Capsule Design for the Accelerated Testing of Advanced Reactor Fuels

Testing of fast reactor fuel is currently challenging because of the thermal neutron spectrum of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and the fact that ATR coolant is substantially below typical temperatures found in liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Despite these issues, since 2003 the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has successfully tested a variety of metallic, oxide, and nitride fuels for fast reactor applications. There are, however, opportunities to improve the experiments so that the time required to reach a desired burnup can be reduced, and so the sensitivity of the experiments to fabrication tolerances can be minimized. A revised capsule design exploits the use of smaller diameter rodlets to increase power densities and correspondingly reduce the irradiation time required to reach high burnup. Thermal and nuclear analyses indicate that the time to reach 30at% burnup could be reduced from about 12 years to approximately 2-3 years if the fuel diameter is reduced by one-half and to around 1-2 years if the diameter is reduced by one-third. In addition, reducing fuel diameter improves the radial power distribution in the fuel without the use of cadmium shrouding. This observation opens up the possibility of testing advanced reactor fuel systems in Small I locations in the ATR where there is substantial unused capacity. Although not directly tied to a revised capsule design, post-irradiation furnace testing is proposed to provide time-to-failure data that will be helpful in the benchmarking of fuel performance models and in assessing the performance of new fuel designs relative to more standard fast reactor fuel systems. In this paradigm, ATR irradiation experiments will be viewed more as preparation for furnace testing than as experiments that exist in isolation. An added benefit to furnace testing is that uncertainties in temperatures will significantly be reduced relative to non-instrumented capsules in the ATR. The time and cost in developing this experimental capability is expected to be reduced considerably because of the availability of the blister anneal furnace used by the HPRR program. A key issue in the experiment approach is the potential for non-prototypical rodlet dimensions to influence the observed performance of a given fuel design. For example, a qualitative assessment indicates that the effects of fuel-cladding chemical interactions during furnace testing might be more pronounced in reduced diameter rodlets simply because thinner cladding would be more sensitive to a given depth of fission product penetration. In a traditional empirically-driven approach to fuel qualification, any change from prototypical behavior is undesirable because the resulting data cannot easily be assimilated into a statistical correlation. However, in the current approach, systematic variations in fuel diameter provide the opportunity to benchmark fuel performance models over a wider range of parameter space, which in turn is expected to improve understanding and result in better, more physically based models in the long term.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Non-invasive in-situ imaging of interior of nuclear reactors

Techniques, systems, and devices are disclosed for non-invasive monitoring and imaging of nuclear fuel inside a nuclear reactor using muon detector arrays. In one aspect, these detector arrays are placed outside the reactor vessel or building for investigating the reactors without access to the cores, therefore the imaging process is non-invasive. In some implementation, these detector arrays measure both muon scattering and absorption to enable imaging and characterizing not only the very high-Z fuel materials, but also other materials in the reactor, thereby obtaining a more complete picture of reactor status. When applied to damaged reactors, the disclosed proposed techniques, systems, and devices, through the process of providing an image, can reveal the presence (or absence) of damage to fuel rod assemblies or puddles of molten fuel at the bottom of the containment vessel, thus providing crucial information to guide decisions about remedial actions.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Coupling of Pronghorn and RELAP-7 for a Pebble Bed Reactor

High temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGR) are a candidate for timely Gen-IV reactor technology deployment because of high technology readiness and walk-away safety. Among HTGRs, pebble bed reactors (PBRs) have attractive features such as low excess reactivity and online refueling. Pebble bed reactors pose unique challenges to analysts and reactor designers such as continuous burnup distribution depending on pebble motion and recirculation, radiative heat transfer across a variety of gas-filled gaps, and long design basis transients such as pressurized and depressurized loss of forced circulation. Modeling and simulation is essential for both the PBR’s safety case and design process. In order to verify and validate the new generation codes the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Data bank provide a set of benchmarks data together with solutions calculated by the participants using the state of the art codes of that time. An important milestone to test the new PBR simulation codes is the OECD NEA PBMR-400 benchmark which includes thermal hydraulic and neutron kinetic standalone exercises as well as coupled exercises and transients scenarios. In this work, the reactor multiphysics code MAMMOTH and the thermal hydraulics code Pronghorn, both developed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) within the multiphysics object-oriented simulation environment (MOOSE), have been used to solve Phase 1 exercises 1 and 2 of the PBMR-400 benchmark. The steady state results are in agreement with the other participants’ solutions demonstrating the adequacy of MAMMOTH and Pronghorn for simulating PBRs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Fail-safe reactivity compensation method for a nuclear reactor

The present invention relates generally to the field of compensation methods for nuclear reactors and, in particular to a method for fail-safe reactivity compensation in solution-type nuclear reactors. In one embodiment, the fail-safe reactivity compensation method of the present invention augments other control methods for a nuclear reactor. In still another embodiment, the fail-safe reactivity compensation method of the present invention permits one to control a nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor through a method that does not rely on moving components into or out of a reactor core, nor does the method of the present invention rely on the constant repositioning of control rods within a nuclear reactor in order to maintain a critical state.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Irradiation Experiments and Thermal Analysis for Reactor System Design and Analysis at INL

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is the nation's lead nuclear laboratory working to enhance reactor systems' safety, security, economics, and efficiency. Research and development (R&D) programs at INL support the current fleet of nuclear reactors for safer operation and newer reactors technology design, development, demonstration, and deployment. A major focus of INL's mission is the reactor system design and analysis supported by the irradiation experiments and thermal analysis of advanced and current-generation nuclear fuels and materials. The irradiation experiments and thermal analysis provide a deeper understanding of basic radiation damage processes that can determine the basis for performance improvements and verification of modeling assumptions. These experiments and analyses include experiment management: design, fabrication, characterization, irradiation, and post-irradiation examination. This research involves thermal, neutronic, and material investigation using the INL's Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facilities. The results from these experiments and analysis are required to develop the regulatory basis for deploying new or modified fuels and materials. This seminar talk will also provide a general overview of the INL's research facilities, ongoing research programs, core capabilities, and opportunities for students and faculties.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

2020 Status Report - Research Reactor Infrastructure Program

This presentation will discuss the purpose and scope of the Department of Energy - Research Reactor Infrastructure (RRI) Program. Personnel involved in the program will be introduced and contact information will be provided for team member. Information will be provided to conference attendees as to the status of the core activities of the program. These activities include fresh fuel element fabrication and spent nuclear fuel shipment returns to the DOE. Current and future issues pertinent to the RRI program will also be presented. The RRI program maintains fuels support contracts and provides nuclear reactor fuel at no or low cost to 24 U.S. universities operating a total of 25 reactor facilities. These facilities include: - Twelve TRIGA facilities - Eight plate fueled facilities - Three AGN facilities - One Pulstar fueled facility - One Critical facility The title for the fuel remains with the United States government and when the universities are finished with the fuel, the fuel is returned to the United States government for long-term storage. Mission of the Research Reactor Infrastructure Program: The Research Reactor Infrastructure Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy and is managed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho. The program goals are: - Keep all U.S. operating university reactor programs supplied with nuclear fuel. - Provide assistance for movement of irradiated nuclear fuel from U.S. universities, after the DOE receipt facility authorizes the fuel receipt.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Decommissioning an Active Historical Reactor Facility at the Savannah River Site - 13453

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is an 802 square-kilometer United States Department of Energy (US DOE) nuclear facility located along the Savannah River near Aiken, South Carolina, where Management and Operations are performed by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS). In 2004, DOE recognized SRS as structure within the Cold War Historic District of national, state and local significance composed of the first generation of facilities constructed and operated from 1950 through 1989 to produce plutonium and tritium for our nation's defense. DOE agreed to manage the SRS 105-C Reactor Facility as a potentially historic property due to its significance in supporting the U.S. Cold War Mission and for potential for future interpretation. This reactor has five primary areas within it, including a Disassembly Basin (DB) that received irradiated materials from the reactor, cooled them and prepared the components for loading and transport to a Separation Canyon for processing. The 6,317 square meter area was divided into numerous work/storage areas. The walls between the individual basin compartments have narrow vertical openings called 'slots' that permit the transfer of material from one section to another. Data indicated there was over 830 curies of radioactivity associated with the basin sediments and approximately 9.1 M liters of contaminated water, not including a large quantity of activated reactor equipment, scrap metal, and debris on the basin floor. The need for an action was identified in 2010 to reduce risks to personnel in the facility and to eliminate the possible release of contaminants into the environment. The release of DB water could potentially migrate to the aquifer and contaminate groundwater. DOE, its regulators [U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-Region 4 and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC)] and the SC Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) agreed/concurred to perform a non-time critical removal action for the In Situ Decommissioning (ISD) of the 105-C Disassembly Basin. ISD consisted of stabilization/isolation of remaining contaminated water, sediment, activated reactor equipment, and scrap metal by filling the DB with underwater non-structural grout to the appropriate (-4.877 meter) grade-level, thence with dry area non-structural grout to the final -10 centimeter level. The roof over the DB was preserved due to its potential historical significance and to prevent the infiltration of precipitation. Forced evaporation was the form of treatment implemented to remove the approximately 9.1 M liters of contaminated basin water. Using specially formulated grouts, irradiated materials and sediment were treated by solidification/isolation thus reducing their mobility, reducing radiation exposure and creating an engineered barrier thereby preventing access to the contaminants. Grouting provided a low permeability barrier to minimize any potential transport of contaminants to the aquifer. Efforts were made to preserve the historical significance of the Reactor in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. ISD provides a cost effective means to isolate and contain residual radioactivity from past nuclear operations allowing natural radioactive decay to reduce hazards to manageable levels. This method limits release of radiological contamination to the environment, minimizes radiation exposure to workers, prevents human/animal access to the hazardous substances, and allows for ongoing monitoring of the decommissioned facility. Field construction was initiated in August 2011; evaporator operations commenced January 2012 and ended July 2012 with over 9 M liters of water treated/removed. Over 8,525 cubic meters of grout were placed, completing in August 2012. The project completed with an excellent safety record, on schedule and under budget. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Radiochemical Methodology Applied To Determination of gamma-Emitting Radionuclides In Waste Samples From IEA-R1 Reactor - 17265

The Brazilian reactor IEA-R1 has been in operation since 1957. It is an open pool-type nuclear research reactor, operating at 2 to 5 MW that uses water as coolant, moderator and biological shield. Polypropylene filter cartridges are part of the water treatment system of the reactor and become radioactive as they remove suspended solid material from the cooling water during the operation of the reactor. Annually, the replacement of the filters from the reactor's water treatment system generates about 36 units. The development of a method for the characterization of the radionuclides present in the filters is required for routine operation in the Radioactive Waste Management Facility (RWMF) in order to determine the radioisotopic inventory of the waste packages. Wastes from nuclear reactors contain transuranic elements, activation and fission products, only few of them emitting gamma radiation measurable by simple gamma scanning methods. The method of the Scaling Factors (SF) uses empirically determined proportions between the concentrations of Difficult to Measure (DTM) radionuclides and that of easily measurable gamma emitters called Key Nuclide (KN), to calculate DTM concentrations. The objective of this study is to describe a method of the dissolution of the filter cartridges for determination of gamma emitting radionuclides. To determine the activity of a sample by means of of gamma spectrometry, it is necessary previous knowledge of the efficiency curve for a given geometry, which can be obtained by calibrating the efficiency and energy of the detector. The need to dissolve the filter cartridges has arisen given the difficulty in obtaining a standard source with the same filter geometry. Therefore, for this work, the calibration curve was constructed using a mixed gamma-ray standard with known activities, same geometry, density, physical state and chemical composition of the source to be analyzed. A sample with background count (BG) was prepared and analyzed under the same conditions as the samples and the result was subtracted from the results obtained for each filter sample. After many tests, it was possible to establish a method for the dissolution of filter cartridges for the determination of gamma-emitting radionuclides. A mixed gamma-ray standard was produced in liquid form, containing the following radionuclides: {sup 241}Am, {sup 137}Cs and {sup 60}Co, which have photo-peaks at the following energies: 59.54, 661.66 and 1332.49 keV, respectively. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Thermal-Hydraulic design of a Fluoride High-Temperature Demonstration Reactor

The Fluoride salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) 'Demonstration Reactor' (DR) is a novel reactor concept using molten salt coolant and tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fuel that is being investigated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The objective of the FHR DR is to advance the technology readiness level of FHRs. The FHR DR will demonstrate the technologies needed to close remaining gaps to commercial viability. The FHR DR will have a thermal power of 100 MWt, very similar to the Small modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor (SmAHTR), another FHR ORNL concept with a power of 125 MWt. The FHR DR shares features with the ORNL Advanced High Temperature Reactor (AHTR), which has a power of 3400 MWt and is cooled by a molten salt. The FHR DR combines three existing technologies: (1) high-temperature, low-pressure molten salt coolant, (2) high-temperature coated particle TRISO fuel, and (3) passive decay heat cooling systems using direct reactor auxiliary cooling systems (DRACS). This paper presents FHR DR thermal-hydraulic design calculations. The FHR DR design concept is being investigated by ORNL. Thermal-hydraulic calculations performed with the codes COMSOL and RELAP5-3D were used to determine the potential thermal and hydraulic characteristics of the concept. These results show that the FHR DR should be able to demonstrate the efficacy of the passive decay heat removal using DRACS, which is a key safety feature in a number of proposed FHR designs. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗