Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Turbulent Simulation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre-and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre-and post-buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the span wise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRS2023

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗
DOE OSTI2020

Boundary-consistent B-spline filtering schemes and application to high-fidelity simulations of turbulence

A filtering operation, based on B-spline discretizations, is introduced to target weakly growing mesh-scale oscillations that can arise in high-fidelity turbulence simulations. This is a spectral regularization that can be described using the singular values of a banded matrix operator, with the filtering strength set by a scalar- or vector-valued penalty parameter. The penalty parameter can be specified though it can also be advantageously selected to minimize the generalized cross validation (GCV) measure of distance between the pre- and post-filtered solutions. Efficient algorithms are developed to compute both the scalar and vector penalty parameters. The B-spline filter has a sharper localization to high-wavenumber than compact or explicit filters of the same stencil width and is demonstrated for solutions of the Burgers' equation, decaying Burgers' turbulence, and compressible Navier–Stokes turbulent channel flow. Furthermore, these simulations confirm the scheme's numerical stability and ability to narrowly target the high wavenumber components of numerical solutions. An advantage over finite-difference filters is that these B-spline filters are stable on bounded domains and even preserve formal order of accuracy.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
NASA NTRS2019

Dynamic Smagorinsky Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulence Using Tetrahedral Meshes

Eddy-resolving numerical computations of turbulent flows are emerging as viable alternatives to Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations for flows with an intrinsically steady mean state due to the advances in large-scale parallel computing. In these computations, medium to large turbulent eddies are resolved by the numerics while the smaller or subgrid scales are either modeled or taken care of by the inherent numerical dissipation. To advance the state of the art of unstructured-mesh turbulence simulation capabilities, large eddy simulations (LES) using the dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM) on tetrahedral meshes are carried out with the space-time conservation element, solution element (CESE) method. In contrast to what has been reported in the literature, the present implementation of dynamic models allows for active backscattering without any ad-hoc limiting of the eddy viscosity calculated from the subgrid-scale model. For the benchmark problems involving compressible isotropic turbulence decay as well as the shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction benchmark problems, no numerical instability associated with kinetic energy growth is observed and the volume percentage of the backscattering portion accounts for about 38-40% of the simulation domain. A slip-wall model in conjunction with the implemented DSM is used to simulate a relatively high Reynolds number Mach 2.85 turbulent boundary layer over a 30° ramp with several tetrahedral meshes and a wall-normal spacing of either Δγ& = 10 or Δγ& = 20. The computed mean wall pressure distribution, separation region size, mean velocity profiles, and Reynolds stress agree reasonably well with experimental data.

CESE method↗
DOE OSTI2015

Flux-driven simulations of turbulence collapse

Using three-dimensional nonlinear simulations of tokamak turbulence, we show that an edge transport barrier (ETB) forms naturally once input power exceeds a threshold value. Profiles, turbulence-driven flows, and neoclassical coefficients are evolved self-consistently. A slow power ramp-up simulation shows that ETB transition is triggered by the turbulence-driven flows via an intermediate phase which involves coherent oscillation of turbulence intensity and E×B flow shear. A novel observation of the evolution is that the turbulence collapses and the ETB transition begins when R{sub T} > 1 at t = t{sub R} (R{sub T}: normalized Reynolds power), while the conventional transition criterion (ω{sub E×B}>γ{sub lin} where ω{sub E×B} denotes mean flow shear) is satisfied only after t = t{sub C} ( >t{sub R}), when the mean flow shear grows due to positive feedback.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
NASA NTRS1988

Investigation of heat and momentum transport in turbulent flows via numerical simulations

Turbulent transport of heat is studied by examining the flow fields obtained from a direct simulation of a turbulent channel flow. The turbulence structures associated with the velocity and scalar fields are presented using air (Pr = 0.71) as the medium. A comparison is made between the wall-layer structures identified by the temperature field and the structures found in the velocity field. Consideration is also given to the role of the organized turbulence structures in scalar transport.

Kim, John↗