DOE OSTI2019
Recently, a Cambrian explosion of novel, non-volatile memory (NVM) devices known as memristive devices have inspired effort in building hardware neural networks that learn like the brain. Early experimental prototypes built simple perceptrons from nanosynapses, and recently, fully-connected multi-layer perceptron (MLP) learning systems have been realized. However, while backpropagating learning systems pair well with high-precision computer memories and achieve state-of-the-art performances, this typically comes with a massive energy budget. For future Internet of Things/peripheral use cases, system energy footprint will be a major constraint, and emerging NVM devices may fill the gap by sacrificing high bit precision for lower energy. In this work, we contrast the well known MLP approach with the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) or NoProp approach, which uses a large layer of random weights to improve the separability of high-dimensional tasks, and is usually considered inferior in a software context. However, we find that when taking device non-linearity into account, NoProp manages to equal hardware MLP system in terms of accuracy. While also using a sign-based adaptation of the delta rule for energy-savings, we find that NoProp can learn effectively with four to six ’bits’ of device analog capacity, while MLP requires eight bit capacity with the same rule. This may allow the requirements for memristive devices to be relaxed in the context of online learning. By comparing the energy footprint of these systems for several candidate nanosynapses, as well as realistic peripherals, we confirm that memristive NoProp systems save energy compared to MLP systems. Lastly, we show that ELM/NoProp systems can achieve better generalization abilities than nanosynaptic MLP systems when paired with pre-processing layers (which do not require backpropagated error). Collectively, these advantages make such systems worthy of consideration in future accelerators or embedded hardware.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗