Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Capture”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Concepts for Mars On-Orbit Robotic Sample Capture and Transfer

A potential Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission could require robotic autonomous capture and manipulation of an Orbital Sample (OS) before returning the samples to Earth. In one scenario, an orbiter would capture the OS, manipulate to a preferential orientation, transition it through the steps required to break-the-chain with Mars, stowing it in a containment vessel or an Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) and providing redundant containment to the OS (for example by closing and sealing the lid of the EEV). In this paper, we discuss the trade-space of concepts generated for both the individual aspects of capture and manipulation of the OS, as well as concepts for the end-to-end system. Notably, we discuss concepts for OS capture, manipulation of the OS to orient it to a preferred configuration, and steps for transitioning the OS between different stages of manipulation, ultimately securing it in a containment vessel or Earth Entry Vehicle.

Chamberlian-Simon, Brendan↗
NASA NTRS2017

Concepts for Mars On-Orbit Robotic Sample Capture and Transfer

A potential Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission could require robotic autonomous capture and manipulation of an Orbital Sample (OS) before returning the samples to Earth. In one scenario, an orbiter would capture the OS, manipulate to a preferential orientation, transition it through the steps required to break-the-chain with Mars, stowing it in a containment vessel or an Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) and providing redundant containment to the OS (for example by closing and sealing the lid of the EEV). In this paper, we discuss the trade-space of concepts generated for both the individual aspects of capture and manipulation of the OS, as well as concepts for the end-to-end system. Notably, we discuss concepts for OS capture, manipulation of the OS to orient it to a preferred configuration, and steps for transitioning the OS between different stages of manipulation, ultimately securing it in a containment vessel or Earth Entry Vehicle.

Ohta, Preston↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

U.S. Spacesuit Knowledge Capture – Creation, Curation, and Dissemination

The U.S. spacesuit is a special system that has intrigued and fascinated the world since Neil Armstrong set foot on the Moon in 1969. With over 50 years since that momentous achievement, NASA is planning to land the first woman and next man on the Moon in the near future. This goal begets the need to build a new spacesuit, a spacesuit created from the legacy knowledge of the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU), combined with knowledge gained from technology development over the decades. As NASA transitions to its new horizon, the U.S. Spacesuit Knowledge Capture (SKC) Program is poised to help. The SKC Program’s primary function has been to capture, curate, and disseminate spacesuit-related knowledge among scientists, engineers, and technicians. The SKC Program was created in 2007 to capture knowledge primarily from spacesuit subject-matter experts (SMEs) who were retiring from NASA. These SMEs had 30 to 50 years of spacesuit knowledge. Over the years, the SKC Program has evolved and expanded its scope with a current focus on complementing the buildup of the Exploration EMU (xEMU) at the Johnson Space Center. As part of this focus, the SKC Program recently teamed with the xEMU Community of Practice (CoP) for knowledge sharing. The xEMU CoP provides a forum where early career engineers, professionals new to human spaceflight, and the xEMU community can come together regularly to seek guidance, share knowledge, meet their peers, discover resources, and ask questions. The CoP created an environment where the knowledge can be easily and routinely captured and recorded. The recorded events are archived and curated in an SKC Program library and disseminated as appropriate. This paper details the roles that the SKC Program and CoP play in the xEMU buildup, along with the navigation of the creation, curation, and dissemination processes.

Cinda Chullen↗
NASA NTRS2020

Dynamic Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis of Orbiting Sample Capture for Potential Mars Sample Return

The current notional architecture for the Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign would require autonomous on-orbit rendezvous and capture of a sample container after it has been delivered to Mars orbit by a preceding MSR mission. As part of the complete orbital payload known as the Capture, Contain, and Return System (CCRS), a concept has been developed for autonomously sensing and capturing this Orbiting Sample (OS) container. The concept, comprised of a capture mechanism and multiple optical break-beam arrays, would detect and enclose the OS into CCRS, and engage a dust-tight seal to prevent the escape of the OS or other unsterilized particles. A challenging goal for the system is to close the lid prior to the OS coming into physical contact after entering CCRS in order to reduce the risk of unsterilized Mars particles on the surface of the OS from contaminating the outside of the spacecraft. The mechanical and sensor performance requirements were driven by the broader architecture of CCRS, OS rendezvous parameters, and Planetary Protection requirements regarding the interaction and handling of the OS. The mechanism and break-beam array concepts were designed accordingly, and kinematic simulations of the mechanism’s behavior, combined with a Monte-Carlo simulation of OS rendezvous/collision behaviors and corresponding breakbeam sensor responses verify compliance.

Ishigo, Alyssa↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the Capture, Containment, and Return System (CCRS)

The Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign is one of the most ambitious and complex planetary exploration missions currently underway. With the participation of NASA, ESA, and a large number of industry partners, MSR aims to bring Martian soil, rock, and atmospheric samples back to Earth, in order to answer key questions about Mars’ biological evolution. To accomplish this goal the campaign relies on four coordinated missions, each fulfilling a fundamental role to bring the samples to Earth. The Mars Perseverance rover, the first of the four missions, landed safely on Mars on February 18, 2021 and has already acquired candidate samples for Earth return. A selection of the samples of Martian soil and atmosphere that Perseverance has captured during its mission will be recovered, launched into Mars orbit, and transported back to Earth. The Sample Fetch Rover and Mars Ascent System, both parts of the Sample Return Lander project, perform the Mars surface missions to retrieve the collected samples and launch them into Mars orbit. NASA’s Capture, Containment, and Return System (CCRS), hosted on ESA’s Earth Return Orbiter (ERO), brings the samples back to Earth from Mars orbit. These retrieval and return missions are currently in the planning and design stages of development. The NASA-provided CCRS is the payload of the ESA ERO and is the focus of this presentation. ERO will enter Mars orbit and provide communication relay to Earth for the other MSR elements. The Sample Return Lander systems will fetch the sample tubes and integrate them into a protective vessel – the Orbiting Sample (OS) system – which is then launched into low Mars orbit. ERO will perform rendezvous maneuvers, allowing its CCRS payload to capture the OS, contain it, and perform the first automated in-space assembly of a spacecraft, the Earth Entry System (EES), while in Mars orbit. ERO will then begin its journey back to Earth, with CCRS and its assembled EES spacecraft. Three days prior to arrival, CCRS will release the EES on an Earth entry trajectory from a distance beyond the orbit of the Moon. The passive EES spacecraft will then enter Earth’s atmosphere, flying on a ballistic trajectory, followed by a terminal descent (without a parachute) and landing at the Utah Test and Training Range (UTTR). This presentation will show the current design of the CCRS system and its concept of operations. ERO and CCRS will perform several firsts in planetary exploration: (a) orbital rendezvous and capture in Mars orbit, (b) in-space sterilization and containment, (c) on-orbit spacecraft assembly at Mars, and (d) fully-passive entry, descent, and landing sequence for sample return.

Carlie H. Zumwalt↗
NASA NTRS2025

Origin of Mars's Moons By Disruptive Partial Capture of an Asteroid

The origin of Mars’s small moons, Phobos and Deimos, remains unknown. They are typically thought either to be captured asteroids or to have accreted from a debris disk produced by a giant impact. Here, we present an alternative scenario wherein fragments of a tidally disrupted asteroid are captured and evolve into a collisional proto-satellite disk. We simulate the initial disruption and the fragments’ subsequent orbital evolution. We find that tens of percent of an unbound asteroid’s mass can be captured and survive beyond collisional timescales, across a broad range of periapsis distances, speeds, masses, spins, and orientations in the Sun–Mars frame. Furthermore, more than one percent of the asteroid’s mass could evolve to circularise in the moons’ accretion region. This implies a lower mass requirement for the parent body than that for a giant impact, which could increase the likelihood of this route to forming a proto-satellite disk that, unlike direct capture, could also naturally explain the moons’ orbits. These three formation scenarios each imply different properties of Mars’s moons to be tested by upcoming spacecraft missions.

Impact phenomena↗
NASA NTRS1972

Californium-252 neutron capture and decay methods for elemental analysis

The feasibility of using a Cf-252 neutron source in conjunction with a capture and/or decay gamma ray method for elemental analysis on lunar or planetary missions was tested. The general problems of using a Cf-252 neutron source for both decay and capture gamma ray analysis in terrestrial environments included the determination of the capture gamma ray spectra by neutron absorption in various metals used for the space hardware, Cf-252 source encapsulation materials, shielding, geometry, and optimum source size for a space mission. Computer data reduction and data transmission techniques were also investigated.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1974

Electron capture in carbon dwarf supernovae

The rates of electron capture on heavier elements under the extreme conditions predicted for dwarf star supernovae have been computed, incorporating modifications that seem to be indicated by present experimental results. An estimate of the maximum possible value of such rates is also given. The distribution of nuclei in nuclear statistical equilibrium has been calculated for the range of expected supernovae conditions, including the effects of the temperature dependence of nuclear partition functions. These nuclide abundance distributions are then used to compute nuclear equilibrium thermodynamic properties. The effects of the electron capture on such equilibrium matter are discussed. In the context of the 'carbon detonation' supernova model, the dwarf central density required to ensure core collapse to a neutron star configuration is found to be slightly higher than that obtained by Bruenn (1972) with the electron capture rates of Hansen (1966).-

Mazurek, T. J.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Lunar neutron capture as a tracer for regolith dynamics

The Apollo 17 Lunar Neutron Probe Experiment measured both the boron-10 neutron capture rate and the uranium-235 neutron-induced fission rate as a function of depth. Cd absorption gave a measure of the neutron energy spectrum. Comparisons of the results are made with theory, and good agreement is obtained for the magnitudes and depth dependences of the capture rates. While the low-energy neutron spectrum at depth agrees with theory, the spectrum near the peak of the flux profile is harder than predicted. In light of these results, several alternatives for interpreting the magnitude and uniformity of the neutron capture data from lunar surface soil samples are outlined. While none of the alternatives can be unquestionably defended or discarded, a surface layer mixing model is discussed in detail.

Burnett, D. S.↗
NASA NTRS1975

A comparison of a shock-capturing technique with experimental data for three-dimensional internal flows

Shock-capturing solutions for an axisymmetric supersonic inlet at small angles of attack are obtained. Good overall agreement between the shock-capturing solutions and experimental data is shown except in regions of strong viscous effects or boundary-layer removal. Although the results indicate a strong potential for the use of shock-capturing or finite-difference solutions for internal flows, improvement in the ability to handle the reflection of strong shockwaves having downstream Mach numbers near 1 is needed.

Presley, L. L.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Scaling of cross sections for K-electron capture by high-energy protons and alpha-particles from the multielectron atoms

Electron capture by protons from H, He, and the K-shell of Ar, and alpha particles from He are considered. It is shown that when a certain function of the experimental cross sections is plotted versus the inverse of the collision energy, at high energies the function falls on a straight line. At lower energies the function concaves up or down, depending on the charge of the projectile, the effective charge and the ionization potential of the electron that is being captured. The plot can be used to predict cross sections where experimental data are not available, and as a guide in future experiments. High energy scaling formulas for K-electron capture by low-charge projectiles are given.

Omidvar, K.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Control and stability problems of remote orbital capture

The dynamics and control aspects of orbital capture of space objects were studied. Differential angular rates and orientation between the object and the grappler were used to investigate the effects of misalignment as well as stability and control. The control responses after capture are discussed. The feasibility of nulling combined spin and nutation of a typical satellite is demonstrated by a Lagrangian formulation to establish a baseline situation. A free-flying teleoperator (FFTO) with a dynamically unbalanced grappler is shown to be desirable because extremely adverse cyclic torques may be generated. A combined teleoperator-satellite system assuming misalignments during capture was dynamically analyzed. Related responses and stability evaluations are included.

Kaplan, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Numerical calculations of the cross-section for the accretional capture of the moon by the earth

If a primary body is increasing in mass the hyperbolic orbit of a secondary body can become an elliptic orbit. In order to determine the cross-section for the accretional capture of the moon by the earth, a series of numerical calculations has been carried out. Calculations have been carried out for various orbital ellipticities and separations and for various accretion rates. Accretional capture is favored if significant accretion occurs in a period of less than 100 yr. A window for accretional capture occurs if the minimum initial separation of the earth and moon (in astronomical units) is nearly equal to the initial heliocentric lunar eccentricity.

Nordmann, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Gas drag in primordial circumplanetary envelopes - A mechanism for satellite capture

Known properties of the current solar system and Bodenheimer's (1977) model of early Jovian evolution are employed to develop a mechanism for satellite capture based on gas drag in primordial circumplanetary envelopes. In particular, the deceleration and fragmentation of two parent bodies passing through an extended primordial Jovian nebula may account for the clusters of prograde and retrograde satellites of Jupiter. Subsequently, the fragments probably underwent limited orbital evolution, and were dispersed by collision with a stray body. The heavy element cores of the outer planets may also be due to primordial gas drag capture. Nebular drag capture of the Martian satellites Phobos and Deimos, Neptune's Nereid and Triton, and Saturn's Phoebe and Iapetus is also conceivable.

Pollack, J. B.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Satellite aided orbit capture

The paper surveys the developments leading to the use of satellites for orbit control. Previous satellite gravity assist work is analyzed, emphasizing powered and unpowered aided capture schemes. In addition, a parametric study characterizes potential gains of satellite aided capture for various satellite systems. Finally, potential applications of aided capture such as for the Galilean System and for Saturn and Titan are given.

Nock, K. T.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Material capture by double lunar gravity assist

The equations yielding the performance of a single lunar flyby in removing incoming hyperbolic excess velocity to capture payloads on interplanetary trajectories are briefly derived. The impossibility of using a single lunar flyby to capture a body entering the earth-moon system with a hyperbolic velocity in excess of about 1.9 km/s is discussed, and a method of using a double flyby of the moon to significantly improve this performance is developed. The equations for achieving a double lunar flyby are derived by solving the orbital equations and Lambert's problem both for the incoming trajectory in the plane of the moon's orbit and for arbitrary declination. For the in-plane case it is shown that the maximum removable hyperbolic excess velocity is 2.2687 km/s. For the inclined case, it is shown that the use of a double lunar flyby allows capture for declinations in excess of 54 degrees, and that for declinations less than 38 degrees the double lunar flyby offers better performance than the single lunar flyby.

Ross, D. J.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Stability and capture of asteroids

The problem of stability of asteroids is treated from the point of view of Hill's stability-concept and using Lyapunov's Characteristic Numbers. The quantitative measure of stability (S) introduced earlier is evaluated for over 300 asteroids and a surprisingly simple relation is established between the semi-major axes of some of the asteroids' orbits and S. A detailed analysis is presented of the Lyapunov Characteristic Numbers for two minor planets and the time-variation of these numbers is discussed. The technology of capture of asteroids is vitally dependent on their orbital stability, therefore, these two problems, i.e., capture and stability, are closely related. In fact, some predictable instabilities may be properly utilized to capture and/or change asteroidal orbits to accomplish collisions with the Earth.

Szebehely, V.↗
NASA NTRS1984

A testable gravitational capture model for the origin of the Earth's Moon

A gravitational capture model is proposed to explain lunar evolution. The model is divided into five orbital eras. In the first era, it is postulated that the pre-capture Moon formed as a small planetary unit on the inner edge of the Asteroid Zone. Orbital era 2 commenced when the Moon's orbit became Earth-crossing. As the Moon underwent periodic gravitational encounters with Earth in a near Earth orbit (orbital era 3), the lunar body because warmer and thus more easily capture. Era 4 saw the Moon inserted into a geocentric orbit that gradually became more circular. Following orbital circulation, the lunar orbit gradually expanded to its present dimensions (era 5).

Malcuit, R. J.↗