Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fuel cycle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Supporting Document 5 Considerations on Learning

Learning refers here to the increased experience associated to each new build of a given type of fuel cycle facility, which results generally in design improvements, increased construction and operational efficiencies and reduced mistakes, and therefore in reduced costs. These are important considerations, for example, when modeling transitions from first-of-a-kind (FOAK) to nth-of-a-kind (NOAK) nuclear facilities and deciding the magnitude of the cost reduction (if any) to be applied to each successive build. Different assumptions on learning can significantly affect the results of the economic analyses during transitions. Other competing electricity-generation technologies, such as wind and solar power for example, have demonstrated substantial cost reductions through learning during the last few decades.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

SCALE Analyses of Scenarios in the TRISO-based Heat Pipe Microreactor Fuel Cycle

This report documents the application of the SCALE code to the analysis of a TRistructural-ISOtropic (TRISO)-based heat pipe microreactor (HPMR) within the context of its nuclear fuel cycle stages. The evaluation was conducted in support of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s ongoing efforts to assess modeling capabilities for advanced non–light-water reactor technologies. The generic HPMR selected as a representative microreactor concept features a compact core design that incorporates TRISO fuel compacts, passive heat removal via heat pipes, and a transportable configuration intended for deployment in remote environments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Comparison of Gas Phase Fragmentation Behaviors of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Ligands in Lanthanide and Americium Metal Ligand Nitrate Clusters

Title (20 word): Comparison of Gas Phase Fragmentation Behaviors of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Ligands in Lanthanide and Americium Metal Ligand Nitrate Clusters Introduction (120 words): Transport of metal ions across the aqueous-organic phase boundary is an essential step in a hydrometallurgical nuclear fuel reprocessing strategy. The study of transport agents for nuclear fuel elements is imperative to guide the design of ligands that boost the separation efficiency of the recovery process from fission products. However, limited studies have been made on the chemistry of these transport agents when complexing with transuranic elements in gas-phase where all surrounding factors are essentially excluded. This work investigates the reagent ligand complexations to transuranic and other metals and their dissociations in the gas phase. Comparisons are made between 4f and 5f elements and between ligands. Methods (120 words): (N,N-diisobutylcarbamoylmethyl)phenyloctylphosphine oxide (CMPO) and N,N,N',N'-tetraoctyldiglycolamide (TODGA) have been selected to complex with metal nitrates. The actinide americium and lanthanides neodymium, samarium, and europium were investigated as part of this work. The lanthanides were selected to act as size and electron configuration analogues of the minor actinides. Metal complexes with two ligands and two nitrates ([M(NO3)2(CMPO)2]+, for example) are studied in Bruker micrOTOF-Q II mass spectrometer equipped with collision-induced dissociation capability. The comparisons of the mass spectra are made in groups of homogenous ligands and mixed TODGA-CMPO ligands clusters. Comparisons are also made based on the complexed metals (Am and lanthanides). Preliminary data (300 words): Collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry data are collected on two ligands complexed with metal nitrates where the two ligands are homogenous, with (CMPO)2 or (TODGA)2, or heterogeneous, with (TODGA)(CMPO). Several fragmentation patterns are observed among complexes with the CMPO ligand whereas the TODGA ligand commonly dissociates intact from the complex. Most of the metal complexes exhibit similar fragmentation patterns, but there are a few notable deviations in fragmentation patterns between the Am and Ln-bearing complexes. For the [M(CMPO)2(NO3)2]+ complexes, the initial loss of nitrate in the form of nitric acid is observed in all four complexes. However, [Am(CMPO)2(NO3)2]+ exhibits an additional fragmentation not found in the lanthanide complexes. Also, a significantly different ratio of the second nitric acid loss is found in the Am complex. These deviations may indicate the different interaction behaviors between actinides and lanthanides. The [M(TODGA)2(NO3)2]+ complexes exhibit the fragmentation as the loss of one TODGA ligand as an intact form and the loss of nitrate as nitric acid. The Am complex exhibits an additional fragmentation after losing the TOGDA ligand, which is not observed among the Ln complexes. The heterogeneous [M(TODGA)(CMPO)(NO3)2]+ complexes exhibit both similarities and differences between the Am and Ln complexes. For example, the heterogenous Am complex does not exhibit the loss of an intact TODGA ligand while all three Ln complexes do. This indicates that TODGA may bind more strongly to Am than Ln. Additionally, the intensity of the loss of CMPO ligand (as partially or whole) is found to be significantly larger than that of the loss of TODGA (as partially of whole) indicating that TODGA is bound to the metal significantly stronger than CMPO. Planned computational analysis will help understand the deviation in fragmentation behaviors between americium and lanthanide metal centers, or between TODGA and CMPO ligands. Novel aspect (20 words): Gas-phase actinide and lanthanide complex formation and fragmentation provide insight into the coordination environment differences of f-element metals.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Procedure for the Computational Models created for the DOE/NRC Collaboration for Criticality Safety Support for Commercial-Scale HALEU Fuel Cycles Project (DNCSH)

This procedure outlines the application models developed as part of the US Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) collaboration for criticality safety support for commercial scale HALEU fuel cycle and transportation (DNCSH) project, an effort authorized by the US Congress. The project is a joint effort among the DOE, NRC, numerous national laboratories, and private enterprises with project management from Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-7 Contact-Handled Pelletized Pressurized Heavy Water (PHWR) UOX Fuel Fabrication (Rev.1)

In addition to literature-based pressurized heavy-water reactor (PHWR) fuel price information in the 2017 AFC-CBR, the what-it-takes (WIT) unit cost data in this update is informed by new analysis and escalation of the 1978 PHWR-UOX fuel life cycle cost (LCC) data from ORNL reports prepared for the 1977–1980 Nonproliferation Alternative Systems Assessment Program (NASAP). (These reports are referenced and summarized in detail in Module D1-PR.) The PHWR fuel fabrication LCC data in these reports is scaled from a bottom-up cost estimate for a reference technology pressurized-water reactor (PWR)—uranium oxide (UOX) fuel fabrication plant by using algorithms that consider the manufacturing process complexity, fuel design complexity, plant floor space requirements, and the radiation and health, safety, and environmental (HS&E) regulatory environment of PHWR-UOX fuel production vis-à-vis light-water reactor (LWR)-UOX production (PWR fuel in this case). The module name has been changed from “Canadian Deuterium Uranium (CANDU)” to the more generic PHWR fuel fabrication in recognition that not all power reactors that might use this fuel type are considered. Unfortunately, the detailed algorithms and their design bases were not archived at the end of the NASAP effort of the commercial CANDU concept specifically developed in the middle of the last century by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Outline for Feasibility Study on Nuclear Material Accounting and Control Technologies for Pu Fuel Cycle Facilities under Decommissioning at Tokai Site [Slides]

DOE/NNSA and JAEA to conduct a feasibility study on nuclear material accounting and control needs and requirements for non-destructive assay (NDA) measurement of material unaccounted for (MUF) in waste streams at JAEA Tokai fuel cycle facilities during the decommissioning process. Under this study, both sides will exchange information, perform an assessment of needs and requirements, and develop joint recommendations for development of NDA systems at select facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-2 LWR Pelletized MOX Fuel Fabrication

Nature of this 2021 Module update from previous AFC-CBRs: Use of U,Pu MOX life cycle cost data from late 1970s Non-proliferation Assessment Systems Analysis Program (NASAP). This archived data has been updated in 2018-2019 to reflect today’s regulatory and economic conditions and is presented in 2017. For the lower unit cost MOX fabrication case the PuO 2 from the reprocessed LWR SNF is assumed to be fabricated immediately after aqueous PUREX reprocessing, thus minimizing the time for undesirable actinide radioisotopes, from the standpoint of radiation safety, to build in. Fabricated MOX utilizing separated and multi-year stored Pu from aqueously reprocessed SNF has also been added to this Module as a second LWR MOX fabrication variant, requiring additional and more costly glovebox design and operations to protect personnel. This new NASAP-informed data augments historical data and unit cost projections appearing in the 2009 (Shropshire et al 2009), 2012 (Dixon et al 2012), and 2017 Dixon et al 2017) AFC-CBRs. The “What-it-takes” 2017 unit fabrication cost values based on the updated NASAP studies are escalated to 2020$ for this 2021 Update Report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Recent Advances in Cladding Material Extraction from Fuels in Nuclear Fuel Cycles

An improved recycling and recovery process for the cladding material from spent nuclear fuels is very important toward confirming nuclear energy to support ongoing sustainable development of nuclear management by reducing waste and conserving resources. Nuclear spent fuel cladding materials such as zirconium alloys have economic values and can be recovered, and their recovery eliminates problems in waste disposal and conserves valuable resources. Over 110 published reports and journal articles are reviewed and summarized herein, with a main focus on documenting recovery techniques used to recover cladding materials from spent nuclear fuel and recent developments. Several recovery techniques which are used at present times, such as mechanical separation, chemical dissolution, and hydrometallurgical processes have been covered with examples and discussions. Difficulties within the recovery process are also discussed, and most probable areas for future research in improving efficiency and sustainability of recovering cladding material are identified and discussed at the end. Here, this review could be an important document to the field of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, recovering valuables and thereby offering guidance on how to effectively manage, safely handle, and reduce nuclear waste. In addition to reducing the volume and radiotoxicity of high-level waste, this review also highlights the potential economic benefit of recovering zirconium from spent fuel cladding by relating typical zirconium metal prices to the mass of cladding per tonne of spent fuel, illustrating that the recoverable material value is non-negligible compared with back-end fuel-cycle costs.

Mondal, Kunal [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL↗

Backend Nuclear Fuel Cycle Radiation Chemistry

Given global commitments to significantly increase nuclear energy capacity, it is now more important than ever to develop efficient used nuclear fuel management strategies to improve resource utilization, energy security, and waste minimization. Here, an overview of nuclear energy, backend fuel cycle challenges, and advances in used nuclear fuel reprocessing radiation chemistry will be presented. More specifically, the use of electron pulse irradiation techniques to explore radiation-induced reaction mechanisms in actinide containing solutions and solvent systems.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain (NFCSC) Technical Monthly September FY-24

AFC hosted the Light Water Reactor (LWR) Fuels Research Workshop and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Collaborative Research on Advanced Fuel Technologies (CRAFT) Meeting September 9-13, 2024. The Department of Energy's (DOE) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) program is pivotal in advancing clean energy through collaborative innovation in fuel technology for light water reactors (LWRs). For over a decade, AFC has engaged a wide array of stakeholders—researchers, industry participants, and regulatory bodies—both within the U.S. and internationally to develop ATF technology. This initiative aims to enhance the safety and economic performance of both Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) and LWRs. To foster community relationships and disseminate research, AFC initiated annual LWR Fuel workshops in 2024, supplementing ongoing industry-led CRAFT workshops.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Improved Fuel Cycle Capability of Griffin for Fast Reactor Applications

Griffin is a MOOSE based reactor multiphysics analysis application jointly developed by Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory under the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation Program. This fiscal year, the fuel cycle capability has been significantly extended by improving the assembly shuffling option to allow flexible fuel reloading in the multi-cycle depletion calculation and incorporating decay between cycles. An equilibrium core calculation capability was also implemented to find an equilibrium core. Additionally, an enrichment search capability was added to determine the enrichment condition that allows a core to reach an equilibrium cycle with the end-of-cycle k-effective meeting a user-specified target value. The updated fuel management capability has been extensively tested using the three-dimensional ABTR problem with different batch schemes, exhibiting reasonable solutions in terms of manual shuffling, equilibrium cycle, and enrichment search calculations. The cross section generation workflow capability for fast reactors was further verified to produce microscopic cross sections as well as Griffin core inputs for an ring-heterogeneous configuration. Rigorous verification tests using the ABTR problem demonstrated that the RH core calculations, with cross sections and Griffin inputs generated from the cross section workflow of Griffin, produced accurate solution for fast reactor problems. In addition, an option to convert delay neutron parameter data generated from MC 2 -3 in the DLAYXS format into XML format was added to support transient calculations using MC 2 -3-generated data.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Comparison of Fuel Cycles for Lead-Lithium and Pure Lithium Liquid Metal Walls in a Magnetized Target Fusion Power Plant

General Fusion (GF) is developing an adaptable, commercial fusion power plant based on magnetized target fusion (MTF). The GF approach involves forming a spherical torus of deuterium-tritium plasma in a large (~4 m diameter) cavity formed in liquid metal, and then collapsing that cavity with an array of pneumatic piston drivers. The liquid metal is constantly flowing through the fusion chamber and out to processing systems where tritium and heat will be extracted using tritium extraction technologies and heat exchangers, respectively. Here, this study focuses on two candidate designs for the liquid metal blanket and first wall material for the General Fusion Magnetized Target Fusion (GF MTF) power plant and assesses their impact on the tritium fuel cycle. The first candidate is the lead lithium eutectic (LLE) and the second candidate is pure lithium (Li). It was found that the main differences between LLE and Li designs are the extraction technologies required to remove tritium from the blanket and the amount of tritium and its distribution within the facility. More than 80% of the in-process tritium inventory for the LLE design is contained in the isotope separation system, while for the Li design, over 60% of the in-process tritium inventory is contained within the blanket material. This is due to significant tritium retention by Li. For the Li blanket, the burden of tritium processing rests on the blanket extraction technology rather than the traditional exhaust processing route. Thus, the blanket extraction technology is a main driver of tritium inventory in the Li system and determines the subsequent interface with the tritium processing plant.

General Fusion↗

Iodine Mass Tracking Research and Development Needs for Pyrochemical Fuel Cycles

This report was generated jointly by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and Idaho National Laboratory to provide a high-level summary of the current knowledge on the behavior of fission product iodine during reprocessing of used nuclear fuel, as well as provide recommended path forward for research and development activities to fill particular knowledge gaps. The focus of this work is on pyrochemical processing as is applied to light water reactor (LWR) oxide-based used nuclear fuels (UNF), however, some discussion of electrorefiner behavior from metal fuel processing equipment is also included.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Modeling and analysis of the tritium fuel cycle for ARC- and STEP-class D-T fusion power plants

Abstract The limited tritium resources available for the first fusion power plants (FPPs) make fuel self-sufficiency and tritium inventory minimization leading issues in FPP design. This work builds on the model proposed by Abdou et al (2020 Nucl. Fusion 61 013001), which analyzed the fuel cycle (FC) of a DEMOnstration nuclear FPP-class FPP with a time-dependent system-level model. Here, we use a modified version of their model to analyze the FC of an Affordable, Robust, Compact (ARC)-class tokamak and two versions of a Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP)-class tokamak. The ARC-class tokamak breeds tritium in a 2LiF + BeF 2 liquid immersion blanket, while the STEP-class tokamak breeds tritium utilizing either a liquid-lithium blanket design or an encapsulated breeding blanket. A time-dependent system-level model is developed in Matlab Simulink ® to simulate the evolution of tritium flows and tritium inventories in the FC. The main goals of this work are to assess tritium self-sufficiency of the ARC- and STEP-class designs and to determine quantitative design requirements that can be used to analyze the adequacy of a proposed FC system. These design requirements are aimed at achieving a low tritium inventory doubling time ( t d ) and a low start-up inventory ( I s t a r t u p ) while keeping the required tritium breeding ratio (TBR r ) as low as possible. We also consider how improvements in FC technology and POs affect TBR r and I s t a r t u p . The model results show that TBR r for ARC- and STEP-class FPPs should be achievable if the tritium burn efficiency (TBE) reaches 0.5%–1% (TBR r < 1.2). This assumes significant, but attainable, improvements over current abilities. However, the model results indicate that an FPP must achieve ambitious performance targets, including FPP availability > 70%, tritium processing time < 4 h, and the implementation of direct internal recycling (DIR). If future research yields major improvements to achievable TBE, it may be possible to achieve tritium self-sufficiency while operating at lower availability and without implementing DIR.

Physics↗

Neutron Total Scattering Analysis of Materials for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Here, this paper reviews recent experimental efforts at the University of Tennessee and Oak Ridge National Laboratory to comprehensively characterize the structural details of materials relevant for the nuclear fuel cycle by employing advanced neutron scattering techniques. For the study of nuclear ceramics, neutron scattering offers distinct advantages over traditional laboratory or synchrotron X-ray diffraction, including enhanced sensitivity to elements with a low atomic mass, such as oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon. The key to these efforts is the recent advancement in the neutron scattering infrastructure at the high-flux diffractometers at the Spallation Neutron Source. The high neutron flux at these instruments enables neutron total scattering, a nondestructive bulk technique that simultaneously captures both short-range structural effects through pair distribution function analysis and long-range order through diffraction pattern analysis. This approach is particularly important for a comprehensive description of defective, disordered, or amorphous nuclear materials. The case studies presented here include analyses of the local defect structure in hyperstoichiometric uranium oxides and short-range order of ion-irradiated ceramics. This advanced analytical methodology will improve our understanding of the behavior of materials in extreme environments and contribute to the development of more resilient nuclear materials.

Neutron scattering↗

Assessing fuel cycle design options for advanced microreactors

Microreactor (MR) technology have recently gained traction due to their reduced construction cost compared to traditional large reactors. Their small physical geometry results in increased neutron leakage and deteriorated neutron economy which limits the achievable burnup of MR fuel. Refueling strategy currently discussed in MR design community is the battery-like refueling which is involve replacing the entire reactor core at the end of their operational cycle. Here, this paper investigates partial core refueling as means to increase MR fuel burnup and improve fuel cycle economy as a result. Two fuel cycle design strategies have been successful. These are the partial core refueling and partial core refueling combined with assembly rotation. Both strategies have been tested to operate a heatpipe-cooled MR referred to as the eVinci-like core for 72 Effective Full Power Months (EFPMs). The partial core refueling showed to reduce the refueling requirements by 18% compared to the battery-like refueling strategy. This corresponds to 10.5% reduction in the Net Present Value (NPV) of fuel cost over the 72 EFPMs of operation. The partial core refueling combined with rotation case reduces the refueling requirements by 29% (corresponding to 14.5% reduction in NPV of fuel cost) compared to the battery-like refueling strategy.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗