Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “sample”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,117 records · Page 62
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 30H (HTF-30-18-54, -55), Tank 32H (HTF-32-18-56, -57), and Tank 37H (HTF-37-18-58, -59) Samples for Support of the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H to support the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator system. The six samples from Tanks 30H, 32H, and 37H all contain highly concentrated salt solution s with sodium concentrations ranging from 7.89 M to 15.0 M. The samples from Tank 30H show small differences in the concentrations of the major cations and anions between the surface sample and VDS. The two Tank 32H samples show significant differences in the concentrations of the major anions and cations with the VDS being nearly twice as concentrated as the surface sample. The surface sample and VDS from Tank 37H contain very similar compositions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Analytical Results from the Salt Batch 10 Routine DSSHT and SEHT Monthly Samples

Strip Effluent Hold Tank (SEHT) and Decontaminated Salt Solution Hold Tank (DSSHT) samples from several of the “microbatches” of Integrated Salt Disposition Project (ISDP) Salt Batch (“Macrobatch”) 10 have been analyzed for 238Pu, 90Sr, 137Cs, elemental constituents (Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy - ICPES), and in some cases anions (Ion Chromatography Anions - IC-A). The included tables contain the data. These samples are from Salt Batch 10 material recently introduced into the Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) system. The DSSHT results are typical for this type of sample, although the dilution due to processing is lower than expected. The August sample is known to have incorporated large amounts of rain water and cannot be compared to other DSSHT samples. The SEHT sample results are typical except for the May sample which is known to have rain water and Contactor Drain Tank (CDT) material in it.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Preparation of Four Large-format Hot Isostatically Pressed I-AgZ Waste Form Samples for Performance Testing

Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) is being considered as a process to directly convert 129 I-bearing materials to a durable radiological waste form. Zeolites, specifically silver-exchanged mordenite (AgZ), have been studied extensively as potential radioactive iodine sorbents and will contain 129 I as chemisorbed AgI, a relatively insoluble compound with a high melting point. Oak Ridge National Laboratory has conducted several recent studies on the HIP of both I–AgZ and other iodine-bearing zeolites, resulting in an inventory of samples prepared with a suite of zeolites with varied iodine incorporation methods, pressing conditions, and sizes. These samples have been made available to researchers at other national laboratories in support of test method development to assess the stability of heterogenous iodine-bearing waste forms. The work described here generated four large-format HIPed I–AgZ samples. These samples are 1.5 in. diameter and 2 in. length and contain 49 g of I–AgZ. Two samples were prepared at an iodine loading of 64 mg I/g I– AgZ, and two samples were prepared at an iodine loading of 135 mg I/g I–AgZ. These two sets of duplicate samples will be made available upon request in support of iodine waste form durability method development efforts.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Characterization Results of SRS Tank 26 Samples FTF-26-19-12 and -13

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) has requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) characterize several samples from the Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank Farm in preparation for Sludge Batch (SB) 10. This report documents the characterization of Tank 26 material received by SRNL in May of 2019. SRR pulled 2 x 200 mL samples (FTF-26-19-12 and FTF-26-19-13) with Tank 26 slurry pumps at 60 inches. Two samples were taken to ensure SRNL has adequate material for the requested analyses. Because both samples were taken at the same time and at the same tank level, SRNL combined the two Tank Farm samples into one sample prior to analyses. Results presented in this report include: weight percent solids, density, elemental composition of supernate and slurry, Cs-137 in supernate and slurry, and slurry total alpha and beta. The sample contained higher than expected total sulfur with a significant insoluble fraction, prompting SRR-E to request a washing study to predict how sulfur will be removed during Tank Farm washing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-20-7, -8) and tank 43H (HTF-43-20-9, -10) samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface sample decreased significantly from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows only small changes in concentration for most major species in the solution from the previous sample. The large differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species within the tank. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample contained a small amount of sludge solids (<1 wt%).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Activation Study of Isotopically Enriched Samples During Neutron Time-of-Flight Measurements

Over the course of a time-of-flight neutron cross section measurement, the sample isotope(s) of interest are irradiated by neutrons and photons. Ideally, the enriched sample will not have any additional radioactivity after the measurement as compared to the baseline detectable radioactivity (0.6 Bq/g) established prior to acquisition of the sample. This document presents the process for estimating the activation of a stable enriched isotope exposed to a mixed photon and neutron source using tools from the SCALE code system developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The report also presents the activation analysis for the isotopes of current interest: 90;91;92;94 Zr. This information is provided for two sets of Zr samples: one set of ZrO 2 samples, and one set of metal Zr samples. It was determined that, following measurements at the GELINA linear accelerator facility, all of the enriched Zr samples would contain less than 0.6 Bq/g of radioactivity within 183 days after irradiation.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Results of the Analyses of SMECT Mercury Sample Collected During Mercury Pump (MB1) Functional Check

A pump added to remove mercury from the sump of the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) in DWPF was successfully tested in 2020, resulting in a sample of contaminated mercury obtained from the Mercury Purification Process (MPP) cell. The mercury in the sump of the SMECT was present as a result of steam stripping of sludge slurry in the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) at DWPF. A schematic of the MPP system provided by DWPF personnel is shown in Appendix A. DWPF personnel supplied the following detailed description of the Hg sampling: “The sample provided is the result of DWPF extraction of mercury by means of the Mercury Pump-Water Cart. The Mercury Pump extracted the sample from the SMECT mercury sump. The pump uses pressurized water to transfer a small amount of mercury to a leachate bucket located at the Lab Mercury cell. The mercury and water were allowed to be self separated, and mercury was gravity decanted from the leachate bucket.” DWPF personnel indicate that the leachate bucket is equipped with both a top stopcock/drain and a lower/bottom stopcock/drain from which the mercury was decanted or drained out, while the separated water layer remained above the mercury during draining. The DWPF customer requested SRNL to analyze the sample for the following: gross alpha/nonvolatile beta analysis and perform a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) per the Environmental Protection Agency's Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846. While the TCLP was preferred, a Total Metals analysis of the eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals was deemed acceptable.2 The analytical data collected on this mercury sample will be used in planning for sample disposition as well to start a profile for future Hg disposition of Hg collected from steam stripping.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-21-95, -96) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-21-97, -98) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows only minor changes in concentration for soluble species in the solution (e.g., Na, Al, Cs-137) relative to the previous sample, but a small decrease in concentrations for species typically associated with sludge solids (e.g., U, Pu, Fe, Si) likely because of a decrease in sludge solids from the previous sample. The large differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species within the tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Intelligent Sampling for Surrogate Modeling, Hyperparameter Optimization, and Data Analysis

Sampling techniques are used in many fields, including design of experiments, image processing, and graphics. The techniques in each field are designed to meet the constraints specific to that field such as uniform coverage of the range of each dimension or random samples that are at least a certain distance apart from each other. When an application imposes new constraints, for example, by requiring samples in a non-rectangular domain or the addition of new samples to an existing set, a common solution is to modify the algorithm currently in use, often with less than satisfactory results. As an alternative, we propose the concept of intelligent sampling, where we devise algorithms specifically tailored to meet our sampling needs, either by creating new algorithms or by modifying suitable algorithms from other fields. Surprisingly, both qualitative and quantitative comparisons indicate that some relatively simple algorithms can be easily modified to meet the many sampling requirements of surrogate modeling, hyperparameter optimization, and data analysis; these algorithms outperform their more sophisticated counterparts currently in use, resulting in better use of time and computer resources.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

IDP Analysis of Tank 9H Mined Well Samples

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank Farm Transfer Control Program Description Document (PDD) requires Inhalation Dose Potential (IDP) testing to determine whether a transfer qualifies as a “HIGH-REM” (> 2.08E+08 rem/gal) or a “LOW-REM” (≤ 2.08E+08 rem/gal) waste transfer. Due to the unexpected presence of solids in a variable depth sample taken from Tank 9H, transfers from salt tanks potentially containing insoluble solids are currently being assessed as sludge slurry transfers. The insoluble solids concentration of such samples were requested to be adjusted to 16.7 wt% for the results to be used to bound future transfers from that tank. Two samples, HTF-09-21-100 and -101, were received from Tank 9H for analysis to determine IDP. The initial percent insoluble solids concentrations of HTF-09-21-100 and -101 were measured at 4.04 wt% and 6.23 wt%, respectively. Sample HTF-09-21-101 was adjusted to a target of at least 16.7 wt% insoluble solids by removing supernate. Analysis measured the adjusted insoluble solids concentration at 19.0 wt%. A representative sample was obtained for analysis. Then, based on calculations, supernate was added back to HTF-09-21-101 to achieve a percent insoluble solids concentration of 17.1 wt%, and a representative sample was collected for analysis. Based on duplicate analyses at 17.1 wt% and 19.0 wt% insoluble solids, the samples contain less than 0.0012 Ci/L of gross alpha activity. Therefore, the Tank 9H material can be transferred as a “LOW REM” transfer.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of the SRNL-Washed Tank 51 Sludge Batch 10 Qualification Sample

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel have been requested to qualify the next sludge batch (Sludge Batch 10 – SB10) for processing at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). To accomplish this task, Savannah River Remediation (SRR) sent SRNL two 3-L samples of Tank 51H slurry to be characterized, washed, and then used in a lab-scale demonstration of the DWPF flowsheet. Sample HTF-51-19-114 was received on January 28, 2020, and HTF-51-20-15 was received on February 4, 2020. SRNL washed the Tank 51H sample per the Tank Farm washing strategy. During washing, material from H Canyon Tanks 16.3 and 16.4 was also added to the Tank 51 samples to simulate canyon discharges subsequent to sampling. A part of the qualification process is extensive radionuclide and chemical characterization of the SRNL-washed Tank 51H slurry. This report documents the chemical characterization of the washed slurry; radiological characterization will be documented in a separate report. The major supernatant components, elements on a weight percent calcined basis, and the weight percent solids of the SRNL-washed sample were comparable to the Tank Farm projections, with the exception of free hydroxide and carbonate. Therefore, this SRNL-washed sample is suitable for further SB10 qualification activities and SRR planning for SB10.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-22-31, -32) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-22-33, -34) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The results indicate the concentrations of most soluble species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased from the previous surface sample. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows changes in concentration for soluble species in the solution with some increasing and some decreasing. The current Tank 38H sub-surface sample contains less sludge solids than the previous sample based on visual appearance. The small differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and sub-surface samples indicate only minimal stratification of solution species within the tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Building 151 NNMA Clean Laboratory Project Soil Sampling and Analysis Plan

This Soil Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) was prepared by the Environmental Function Area (EFA)/Technical Services Department (TSD) of the Environment, Safety & Health (ES&H) Directorate for the Project Management Office (PMO) for the proposed Building 151 NNMA Clean Laboratory Project (project) located immediately south of Building 154. The purpose of the SAP was to describe the procedures for collection and analysis of environmental samples and evaluation of analytical data (chemical and radiological) to determine management options of excavated soil during project construction in accordance with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL) Soils Screening and Management Plan (SSMP) (LLNL, 2022), which is consistent with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance for developing Data Quality Objectives for environmental data (EPA, 2006). The SAP was developed in accordance with the SSMP and based on preliminary design information provided to EFA by PMO. In addition to environmental samples, geotechnical samples will be collected by Consolidated Engineering Laboratories (CEL) on behalf of PMO. Geotechnical samples will be collected from a dedicated geotechnical boring location or co-located with environmental samples. Collection of geotechnical samples is determined by CEL and is therefore not discussed in this SAP.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Characterization Results for the September 2023 Tank Farm 3H Evaporator Overhead Sample

On an annual basis, Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) provides 2H and 3H evaporator overhead samples to Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to be analyzed per Section 5.2 of the Effluent Treatment Project (ETP) Waste Compliance Plan (WCP) and the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). This report presents the average characterization results for the September 2023 3H evaporator overhead sample. The sample was clear and colorless with no visible solids. The results provide measurements for cesium-137 ( 137 Cs), strontium-90 ( 90 Sr), and iodine-129 ( 129 I) with the radionuclide concentration limits specified by the WAC. These analyses were performed in duplicate, and all three measured radionuclide concentrations were within ETP WAC limits. A summary of the analytical results for this 3H evaporator overhead sample includes the following: The measured cesium-137 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged 5.70E+01 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.30E+03 dpm/mL. As seen through historical results, Cs-137 continues to present a decreasing activity since 2020. The strontium-90 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged <2.16E00 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.76E+02 dpm/mL. The iodine-129 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged <9.08E-02 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.00E+00 dpm/mL

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Characterization Results for the October 2024 Tank Farm 3H Evaporator Overhead Sample

On an annual basis, Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) provides 2H and 3H evaporator overhead samples to Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to be analyzed per Section 5.2 of the Effluent Treatment Project (ETP) Waste Compliance Plan (WCP) and the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). This report presents characterization results for the October 2024 3H evaporator overhead sample. The sample was clear and colorless with no visible solids. The results provide measurements for cesium-137 (137Cs), strontium-90 (90Sr), and iodine-129 (129I) with the radionuclide concentration limits specified by the WAC. These analyses were performed in duplicate, and a summary of the analytical results for this 3H evaporator overhead sample includes the following: The measured cesium-137 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged 6.72E+01 dpm/mL, (3.90E+00 %RSD), which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.30E+03 dpm/mL. The strontium-90 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged <2.72E+00 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.76E+02 dpm/mL. The iodine-129 activity in the 3H evaporator overhead sample averaged <1.63E-01 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.00E+00 dpm/mL.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Characterization Results for the August 2025 Tank Farm 2H Evaporator Overhead Sample

On an annual basis, Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) provides 2H and 3H evaporator overhead samples to Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to be analyzed per Section 5.2 of the Effluent Treatment Project (ETP) Waste Compliance Plan (WCP) and the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). This report presents the average characterization results for the August 2025 2H evaporator overhead sample. The sample was clear and colorless with no visible solids. The results provide measurements for cesium-137 ( 137 Cs), strontium-90 ( 90 Sr), and iodine-129 ( 129 I) with the radionuclide concentration limits specified by the WAC. These analyses were performed in duplicate, and all three measured radionuclide concentrations were within ETP WAC limits. A summary of the analytical results for this 2H evaporator overhead sample includes the following: The measured cesium-137 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 3.02E+02 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.30E+03 dpm/mL. The strontium-90 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 3.33E+00 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.76E+02 dpm/mL. The iodine-129 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 1.20E-01 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.00E+00 dpm/mL. Although the measurements for Cs-137 and Sr-90 are lower compared to previous years, the results remain within a similar range to past measurements and are well below the WAC limits. Iodine-129 indicates detectable results compared to previous years, which can be attributed to recent salt batch processing trending close to the WAC limit for saltstone production. However, these results are still below the ETP WAC limit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Cross-section SEM-EDS Analysis of Corroded 316 Steel Samples Using JEOL 6610 SEM

Comparison of SEM images obtained for samples 316H-1, 5, 7, and 10 revealed that samples 1 and 5 were subjected to more corrosion than the other two samples. Pores of an average of 1µm size were also observed scattered near the edge of each sample. Corrosion layer thickness was measured from edge of the corroded surface to the pore region. It was found that 316H-1 and 316H-5 had more corrosion damage with 82.40µm and 100µm respectively. Sample 316H-5 posed a challenge in measuring the corrosion layer thickness due to it breaking off from the parent sample during polishing. Samples 316H-7 and 316H-10 are less corroded with 26.57µm and 39.94µm thickness respectively.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2026

AutoSAC-Automated Sample Activation Calculation on VULCAN

AutoSAC is an automated python program to conduct sample activation calculation immediately after neutron scattering experiment on VULCAN. AutoSAC takes account of sample dimensions, compositions, forms, sample environments, neutron beam configurations, neutron scattering history, and proton charged resolved beam power etc., and uses a simplified method to rapidly estimate the radioactivity at end of beam or after. It generates a draft report per sample and repository of radioactivity per measurement and provides feedback of current radioactivity and decay time back to a neutron proposal Slack channel to inform users immediately on sample handling. It also utilizes either the sample note field in EPICS or sample composition or thickness correction and takes slack prompt or command to conduct post-beam SAC by demand. The program can be shared to be used in other beamlines at spallation neutron source with modified instrument configurations including instrument specific characteristic beam fluxes.

An, Ke [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak ↗