A General Tool for Evaluating High-Contrast Coronagraphic Telescope Performance Error Budgets
No abstract available
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
No abstract available
This paper describes a general purpose Coronagraph Performance Error Budget (CPEB) tool that we have developed under the NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program. The CPEB automates many of the key steps required to evaluate the scattered starlight contrast in the dark hole of a space-based coronagraph. It operates in 3 steps: first, a CodeV or Zemax prescription is converted into a MACOS optical prescription. Second, a Matlab program calls ray-trace code that generates linear beam-walk and aberration sensitivity matrices for motions of the optical elements and line-of-sight pointing, with and without controlled coarse and fine-steering mirrors. Third, the sensitivity matrices are imported by macros into Excel 2007 where the error budget is created. Once created, the user specifies the quality of each optic from a predefined set of PSDs. The spreadsheet creates a nominal set of thermal and jitter motions and combines them with the sensitivity matrices to generate an error budget for the system. The user can easily modify the motion allocations to perform trade studies.
The Shaped Pupil Coronagraph (SPC) is one of the two operating modes of the WFIRST (Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope) coronagraph instrument. The SPC provides starlight suppression in a pair of wedge-shaped regions over an 18 percent bandpass, and is well suited for spectroscopy of known exoplanets. To demonstrate this starlight suppression in the presence of expected on-orbit input wavefront disturbances, we have recently built a dynamic testbed at JPL (Jet Propulsion Lab.) analogous to the WFIRST fight instrument architecture, with both Hybrid Lyot Coronagraph (HLC) and SPC architectures and a Low Order Wavefront Sensing and Control (LOWFS/C) subsystem to apply, sense, and correct dynamic wavefront disturbances. We present our best up-to-date results of the static SPC mode demonstration from the testbed, along with model comparisons and performance under realistic dynamical conditions. HLC results will be reported separately.
. . .viability. This paper describes the current testbed design and preliminary experimental results.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.