Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ENGINE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,135 records · Page 63
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Optical Engine Lockout System Design and Operation

Engine run days in the Diesel Combustion and Fuel Effects Lab are hectic. The long mental lists that must be kept by engine operators, paired with the tight time constraints between experiments, can cause operational issues that may be dangerous to personnel and/or cause damage to test equipment. Until now, a paper sign has been used to warn operators not to motor the engine when a foreign object has been placed inside of it. Unfortunately, this simple administrative control has failed in the past, motivating this effort to develop an improved system. The lockout system described in this document introduces an engineering control that, when activated, actually prevents the engine from being motored. The new system consists of a primary and a secondary control panel. Prior to an operator placing a foreign object into the cylinder, they press a button on the secondary control panel near the engine. This breaks the interlock circuit for the engine dynamometer and activates LEDs on both control panels to notify operators that a foreign object is present within the engine cylinder. Once the work is done and all foreign objects have been removed from the combustion chamber, two operators must be present to disable the system by simultaneously pressing the buttons on the primary and secondary control panels. Requiring a second operator to disable the system increases accountability and reduces the likelihood of potentially costly mistakes.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of Engineered Form MOFs CaSDB and HKUST-1

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) have studied different sorbents for the purpose of separating krypton (Kr) and xenon (Xe). PNNL has researched various metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that have characteristics theoretically suitable for the separation. Based on computational analysis, PNNL chose Calcium–4,4’–sulfonyl dibenzoate (CaSDB) and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology MOF1 (HKUST–1). The raw MOFs are supplied in a powder form and must be incorporated into a robust engineered form to be viable for gas separation. In 2016, PNNL produced an engineered form of CaSDB by compressing and grinding the raw MOF material. This form was sent to INL for adsorption testing. Gentle mechanical agitation of the compressed form produced a large amount of powder, resulting in the conclusion that the form was not viable for the application. In 2019, INL successfully produced two engineered forms, CaSDB–EF1 and HKUST–EF2, by incorporating the active MOF powders into a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) binder. PNNL also produced two engineered forms, CaSDB–10pmma and HKUST–10pmma, by using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as a binder. Surface area analysis indicated that the forms could be viable for separations in which the CaSDB–EF1 retained 84% of the raw CaSDB surface area and CaSDB–10pmma retained 48%. HKUST–EF2 retained all the raw HKUST–1 surface area, whereas HKUST–10pmma retained only 28%. Mechanical stability testing demonstrated that the PMMA forms formed a fine powder whereas, the PAN forms did not. In general, adsorption testing showed that CaSDB–10pmma had a lower Xe breakthrough capacity than CaSDB–EF1, but a higher saturation capacity at both room temperature and at 253 K. The CaSDB MOF was intended to be used as a room temperature sorbent to capture Xe. However, both CaSDB engineered forms displayed relatively short initial break through times. Reduced temperature increased the Xe capacity of both engineered forms. HKUST–1 was expected to be effective only at sub-zero temperatures. At 195 K, HKUST–10pmma had an initial Xe breakthrough capacity of 119 mmol/ kg, compared to HKUST–EF2 at 339 mmol/ kg. The saturation capacities were 275 and 383 mmol/ kg, respectively. HKUST–10ppm also had a lower Kr capacity of 1.7 mmol/kg, whereas the HKUST–EF had a Kr capacity of 3 mmol/ kg. Test results indicate that the PAN engineered forms are a more suitable choice for the complete separation of Xe and Kr, due to the increase in initial breakthrough capacity. CaSDB allows rapid breakthrough of Kr and Xe regardless of the type of engineered form. At 253 K, it is more viable, but is still not the most effective sorbent. HKUST–EF2 demonstrated viability for Xe capture at 195 K, which may merit further study, however it may be cost prohibitive.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS2015

Affordable Development and Demonstration of a Small NTR Engine and Stage: A Preliminary NASA, DOE, and Industry Assessment

The Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) represents the next evolutionary step in cryogenic liquid rocket engines. Deriving its energy from fission of uranium-235 atoms contained within fuel elements that comprise the engine's reactor core, the NTR can generate high thrust at a specific impulse of approx. 900 seconds or more - twice that of today's best chemical rockets. In FY'11, as part of the AISP project, NASA proposed a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) effort that envisioned two key activities - "Foundational Technology Development" followed by system-level "Technology Demonstrations". Five near-term NTP activities identified for Foundational Technology Development became the basis for the NCPS project started in FY'12 and funded by NASA's AES program. During Phase 1 (FY'12-14), the NCPS project was focused on (1) Recapturing fuel processing techniques and fabricating partial length "heritage" fuel elements for the two candidate fuel forms identified by NASA and the DOE - NERVA graphite "composite" and the uranium dioxide (UO2) in tungsten "cermet". The Phase 1 effort also included: (2) Engine Conceptual Design; (3) Mission Analysis and Requirements Definition; (4) Identification of Affordable Options for Ground Testing; and (5) Formulation of an Affordable and Sustainable NTP Development Strategy. During FY'14, a preliminary plan for DDT&E was outlined by GRC, the DOE and industry for NASA HQ that involved significant system-level demonstration projects that included GTD tests at the NNSS, followed by a FTD mission. To reduce development costs, the GTD and FTD tests use a small, low thrust (approx. 7.5 or 16.5 klbf) engine. Both engines use graphite composite fuel and a "common" fuel element design that is scalable to higher thrust (approx. 25 klbf) engines by increasing the number of elements in a larger diameter core that can produce greater thermal power output. To keep the FTD mission cost down, a simple "1-burn" lunar flyby mission was considered along with maximizing the use of existing and flight proven liquid rocket and stage hardware (e.g., from the RL10-B2 engine and Delta Cryogenic Second Stage) to further ensure affordability. This paper provides a preliminary NASA, DOE and industry assessment of what is required - the key DDT&E activities, development options, and the associated schedule - to affordably build, ground test and fly a small NTR engine and stage within a 10-year timeframe.

Nuclear rocket engines↗
NASA NTRS2016

Modeling of Highly Instrumented Honeywell Turbofan Engine Tested with Ice Crystal Ingestion in the NASA Propulsion System Laboratory

The Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL), an altitude test facility at NASA Glenn Research Center, has been used to test a highly instrumented turbine engine at simulated altitude operating conditions. This is a continuation of the PSL testing that successfully duplicated the icing events that were experienced in a previous engine (serial LF01) during flight through ice crystal clouds, which was the first turbofan engine tested in PSL. This second model of the ALF502R-5A serial number LF11 is a highly instrumented version of the previous engine. The PSL facility provides a continuous cloud of ice crystals with controlled characteristics of size and concentration, which are ingested by the engine during operation at simulated altitudes. Several of the previous operating points tested in the LF01 engine were duplicated to confirm repeatability in LF11. The instrumentation included video cameras to visually illustrate the accretion of ice in the low pressure compressor (LPC) exit guide vane region in order to confirm the ice accretion, which was suspected during the testing of the LF01. Traditional instrumentation included static pressure taps in the low pressure compressor inner and outer flow path walls, as well as total pressure and temperature rakes in the low pressure compressor region. The test data was utilized to determine the losses and blockages due to accretion in the exit guide vane region of the LPC. Multiple data points were analyzed with the Honeywell Customer Deck. A full engine roll back point was modeled with the Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) code. The mean line compressor flow analysis code with ice crystal modeling was utilized to estimate the parameters that indicate the risk of accretion, as well as to estimate the degree of blockage and losses caused by accretion during a full engine roll back point. The analysis provided additional validation of the icing risk parameters within the LPC, as well as the creation of models for estimating the rates of blockage growth and losses.

Simulation↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA Systems Engineering Handbook

The update of this handbook continues the methodology of the previous revision: a top-down compatibility with higher level Agency policy and a bottom-up infusion of guidance from the NASA practitioners in the field. This approach provides the opportunity to obtain best practices from across NASA and bridge the information to the established NASA systems engineering processes and to communicate principles of good practice as well as alternative approaches rather than specify a particular way to accomplish a task. The result embodied in this handbook is a top-level implementation approach on the practice of systems engineering unique to NASA. Material used for updating this handbook has been drawn from many sources, including NPRs, Center systems engineering handbooks and processes, other Agency best practices, and external systems engineering textbooks and guides. This handbook consists of six chapters: (1) an introduction, (2) a systems engineering fundamentals discussion, (3) the NASA program project life cycles, (4) systems engineering processes to get from a concept to a design, (5) systems engineering processes to get from a design to a final product, and (6) crosscutting management processes in systems engineering. The chapters are supplemented by appendices that provide outlines, examples, and further information to illustrate topics in the chapters. The handbook makes extensive use of boxes and figures to define, refine, illustrate, and extend concepts in the chapters.

ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT; HANDBOOKS; MANAGEMENT METH↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned in Systems Engineering Availability and Recommendations for Mission Technical Leaders

In spaceflight missions at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), the Mission System Engineer (MSE) is the technical leader of the overall engineering team and also is the Independent Engineering Technical Authority. The responsibility of this role includes the definition of the mission design architecture, concept of operations, and mission requirements, management of risk throughout the development, and verification and validation of the final system performance and function amongst other duties. This responsibility inherently requires time management, enabling focus on a balanced development with appropriate risk. Time is the most valuable resource of the MSE. The system engineer’s availability to interact with the development team (often product or component design leads and technicians, often in different worksites) to discover and mitigate mission risks during development is key to mission success. This paper presents examples from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, Landsat 9, and Neutron star Interior Composition ExploreR (NICER) which represent in-house and out-of-house hardware builds. These examples demonstrate how interactions between the Mission Systems Engineers and other project and partner engineers result in discovery of critical risks, leading to early mitigation with significant cost and performance savings. These three missions would have suffered test failures or on-orbit failures had their MSEs not set aside time to visit engineers and technicians that were working on key pieces of space flight hardware. Availability is more than just time; it is openness to listen to concerns and questions. It begins by building a level of trust in the team that it is safe to ask questions or share concerns without the fear of blame or additional workload. It also requires enabling informal conversations (over lunch, coffee, in the clean room, or at the team members desk, etc.) where key information can be exchanged, and team members may even provide an easy-to-implement mitigation idea for another subsystem. Availability is a highly valuable commodity and completely non-obvious to protect and optimize. The natural tendency of engineers is to keep themselves busy with solving problems that they know about. This paper is encouraging MSEs to resist this tendency to try and solve all the complex problems themselves and actively devote daily time to learning and solving problems that are found with informal communications with other team members.

Lessons Learned↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

How to Educate Decision Makers on the Value and Necessity of Modal Testing and Model Correlation: Tips for Young Engineers

Engineers need to effectively communicate the justification and value of their modal testing and model correlation in terminology familiar to decision makers as it relates to the program’s risk tolerance. This communication must relate to the program’s risk tolerance and the metrics used to judge the performance of both the program and individual decision makers. The challenge is the terminologies familiar to engineers and decision makers are quite different and seemingly unrelated. The engineering profession has developed a specific terminology to solve highly technical issues, which are many times themselves unique to very specific engineering problems. It is all too easy for engineers to believe that everyone in their organization, including the decision makers, has an intrinsic understanding of what they do and the value it brings to the program’s success. This is especially true for young engineers who have recently spent the last four plus years in an academic engineering learning environment, which has a highly technical research oriented atmosphere. Effective communication with decision makers is increasingly important as the technical breadth and practical program and project experience level for up and coming decision makers diminishes. It is not unusual for the decision makers to have technical knowledge in a domain different from structural dynamics (e.g., electronics or systems). Competition among satellite manufactures has increased the focus on programmatic cost and ability to deliver on schedule. NASA programs are also seeing more restrictive programmatic cost and schedule constraints, which impact both analysis and testing. It should also be noted that a comprehensive suite of tests are required to verify a satellite’s design capability with some margin. These tests include static strength verification tests, shock, acoustic, and vibration tests (sine and random) of systems, subsystems, and components. Each of these verification tests provide opportunities for model correlation and risk reduction. It is important to recognize dynamic loads/modal test models may not include all of the flight hardware (i.e., harness, coax, waveguides, connectors, etc.) and the previously mentioned tests are still required for qualification/verification of the design. This paper provides tips to young engineers on how to bridge this communications gap, have a better understanding of the environment in which decision makers operate, and assist them to better support successful missions. While this paper primarily focuses on modal testing and model correlation as related to spacecraft missions, the concepts and recommendations presented here are equally applicable to other fields such as aeronautics, automotive, power generation, etc.

Decision Maker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

How to Educate Decision Makers on the Value and Necessity of Modal Testing and Model Correlation: Tips for Young Engineers

Engineers need to effectively communicate the justification and value of their modal testing and model correlation in terminology familiar to decision makers as it relates to the program’s risk tolerance. This communication must relate to the program’s risk tolerance and the metrics used to judge the performance of both the program and individual decision makers. The challenge is the terminologies familiar to engineers and decision makers are quite different and seemingly unrelated. The engineering profession has developed a specific terminology to solve highly technical issues, which are many times themselves unique to very specific engineering problems. It is all too easy for engineers to believe that everyone in their organization, including the decision makers, has an intrinsic understanding of what they do and the value it brings to the program’s success. This is especially true for young engineers who have recently spent the last four plus years in an academic engineering learning environment, which has a highly technical research oriented atmosphere. Effective communication with decision makers is increasingly important as the technical breadth and practical program and project experience level for up and coming decision makers diminishes. It is not unusual for the decision makers to have technical knowledge in a domain different from structural dynamics (e.g., electronics or systems). Competition among satellite manufactures has increased the focus on programmatic cost and ability to deliver on schedule. NASA programs are also seeing more restrictive programmatic cost and schedule constraints, which impact both analysis and testing. It should also be noted that a comprehensive suite of tests are required to verify a satellite’s design capability with some margin. These tests include static strength verification tests, shock, acoustic, and vibration tests (sine and random) of systems, subsystems, and components. Each of these verification tests provide opportunities for model correlation and risk reduction. It is important to recognize dynamic loads/modal test models may not include all of the flight hardware (i.e., harness, coax, waveguides, connectors, etc.) and the previously mentioned tests are still required for qualification/verification of the design. This paper provides tips to young engineers on how to bridge this communications gap, have a better understanding of the environment in which decision makers operate, and assist them to better support successful missions. While this paper primarily focuses on modal testing and model correlation as related to spacecraft missions, the concepts and recommendations presented here are equally applicable to other fields such as aeronautics, automotive, power generation, etc.

Decision Maker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transient Optimization of a Gas Turbine Engine

Gas turbine engines are the primary power plants for modern commercial aircraft. Transients prompted by significant changes in thrust or power demand are common and unavoidable. Extreme transient scenarios such as those associated with a go-around during a landing attempt are possible and must be accounted for in the design of the engine and its controller. Engine transients tend to cause a reduction in compressor operability margin, which must be addressed by the engine control system and accounted for in the engine design to prevent events such as compressor stall/surge and combustor blow out. Transient operability concerns typically lead to compromises in the engine design that sacrifice efficiency and/or limit responsiveness. Transient operability is typically managed by logic that limits the fuel flow command. If this logic is not optimized, then the potential for valuable performance could be lost. This study presents a strategy for optimizing the transient limit logic and proposes a strategy for updating the control logic over the lifespan of the engine. The results demonstrate significant improvements in transient operability. For example, of the results at sea level static conditions demonstrated a 31% reduction in the usage of the high pressure compressor operability stack during a snap acceleration transient. Furthermore, a reinforcement learning algorithm is demonstrated to modify the transient logic as the engine degrades to minimize response time while respecting a prescribed compressor operability margin limit. A simple demonstration of the reinforcement learning algorithm resulted in a thrust response time reduction of ~11.8%.

transient↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transient Optimization of a Gas Turbine Engine

Gas turbine engines are the primary power plants for modern commercial aircraft. Transients prompted by significant changes in thrust or power demand are common and unavoidable. Extreme transient scenarios such as those associated with a go-around during a landing attempt are possible and must be accounted for in the design of the engine and its controller. Engine transients tend to cause a reduction in compressor operability margin, which must be addressed by the engine control system and accounted for in the engine design to prevent events such as compressor stall/surge and combustor blow out. Transient operability concerns typically lead to compromises in the engine design that sacrifice efficiency and/or limit responsiveness. Transient operability is typically managed by logic that limits the fuel flow command. If this logic is not optimized, then the potential for valuable performance could be lost. This study presents a strategy for optimizing the transient limit logic and proposes a strategy for updating the control logic over the lifespan of the engine. The results demonstrate significant improvements in transient operability. For example, of the results at sea level static conditions demonstrated a 31% reduction in the usage of the high pressure compressor operability stack during a snap acceleration transient. Furthermore, a reinforcement learning algorithm is demonstrated to modify the transient logic as the engine degrades to minimize response time while respecting a prescribed compressor operability margin limit. A simple demonstration of the reinforcement learning algorithm resulted in a thrust response time reduction of ~11.8%.

transient↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transient Optimization of a Gas Turbine Engine

Gas turbine engines are the primary power plants for modern commercial aircraft. Transients prompted by significant changes in thrust or power demand are common and unavoidable. Extreme transient scenarios such as those associated with a go-around during a landing attempt are possible and must be accounted for in the design of the engine and its controller. Engine transients tend to cause a reduction in compressor operability margin, which must be addressed by the engine control system and accounted for in the engine design to prevent events such as compressor stall/surge and combustor blow out. Transient operability concerns typically lead to compromises in the engine design that sacrifice efficiency and/or limit responsiveness. Transient operability is typically managed by logic that limits the fuel flow command. If this logic is not optimized, then the potential for valuable performance could be lost. This study presents a strategy for optimizing the transient limit logic and proposes a strategy for updating the control logic over the lifespan of the engine. The results demonstrate significant improvements in transient operability. For example, of the results at sea level static conditions demonstrated a 31% reduction in the usage of the high pressure compressor operability stack during a snap acceleration transient. Furthermore, a reinforcement learning algorithm is demonstrated to modify the transient logic as the engine degrades to minimize response time while respecting a prescribed compressor operability margin limit. A simple demonstration of the reinforcement learning algorithm resulted in a thrust response time reduction of ~11.8%.

transient↗
DOE OSTI2018

Method of making an aero-derivative gas turbine engine

A method of making an aero-derivative gas turbine engine (100) is provided. A combustor outer casing (68) is removed from an existing aero gas turbine engine (60). An annular combustor (84) is removed from the existing aero gas turbine engine. A first row of turbine vanes (38) is removed from the existing aero gas turbine engine. A can annular combustor assembly (122) is installed within the existing aero gas turbine engine. The can annular combustor assembly is configured to accelerate and orient combustion gasses directly onto a first row of turbine blades of the existing aero gas turbine engine. A can annular combustor assembly outer casing (108) is installed to produce the aero-derivative gas turbine engine (100). The can annular combustor assembly is installed within an axial span (85) of the existing aero gas turbine engine vacated by the annular combustor and the first row of turbine vanes.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Development of a Physics-Based Combustion Model for Engine Knock Prediction

The objective of this project is to improve the prediction of engine knock by developing a new combustion modeling framework. Engine knock is a limiting factor to constrain the increase of fuel efficiency for spark ignition (SI) engines in most passenger cars. Efforts to increase fuel efficiency, increasing the compression ratio or downsizing, lead to the increase in the tendency of the knock occurrence. The knock is an undesired ignition of the end-gas, unburned fuel/air mixture ahead of the spark-ignited premixed flame, resulting in rapid in-cylinder pressure rises and engine damages. The combustion modeling framework developed in this project can consider turbulence-chemistry interactions during end-gas ignition, while using a reasonably detailed chemical mechanism developed for ignition and combustion reactions under engine relevant conditions, and the subtle characteristics of spark-ignited flame propagation. It is developed in the context of large eddy simulation (LES), which can capture stochastic in-cylinder processes. The developed model is incorporated into a commercial software for engine simulation, CONVERGE CFD, as a user defined function, and validated. Engine knock and knock-free experiments as well as direct numerical simulation (DNS) of end-gas ignition in homogeneous turbulence are performed to help model development and provide data sets for model validation. With further validation, the developed model is expected to advance the predictive capability for engine knock simulations and thus contribute to improving the fuel efficiency.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Effect of EGR on Knock Suppression, Efficiency, and Emissions in a Stoichiometric, Spark Ignited, Natural Gas Engine

Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is widely employed on internal combustion engines for NOx reduction and knock suppression. In this study a comprehensive analysis was performed to determine the effect of EGR on efficiency, emissions, and knock suppression of stoichiometric, spark ignited, natural gas engines. Tests were conducted using a single cylinder, variable compression ratio, cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine at 900 RPM, engine load of 800 kPa indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP), and stoichiometric conditions. The tests were performed using a custom EGR system capable of providing a range of EGR displacement rates from 0% to 40% of the intake charge at engine power levels between 1.5 and 3.5 kW. The experimental measurements included the variance of EGR rate, compression ratio, boost pressure, and location of 50% mass fraction burned (CA50). CA50 was controlled with ignition timing using a Woodward Large Engine Control Module. The use of EGR was found to expand the knock limit, while reducing NOx emissions and increasing engine efficiency as much as 4.5% through increased compression ratio and power density. The highest EGR rate that demonstrated beneficial gains on the CFR engine was 23%; the optimal EGR rate was found to be 19%.

Cooperative Fuel Research Engine, Exhaust Gas Reci↗
DOE OSTI2022

New Directions for Chemical Engineering

Over the past century, the work of chemical engineers has helped transform societies and the lives of individuals, from the synthetic fertilizers that helped feed the world to the development of novel materials used in fuels, electronics, medical devices, and other products. Chemical engineers' ability to apply systems-level thinking from molecular to manufacturing scales uniquely positions them to address today’s most pressing problems, including climate change and the overuse of resources by a growing population. New Directions for Chemical Engineering details a vision to guide chemical engineering research, innovation, and education over the next few decades. This report calls for new investments in U.S. chemical engineering and the interdisciplinary, cross-sector collaborations necessary to advance the societal goals of transitioning to a low-carbon energy system, ensuring our production and use of food and water is sustainable, developing medical advances and engineering solutions to health equity, and manufacturing with less waste and pollution. The report also calls for changes in chemical engineering education to ensure the next generation of chemical engineers is more diverse and equipped with the skills necessary to address the challenges ahead.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and M↗
DOE OSTI2023

SPC-70486 Rev 0 Stirling Engine Prototype Performance Specification

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is developing a small microreactor to produce electrical power utilizing a small nuclear core and Stirling engines under the Microreactor Application Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) program. The purpose of this performance specification is to define requirements to build and test the Stirling Engine prototype, including interfacing with Kinnetech in the development/test of the engines. This specification includes prototyping components only and are not for use in the reactor. Prototype testing is a preliminary test to be conducted with conceptual equipment from which a final design will be developed. The results of the testing defined herein will not be used as a qualification test. The Stirling Engines have an engine controller module (QEC). Currently, the QEC doesn’t have a means to stop the engine. An analog controlled engine braking system must be developed and tested with the engine prototype. Any conflict between this specification and any supplementary specifications in the procurement documents requires written clarification from the Contractor prior to proceeding with any work. Any deviation from the procurement documents requires approval by the Contractor with the change request process.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Investigation of Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Internal Combustion Engine Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

The understanding, modeling and control of the cycle-to-cycle variation (CCV) in the modern internal combustion engine (ICE) is a key scientific challenge to achieve stable engine operation. High CCV in the engine combustion chamber may contribute to partial burn, misfire and knock, which adversely affects the engine performance and may potentially damage the engine. The objective of the current study is to leverage high-fidelity numerical simulations to improve the understanding of the causes of CCV. Using the massively parallel code, Nek5000, multi-cycle, wall-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) were performed for the General Motors (GM), Transparent Combustion Chamber (TCC-III) optical engine under motored operating conditions. Further, the large-scale structures of the in-cylinder flow were investigated using a triple proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) technique to explore the characteristics of different parts of the flow and their contributions to CCV. The kinetic energy of the subset of flow structures were determined and correlated between the intake and compression strokes. The insights from the analysis of the large-scale flow structures will be used to assist the development of improved engine designs with reduced CCV and enhance the engine performance.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Understanding fuel anti-knock performances in modern SI engines using fundamental HCCI experiments

Modern spark-ignition (SI) engine technologies have considerably changed in-cylinder conditions under which fuel autoignition and engine knock take place. In this paper, fundamental HCCI engine experiments are proposed as a means for characterizing the impact of these technologies on the knock propensity of different fuels. In particular, the impacts of turbocharging, direct injection (DI), and downspeeding on operation with ethanol and gasoline are investigated to demonstrate this approach. Results reported earlier for ethanol and gasoline on HCCI combustion are revisited with the new perspective of how their autoignition characteristics fit into the anti-knock requirement in modern SI engines. For example, the weak sensitivity to pressure boost demonstrated by ethanol in HCCI autoignition can be used to explain the strong knock resistance of ethanol fuels for turbocharged SI engines. Further, ethanol's high sensitivity to charge temperature makes charge cooling, which can be produced by fuel vaporization via direct injection or by piston expansion via spark-timing retard, very effective for inhibiting knock. On the other hand, gasoline autoignition shows a higher sensitivity to pressure, so only very low pressure boost can be applied before knock occurs. Gasoline also demonstrates low temperature sensitivity, so it is unable to make as effective use of the charge cooling produced by fuel vaporization or spark retard. These arguments comprehensively explain literature results on ethanol's substantially better anti-knock performance over gasoline in modern turbocharged DISI engines. Fundamental HCCI experiments such as these can thus be used as a diagnostic and predictive tool for knock-limited SI engine performance for various fuels. As a result, examples are presented where HCCI experiments are used to identify biofuel compounds with good potential for modern SI-engine applications.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗