Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “manufacturing processes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Effect of Internal Structure on Warpage in a Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing Process With Bio-Derived Composites

Extrusion-based large-format additive manufacturing (LFAM) often results in unintended deformation and failures due to thermal residual stress between layers. This LFAM involves a hot molten polymer deposited on a previously deposited and cooled layer, generating a temperature mismatch between the layers. The temperature discrepancy causes a thermal contraction mismatch, generating thermal residual stress. Due to the residual stress, printed structures experience warpage and delamination Therefore, understanding the heat distribution behavior is essential to preventing undesired deformation and failures. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of infill patterns on heat distribution and deformation in an LFAM system. Wood fiber-reinforced polylactic acid was used as a sustainable and low-cost reinforcement material. A numerical model was developed to predict the temperature and deformation field with thermo-mechanical properties, which were measured by a dynamic mechanical analysis and a thermal expansion test. Simulations were performed on a box geometry with three different infill patterns. The simulation model was verified with temperature data gathered from an infrared camera. The results show good agreement between predicted and measured temperature profiles. The developed simulation model was applied to a roof tray with different infill patterns for a case study. We found that the different thermal mass distributions resulting from the various infill patterns affected the heat distribution and deformation. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the thermal and mechanical behavior of LFAM.

Jo, Eonyeon↗

Indirect additive manufacturing process using amine-containing adhesive polymers

A method for binder jetting additive manufacturing of an object, the method comprising: (i) separately feeding a powder from which said object is to be manufactured and a solution comprising an adhesive polymer dissolved in a solvent into an additive manufacturing device, wherein said adhesive polymer is an amine-containing polymer having a molecular weight of at least 200 g/mole and is present in said solution in a concentration of 1-30 wt % to result in said solution having a viscosity of 2-25 mPa·s and a surface tension of 25-45 mN/m at room temperature; and (ii) dispensing selectively positioned droplets of said adhesive polymer, from a printhead of said additive manufacturing device, into a bed of said powder to bind particles of said powder with said adhesive polymer to produce a preform having a shape of the object to be manufactured.

Saito, Tomonori↗

Design of Novel Hot Gas Path Component for Gas Turbine Engines Enabled by Materials and Additive Manufacturing Process Development

This report covers the activities associated with the development and evaluation of two high-γ’ superalloys that were designed by external partners on this project, namely Carpenter Technologies Corporation and the University of California-Santa Barbra. One alloy was GammaPrint-700, a cobalt-base superalloy, and the other a nickel-base (Ni-base) superalloy GammaPrint-1100. Both were found to be printable through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing, with optimal process parameter sets being identified for each alloy. Further, high temperature mechanical testing was conducted on each alloy that showed both materials performed better than the comparative baseline (LPBF Hastelloy X), with the Ni-base superalloy being down-selected for scaling and printing of the tip shoe components.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Advancement of Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes and Alloys for Rocket Propulsion Applications

NASA has been involved in the development and maturation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) for space applications since the 2000’s. Several efforts have focused on the understanding of AM processes through material characterization and testing, standards development, component fabrication, and infusion into development and flight applications. While many common aerospace alloys have been and continue to be a focus of ongoing development, the need for custom-alloy developments for high performance applications enabled by various AM processes has been realized. The applications being targeted are liquid rocket engines with high heat fluxes, high pressure, and that utilize propellants such as hydrogen, which can degrade the alloy. NASA has recently focused on the development and advancement of novel alloy advancement using AM for use in these harsh environments, such as GRCop-42, GRCop-84, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. These alloys have been evaluated using powder bed fusion (PBF), directed energy deposition (DED), and solid-state AM processes. The results from these processes have demonstrated that AM can enable rapid development of new alloy systems that can yield higher performances across various metal AM processes. These alloys have undergone the fundamental metallurgical evaluations, heat treatment study, and microstructure characterization and mechanical testing campaign. This, combined with direct application-specific component fabrication and hot-fire testing, enabled the increase of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL). This presentation will provide a background and overview of various AM-enabled novel alloys, a comparison across the AM processes, and development including metallurgical and mechanical property studies. It will also cover the latest advancement in the parallel component development and testing and future developments. The goal of these alloy development and use of various AM processes is to allow for technology infusion into NASA and commercial spaceflight missions as well as to establish and sustain the needed commercial AM supply chain.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Risks and reliability of manufacturing processes as related to composite materials for spacecraft structures

Fabricating primary aircraft and spacecraft structures using advanced composite materials entail both benefits and risks. The benefits come from much improved strength-to-weight ratios and stiffness-to-weight ratios, potential for less part count, ability to tailor properties, chemical and solvent resistance, and superior thermal properties. On the other hand, the risks involved include high material costs, lack of processing experience, expensive labor, poor reproducibility, high toxicity for some composites, and a variety of space induced risks. The purpose of this project is to generate a manufacturing database for a selected number of materials with potential for space applications, and to rely on this database to develop quantitative approaches to screen candidate materials and processes for space applications on the basis of their manufacturing risks including costs. So far, the following materials have been included in the database: epoxies, polycyanates, bismalemides, PMR-15, polyphenylene sulfides, polyetherimides, polyetheretherketone, and aluminum lithium. The first four materials are thermoset composites; the next three are thermoplastic composites, and the last one is is a metal. The emphasis of this database is on factors affecting manufacturing such as cost of raw material, handling aspects which include working life and shelf life of resins, process temperature, chemical/solvent resistance, moisture resistance, damage tolerance, toxicity, outgassing, thermal cycling, and void content, nature or type of process, associate tooling, and in-process quality assurance. Based on industry experience and published literature, a relative ranking was established for each of the factors affecting manufacturing as listed above. Potential applications of this database include the determination of a delta cost factor for specific structures with a given process plan and a general methodology to screen materials and processes for incorporation into the current conceptual design optimization of future spacecrafts as being coordinated by the Vehicle Analysis Branch where this research is being conducted.

Bao, Han P.↗

Manufacturing process applications team (MATeam)

Progress in the transfer of aerospace technology to solve key problems in the manufacturing sector of the economy is reported. Potential RTOP programs are summarized along with dissemination activities. The impact of transferred NASA manufacturing technology is discussed. Specific areas covered include aircraft production, robot technology, machining of alloys, and electrical switching systems.

Bangs, E. R.↗

Systems and Methods for Additive Manufacturing Processes that Strategically Buildup Objects

Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention implement additive manufacturing techniques that employ different sets of deposition characteristics and/or material formation characteristics during the additive manufacture of an object so as to strategically build up the object. In many embodiments, material used to build up an object is deposited at different deposition rates during the additive manufacture of the object, and the object is thereby strategically built up. In one embodiment, a method of additively manufacturing an object includes: depositing material onto a surface at a first deposition rate so as to define a first region of the object to be additively manufactured; and depositing material onto a surface at a second deposition rate so as to define a second region of the object to be additively manufactured; where the second deposition rate is different from the first deposition rate.

Hofmann, Douglas C.↗

Laser Additive Manufacturing Process Development for Bismuth Telluride Thermoelectric Material

Thermoelectric generators have strong potential for aerospace and aircraft applications. However, traditional manufacturing methods for thermoelectric devices severely limit device adaptability and consequently marketability. Laser powder bed fusion is an additive manufacturing method which shows promising potential for producing thermoelectric devices. Thermoelectric materials pose unique challenges compared to metals because of low thermal conductivity, brittle fracture characteristics, and irregular powder particle morphologies. Herein, we communicate processing procedures to fabricate thermoelectric parts of Bi 2 Te 3 through laser powder bed fusion. In this study, we identify the successful combination of key process parameters—laser power, scan speed, hatch distance, and powder layer thickness—to achieve high-quality parts in terms of density and physical properties, and we demonstrate the impact of process parameter variation on built part quality. While it cannot exclusively determine part quality, the volumetric energy density is a useful guide in deciding process parameters for thermoelectric materials, and the optimal value is between 9 and 11 J/mm 3 for Bi 2 Te 3 . We demonstrate successful fabrication of different freeform geometries of Bi 2 Te 3 powders. The results suggest it is possible to extend this method more broadly to other semiconductor materials, including thermoelectric power generation materials applicable for space applications.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Layer-wise Imaging Dataset from Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Processes for Machine Learning Applications (Peregrine v2021-03)

This dataset contains layer-wise powder bed images from three different powder bed printing technologies – laser powder bed fusion, electron beam powder bed fusion, and binder jetting. This dataset was collected and annotated using the internally-developed Peregrine software tool and is designed primarily to facilitate research into anomaly defect detection using image segmentation or similar techniques. A total of 20 layers are provided for each printing technology, with each layer of data consisting of one or more calibrated images and an annotation file containing pixel-wise ground truth labels. The ground truths were labeled by domain experts, typically printer technicians. Data in this release were collected at Oak Ridge National Laboratory between 2016 and 2020 and were compiled in March 2021.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Layer-wise Imaging Dataset from Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Processes for Machine Learning Applications (Peregrine v2022-10)

This release consists of six datasets which together include multi-modal layer-wise powder bed images from two different powder bed printing technologies. These datasets are designed primarily to facilitate the development and testing of new computer vision and machine learning based anomaly and defect detection algorithms. The authors provide both training data with corresponding ground truth pixel masks and evaluation data with corresponding baseline prediction pixel masks made by a trained neural network. The laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) datasets are sourced from EOS M290 and AddUp FormUp 350 printers and the binder jet (BJ) dataset is sourced from an ExOne M-Flex printer. The materials represented in these datasets include 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, DMREF, Inconel 718, Maraging Steel, and H13 Steel. The sensor imaging modalities represented include visible-light (VL), temporally-integrated (i.e., long duration exposure) near-infrared (TI-NIR), and wide-band infrared (IR).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Layer-wise Imaging Dataset from Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Processes for Machine Learning Applications (Peregrine v2022-10.1)

This release consists of six datasets which together include multi-modal layer-wise powder bed images from two different powder bed printing technologies. These datasets are designed primarily to facilitate the development and testing of new computer vision and machine learning based anomaly and defect detection algorithms. The authors provide both training data with corresponding ground truth pixel masks and evaluation data with corresponding baseline prediction pixel masks made by a trained neural network. The laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) datasets are sourced from EOS M290 and AddUp FormUp 350 printers and the binder jet (BJ) dataset is sourced from an ExOne M-Flex printer. The materials represented in these datasets include 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, GammaPrint-700, Inconel 718, Maraging Steel, and H13 Steel. The sensor imaging modalities represented include visible-light (VL), temporally-integrated (i.e., long duration exposure) near-infrared (TI-NIR), and wide-band infrared (IR). To download the dataset: (1) Create a Globus account. (2) Create a Globus Endpoint on your computer. (3) Transfer the dataset from the OLCF DOI-DOWNLOADS Collection to your Collection. Common troubleshooting steps: (a) Confirm that the transfer is going from OLCF DOI-DOWNLOADS to your Collection. (b) Create an exception for Globus in your antivirus software so that it can create an Endpoint. (c) Manually create a Globus access directory (where the data will be downloaded) by going to the Preferences > Access tab.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Dataset from an Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-09)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from a single Arcam Q10 Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (EB-PBF) Inconel 738 build. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise Near Infrared (NIR) in-situ imaging data, in-situ temporal sensor data, ex-situ X-Ray Computed Tomography (X-CT) scans, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a trained Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Dataset from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-10)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from a single Concept Laser M2 Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) stainless steel 316L build. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise visible-light in-situ imaging data, the laser scan paths and parameters, in-situ temporal sensor data, X-Ray Computed Tomography (X-CT) scans, pycnometry and tensile test results, etched micrographs from selected locations, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a modified Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Manufacturing process applications team (MATeam)

Forty additional statements were added to the list of 150 problem/opportunity statements identifying possibilities for transfer of NASA technology to various manufacturing industries. Selected statements that are considered to have a high potential for transfer in the 1978 program year are presented in the form of goals and milestones. The transfer of a flux used in the stud welding of aluminum is reported. Candidate RTOP programs are identified.

Bangs, E. R.↗

A Co-Registered In-Situ and Ex-Situ Tensile Properties Dataset from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process (Peregrine v2023-11)

This release contains a co-registered in-situ and ex-situ Peregrine dataset from five Concept Laser M2 Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) stainless steel 316L builds containing 6,299 SS-J3 individually tracked tensile coupons. These data were collected at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The dataset includes layer-wise visible-light in-situ imaging data, the laser scan paths and parameters, in-situ temporal sensor data, room-temperature static tensile test results, and the target part geometries. Additionally, anomaly detections produced by a modified Dynamic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (DSCNN) are provided.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Manufacturing Process Developments for Regeneratively-Cooled Channel Wall Rocket Nozzles

Regeneratively cooled channel wall nozzles incorporate a series of integral coolant channels to contain the coolant to maintain adequate wall temperatures and expand hot gas providing engine thrust and specific impulse. NASA has been evaluating manufacturing techniques targeting large scale channel wall nozzles to support affordability of current and future liquid rocket engine nozzles and thrust chamber assemblies. The development of these large scale manufacturing techniques focus on the liner formation, channel slotting with advanced abrasive water-jet milling techniques and closeout of the coolant channels to replace or augment other cost reduction techniques being evaluated for nozzles. NASA is developing a series of channel closeout techniques including large scale additive manufacturing laser deposition and explosively bonded closeouts. A series of subscale nozzles were completed evaluating these processes. Fabrication of mechanical test and metallography samples, in addition to subscale hardware has focused on Inconel 625, 300 series stainless, aluminum alloys as well as other candidate materials. Evaluations of these techniques are demonstrating potential for significant cost reductions for large scale nozzles and chambers. Hot fire testing is planned using these techniques in the future.

Gradl, Paul↗

Binder Jet Additive Manufacturing Process and Material Characterization for High Temperature Heat Exchangers Used in Concentrated Solar Power Applications

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Sunshot 2030 initiative has a goal of reducing the cost of concentrating solar power (CSP) to 5 cents per kWh for baseload power plants. One of the potential pathways to this goal includes a reduction in the cost of the supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power block to 0.9 cents per kWh. Recuperators—high and low temperatures, used in the sCO2 power cycle, contribute to >50% of the cost of the power cycle. This work studies the feasibility towards a ≥10% cost reduction for High Temperature Recuperators (HTR) used in the sCO2 power cycle. One way to address the cost reduction is by leveraging low-cost additive manufacturing, specifically, Binder Jet Additive Manufacturing (BJAM) to 3D print HTRs at scale. This study focuses on the development of a BJAM process towards 3D printing HTR cores using Stainless Steel alloy 316L (SS316L). To evaluate the suitability of the BJ process towards the HTR, high level specifications of the application are translated to materials capability requirements. Subsequently, at-temperature materials testing is conducted on as-printed and sintered additively manufactured coupons. Data from the coupons are compared against cast and wrought SS316L data obtained from the literature. Results show that the tensile properties from the BJ process compare well against cast properties. Furthermore, a baseline analysis of creep testing data is established for the BJ process, and insights are drawn from the results towards future improvements of the process.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Additive manufacturing process parameter determination for a new Fe-C-Cu alloy

As a potential replacement for stainless steel alloys commonly used to print parts with laser powder bed fusion, a new Cu precipitation strengthened ferrous alloy, with composition Fe-0.2C-6Cu (wt%), was recently developed. This material is Co- and Ni-free, printable, has mechanical properties comparable to that of high strength stainless steels (approximately 1300 MPa UTS), and is cost-advantaged relative to existing low-alloy steels for additive manufacturing of parts with complex shapes. To gain traction for broader application, optimal laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) processing conditions to produce nearly defect-free parts without compromising mechanical strength are needed. Here, an optimal processing window based upon laser speeds that achieve minimal porosity was quantified via comparisons of measured melt pool penetration, scan speeds, printed material density and laser beam energy density on a commercial LPBF unit operating at 350 W, 80 μm hatch spacing, and 50 μm layer thickness based upon optimal parameters for 17-4PH. Furthermore, the window is 300 to 500 mm/s to achieve >99.8 % dense Fe-0.2C-6Cu (wt%) specimens. Other defects such as burning, spatter, and lack of fusion were also avoided in this window. The window was validated with in-situ synchrotron X-ray imaging that enabled visualization of the vapor cavity, melting, and solidification during a single laser track scan on a miniature powder bed sample. In addition, in-situ infrared imaging provided temperature fields, cooling rate and solidification range, and confirmed minimal printing defects and spatter within the processing window.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗