Techno-economic, life-cycle, and socioeconomic impact analysis of enzymatic recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Not Available
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not Available
Not Available
The environmental and economic impacts of implementing a circular economy in plastic waste supply chains are not well understood. The proposed systems analysis framework assesses environmental, social, and economic impacts of plastic waste supply chains in a circular economy. The first objective of this article is to identify datasets, models and knowledge gaps associated with waste plastic supply chain processes, mainly in the U.S. Our literature review indicated that the best datasets exist for virgin plastic resin production, mechanical recycling, landfilling, and incineration, with materials recovery facility being intermediate, and with chemical recycling the lowest. The second objective of this article is to develop an illustrative application of the framework by conducting a preliminary systems analysis of PET bottles with closed-loop recycling. Here, the preliminary systems analysis of PET bottles utilized a linear programming optimization method. Our optimization model indicated that both chemical and mechanical recycling processes are needed to achieve a true circular economy of PET bottles with the least greenhouse gas emissions, specifically reductions of 24% when compared with the linear economy. Good quality and standardized life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis studies are needed to better understand the environmental, economic, and social impacts of advanced sorting and chemical recycling technologies.
Not Available
Evaluating six economic and two environmental performance metrics for recycling of waste PET via solvent-based dissolution–precipitation processes.
Abstract not provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract Here, low‐energy poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) chemical recycling in water: PET copolymers with diethyl 2,5‐dihydroxyterephthalate (DHTE) undergo selective hydrolysis at DHTE sites, autocatalyzed by neighboring group participation, is demonstrated. Liberated oligomeric subchains further hydrolyze until only small molecules remain. Poly(ethylene terephthalate‐ stat ‐2,5‐dihydroxyterephthalate) copolymers were synthesized via melt polycondensation and then hydrolyzed in 150–200 °C water with 0–1 wt% ZnCl 2 , or alternatively in simulated sea water. Degradation progress follows pseudo‐first order kinetics. With increasing DHTE loading, the rate constant increases monotonically while the thermal activation barrier decreases. The depolymerization products are ethylene glycol, terephthalic acid, 2,5‐dihydroxyterephthalic acid, and bis(2‐hydroxyethyl) terephthalate dimer, which could be used to regenerate virgin polymer. Composition‐optimized copolymers show a decrease of nearly 50% in the Arrhenius activation energy, suggesting a 6‐order reduction in depolymerization time under ambient conditions compared to that of PET homopolymer. This study provides new insight to the design of polymers for end‐of‐life while maintaining key properties like service temperature and mechanical properties. Moreover, this chemical recycling procedure is more environmentally friendly compared to traditional approaches since water is the only needed material, which is green, sustainable, and cheap.
Millions of tons of waste polyester plastics, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), end up in the environment as soil and water contaminants. Recent advances in enzymatic polyester degradation have motivated researchers toward biorecycling of plastic wastes. Leaf-branch compost cutinase (LCC) enzymes have been proven to be effective in the biodegradation of PET. This study focuses on enzymatic depolymerization of waste PET, PTT, and PBT materials by using an ICCG variant of LCC (LCC ICCG ) produced from Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). The degradation efficiency of the polyesters was determined by the monomer terephthalic acid (TPA) released from the depolymerization reaction. It was found that the most efficient depolymerization was achieved for PET, followed by PTT and PBT. A kinetic model based on Langmuir adsorption and the Michaelis-Menten equation was developed to describe the enzymatic depolymerization of PET, PTT, and PBT with various enzyme and substrate loadings. The model simulation results revealed that the LCCICCG enzyme loading should be linearly increased as the work capacity of the polyester substrate increases. A specific enzyme loading of 0.91 mg/g PET is suggested to achieve 90% depolymerization of PET within three days. Furthermore, the experimental data and model simulation results can be used to help further engineer the enzyme and process to achieve a complete biodegradation of polyester wastes at large scale.
Solvolysis is a promising strategy for mixed-feed polyester recycling, but little attention has been given to downstream product separations or the impact of using imperfectly separated monomer mixtures in recycled polymer reconstruction. Here, we challenge the traditional need for high-purity monomers in polycondensation synthesis of engineering thermoplastics. Monomer mixtures are derived from catalyzed methanolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT), with separation scenarios ranging from high (99:1) to low (90:10) purity. We focus on challenging-to-separate products like ethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol and evaluate tolerance for comonomer incorporation in recycled hybrid polyesters: polybutylene-co-ethylene terephthalate (PBET) and polybutylene ethylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBEAT). Evaluations are made between “contaminant” monomer incorporation, and the resulting materials’ thermal properties, crystalline structure, tensile toughness, and rheology. Ultimately, we highlight that despite incorporation of contaminant monomer, high-performance hybrid polyesters of PET, PBT, and PBAT are obtained while reducing the strain of high-throughput separations.
There is keen interest to develop new technologies to recycle the plastic poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). To this end, the use of PET-hydrolyzing enzymes has shown promise for PET deconstruction to its monomers, terephthalate (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG). Here, we compare the Ideonella sakaiensis PETase wild-type enzyme to a previously reported improved variant (W159H/S238F). We compare the thermostability of each enzyme and describe a 1.45 Å resolution structure of the mutant, highlighting changes in the substrate binding cleft compared to the wild-type enzyme. Subsequently, the performance of the wild-type and variant enzyme was compared as a function of temperature, substrate morphology, and reaction mixture composition. These studies show that reaction temperature has the strongest influence on performance between the two enzymes. We also show that both enzymes achieve higher levels of PET conversion for substrates with moderate crystallinity relative to amorphous substrates. Finally, we assess the impact of product accumulation on reaction progress for the hydrolysis of both PET and bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET). Each enzyme displays different inhibition profiles to mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (MHET) and TPA, while both are sensitive to inhibition by EG. Overall, this work highlights the importance of reaction conditions, substrate selection, and product accumulation for catalytic performance of PET-hydrolyzing enzymes, which have implications for enzyme screening in the development of enzyme-based polyester recycling.
Lignin-derived aromatic carboxylic acids can be produced from oxidative catalytic processes and are promising building blocks for performance-advantaged bioproducts that leverage their inherent heteroatom functionalities. Here, we synthesize 2-methoxyterephthalate and 2,6-dimethoxyterephthalate derivatives by electrochemical carboxylation of guaiacyl- and syringyl-derived lignin monomers obtained from the oxidative deconstruction of lignin. These methoxylated terephthalates are evaluated as comonomers in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and as plasticizers that could replace petrochemically-derived isophthalate and phthalate, respectively. Specifically, we copolymerize 2-methoxy- and 2,6-dimethoxyterephthalate with dimethyl terephthalate to form several PET copolymers, both of which enable the properties of PET to be tuned, with an incorporation beyond 25% producing amorphous polyesters. At 10 mol % loading in the copolymers, we demonstrate that the bioderived comonomers exhibit comparable behavior to isophthalic acid, a commonly used comonomer in PET, by lowering the crystallinity and melting temperature. Moreover, methoxyterephthalate esters (2-ethylhexyl and butyl) are compared to phthalate and terephthalate ester counterparts used as poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) plasticizers. The bioderived plasticizers are comparable to the petroleum-derived incumbents in reducing the glass transition temperature and increasing the thermal stability of PVC. Furthermore, the dimethoxyterephthalic esters are expected to have an extended lifetime in the polymer matrix due to their lower volatility and lower diffusion coefficients calculated by molecular dynamic simulations. These results demonstrate that the isophthalate and phthalate components in polyesters and plasticizers, respectively, could be substituted with biobased methoxyterephthalate derivatives.
An improved design concept for aerogel vacuum thermal-insulation panels calls for multiple layers of aerogel sandwiched between layers of aluminized Mylar (or equivalent) poly(ethylene terephthalate), as depicted in the figure. This concept is applicable to both the rigid (brick) form and the flexible (blanket) form of aerogel vacuum thermal-insulation panels. Heretofore, the fabrication of a typical aerogel vacuum insulating panel has involved encapsulation of a single layer of aerogel in poly(ethylene terephthalate) and pumping of gases out of the aerogel-filled volume. A multilayer panel according to the improved design concept is fabricated in basically the same way: Multiple alternating layers of aerogel and aluminized poly(ethylene terephthalate) are assembled, then encapsulated in an outer layer of poly(ethylene terephthalate), and then the volume containing the multilayer structure is evacuated as in the single-layer case. The multilayer concept makes it possible to reduce effective thermal conductivity of a panel below that of a comparable single-layer panel, without adding weight or incurring other performance penalties. Implementation of the multilayer concept is simple and relatively inexpensive, involving only a few additional fabrication steps to assemble the multiple layers prior to evacuation. For a panel of the blanket type, the multilayer concept, affords the additional advantage of reduced stiffness.