Improved Creep-Fatigue Models on Advanced Materials for SFR Applications (Final Report)
This report provides an update on the materials performance criteria and methodology relevant to sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs). The report is the second deliverable (Level 2) in FY11 (M2A11AN040303) under the work package A-11AN040303 “Materials Performance Criteria and Methodology” as part of the Advanced Structural Materials Program for the Advanced Reactor Concepts. The overall objective of the Materials Performance Criteria and Methodology work project is to evaluate the key requirements for the ASME Code qualification and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval of advanced structural materials in support of the design and performance of sodium-cooled fast reactors. Advanced materials are a critical element in the development of fast reactor technologies. Enhanced materials performance not only improves safety margins and provides design flexibility, but also is essential for the economics of future advanced fast reactors. Qualification and licensing of advanced materials are prominent needs for the development and implementation of advanced fast reactor technologies. Nuclear structural component designs in the U.S. comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code Section III (Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components), and the NRC grants licensing. As the SFRs will operate at higher temperatures than the current light water reactors (LWRs), the design of elevated-temperature components must comply with ASME Section III Subsection NH (Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service). A number of technical issues relevant to materials performance criteria and high temperature design methodology in the SFR were identified and presented in earlier reports. A viable approach to resolve these issues and the R&D priority were also recommended. The development of mechanistically based creep-fatigue interaction models for life prediction and reliable data extrapolation was chosen to be the central focus in near-term efforts. Our current focus is on the creep-fatigue damage issue in high-strength ferritic/martensitic steels such as mod.9Cr-1Mo (G91) and NF616 (G92) steels. The current ASME creep-fatigue design rule puts severe limits of fatigue and creep loads for G91 steel, the lead structural material for fast reactors. High-strength ferritic/martensitic steels behave fundamentally differently from austenitic stainless steels, for which the current ASME creep-fatigue design rules were developed. The unique deformation and damage characteristics in G91 steel, e.g. cyclic softening, degradation of creep and rupture strength during cyclic service, demands a new creep-fatigue design procedure that explicitly accounts for the material’s unique creep-fatigue behavior. G92 steel, a variant of G91 steel, is the lead candidate in the Advanced Alloy Development program. There is currently no creep-fatigue design rule available for this advanced alloy. To support the predictive model development and resolve the over-conservative issue with the ASME design rule for G91 steel, we recovered stress relaxation data from thirteen creep-fatigue tests conducted in the late 1980s and early 1990s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and conducted extensive data analysis in FY10. Based on this database and available literature data, we have developed a Cyclic Softening Model and a Stress Relaxation Model specifically applied to G91 steel. The Cyclic Softening Model describes the cyclic stress variation as a function of cycle number during creep-fatigue loading, and well captures the cyclic softening effect in G91 steel. The Stress Relaxation Model predicts the stress relaxation curve during the hold time of cyclic loading, and its dependence on the cyclic softening effect of G91 steel. Two creep-fatigue test systems have been set up to conduct model-oriented creep-fatigue experiments. Results from three creep-fatigue experiments on Heat 30176 of G91 steel are presented in the report: (1) a test performed at 550°C with total strain amplitude of 0.25% and a hold time of 60 s applied at peak strains in both tension and compression, (2) a test performed at 400°C with total strain amplitude of 0.5% and a tension and compression hold time of 60 s, and (3) a test performed at 20°C with total strain amplitude of 0.5% and a tension and compression hold time of 60 s. Three different test temperatures were chosen for two primary reasons: to determine the transition temperature of creep-fatigue interaction from a plasticity-dominated process to a creep-dominated process; to develop unified creep-fatigue models applicable for a wide range of temperatures. With the detailed information obtained in the creep-fatigue experiments, we have further refined the Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model. The Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model were incorporated into the Bilinear Creep-Fatigue Damage Model, forming a powerful framework for the life prediction by an improved creep-fatigue evaluation methodology. The cyclic softening and consecutive stress relaxation responses in G91 steel can be considered for each cycle of the entire cyclic process in the model calculation. The creep-fatigue damage in G91 steel was evaluated using the improved Bilinear Creep-Fatigue Damage Model without any safety margins. It was found that due to the significant cyclic softening in G91 steel, the unit creep damage in each cycle decreased continuously with increasing number of cycles. This continuous change in creep damage with cycling has significant implication in the evaluation of the total creep-fatigue damage. The total creep damage can be one order of magnitude lower when the unit creep damage at half-life was used in the evaluation in comparison with the calculations using the unit creep damage at cycle 10. An important conclusion was that the accurate assessment of the creep-fatigue damage in G91 steel must consider the history of cycling. This analysis provides a more realistic assessment of creep-fatigue damage and identifies critical factors that must be considered in the development of future advanced models for high-strength ferritic/martensitic alloys. An accelerated creep-fatigue testing methodology is proposed for the design of model-oriented experiments to guide and validate model developments. Future work will focus on creep-fatigue experiments of both G91 and G92 steels, and development of creep-fatigue models applicable to advanced ferritic/martensitic alloys. The Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model will be improved by incorporating microstructural parameters of dislocation density, subgrain structure, and second-phase particles. Collaborative modeling of combined Cyclic Softening Model, Stress Relaxation Model, and Interactive Damage Rate Model will be pursued for life prediction under creep-fatigue loading with extended hold time. Accelerated, well-controlled creep-fatigue tests will be conducted to provide high-quality experimental data to refine key material parameters and validate models.