SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “radioactive”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2019

Taking in Nuclear Operation of the Plasma Facility for Treatment Industrial Radioactive Waste - 19346

The operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants, the nuclear fuel cycle in general, research laboratories and pharmaceutical, medical and industrial facilities generate low-level radioactive waste which, along with the historical radioactive waste from past nuclear activities, needs to be treated and stored, awaiting final disposal. Plasma technology offers a very effective way of treating this waste with a high volume reduction factor (VRF), free from organics, liquids and moisture, and meets without a doubt the acceptance criteria for safe storage and disposal. By means of a plasma beam of approximately 5000 deg. C, the inorganic materials are melted into a glassy slag, containing most of the radioactive isotopes while the organic material is gasified and afterwards oxidized in an afterburner and purified in an off-gas cleaning system. This paper describes the principles of plasma, the different waste feed systems, off-gas treatment and operational experience and future plasma plants. More specifically, it presents the new full-scale plasma facility for the treatment of radioactive waste at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria for which construction and assembly was finalized end of August 2016. It also describes in more detail the Site Acceptance Tests (SAT) of this facility. Previous paper describes the construction and testing of the plasma melting facility at the Kozloduy NPP in Bulgaria. Now the paper focus on the nuclear starting up conducted in May 2018 with real radioactive waste and illustrates the first operational results such as types of waste treated, volume reduction factors, etc The Project was co-financed through a grant by Kozloduy International Decommissioning fund (KIDSF) administrated by the EBRD and through Bulgarian national funding -Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Fund and Radioactive Waste Fund. The KIDSF is funded by the European Union as well by the contributors to the KIDSF - Austria, Belgium, France, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom and Switzerland. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Geographic Information System Based Emergency Response Training Assessments for DOE Radioactive Materials Transport - 20027

Safety and security are priorities of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) radioactive materials shipping campaigns. In the more than 70-year history of domestic transport of spent nuclear fuel (SNF), there has never been a transportation-related radiological injury. To support transportation planning, among the tools that DOE uses is the Stakeholder Tool for Assessing Radioactive Transportation (START). START contains geospatial data and transportation route analyses capabilities designed to support a range of DOE transportation planning initiatives. One of those functions is the capability to support emergency response planning and training for State and Tribal jurisdictions located on routes used for DOE shipments of radioactive materials. As part of the Department's commitment to public safety, DOE provides federally-funded radiological response training to emergency responders along DOE radioactive materials transportation corridors through its Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP). START contains spatial data representing the locations and emergency-response capabilities of fire departments, police, hospitals, State emergency response centers, and where TEPP-trained personnel are based. The START tool supports State and Tribal users' ability to evaluate emergency-response coverage on active and potential DOE radioactive materials transport routes through their jurisdictions, provide expected response times to reach the scene of an incident, identify equipment available to support a response, and identify the number of response personnel and their respective training levels. In addition, START can be used to identify gaps in coverage along a transportation corridor where additional radiological emergency response training may be needed. This paper describes the data, features, and functionality DOE uses to provide a resource for emergency response training needs assessments for States and Tribes along active and potential routes for transporting radioactive materials, and illustrates its use. It also discusses future plans to integrate TEPP and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) radiological training data to provide a more comprehensive source of geospatial information on personnel who have received equivalent radiological response training. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Proof of principle study: synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy for identification of previously radioactive microparticles and elemental mapping of FFPE tissues

Biobanks containing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from animals and human atomic-bomb survivors exposed to radioactive particulates remain a vital resource for understanding the molecular effects of radiation exposure. These samples are often decades old and prepared using harsh fixation processes which limit sample imaging options. Optical imaging of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissues may be the only feasible processing option, however, H&E images provide no information about radioactive microparticles or radioactive history. Synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) is a robust, non-destructive, semi-quantitative technique for elemental mapping and identifying candidate chemical element biomarkers in FFPE tissues. Still, XFM has never been used to uncover distribution of formerly radioactive micro-particulates in FFPE canine specimens collected more than 30 years ago. In this work, we demonstrate the first use of low-, medium-, and high-resolution XFM to generate 2D elemental maps of ~ 35-year-old, canine FFPE lung and lymph node specimens stored in the Northwestern University Radiobiology Archive documenting distribution of formerly radioactive micro-particulates. Additionally, we use XFM to identify individual microparticles and detect daughter products of radioactive decay. The results of this proof-of-principle study support the use of XFM to map chemical element composition in historic FFPE specimens and conduct radioactive micro-particulate forensics.

62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE↗

DOE OSTI2016

Dynamic Radioactive Source for Evaluating and Demonstrating Time-dependent Performance of Continuous Air Monitors

Evaluation of continuous air monitors in the presence of a plutonium aerosol is time intensive, expensive, and requires a specialized facility. The Radiation Protection Services Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory has designed a Dynamic Radioactive Source, intended to replace plutonium aerosol challenge testing. Furthermore, the Dynamic Radioactive Source is small enough to be inserted into the sampler filter chamber of a typical continuous air monitor. Time-dependent radioactivity is introduced from electroplated sources for real-time testing of a continuous air monitor where a mechanical wristwatch motor rotates a mask above an alpha-emitting electroplated disk source. The mask is attached to the watch’s minute hand, and as it rotates, more of the underlying source is revealed. The alpha activity we measured increases with time, simulating the arrival of airborne radioactive particulates at the air sampler inlet. The Dynamic Radioactive Source allows the temporal behavior of puff and chronic release conditions to be mimicked without the need for radioactive aerosols. The new system is configurable to different continuous air monitor designs and provides an in-house testing capability (benchtop compatible). It is a repeatable and reusable system and does not contaminate the tested air monitor. Test benefits include direct user control, realistic (plutonium) aerosol spectra, and iterative development of continuous air monitor alarm algorithms. We also used data obtained using the Dynamic Radioactive Source to elucidate alarm algorithms and to compare the response time of two commercial continuous air monitors.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

DOE OSTI2015

1st Quarter Transportation Report FY 2015: Radioactive Waste Shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS)

This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare a quarterly summary report of radioactive waste shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) at Area 5. There were no shipments sent for offsite treatment and returned to the NNSS this quarter. This report summarizes the 1st quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed low-level radioactive waste (MLLW) shipments. Tabular summaries are provided which include the following: Sources of and carriers for LLW and MLLW shipments to and from the NNSS; Number and external volume of LLW and MLLW shipments; Highway routes used by carriers; and Incident/accident data applicable to LLW and MLLW shipments. In this report shipments are accounted for upon arrival at the NNSS, while disposal volumes are accounted for upon waste burial. The disposal volumes presented in this report include minor volumes of non-radioactive classified waste/material that were approved for disposal (non-radioactive classified or nonradioactive classified hazardous). Volume reports showing cubic feet generated using the Low-Level Waste Information System may vary slightly due to rounding conventions for volumetric conversions from cubic meters to cubic feet.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Charging, aggregation, and electrostatic dispersion of radioactive and nonradioactive particles in the atmosphere

Electrostatic dispersion can significantly impact the microphysical behavior of charged particles and ions until reaching zero space charge. However, although radioactive particles can be strongly charged in air, the influence of electrostatic dispersion has been neglected in understanding their behavior. This study is aimed at investigating the time evolution of the charge and size distributions of radioactive and nonradioactive particles in air and developing simple approaches for applications. With processes involving charging, aggregation, and electrostatic dispersion, a comprehensive population balance model (PBM) has been developed to examine particle charge/size distribution dynamics. It is shown that compared to nonradioactive particles, the charge and size distributions of radioactive particles may evolve differently with time because radioactivity and electrostatic dispersion can significantly affect the charging and aggregation kinetics of the particles. It is found that, after the Fukushima accident, background aerosols in the pathway of radioactive plumes might be highly charged due to ionizing radiation, suggesting that radiation fields may strongly influence in situ measurements of charged atmospheric particles. The comprehensive PBM is simplified, and then the verification and application of the simplified PBMs are discussed. This study provides useful insight into how radioactivity can affect the dynamic behavior of particles in atmospheric systems including radiation sources.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2015

Thermal Neutron Die-Way-Time Studies for P and DGNAA of Radioactive Waste Drums at the MEDINA Facility

In Germany, radioactive waste with negligible heat production has to pass through a process of quality checking in order to check its conformance with national regulations prior to its transport, intermediate storage and final disposal. Additionally to its radioactive components, the waste may contain non-radioactive chemically toxic substances that can adversely affect human health and pollute the environment, especially the ground water. After an adequate decay time, the waste radioactivity will become harmless but the non-radioactive substances will persist over time. In principle, these hazardous substances may be quantified from traceability and quality controls performed during the production of the waste packages. As a consequence, a research and development program was initiated in 2007 with the aim to develop a nondestructive analytical technique for radioactive waste packages based on prompt and delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (P and DGNAA) employing a DT-neutron generator in pulsed mode. In a preliminary study it was experimentally demonstrated that P and DGNAA is suitable to determine the chemical composition of large samples. In 2010 a facility called MEDINA (Multi Element Detection based on Instrumental Neutron Activation) was developed for the qualitative and quantitative determination of nonradioactive, toxic elements and substances in 200-l steel drums. The determination of hazardous substances and elements is generally achieved measuring the prompt gamma-rays induced by thermal neutrons. Additional information about the composition of the waste matrix could be derived measuring the delayed gamma-rays from short life activation products. However a sensitive detection of these delayed gamma-rays requires that thermal neutrons have almost vanished. Therefore, the thermal neutron die-away-time has to be known in order to achieve an optimal discrimination between prompt and delayed gamma-ray spectra acquisition. Measurements Thermal neutron die-away times have been determined for the following cases: a) the empty chamber, b ) an empty 200-l steel drum, for a 200-l steel drum filled c) with concrete d) with polyethylene and e) with a mixture of polyethylene and concrete by measuring the prompt-gamma ray count rate of relevant isotopes like of {sup 1}H, {sup 10}B, {sup 12}C, {sup 28}Si, {sup 35}Cl, {sup 40}Ca and {sup 56}Fe which are emitted from different parts of the facility and the sample. Additionally, the average die-away-time was determined from the total detector count rate. The neutron generator was operated with a neutron emission of 8x10{sup 7} n.s{sup -1}, a neutron pulse with a length of 250 μs and a repetition time of 5 ms. The spectra were acquired between the neutron pulses over t{sub c}=500 μs after a pre-defined waiting time t{sub D} (multiple of 500 μs). The thermal neutron die-away time was ranging between 0.9 ms and 5 ms according to the sample composition. As an example the measured thermal neutron die-away-time Λ [μs] of a drum filled with concrete is presented. Detailed results of this study will be presented and discussed. (authors)

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2019

Second Quarter Transportation Report Fiscal Year 2019 Waste Shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site, Radioactive Waste Management Complex

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Waste Shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site, Radioactive Waste Management Complex (Q3 Transportation Report, FY 2019)

This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare a quarterly summary of waste shipments to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) in Area 3 and Area 5. This report summarizes the third quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2019 and serves as a quarterly report for the following types of shipments: • Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW), • Mixed Low-Level Radioactive Waste (MLLW), • Classified Non-Radioactive (CNR) Waste, and • Classified Non-Radioactive Hazardous (CNRH) Waste. Tabular summaries are provided that include the following: • Number and external volume of LLW, MLLW, and CNR/CNRH shipments, • Waste generators for LLW, MLLW, and CNR/CNRH shipments to and on the NNSS, • Carriers for LLW, MLLW, and CNR/CNRH shipments to and on the NNSS, • Waste generator shipments by quarter, • Highway routes used by carriers, and • Incident and accident data applicable to LLW, MLLW, and CNR/CNRH shipments. In this report, shipments are accounted for upon arrival at the NNSS, while disposal volumes are accounted for upon waste burial. Volume reports using the Low-Level Waste Information System showing cubic feet (ft 3 ) of waste generated may vary slightly due to rounding conventions for conversions from cubic meters to ft 3 .

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Development of a New Clearance Monitor for Exemption of NPP Radioactive Wastes and its Performance Test - 17200

In nuclear power plants, it is common practice to clear radioactive wastes for free release by using clearance monitor with plastic scintillation detectors so as to reduce disposal costs. These monitors are possible in part thanks to the excellent detection levels achievable with high energy and high yield photons emitted from contaminants such as Cs-137 and Co-60. However, it is difficult for the monitors to separate Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) from the radioactive wastes because the plastic scintillation detectors have poor resolution compared to NaI or HPGe detectors. KHNP has developed a new clearance monitor for determining whether or not the radioactivity level of metal scraps satisfies regulatory criteria. The monitor is composed of 12 large area plastic scintillation detectors and 3 NaI scintillation detectors. The measuring chamber is surrounded by a 5 cm-thick lead shield with chamber dimensions of 1.5 m x 1.0 m x 1.0 m. Its algorithm has a function of measuring total gamma activity while analyzing gamma nuclides and identifying 27 hotspots in radioactive wastes. The detection limit of this system, according to the MCNP simulation, was determined to be about 45 Bq for Co-60 and 78 Bq for Cs-137 with the condition of an empty chamber and measuring time of 1 minute. We evaluated the self - shielding effect of waste for background correction factor and waste height (volume in the chamber) correction factor. We also tested its MDA, location determination of hot-spots, temperature compensation function and convenience of operation. In the future, we will plan to install it at a nuclear site for more tests including evaluating its durability. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Immobilization of Organic Liquid Radioactive Waste (LWR) in a Sulfur Composite Matrix at the BN-350 Fast Neutron Reactor Site, Kazakhstan - 18031

The immobilization treatment and final disposition of all forms of organic radioactive liquids, such as pump oil, spent solvent, tri-butyl-phosphate (TBP) and scintillation fluids, remain a significant challenge for nuclear waste generators and national regulators. The majority of nuclear nations have instituted regulations that require some form of encapsulation of treated organic liquid, notwithstanding LLW organic liquids that can be safely incinerated. In most cases cement is the designated material for encapsulation; however, cement can pose certain problems with the containment of treated organic liquids. In 2013, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy - National Nuclear Security Administration through its Global Initiative for Proliferation Prevention Program (GIPP), a proven U.S. technology for the treatment of radioactive organic liquids was introduced at the BN-350 fast neutron reactor facility in Aktau, Kazakhstan. As the facility was undergoing full decommissioning, one hundred and sixty cubic meters of contaminated pump oil (including Cs-137, Sr-90 and U-235/238) contained in large above ground tanks had to be treated for final disposal. As a result of the research conducted over a two-year period, a new 2-step treatment process was invented by combining the U.S. solidification technology with a newly developed inorganic filler and molecular sulfur, referred to as radiation-resistant composite (RRC) to fully encapsulate the waste oil. The outcome of extensive test program indicates that the final form can reach up to 60 wt.% with a compressive strength of about 100 kg/cm{sup 2}. Preliminary conclusions indicate that RRC outperforms cement as an encapsulation form for final waste treatment which meets U.S. Nuclear Regulatory requirements for final disposal. This paper examines the preliminary experimental work that was conducted in Kazakhstan with the U.S. polymer technology and radioactive pump oil, and the subsequent secondary process of combining the solidified material into a homogeneous final form utilizing RRC. Topics covered in the paper include: - Kazakhstan's regulatory requirements for attaining an achievable waste form for acceptance, which led to the RRC invention; - Technical objectives for the application of polymer technology and RRC materials to radioactive liquid waste; - Polymer solidification with radioactive oil and the result; step one of the RRC process; - Description of RRC materials, their origin and chemical characteristics; - Process of combining the solidified polymer mass with RRC materials into a solid, homogeneous matrix; step two of the RRC process; - Experimental results including leaching data, waste loading estimates and heat process calculations to create the matrix; - Cost advantages of the RRC process over cementation; - Limitations of the RRC process; - Next steps to verify conformance of the RRC technology to the U.S. requirements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Greater Efficiency in the Management of Low-Level Radioactive Material - 18305

The World Nuclear Association is the international organization representing the global nuclear industry. Its mission is to promote a wider understanding of nuclear energy among key international influencers by producing authoritative information, developing common industry positions, and contributing to the energy debate. Membership encompasses companies from the whole fuel cycle (from uranium mining through to decommissioning) as well as support services. Through discussions and survey of the Association's Waste Management and Decommissioning Working Group, it is clear that there is an issue relating to the management of cleared and/or low level radioactive material, particularly during decommissioning where it represents more than 90% of all wastes generated. The group has found that the status quo on the reuse, recycling and disposal of cleared and/or low-level radioactive material arising from the civil nuclear industry (all successfully tested and implemented options) is untenable, and believes that this message should be conveyed to relevant influencers internationally. This message is key and features prominently in a methodological guide being prepared by the group's experts on managing waste from decommissioning which will work through case studies (relating to both technical and financial management) and showcase good practice to support the development of a successful decommissioning strategy. There are currently nearly 450 operating civil nuclear power reactors in the world with many associated nuclear fuel cycle and nuclear research facilities. During the operation and subsequent decommissioning of nuclear facilities, cleared and low-level radioactive material is routinely generated from normal activities, including clothes, rags, metal equipment, concrete structures, etc. For low-level radioactive material, most of this material can be freed from its added radioactivity through survey and simple cleanup (decontamination if necessary). When properly managed and regulated these activities pose no real health issues for people or the environment. It is understandable that there are increasing public demands and expectations for the reuse and recycling of valuable resources, which nuclear - like many other sectors - can no longer ignore. There are efficiencies to be found through technical solutions (resulting in waste volume reductions, better sorting of waste, etc.), which would enable mitigation of environmental impacts and increased preservation of these natural resources. In addition, it will reduce volumes for storage and disposal which are rare resources. There must be a balance struck between the availability of disposal, and recycling and reuse, depending on the outcomes of assessments. Both the advantages in terms of preserving natural resources and disposal capacity should enable the industry to gain credibility with stakeholders. Taking Europe as an example, excellence in the implementation of the reuse and recycling of metals and of disposal of very-low waste, would, if widely shared between countries, no doubt lead to greater efficiency. International and national leaders from industry, regulators and governments should enable the concurrent availability of these three safe management options in each country, worldwide. Whenever an option considered is supported by a solid industrial business case, operators and regulators can (and must) concurrently deploy and operate safe reuse, recycling and disposal. This flexible approach should be deployed; the Association is of the firm conviction that the exclusive commitment to a single option cannot be sound on any grounds. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

A Comparison of GoldSim, RESRAD-Onsite, and NORMALYSA Modeling Tools at Radioactive Waste Sites - 19480

Radioactive waste disposal and associated decision making is a challenging problem around the world. A strong performance assessment model plays a crucial role in making good management and remediation decisions and in optimizing the performance of a site. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) MODARIA II Working Group 1 (WG1) is comparing the performance of various modeling platforms used at Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) and legacy waste sites to support risk-informed decision making. Neptune and Company, Inc. (Neptune) has developed probabilistic performance assessment models using the GoldSim system modeling software at a variety of radioactive waste sites. This paper presents a comparison between GoldSim and two other tools used to evaluate radiation exposure and their associated risks: the NORM And Legacy Site Assessment (NORMALYSA) tool used to assess risk at the Zapadnoe mill tailings site, and the residual radioactivity (RESRAD-Onsite) computer program used to calculate Authorized Limits at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supported development of NORMALYSA based off of Ecolego 6.0, in which the user connects several universal modules, representing various environmental transport and exposure pathways, and enters in site-specific data. Further work with NORMALYSA has continued under the MODARIA II WG 1. A radionuclide transport and dose calculation model of the Zapadnoe uranium mill tailings site at the Pridneprovsky Chemical Plant in the Ukraine has been configured by MODARIA II WG1 to test the capabilities of NORMALYSA. Under this test case, contaminant transport and effective dose calculations were performed for two exposure scenarios. The onsite worker is exposed via external ground irradiation and radon and radioactive dust inhalation. The offsite resident defines a residence established 300 years after institutional control has ended, 800 meters downstream from the site with exposure pathways including: ingestion of garden vegetables irrigated by contaminated ground water, ingestion of fish from the Konoplyanka River and agricultural activities in the contaminated garden. GoldSim modeling software is a dynamic probabilistic modeling platform that evaluates uncertainty in a robust and transparent manner. Although GoldSim provides contaminant and radionuclide transport modules to facilitate integrated modeling of radionuclide migration in the environment, these features are not embedded in an existing modeling framework, except as created by the user. Neptune developed a GoldSim model for the two exposure scenarios of the Zapadnoe test case. Neptune's Generic PA Model was used as a starting point for the Zapadnoe site. Input parameters for the GoldSim model include site-specific parameters from the MODARIA Working Group as well as parameters from the Generic PA Model and other PA models created by Neptune. For the other comparison, Version 7.0 of RESRAD-Onsite, developed by Argonne National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), was used to calculate Authorized Limits for LANL. Authorized Limits are concentrations of radionuclides in soil that support the evaluation process to clear land for release under different uses. The RESRAD-Onsite computer code was used to calculate Authorized Limits because this program was specifically designed to derive radionuclide soil guidelines corresponding to a specific dose criterion. The scope of the RESRAD dose or risk evaluation is constrained to the transport and exposure pathways that have been included in the computer code. To assist in illustrating the capability of GoldSim modeling software, a GoldSim model was created to replicate the calculation of LANL's Authorized Limits for soil. The main exposure pathways in this model are inhalation of dust and gas, plant ingestion, soil ingestion, and external ground irradiation. All of the processes and outputs of RESRAD-Onsite and NORMALYSA can be created in a GoldSim model, but the value of GoldSim lies in its flexibility for application to any of a wide variety of environmental modeling problems. GoldSim allows development of site-specific inventory, transport mechanisms and risk assessment scenarios. If all potentially complete release, transport, and exposure pathways are addressed in an existing dose and risk assessment computer code, and if the code's capabilities fulfill the project modeling objectives, then expending resources to create a GoldSim model may not be necessary. Site optimization and good decision making about site management are often best when supported with the flexibility of GoldSim as a modeling tool. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2014

3rd Quarter Transportation Report FY 2014: Radioactive Waste Shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS)

This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare a quarterly summary report of radioactive waste shipments to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) at Area 5. There were no shipments sent for offsite treatment and returned to the NNSS this quarter. This report summarizes the 3rd quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed low-level radioactive waste (MLLW) shipments. This report also includes annual summaries for FY 2014 in Tables 4 and 5. Tabular summaries are provided which include the following: Sources of and carriers for LLW and MLLW shipments to and from the NNSS; Number and external volume of LLW and MLLW shipments; Highway routes used by carriers; and Incident/accident data applicable to LLW and MLLW shipments. In this report shipments are accounted for upon arrival at the NNSS, while disposal volumes are accounted for upon waste burial. The disposal volumes presented in this report do not include minor volumes of non-radioactive materials that were approved for disposal. Volume reports showing cubic feet generated using the Low-Level Waste Information System may vary slightly due to differing rounding conventions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

3rd Quarter Transportation Report FY2017 Waste Shipments To and From the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), Radioactive Waste Management Complex

This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare a quarterly summary report of waste shipments to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) at Area 5. This report summarizes the 3rd quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2017 low-level radioactive waste (LLW), mixed low-level radioactive waste (MLLW), which includes classified LLW and MLLW, classified non-radioactive (CNR) and classified non-radioactive hazardous (CNRH) shipments. There were no shipments sent for offsite treatment from a NNSS facility and returned to the NNSS this quarter of FY2017. Tabular summaries are provided, which include the following: Sources of and carriers for LLW, MLLW and CNR/CNRH shipments to and from the NNSS; Number and external volume of LLW, MLLW and CNR/CNRH shipments; Highway routes used by carriers; and Incident/accident data applicable to LLW, MLLW and CNR/CNRH shipments.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

There Are Safe Limits for Radioactivity - Does WIPP Need to Filter its Exhaust Air? - 17165

Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository resulted in the release of americium and plutonium (mostly {sup 241}Am) into the environment and contaminated portions of the repository, primarily along the ventilation path from the location of the incident. The WIPP uses a ventilation system to ensure that underground air is circulated through the repository and to ensure that air quality conditions are safe for the workers. Since the air in the repository exits to the surface through an exhaust shaft, this shaft is the sole potential pathway for airborne radioactivity release from the repository. During normal operations before the 2014 incident, exhaust air was released to the environment unfiltered, with an automatic switch to filtration when airborne radioactivity was detected immediately down-stream from the active waste disposal operation. However, since the radiation release event, the WIPP ventilation system has been, and will likely remain in what is called 'filtration mode,' (i.e., exhaust air is routed through a HEPA filter system). Redirection of the ventilation system through the HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter system was necessary at the peak of the radiation release event to protect aboveground workers at the site and the public in the surrounding areas; however, it has hampered recovery efforts and has exacerbated the inherent safety issues of working underground. As a component of the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center's (CEMRC) WIPP environmental monitoring program, airborne radioactivity samples are collected daily in the exhaust shaft ventilation air as it reaches the surface, and before entering the HEPA filters. Since June 2014, airborne radiation levels entering the HEPA filters have averaged about 1% of a derived air concentration (DAC) for {sup 241}Am. An airborne radioactivity level of one DAC is equivalent to a potential worker internal dose exposure of 50 mSv per work year, if a worker were continuously exposed for a full work year (2000 hours). During Project Reach and throughout decontamination campaigns conducted in Panel 7 for several months in 2015, these unfiltered levels rose to 3-5% of a DAC, with a one week spike reaching almost one DAC in June 2015, during decontamination of the most heavily contaminated exhaust drift in Panel 7. Since that period, the unfiltered levels have never exceeded 2% of a DAC. Going forward, the question is, should WIPP resume unfiltered discharge of its underground ventilation air? Evaluation of more than two years of underground ventilation sampling data indicates that residual radioactivity levels in the underground no longer warrant HEPA filtration in order to meet either worker or environmental protection criteria. In terms of radiological risk at or in the vicinity of the WIPP site, the increased risk from resuming unfiltered ventilation is exceedingly small and would not result in a hypothetical dose to a member of the public in excess of the 100 micro Sv per year limit for periodic confirmatory sampling as required for operating repositories by the Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR 191). In addition, the requirement for respiratory protection for workers underground exposed to 1-2% of a DAC is questionable, given the added industrial safety risk of heavy equipment operation while wearing respirators. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

A Comparison of Social and Economic Engagement Approaches: Lessons from Recent International Radioactive Waste Projects - 17478

The central challenge of any proposed radioactive waste management project is securing not only regulatory permissions, but also a social license to operate. 'Social license' generally refers to a community's acceptance or approval of a specific project. Oftentimes development of social license occurs outside of, or in parallel to, formal regulatory or permitting processes, and requires sustained commitment and proposed economic benefits to communities by proponents to acquire, build, and sustain social capital in the context of trust-based relationships. Historically, radioactive waste management projects have defaulted to demagoguery and 'siege warfare' modes of thinking and action by both proponents and opponents. While radioactive waste management projects are always inherently controversial, it is only recently that project owners and developers have experimented with alternative forms of social engagement outside of, or in addition to, formal regulatory processes. This paper compares and contrasts recent projects in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, by examining distinct approaches to social engagement, with a focus on new methods that have been used to promote mutual understanding, foster rational debate, build confidence, promote economic development, and secure social license. The projects examined span the life-cycle of radioactive waste management development, from ones that are purely aspirational, to ones in early planning stages, to ones seeking a host community, to one that is focused on sustainment of existing social license. Several notable lessons and innovative practices are identified that will be of interest to radioactive waste management project owners and developers, non-governmental organizations, potential host communities, and political decision-makers for such projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

Success in commissioning a key U.S. radioactive waste burial site through the technical support of Dufrane Nuclear Shielding Incorporated (DNSI) - 15476

With the -phase out- of the South Carolina based Barnwell Radioactive Waste Burial Site, and the stockpile and storage of radioactive waste and irradiated components throughout the U.S. Nuclear Industry for decades, the opening of the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact Facility by Waste Control Specialists (WCS), is a game changer in solving this industry-wide issue. For the first time in decades, generators now have the opportunity to send their waste to a site specifically designed to permanently sequester the waste in a licensed facility that will protect public health and the environment, better than any built to date. As history has shown through the many decades of the U.S. Commercial and Federal Nuclear Industry, site operators and management have relied heavily on contractors and vendors with exceptional expertise and decades of experience to achieve success and meet their goals. The commissioning of WCS was no exception as DNSI was contracted to design, develop, build and deploy a major component required for the opening and successful operation of the WCS site. This component, being the Modular Concrete Canister (MCC), is the -work horse- of the site. With its enormous size, weight and strength, it provides many functions that meet and comply with the site performance assessment (PA) under 10 CFR Part 61, the site WAC, and Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority. Offsite contracting the production and delivery of this critical component was a major step toward success in meeting schedule and cost for the much needed opening of the Texas Compact and Federal site. In selecting a shielding vendor, WCS partnered with a U.S. Nuclear Service company with over 30 years of experience which spans the entire U.S. Commercial, Federal, and Nuclear Industry. The task given DNSI was not a simple one, it involved every aspect from start to finish of the design, production and delivery of rectangular, cylindrical and -irradiated hardware- (IH) MCCs, that could accept waste up to 100 Sv /Hr contact dose rates. The enormity of this project was quite clear and required extensive quality control, construction of batch plants, purchase of huge quantities of raw materials, setting up a production site in a neighboring city, relocation of personnel from company headquarters, and safely transporting 8,000 Tons of MCC components 75 miles one-way on West Texas highways daily. Most important of all, this was accomplished safely with no incidents, no component failures or rejects, and on schedule. The start of receipt, of -in-compact waste- and -out-of-compact waste- was conducted virtually in a 3 month period time span. To help guarantee success and quality of product, all forms had surfaces machined, heavy duty elastomer coatings were applied to concrete surfaces, only galvanized anchors were used, and the batch plant was run to strict ASME standards thus testing every 50 cubic yards of concrete poured. With significant teamwork and success from Vendors such as DNSI, WCS and the Texas Compact has evolved as one of the leading radioactive waste sites in the U.S. and the world, providing safe, secure and compliant permanent waste disposal services by using technical expertise and innovation of the highest standards. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗