Progress on Resolution of Technical Issues at the Hanford Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant Project - 16285
The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Pretreatment (PT) Facility has a number of first-of-a-kind technical challenges that have required additional expert analysis and testing activities to resolve. In 2006 an External Flowsheet Review Team identified 28 technical vulnerabilities with the plant design or future operability. Over a period of three months starting in September 2012, a number of top scientists and engineers conducted a review of the major technical issues associated with the design and operability of the WTP. These experts also provided independent advice on some of the broader challenges associated with completing the Hanford tank waste mission - highlighting the linkage between the physical and chemical properties of the tank waste and the PT Facility technical issues. In 2012 and early 2013 DOE's Office of River Protection (ORP) directed the WTP contractor to suspend production work on the Pretreatment Facility until the outstanding technical issues could be resolved and the nuclear safety basis could be updated and brought into alignment with any updates to the facility design and/or process flowsheet. Specific plans for resolving each the technical issues have been developed and significant progress has been made over the past year in identifying solution sets for each of the issues. The eight remaining technical issues (referred to as T1 to T8) are as follows: (T1) Hydrogen Gas Release from Vessel Solids; (T2) Potential Criticality in Pretreatment Facility Vessels; (T3) Hydrogen in Piping and Ancillary Vessels; (T4) Pulse-Jet Mixing and Control; (T5) Erosion and Localized Corrosion in WTP Vessels and Piping; (T6) Design Redundancy in Black Cells/In-Service Inspection; (T7) Black Cell Vessel Structural Integrity; (T8) Facility Ventilation. This paper provides a synopsis of the progress that has been made on resolving the Pretreatment technical issues over the past year, and how resolution of the issues will enable DOE to make an informed decision to resume design and production engineering for the Pretreatment Facility. (authors)