Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Environmental Protection”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Life Support and Habitation Systems: Crew Support and Protection for Human Exploration Missions Beyond Low Earth Orbit

Life Support and Habitation Systems (LSHS) is one of 10 Foundational Domains as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration s proposed Enabling Technology Development and Demonstration (ETDD) Program. LSHS will develop and mature technologies to sustain life on long duration human missions beyond Low Earth Orbit that are reliable, have minimal logistics supply and increase self-sufficiency. For long duration exploration missions, further closure of life support systems is paramount, including focus on key technologies for atmosphere revitalization, water recovery, waste management, thermal control and crew accommodation that recover additional consumable mass, reduce requirements for power, volume, heat rejection, crew involvement, and which have increased reliability and capability. Other areas of focus include technologies for radiation protection, environmental monitoring and fire protection. Beyond LEO, return to Earth will be constrained. The potability of recycled water and purity of regenerated air must be measured and certified aboard the spacecraft. Missions must be able to recover from fire events through early detection, use of non-toxic suppression agents, and operation of recovery systems that protect on-board Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLS) hardware. Without the protection of the Earth s geomagnetic field, missions beyond LEO must have improved radiation shielding and dosimetry, as well as warning systems to protect the crew against solar particle events. This paper will describe plans for the new LSHS Foundational Domain and mission factors that will shape its technology development portfolio.

Barta, Daniel J.↗

There Are Safe Limits for Radioactivity - Does WIPP Need to Filter its Exhaust Air? - 17165

Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository resulted in the release of americium and plutonium (mostly {sup 241}Am) into the environment and contaminated portions of the repository, primarily along the ventilation path from the location of the incident. The WIPP uses a ventilation system to ensure that underground air is circulated through the repository and to ensure that air quality conditions are safe for the workers. Since the air in the repository exits to the surface through an exhaust shaft, this shaft is the sole potential pathway for airborne radioactivity release from the repository. During normal operations before the 2014 incident, exhaust air was released to the environment unfiltered, with an automatic switch to filtration when airborne radioactivity was detected immediately down-stream from the active waste disposal operation. However, since the radiation release event, the WIPP ventilation system has been, and will likely remain in what is called 'filtration mode,' (i.e., exhaust air is routed through a HEPA filter system). Redirection of the ventilation system through the HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter system was necessary at the peak of the radiation release event to protect aboveground workers at the site and the public in the surrounding areas; however, it has hampered recovery efforts and has exacerbated the inherent safety issues of working underground. As a component of the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center's (CEMRC) WIPP environmental monitoring program, airborne radioactivity samples are collected daily in the exhaust shaft ventilation air as it reaches the surface, and before entering the HEPA filters. Since June 2014, airborne radiation levels entering the HEPA filters have averaged about 1% of a derived air concentration (DAC) for {sup 241}Am. An airborne radioactivity level of one DAC is equivalent to a potential worker internal dose exposure of 50 mSv per work year, if a worker were continuously exposed for a full work year (2000 hours). During Project Reach and throughout decontamination campaigns conducted in Panel 7 for several months in 2015, these unfiltered levels rose to 3-5% of a DAC, with a one week spike reaching almost one DAC in June 2015, during decontamination of the most heavily contaminated exhaust drift in Panel 7. Since that period, the unfiltered levels have never exceeded 2% of a DAC. Going forward, the question is, should WIPP resume unfiltered discharge of its underground ventilation air? Evaluation of more than two years of underground ventilation sampling data indicates that residual radioactivity levels in the underground no longer warrant HEPA filtration in order to meet either worker or environmental protection criteria. In terms of radiological risk at or in the vicinity of the WIPP site, the increased risk from resuming unfiltered ventilation is exceedingly small and would not result in a hypothetical dose to a member of the public in excess of the 100 micro Sv per year limit for periodic confirmatory sampling as required for operating repositories by the Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR 191). In addition, the requirement for respiratory protection for workers underground exposed to 1-2% of a DAC is questionable, given the added industrial safety risk of heavy equipment operation while wearing respirators. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

MARSAME Radiological Release Report for Metal Items from Technical Area 53, Set 28

Environmental Protection and Compliance, Environmental Stewardship Group (EPC-ES) has evaluated the survey results for metal items from the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) at Technical Area 53 (TA-53) and found that the metal items described in Table 1 of this report (identified by Radiation Protection [RP] Tracking Numbers) meet the criteria for unrestricted release under Department of Energy (DOE) Order 458.1 Chg 4, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment (DOE 2020) and can be recycled. This conclusion is based on the known history of the metal items and radiation survey data (see the completed RP-Form-031 LANSCE Metals Clearance Log [LANL 2021a] for each item in Attachment 1). Process knowledge indicates that items were released from radiological areas, including radiation areas, prior to the implementation of the 2000 metals moratorium. Therefore, the items are considered unencumbered and are not subject to the moratorium suspension on metal recycling from DOE facilities. Additionally, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has determined that there is no practical opportunity for internal DOE reuse of this metal. Process knowledge indicates that these metal items were unlikely to ever be in direct contact with the beam and thus are unlikely to have become activated. Surface contamination measurements (both total and removable) showed either no detectable radioactivity or activity levels within the range of background. All measurements for volumetric contamination were indistinguishable from background based on calculated decision limits. Additionally, all gamma isotopic surveys conducted for defense-in depth showed no identifiable gamma radiation from beam activation.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

Should WIPP Resume Unfiltered Discharge of Underground Ventilation?

On February 14, 2014 an incident in Panel 7, Room 7 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository resulted in the release of americium and plutonium (mostly {sup 241}Am) into the environment and contaminated portions of the repository primarily along the ventilation path from the location of the incident. The WIPP uses a ventilation system to ensure that underground air is circulated throughout the repository and to ensure that conditions are safe for the workers. Since the air in the repository exits to the surface through an exhaust shaft, this shaft is the sole potential pathway for airborne radioactivity release from the repository. During normal operations, exhaust air is released to the environment unfiltered. However, since the radiation release event, the WIPP ventilation system has been, and will likely remain in what is called 'filtration mode', (i.e., exhaust air is routed through a HEPA filter system). Redirection of the ventilation system through the HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter system was necessary at the peak of the radiation release event to protect aboveground workers at the site and the public in the surrounding areas. However, evaluation of more than two years of underground ventilation sampling data indicates that residual radioactivity levels in the underground no longer warrant HEPA filtration in order to meet either worker or environmental protection criteria. WIPP should consider resumption of the unfiltered discharge of underground ventilation to the environment. Recent sampling data indicate that there have been no detectable releases that would have resulted in a hypothetical dose to a worker or a member of the public in excess of the 0.1 mSv (10 mrem) per year limit for periodic confirmatory sampling as required for operating repositories by the Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR 191)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

EPC-ES WIPP WAC Appendix A Equivalence Support Measurements 2019-2020

Characterization of low-level waste (LLW) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is primarily performed by the Environmental Protection and Compliance - Environmental Stewardship (EPC-ES) Characterization Services team and/or the Nuclear Process Infrastructure (NPI--9) Nuclear Material Support Services team (hereafter referred to as the gamma spectroscopy teams). The gamma spectroscopy teams use portable high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector systems for the nondestructive assay (NDA) characterization of LLW. Controlled-approved procedures and processes for the use of such systems to assay LLW items are currently in place. Additionally, a number of performance studies have been conducted by the gamma spectroscopy teams to support the efficacy and quality of assay results generated by the established NDA process.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

KSC Headquarters Building Area SWMU 104 Soil Interim Measure Report for LOC 2D and LOC 2E Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Interim Measure (IM) Report for Location of Concern (LOC) 2D and LOC 2E summarizes the activities associated with implementation of an IM to address soil and concrete contamination at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Headquarters Building Area (KHQA) located at KSC, Florida. KHQA has been designated Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 104 under KSC’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Program. The IM consisted of excavating/removing residual polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination in soil and concrete from two separate areas, LOC 2D and LOC 2E, which were associated with electrical transformer locations. IM activities were conducted in accordance with the Interim Measure Work Plan (IMWP), Revision 1, for KHQA dated June 2018, which was approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in a correspondence letter dated April 2016 and the United States Environmental Protection Agency in a correspondence letter dated August 2018. The objective of the IM was to remove all remaining contaminated media with total PCB concentrations greater than the State of Florida Residential Soil Cleanup Target Level (RSCTL) (0.5 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]). This cleanup goal meets unrestrictive re-use conditions in Florida, and is below federal regulations for PCB Bulk Remediation Waste Cleanup of 1 mg/kg for high occupancy, unrestricted use areas, as outlined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 761.61(a). The timeline of the IM was coordinated with demolition of the former KSC Headquarters Building (demolished in 2021) in order to safely remove contaminated media after electrical equipment was de-energized and removed from the site. Excavation activities were conducted between January 10, 2022, and February 8, 2022, and included two waste streams for off-site disposal: (1) PCB-remediation waste greater than or equal to 50 mg/kg, and (2) PCB-remediation waste less than 50 mg/kg. A total of approximately 347 cubic yards (478 tons) of PCB-contaminated soil and concrete was initially removed from the LOC 2D and LOC 2E areas, as defined in the IMWP. An additional 4.35 tons of soil and concrete were removed based on verification sampling, which was conducted until the cleanup goal was achieved. The total area of excavation from both LOC 2D and LOC 2E was approximately 5,186 square feet (0.12 acres), and excavation depths ranged from 0.5 to 4.0 feet below land surface Excavated soils and concrete were stockpiled based on waste stream and subsequently transported and disposed of at Waste Connections of Osceola County, LLC – JED Landfill in St. Cloud, Florida (PCBs less than 50 mg/kg) or the Chemical Waste Management Landfill in Emelle, Alabama (PCBs greater than or equal to 50 mg/kg). Following excavation, clean backfill was brought to the site and provided to the Demolition Contractor to complete backfill and grading in conjunction with their final site restoration activities from building demolition. Post-IM groundwater sampling was conducted in May 2022 at three monitoring wells installed in April 2022 to confirm that PCBs did not leach into groundwater. These wells were installed where the highest PCB concentrations were detected at LOC 2D, LOC 2E, and from the Building Perimeter IM (previously completed in 2020). All PCB results in groundwater were non-detect. Volatile organic compounds were also analyzed based on potential past use of solvents in transformers with PCB-dielectric fluids and the potential release of dielectric fluids containing volatile organic compounds, and all results were non-detect. Based on completion of a successful IM at LOC 2D and LOC 2E, as well as previous remedial actions that have addressed other contamination at KHQA (SWMU 104), No Further Action without controls will be recommended for SWMU 104. NASA will submit separate Site Rehabilitation Completion Order request documentation for SWMU 104 to support an NFA without controls recommendation.

PCB↗

Environmental Performance Report 2021: Annual Site Environmental Report per the U.S. Department of Energy Order 231.1B Chg 1

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) Environmental Performance Report provides a description of the laboratory's environmental management activities in 2021, including information on environmental and sustainability performance, environmental compliance activities and status, and environmental protection programs, highlights, and successes. The purpose of this report is to ensure that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the public receive timely, accurate information about events that have positively affected or could adversely affect the health and safety of the public or workers, the environment, or the operations of DOE facilities. This report meets the DOE requirements of the Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) and has been prepared in accordance with DOE Order 231.1B Chg 1, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting.

air quality↗

Endpoint Evaluation for 200-PW-1 Operable Unit Soil Vapor Extraction, Hanford Site, Washington - 16478

On the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site in semi-arid southeast Washington State, the 216-Z-9 Trench, 216-Z-1A Tile Field, and 216-Z-18 Crib were used from 1955 to 1973 for soil column disposal of liquid wastes containing carbon tetrachloride. The geological setting underneath these disposal areas consists of an approximately 70 m thick vadose zone with a nominally 5 m thick low-permeability layer at a depth of 30 m. Infiltration of the liquid waste through the vadose zone to the groundwater was driven by the liquid volume introduced during disposal. Carbon tetrachloride readily volatilises in the vadose zone, making soil vapor extraction (SVE) the preferred remediation technology. Between 1992 and 2012, SVE recovered 80,107 kg of carbon tetrachloride from the vadose zone below the three waste sites. Of this total recovery, 93 percent was removed during the first 5 years of operations. The last 7 percent was recovered in the last 16 years of operation. In 2011, a final cleanup level of 100 ppmv for carbon tetrachloride in soil vapor was established in the record of decision for the 200-PW-1 Operable Unit, which includes the three carbon tetrachloride waste sites. The final cleanup decision specified that soil vapor concentrations and the cleanup level would be further refined and assessed in the future to ensure groundwater protection. A subsequent treatability test was conducted and the results were used to further refine the definition of vadose zone source conditions that are protective of groundwater. Based on this treatability test, predictions indicate that current and future vadose zone conditions will meet groundwater protection objectives. SVE operations were not performed in 2013, 2014, and 2015, and soil vapor concentrations in all SVE wells (and all but two monitoring probes installed using direct-push technology) remained below the 100 ppmv cleanup level during this time. SVE endpoint guidance was prepared in 2013 as a joint effort between Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This SVE guidance was used to develop a path forward for the 200-PW-1 Operable Unit SVE remedy. The guidance asks the following questions: 1. Are data collected to date adequate to support a well-defined conceptual site model? 2. Have remediation goals (cleanup levels) been defined? 3. Are environmental pathways and risk understood well enough to support site closeout? 4. Will remaining contamination in the vadose zone cause groundwater cleanup levels to be exceeded? If the answer to the first three questions is 'Yes', and the answer to the fourth question is 'No', then the site is ready for closure. At this time, the site has compiled appropriate information to answer these questions to support a remedy decision to terminate SVE operations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently provided concurrence that termination of SVE operations within the 200-PW-1 Operable Unit is appropriate. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Middlesex South FUSRAP Site: Collaboration Towards Beneficial Reuse - 20338

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) manages DoE's post-closure responsibilities and ensures the future protection of human health and the environment with respect to sites that have no continuing DOE mission after undergoing remediation. LM's beneficial reuse program promotes the LM strategic goal to sustainably manage and optimize use of public lands. The beneficial reuse program aims to repurpose former contaminated sites to restore the environment, protect the public health, revitalize communities, and spur economic growth. Benefits from the reuse of a site may increase the local tax base, facilitate job growth, utilize existing infrastructure, and enhance or protect natural resources. Beneficial reuse also promotes protectiveness by ensuring activities are compatible with long-term maintenance and protection of public health and the environment, as well as by retaining good stewardship of natural resources. LM actively participates in promoting the economic development vision of the surrounding communities by collaborating with local communities to promote regional or municipal initiatives. The Borough of Middlesex, New Jersey, has prepared the Lincoln Boulevard Redevelopment Plan, which will reinvent a once-viable downtown and enhance the quality of life for the community. The Middlesex South, New Jersey, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site lies within the boundaries of this redevelopment area. In support of this development plan, the Borough is interested in acquiring the site for its Department of Public Works and to increase street access in the future commercial district to be built near adjacent properties. The opportunity to put the FUSRAP site into productive use aligns with LM's mission and strategic goals. In support of beneficial reuse activities, DOE can dispose of excess real property using several mechanisms. The two disposal options applicable to the Middlesex south site include (1) utilizing the US General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) using the Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Section 770, 'Transfer of Real Property at Defense Nuclear Facilities for Economic Development' (known as a '770 transfer') process. Using the 770 transfer requires economic development as the primary driver, and a specific redevelopment proposal must be submitted. If there is no interest in specific economic development, the GSA option becomes the default mechanism for disposal of the property. In the case of the Middlesex south site, the 770 transfer process is being utilized and the Borough has submitted its economic development proposal to LM. Although LM is encouraged by the opportunity to put the site into productive use, the Middlesex south site is currently on the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Priorities List and remediation is being performed by the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Consequently, any property transfer must meet the requirements under CERCLA Section 120(h), 'Property Transferred by Federal Agencies.' As the groundwater remedy will not be in place for several years, approval would be required from the US EPA administrator and the governor of the state of New Jersey to perform an early transfer of the site (before all response actions have been completed). The time frame for these approvals to occur under the normal process conflicts with the proposed redevelopment schedule; therefore, various options for expedited sale, transfer, or lease of portions of the site to the Borough were evaluated. The subsequent decision on a mutually beneficial path forward was the result of a collaborative effort between LM, USACE, the Borough and its redevelopment team, EPA, and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Deactivation and Demolition (D and D) of the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) Incinerator Oak Ridge, Tennessee - 19184

UCOR, an AECOM-led partnership with Jacobs, manages the cleanup of the 2,200-acre East Tennessee Technology Park for its client, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The site was contaminated with radioactive, hazardous and industrial wastes generated by more than 40 years of national defense and energy missions. In 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added the Oak Ridge Reservation to the National Priorities List of sites and facilities that pose a sufficient threat to human health or the environment to warrant cleanup. The U.S. Department of Energy is cleaning up the Oak Ridge Reservation under a Federal Facility Agreement with the EPA and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. Many types of waste have been managed and disposed as part of the multi-decade cleanup effort. One unique facility, the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) Incinerator, was constructed at the Department of Energy's Est Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The Incinerator was constructed in the mid-1980's and underwent a series of test burns and readiness reviews to obtain the necessary environmental permits and operating approvals from state and federal regulatory agencies. With these in place, the incinerator began routine operations in 1991. It was designed and permitted for receiving, sorting, storing, preparing, and thermally destroying low-level radioactive and RCRA mixed waste contaminated with PCBs. The incinerator was named after a law passed in 1976 that provides the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with authority to require reporting, record-keeping, testing, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures. During its operating lifetime, the one-of-a-kind thermal treatment facility burned materials regulated under TSCA and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), most notably radiologically-contaminated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The TSCA Incinerator met or exceeded environmental regulations and DOE requirements for the treatment of these types of wastes. After more than 18 years of operation and more than 35 million pounds of waste safely incinerated, the TSCA Incinerator shut down operations on December 2, 2009. The TSCA Incinerator has been called a national resource for DOE sites from coast to coast. As the only U.S. facility permitted to incinerate specialized types of wastes, it not only accepted material from the Oak Ridge Reservation but also other facilities across the nationwide DOE complex. Over the years, a dynamic team of hard working and talented people operated and maintained the facility under the most stringent environmental permits and site requirements. The facility has played a key role in the treatment of radioactive PCB and hazardous wastes (mixed wastes) from the Oak Ridge Reservation, as well as from other facilities across the DOE complex. Through its support to over 20 sites in the DOE complex, environmental waste from past and ongoing operations has been safely and permanently treated. In the years since it was shut down, deactivation workers have been preparing TSCA for demolition. This work scope included triple cleaning, rinsing of all production equipment and tanks to RCRA clean criteria, filling sumps, encapsulating PCB and radioactive contamination, removal of universal waste (asbestos. lead and mercury), draining and disposal of residual water in tanks and transfer piping, and removing and disposing of carbon vessels, which were part of the water management system. In 2018, the facility was successfully deactivated and demolished, permanently removing one of the most unique facilities in the DOE complex. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Notice of Submittal – 2023 Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Los Alamos National Laboratory

This report describes the emissions of airborne radionuclides from operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for calendar year 2023 and the resulting off-site dose from these emissions. This document fulfills the requirements established by the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in 40 CFR 61, Subpart H – Emissions of Radionuclides other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities, commonly referred to as the Radionuclide NESHAP or Rad-NESHAP. Compliance with this regulation and preparation of this document is the responsibility of LANL’s Rad NESHAP compliance program, which is part of the Environmental Protection and Compliance (EPC) Division. The information in this report is required under the Clean Air Act and is being submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Headquarters and EPA Region 6. The highest effective dose equivalent (EDE) to an off-site member of the public was calculated using procedures specified by the EPA and described in this report. LANL’s EDE was 0.43 for 2023. The annual limit is 10 millirem per year, established by the EPA in 40 CFR 61 Subpart H. All measured air emissions are modeled to a single location, known as the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI). During calendar year 2023, LANL continuously monitored radionuclide emissions at 28 “major” release points, or stacks. The Laboratory estimates emissions from an additional 59 “minor” release points using radionuclide usage source terms in lieu of stack monitoring. Also, LANL uses an EPA approved network of air samplers around the Laboratory perimeter to monitor ambient airborne levels of radionuclides. To provide data for dispersion modeling and dose assessment, LANL maintains and operates several meteorological monitoring towers. From these various systems, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to calculate the MEI dose for the Laboratory. The MEI can be any member of the public at any off-site location where there is a residence, school, business, or office. In 2023, this MEI location was a business at 129 New Mexico State Road 4 (NM-4), located in the northern end of White Rock. The primary contributors to the off-site dose at this location are the ambient air data at that location combined with the collected potential emissions from unmonitored (minor) sources. Overall, the MEI dose in 2023 is similar to that which has been observed in recent years, and it remains well below the EPA’s 10 millirem per year limit. Doses reported to the EPA for the past 10 years are shown in Table E1.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

2022 LANL Radionuclide Air Emissions Report (Rev. 2)

This report describes the emissions of airborne radionuclides from operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for calendar year 2022 and the resulting off-site dose from these emissions. This document fulfills the requirements established by the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in 40 CFR 61, Subpart H – Emissions of Radionuclides other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities, commonly referred to as the Radionuclide NESHAP or Rad-NESHAP. Compliance with this regulation and preparation of this document is the responsibility of LANL’s Rad NESHAP compliance program, which is part of the Environmental Protection and Compliance (EPC) Division. The information in this report is required under the Clean Air Act and is being submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Headquarters and EPA Region 6. The highest effective dose equivalent (EDE) to an off-site member of the public was calculated using procedures specified by the EPA and described in this report. LANL’s EDE was 0.45 for 2022. The annual limit is 10 millirem per year, established by the EPA in 40 CFR 61 Subpart H. All measured air emissions are modeled to a single location, known as the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI). During calendar year 2022, LANL continuously monitored radionuclide emissions at 27 “major” release points, or stacks. The Laboratory estimates emissions from an additional 34 “minor” release points using radionuclide usage source terms in lieu of stack monitoring. Also, LANL uses an EPA approved network of air samplers around the Laboratory perimeter to monitor ambient airborne levels of radionuclides. To provide data for dispersion modeling and dose assessment, LANL maintains and operates several meteorological monitoring towers. From these various systems, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to calculate the MEI dose for the Laboratory. The MEI can be any member of the public at any off-site location where there is a residence, school, business, or office. In 2022, this MEI location was a business at 95 Entrada Drive, located in the eastern end of Los Alamos town site. The primary contributors to the off-site dose at this location are the ambient air data at that location combined with radioactive gas emissions from the LANSCE facility and the collected potential emissions from unmonitored (minor) sources. Overall, the MEI dose in 2022 is similar to that which has been observed in recent years, and it remains well below the EPA’s 10 millirem per year limit. Doses reported to the EPA for the past 10 years are shown in Table E1.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Middle DP Road Recovery Effort, June 26, 2020

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final 2017 Construction General Permit (CGP) that covers discharges of stormwater from construction sites. The 2017 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity (Appendix D) includes the following requirements:(1) conduct a critical habitat and threatened/endangered species study; (2) develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with good engineering practices; (3) submit a Notice of Intent (NOI); (4) install and maintain erosion and stormwater controls; (5) perform and document storm water inspections during construction and site stabilization; (6) amend the SWPPP as necessary; and (7) submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) following project completion and final stabilization of disturbed areas. Authorization to discharge storm water is required under this Permit for both large and small construction projects disturbing more than one (1) acre or part of a larger common plan of development that collectively disturbs more than one (1) acre. All parties that meet the definition of Operator must be permitted. Each permittee is not required to develop and implement a separate SWPP Plan. It is required that there be at least one SWPP Plan for a site that incorporates the required elements for all Operators. The 2017 CGP number for New Mexico (Region 6) is NMR100000. This Plan, which has been developed for Triad National Security, LLC (Triad), describes the nature and sequencing of construction activities, potential sources of pollution, and identifies the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the potential for erosion and storm water pollution. The Plan was developed in accordance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § §1251 et seq., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100-4), and the regulations established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permits for Storm Water Discharges From Construction Activities.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Middle DP Road Recovery Effort, June 26, 2020 (Copy for Informational Puproses Only)

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final 2017 Construction General Permit (CGP) that covers discharges of stormwater from construction sites. The 2017 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity (Appendix D) includes the following requirements: (1) conduct a critical habitat and threatened/endangered species study; (2) develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with good engineering practices; (3) submit a Notice of Intent (NOI); (4) install and maintain erosion and stormwater controls; (5) perform and document storm water inspections during construction and site stabilization; (6) amend the SWPPP as necessary; and (7) submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) following project completion and final stabilization of disturbed areas. Authorization to discharge storm water is required under this Permit for both large and small construction projects disturbing more than one (1) acre or part of a larger common plan of development that collectively disturbs more than one (1) acre. All parties that meet the definition of Operator must be permitted. Each permittee is not required to develop and implement a separate SWPP Plan. It is required that there be at least one SWPP Plan for a site that incorporates the required elements for all Operators. The 2017 CGP number for New Mexico (Region 6) is NMR100000. This Plan, which has been developed for Triad National Security, LLC (Triad), describes the nature and sequencing of construction activities, potential sources of pollution, and identifies the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the potential for erosion and storm water pollution. The Plan was developed in accordance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § §1251 et seq., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100-4), and the regulations established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permits for Storm Water Discharges From Construction Activities.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Results of a Soil Flushing Treatability Test for Hanford Site Hexavalent Chromium Removal - 20446

U.S. Department of Energy contractor CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company has made significant progress remediating hexavalent chromium in groundwater near the Columbia River through the operation of pump and treat facilities and source removal activities. To mitigate risks associated with hexavalent chromium contamination, which was identified in a CERCLA interim action record of decision as the primary groundwater contaminant of concern for the 100-KR-4 Operable Unit from discharging to the Columbia River, three ion-exchange pump and treat systems were installed between 1997 and 2009. Between 2010 and 2016, operation of the K West pump and treat system, located near the former 105K West plutonium production reactor, reduced concentrations below the groundwater remediation target for hexavalent chromium. In 2016, a rebound study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the pump and treat remedy and assess the potential for any residual hexavalent chromium sources continuing to contribute to groundwater contamination. As a result of the rebound study, a source of continued groundwater contamination was identified. To address this condition, a soil flushing treatability test was written and approved by the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The test included saturating about a 1-acre area of soil with treated water with the goal of forcing the residual hexavalent chromium to groundwater where existing extraction wells could remove it for treatment, accelerating the cleanup process. In spring and summer 2019, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company installed and began operating a shallow underground leach system to support the treatability test. Preliminary sampling data show the test was effective in removing the residual contamination. Following further evaluation and analysis from the initial test, the process will be considered for implementation elsewhere on the Hanford Site, particularly at locations where there is a known or suspected continuing contamination source in the soil column. The paper will cover the goals of the study, as well as more details about the following: - Overview of pump and treat exit strategy (using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance); - The design and installation of the soil flushing technology in the 100-K Area; - The testing process and results of sampling data; - Post-study evaluation and potential for implementation in other locations at the Hanford Site. Innovative solutions for cleanup, such as the soil flushing technology, have resulted in substantial progress in the removal of groundwater contaminants at the Hanford Site, potentially shortening the time frame required to meet cleanup goals and resulting in significant cost savings. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Open-air Demolition: Validation of EPA Approved Alternative Method for Emission Estimation - 19397

Emissions from open-air demolition of US Department of Energy (DOE) facilities are regulated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under 40 CFR 61 subpart H. This regulation requires that facilities estimate emissions using an EPA approved method from activities such as open-air demolition prior to commencing the activity. Should those emissions exceed certain thresholds, the facility may be required to obtain an Approval to Construct or Modify the facility and/or installed monitoring methods meeting methods acceptable to EPA. There are no EPA approved methods that are specific to open-air demolition methods. For this project the DOE and CH2M Hill BWXT elected to prepare an alternative method specific to open-air demolition. EPA conditionally approved the method but required validation of the method during the demolition of the Vitrification Facility at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) before use for open-air demolition at other WVDP structures. The validation method included detailed source characterization, close-in ambient samplers, and a comparison of measured results to predicted emissions using AERMOD (American Meteorological Society (AMS) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulatory Model). The methods evaluated include hydraulic hammers, mechanical shears, load out of waste and handling of the debris piles. The validation method involved the collection and analysis of ambient air samples from air samplers located at strategic locations within the projected plume path of the demolition activities. The analytical results from the air samplers were then compared to ambient air concentrations predicted at the sampler locations with the EPA model AERMOD. The input to the AERMOD software is a source term developed weekly using the alternative method and material at risk disturbed during each week. To account for the building wake effects of the surrounding structures, virtual point sources were developed in the AERMOD model and placed at the locations of the demolition, debris piles, debris handling and load out areas. It was found that the factors used for hydraulic hammering were extremely conservative and that emissions from the debris pile were not only the primary emission source, but that the moisture content of the debris pile and the wind speed were critical factors that must be considered in future open-air demolition projects. Based on the results of the validation process, adjustments were made to the alternative method. The final validated alternative method provides an approach for estimating airborne emissions from open-air demolition methods and techniques. The method will be used in lieu of 40 CFR 61 Appendix D to estimate emissions from future open-air demolition projects at the WVDP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Kennedy Space Center Press Site (SWMU 074) Interim Measure Report

This report summarizes the Interim Measure (IM) activities conducted at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Press Site ("the Press Site"). This facility has been designated as Solid Waste Management Unit 074 under KSC's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action program. The activities were completed as part of the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) Area Land Use Controls Implementation Plan (LUCIP) Elimination Project. The purpose of the VAB Area LUCIP Elimination Project was to delineate and remove soil affected with constituents of concern (COCs) that historically resulted in Land Use Controls (LUCs). The goal of the project was to eliminate the LUCs on soil. LUCs for groundwater were not addressed as part of the project and are not discussed in this report. This report is intended to meet the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Corrective Action Management Plan requirement as part of the KSC Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments permit and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) self-implementing polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) cleanup requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 761.61(a).

Measures↗

Environmental vulnerability assessment using Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process based model

Environmental management of an area describes a policy for its systematic and sustainable environmental protection. In the present study, regional environmental vulnerability assessment in Hirakud command area of Odisha, India is envisaged based on Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process method (Grey–AHP) using integrated remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. Grey–AHP combines the advantages of classical analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey clustering method for accurate estimation of weight coefficients. It is a new method for environmental vulnerability assessment. Environmental vulnerability index (EVI) uses natural, environmental and human impact related factors, e.g., soil, geology, elevation, slope, rainfall, temperature, wind speed, normalized difference vegetation index, drainage density, crop intensity, agricultural DRASTIC value, population density and road density. EVI map has been classified into four environmental vulnerability zones (EVZs) namely: ‘low’, ‘moderate’ ‘high’, and ‘extreme’ encompassing 17.87%, 44.44%, 27.81% and 9.88% of the study area, respectively. EVI map indicates that the northern part of the study area is more vulnerable from an environmental point of view. EVI map shows close correlation with elevation. Effectiveness of the zone classification is evaluated by using grey clustering method. General effectiveness is in between “better” and “common classes”. This analysis demonstrates the potential applicability of the methodology. - Highlights: • Environmental vulnerability zone identification based on Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) • The effectiveness evaluation by means of a grey clustering method with support from AHP • Use of grey approach eliminates the excessive dependency on the experience of experts.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗