Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “compute workflow”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Novel Approaches Toward Scalable Composable Workflows in Hyper-Heterogeneous Computing Environments

The annual Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS) is a premier venue for the scientific workflow community to present the latest advances in research and development on the many facets of scientific workflows throughout their life-cycle. The Lightning Talks at WORKS focus on describing a novel tool, scientific workflow, or concept, which are work-in-progress and address emerging technologies and frameworks to foster discussion in the community. This paper summarizes the lightning talks at the 2023 edition of WORKS, covering five topics: leveraging large language models to build and execute workflows; developing a common workflow scheduler interface; scaling uncertainty workflow applications on exascale computing systems; evaluating a transcriptomics workflow for cloud vs. HPC systems; and best practices in migrating legacy workflows to workflow management systems.

Titov, Mikhail↗

Mesh Computing Remote Automatic Workflow

The software suite uses a microservice architecture using Docker and `docker-compose`. The microservices are as follows: 1. User interface. This interface is written in JavaScript using the Svelte framework. It exposes form elements and a 3D visualizer to prompt the user through the definition of microstructure parameters, and setting parameters for mesh generation and refinement. 2. Mesh generator. This is a container running the Python package for DREAM3D to generate a voxelized mesh that represents a microstructure defined by the user in the interface. 3. Cubit runner. This is a secure shell protocol tool that makes the submitting the DREAM mesh to an HPC instance and starts to run Cubit shell commands to smooth the grain boundaries with its `sculpt` library, applies user-defined boundary node sets, and bundles and returns the simulation-ready meshes and input files as a zipped directory.

Harris, BrennanKay↗

Leveraging History to Predict Infrequent Abnormal Transfers in Distributed Workflows

Scientific computing heavily relies on data shared by the community, especially in distributed data-intensive applications. This research focuses on predicting slow connections that create bottlenecks in distributed workflows. In this study, we analyze network traffic logs collected between January 2021 and August 2022 at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC). Based on the observed patterns, we define a set of features primarily based on history for identifying low-performing data transfers. Typically, there are far fewer slow connections on well-maintained networks, which creates difficulty in learning to identify these abnormally slow connections from the normal ones. We devise several stratified sampling techniques to address the class-imbalance challenge and study how they affect the machine learning approaches. Our tests show that a relatively simple technique that undersamples the normal cases to balance the number of samples in two classes (normal and slow) is very effective for model training. This model predicts slow connections with an F1 score of 0.926.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Building the I (Interoperability) of FAIR for performance reproducibility of large-scale composable workflows in RECUP

Abstract-Scientific computing communities increasingly run their experiments using complex data- and compute-intensive workflows that utilize distributed and heterogeneous architectures targeting numerical simulations and machine learning, often executed on the Department of Energy Leadership Computing Facilities (LCFs). We argue that a principled, systematic approach to implementing FAIR principles at scale, including fine-grained metadata extraction and organization, can help with the numerous challenges to performance reproducibility posed by such workflows. We extract workflow patterns, propose a set of tools to manage the entire life cycle of performance metadata, and aggregate them in an HPC-ready framework for reproducibility (RECUP). We describe the challenges in making these tools interoperable, preliminary work, and lessons learned from this experiment.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Workflow Provenance in the Computing Continuum for Responsible, Trustworthy, and Energy-Efficient AI

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more pervasive in our society, it is crucial to develop, deploy, and assess Responsible and Trustworthy AI (RTAI) models, i.e., those that consider not only accuracy but also other aspects, such as explainability, fairness, and energy efficiency. Workflow provenance data have historically enabled critical capabilities towards RTAI. Provenance data derivation paths contribute to responsible workflows through transparency in tracking artifacts and resource consumption. Provenance data are well-known for their trustworthiness helping explainability, reproducibility, and accountability. However, there are complex challenges to achieve RTAI, which are further complicated by the heterogeneous infrastructure in the computing continuum (Edge-Cloud-HPC) used to develop and deploy models. As a result, a significant research and development gap remains between workflow provenance data management and RTAI. In this paper, we present a vision of the pivotal role of workflow provenance in supporting RTAI and discuss related challenges. We present a schematic view between RTAI and provenance, and highlight open research directions.

Santos Souza, Renan↗

Workflows for Science: A comprehensive guide for ensemble workflow tools usage with applications on OLCF systems

The growing demand for robust computational and workflow environments for scientific applications and user communities at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) has prompted collaboration with ensemble tools development teams and facility users to produce this technical paper. We connect science applications to the RADICAL-Pilot (RP) workflow tool to execute ensemble instantiations using the Frontier supercomputer. The documented installation, usage, and execution demonstrates how RP streamlines scientific workflows at OLCF. We outline the specific steps OLCF users can follow to integrate this tool with their applications and advance their research. This document stands as a comprehensive guide to OLCF users of ensemble workflow tools with examples on real applications using the Frontier supercomputer.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Integration of scanning probe microscope with high-performance computing: Fixed-policy and reward-driven workflows implementation

The rapid development of computation power and machine learning algorithms has paved the way for automating scientific discovery with a scanning probe microscope (SPM). The key elements toward operationalization of the automated SPM are the interface to enable SPM control from Python codes, availability of high computing power, and development of workflows for scientific discovery. Here, we build a Python interface library that enables controlling an SPM from either a local computer or a remote high-performance computer, which satisfies the high computation power need of machine learning algorithms in autonomous workflows. We further introduce a general platform to abstract the operations of SPM in scientific discovery into fixed-policy or reward-driven workflows. Furthermore, our work provides a full infrastructure to build automated SPM workflows for both routine operations and autonomous scientific discovery with machine learning.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DYFLOW: A flexible framework for orchestrating scientific workflows on supercomputers

Modern scientific workflows are increasing in complexity with growth in computation power, incorporation of non-traditional computation methods, and advances in technologies enabling data streaming to support on-the-fly computation. These workflows have unpredictable runtime behaviors, and a fixed, predetermined resource assignment on supercomputers can be inefficient for overall performance and throughput. Inability to change resource assignments further limits the scientists to avail of science-driven opportunities or respond to failures.We introduce DYFLOW, a flexible framework that orchestrates scientific workflows on supercomputers based on user-designed policies. DYFLOW compartmentalizes orchestration stages into simplified constructs, and end-users can program and reuse them according to their workflow requirements through an easy-to-use interface. These constructs hide the intricacies involved in runtime management from end-users, for instance, procurement of information to understand the workflow state, assessment, and supervision of the runtime changes. DYFLOW is designed to work alongside existing workflow management systems and reuse the available (static) support for workflow management. We have integrated DYFLOW with an existing workflow management tool as a demonstration. With experiments performed on use cases from three types of scientific workflows and two different parallel architectures, we show that DYFLOW achieves the desired orchestration incurring a small cost to carry out the runtime changes.

Singhal, Swati↗

Scientific Data Management Beyond Traditional Computing Boundaries

Scientific data management is undergoing a fundamental transformation driven by the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning workflows, distributed computing and storage environments, and exponential data growth. Here, we analyze how these developments address current limitations while enabling new capabilities for cross-facility collaboration and AI-driven research.

Widener, Patrick [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (O↗

Engineering Computational Practices (Rev. 1)

This manual will attempt to motivate the use of an automated build system for the purposes of computational science and engineering. As part of this motivation, the surrounding computational practices of version control, documen tation, compute environment management, and regression testing will also be addressed as applied to the practice of computational engineering. Specifically, this manual intends to motivate the adoption of these traditional software engineering practices for use in research and production engineering simulation projects. This manual is not the first such effort in the greater scientific computing community. In fact, the authors relied heavily on the lesson plans of the Software Carpentry, established to teach computing skills to researchers in 1998. As the intention for this manual is to lay out fundamental practices of engineering computing, it will not attempt to fully teach the underlying concepts and will instead reference the well designed lesson plans of the Software Carpentry. Where possible, this manual will explain to general computing practices and concepts and limit discussion of specific software implementations to examples or vehicles for practice in concrete application. The specific software taught by the Software Carpentry curriculum is an excellent starting point to learn the core concepts of computational engi neering. However, the authors have found that applications to engineering simulation and analysis require translation of these software development concepts into the language and workflows of computational engineers. Adopting these computational tools may require engineers to re-imagine their workflows in some combination of traditional engineer ing and software concepts. It has also been necessary to extend existing software build systems for engineering practices beyond the simple wrap ping of engineering software execution. Where necessary, examples of specific software and their method of extension to engineering simulations will be given, with reference to the User Manual for recommended practical use. Where this manual relies on specific implementation examples, it should be understood that the practicing engineer may find that different software is more amenable to their specific work. It is always the overall collection of computational practices is more important than any specific software implementation. The ability to recognize which concepts are implemented by a software package will make a practicing engineer agile to changing project needs, computing resources, numeric solvers, programming languages, and even available funding.

42 ENGINEERING↗

2019 Computing Sciences Strategic Plan

Computing has transformed nearly every aspect of scientific inquiry — across disciplines and across scales — from the behavior of subatomic particles to the formation of structures in the early universe, from the assembly of the human genome to the evolution of earth systems. Over the past two decades, computing has become an integral part of how Berkeley Lab is “Bringing Science Solutions to the World.” Advances in computing and mathematics have been key, with new mathematical models of complex physical phenomena, new methods for analyzing complex data, new algorithms for accuracy and scaling and sophisticated software systems that encapsulate these techniques into open, reusable tools. The performance of NERSC computers and the ESnet network have grown by several orders of magnitude, along with our understanding of how to map scientific computations and workflows onto these systems. From research to facility operations, the passion, talent and dedication of the Computing Sciences Area staff has been the cornerstone of our success. The plan outlined in this document describes the next step in a journey to expand the influence and impact of our efforts, building an increasingly connected global enterprise for science that places more powerful instruments in the hands of scientists, along with more powerful methods and tools for modeling, analysis and prediction.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

What's Left for a Computational Chemist To Do in the Age of Machine Learning?

Machine learning (ML) has become a central focus of the computational chemistry community. In this paper, I will first discuss my personal history in the field. Then I will provide a broader view of how this resurgence in ML interest echoes and advances upon earlier efforts. Although numerous changes have brought about this latest wave, one of the most significant is the increased accuracy and efficiency of low-cost methods (e.g., density functional theory or DFT) that have made it possible to generate large data sets for ML models. ML has also been used to bypass, guide, or improve DFT. The field of computational chemistry thus finds itself at a crossroads as ML both augments and supersedes traditional efforts. I will present what I believe the role of the computational chemist will be in this evolving landscape, with specific focus on my experience in the development of autonomous workflows in computational materials discovery for open-shell transition-metal chemistry.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

WAVES [Slides]

WAVES (LANL code C23004) is a computational engineering workflow tool that integrates parametric studies with traditional software build systems.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Interactive Supercomputing With Jupyter

Rich user interfaces like Jupyter have the potential to make interacting with a supercomputer easier and more productive, consequently attracting new kinds of users and helping to expand the application of supercomputing to new science domains. For the scientist-user, the ideal rich user interface delivers a familiar, responsive, introspective, modular, and customizable platform upon which to build, run, capture, document, re-run, and share analysis workflows. From the provider or system administrator perspective, such a platform would also be easy to configure, deploy securely, update, customize, and support. Jupyter checks most if not all of these boxes. But from the perspective of leadership computing organizations that provide supercomputing power to users, such a platform should also make the unique features of a supercomputer center more accessible to users and more composable with high performance computing (HPC) workflows. Project Jupyter’s core design philosophy of extensibility, abstraction, and agnostic deployment, has allowed HPC centers like NERSC to bring in advanced supercomputing capabilities that can extend the interactive notebook environment. This has enabled a rich scientific discovery platform, particularly for experimental facility data analysis and machine learning problems.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Dial

A key step in almost all scientific endeavors is answering the question: Given this data I already collected, what new data do I expect will yield the most useful information toward my scientific objective? The area of (sequential) experimental design has long been investigating answers to this question, but in recent years techniques from the machine learning subfield of active learning are increasingly applied. Researchers need a simple software tool for active learning applied to experimental design that can easily integrate into their existing workflows. This computer code, Dial, provides a microservice in ORNL's INTERSECT ecosystem for active learning applied to experimental design. By being part of the INTERSECT ecosystem, Dial is simple to integrate into any INTERSECT-based workflow. Dial provides multiple backend options, where a backend is an implementation of a specific active learning method. Users can select the backend that performs best for their application. Developers can also add new backends as needed. At its core, Dial receives a set of pre-existing measurements and input parameter bounds and then recommends one or more new sets of parameters to measure. Dial also includes interfaces to other microservices in the INTERSECT ecosystem so that it can be incorporated into INTERSECT campaigns. Dial provides a simple, yet powerful interface to convert automated INTERSECT workflows into autonomous workflows that adapt based on the results that are obtained. A shared microservice for active learning prevents duplicated effort by each application team implementing its own adaptive design of experiments tool.

Drane, Lance [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)↗

Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution

Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from the execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing (often referred to as a computing continuum) and the evolving needs of emerging scientific applications, it is paramount that the development of novel scientific workflows and system functionalities seek to increase the efficiency, resilience, and pervasiveness of existing systems and applications. Specifically, the proliferation of machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) workflows, need for processing large-scale datasets produced by instruments at the edge, intensification of near real-time data processing, support for long-term experiment campaigns, and emergence of quantum computing as an adjunct to HPC, have significantly changed the functional and operational requirements of workflow systems. Workflow systems now need to, for example, support data streams from the edge-to-cloud-to-HPC, enable the management of many small-sized files, allow data reduction while ensuring high accuracy, orchestrate distributed services (workflows, instruments, data movement, provenance, publication, etc.) across computing and user facilities, among others. Further, to accelerate science, it is also necessary that these systems implement specifications/standards and APIs for seamless (horizontal and vertical) integration between systems and applications, as well as enable the publication of workflows and their associated products according to the FAIR principles.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Computationally evaluating high-yield metabolites for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) using machine learning

The computational tool described in this report helps identify promising biological pathways that produce SAF platform molecules (either a drop-in SAF, or a precursor that can be easily converted to a drop-in SAF). The workflow the computational tool follows first identifies possible biological pathways from a user-defined metabolite. These pathways may, or may not lead to a SAF platform molecule, thus the second step involves insilico testing of the end product of each pathway to assess whether it is, or is not, a SAF platform molecule. The identification of biological pathways performed in the first step is facilitated by linking the metabolite to a biological reaction database. Pathways are found by identifying pathways in the reaction database that include the metabolite. The computational tool includes an alternative way to find pathways. The alternative way develops a Flux Balanced Analysis (FBA), and modifying the FBA to include reactions that transform the metabolite. These modifications serve as a basis for understanding, in a semi-quantitative way, if there is an increase in the flux to desirable products. The second step, in silico testing of the end-products, is accomplished by estimating key physical properties relevant to SAF. When good models are available, we have integrated those models into the computational tool. In a few instances, we have developed our own models. In all instances, we have validated the models against available measured data. Finally, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our computational tool by genetically engineering Rhodosporidium toruloides. Validation occurred without the use of a FBA, and further validation is required.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗