The root causes of siting failures in nuclear waste management - 15652
For many decades, the global nuclear industry and associated governments have attempted to establish new facilities for the storage and disposal of nuclear wastes. Success has been rare (France, Sweden and Finland being the examples) and remains elusive for many programs despite attempts to change the selection process in some cases. Success has been aided by local and national consent in the few cases that are proceeding. A small study of several countries lack of success is examined to determine the dominant reasons for such failures. The goal of the study is to inform the planning process for efforts to site new facilities by feeding back some lessons learned from past failed efforts. This limited review of international experience indicates that there is no simple approach available for siting deep geologic disposal or even centralized storage facilities. A number of countries have tried multiple times to find an acceptable site. Two studies [1, 2] clearly indicate that there must be adequate assurance of social as well as technical acceptability for successfully siting such facilities. It is evident that even though the technology and science may be proven, it is the politics and public engagement in siting processes that dominate the failures. However, the detailed reasons within each effort present a richer set of lessons. This paper will summarize the findings and present them such that they can be used to inform future siting efforts by a nation. (authors)