Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Advanced reactor modeling and simulation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Simulation using Shift/Griffin

The Department of Energy (DOE)’s NEAMS focuses its efforts on the development of advanced modeling and simulation (M&S) tools for light-water reactors (LWRs) and non–LWRs (i.e., molten salt reactors, high-temperature gas reactors, microreactors, and fast reactors). In the previous fiscal year, the Multiphysics Applications Driver Technical Area funded molten salt reactor (MSR) M&S at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to generate multigroup macroscopic cross sections with Shift for a MSRE 2D lattice model in Griffin. In addition, Shift’s capability to calculate gamma dose rates from activated components in the primary exchangers in a molten salt breeder reactor was also demonstrated. In fiscal year 2023, ORNL generated multigroup macroscopic cross sections using Shift for a 3D MSRE core model. MSRE depletion calculations using Griffin were also demonstrated in this fiscal year. For the depletion calculation, one-group microscopic cross sections for the 3D MSRE core were generated using Shift, and the decay transmutation library from ORIGEN was converted to an ISOXML file, which is required as input in Griffin. Several Monte Carlo codes, such as OpenMC and Serpent, were also used to benchmark and supplement multigroup cross sections generated by Shift. Multigroup libraries were generated with 8 and 20 group structures, and the study found the 8-group structure to be more accurate when comparing Griffin results to continuous energy (CE) Monte Carlo results. The average flux from CE Shift calculations is up to ~6% higher than the CE Serpent calculations because of different values applied for the energy released per fission (κ values). The average flux in the fuel salt calculated by Griffin using cross sections generated with Shift agrees well with the reference CE Shift solution; the same is valid for the corresponding Serpent results. The maximum relative error is ~6% and ~2% compared to the CE Shift and Serpent reference solutions, respectively. Meanwhile, the average flux calculated by Griffin in the graphite moderator shows a higher difference in the thermal range when compared to both reference Monte Carlo solutions; this result suggests a need for improvement in cross section generation for the graphite moderator in the thermal range in both Monte Carlo codes. Griffin depletion calculations using cross sections from Shift and Serpent were performed and compared against ORIGEN calculations, and the nuclide densities calculated by Griffin were found to be generally in agreement with those of ORIGEN. Because a different approach was taken to calculate the energy released per fission ( κ values) in Shift and Serpent, a difference in nuclide densities from differences in the average flux was observed between Griffin using Serpent and Shift cross sections. Griffin calculations with Shift cross sections produced higher average flux in the salt than with Serpent cross sections, leading to higher consumption of 235 U and higher production of 135 Xe. For time-dependent depletion calculations, cross sections were generated with Serpent, and Griffin’s results using these cross sections were compared to CE Serpent depletion results, demonstrating good agreement. The average difference in keff between Serpent and Griffin as a function of burnup is about 155 pcm. Similarly, good agreement with small differences up to ~0.5% was also noticed in the nuclide density of 235 U and 135 Xe. More details regarding the methodologies invoked to generate the cross section to make code-to-code comparisons are discussed further in this report. User feedback on Griffin and Shift capabilities that will enhance these calculations is provided in this report for future consideration. The work performed this fiscal year can be extended further for multiphysics coupling of Griffin-Pronghorn/SAM with Mole to study precursor flow and salt chemistry.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Separate Effects Validation for Subcooled Boiling in CTF

In 2010, the U.S. Department of Energy created its first Energy Innovation Hub, which is focused on developing high-fidelity and high-resolution modeling and simulation (M&S) tools for modeling of light water reactors (LWRs). This hub, the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL), has developed an LWR simulation tool called the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA). The multi-physics capability of VERA is achieved through the coupling of single-physics codes, including CTF (the CASL version of Coolant Boiling in Rod Arrays— Three Field (COBRA-TF)), Michigan Parallel Characteristics Transport (MPACT), BISON, and Materials Performance and Optimization (MPO) Advanced Model for Boron Analysis (MAMBA). As part of its M&S efforts, CASL has identified various challenge problems, including Crud Induced Power Shift (CIPS), Crud-Induced Localized Corrosion (CILC), Pellet-Cladding Interaction (PCI), and Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB). This work addresses CASL milestone L2:VVI.P19.03, which focuses on uncertainty quantification of crud, which is relevant to both CIPS and CILC. This is achieved through an analysis and separate effects validation of the thermal hydraulic phenomenon known as subcooled boiling. As part of this work, various sources of experimental data are examined and compared to different options for empirical modeling of subcooled boiling. Through this analysis, a complete understanding of the underlying models and their implementation details are understood. A subset of these data are incorporated into a separate effects validation study of CTF. The Westinghouse Advanced Loop Tester (WALT) and Rohsenow experiments are modeled, and it is shown that the newly-implemented Gorenflo correlation is more accurate than the existing Chen and Thom correlations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

High-Burnup LOCA Burst Susceptibility BISON Analysis in PWRs and BWRs

Accurately assessing high-burnup fuel behavior during loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs) is essential for understanding fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD) risks across the US light-water reactor fleet. This work updates previous Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program multiphysics LOCA analyses for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) and a boiling water reactor (BWR) by incorporating recent model and material property advancements in the BISON fuel performance code, including a high-burnup structure (HBS) model, revised cladding burst criteria, and updated thermal–mechanical correlations. This update was needed to support ongoing industry initiatives and upcoming regulatory changes. Full-core, rod-resolved operating histories generated using Virtual Environment for Reactor Analysis (VERA) and system-level LOCA conditions obtained from TRACE were applied to statistically representative rod samples in BISON to evaluate burst behavior and FFRD susceptibility. These calculations used two cladding burst correlations and three fuel pulverization models so that the predictions of these models could be compared. The updated PWR simulations show markedly improved numerical stability as the number of crashed simulations decreased by 95% compared to the previous study, and hence higher confidence in results. The updated PWR simulations predicted cladding bursts exclusively among once-burned, high-power rods, with two different cladding burst models identifying the same burst-susceptible population. Resulting FFRD susceptibility estimates are significantly reduced compared with earlier studies, driven by cooler predicted fuel and plenum temperatures, lower hoop strains, and reduced fission gas release in the updated models. In contrast, none of the BWR rods were predicted to burst under either burst criterion, reaffirming minimal BWR FFRD susceptibility even with updated HBS and material models. Comparisons between the PWR and BWR end-of-cycle predictions are made. Comparison with prior work highlights significant shifts in PWR fuel performance metrics and confirmation of earlier BWR conclusions. Overall, the updated results underscore the importance of having high-resolution detailed modeling capability and continuously integrating evolving material models and physics into high-resolution multiphysics simulations. The unified assessment presented here strengthens confidence in predicting high-burnup LOCA behavior by improving agreement between different cladding burst correlations. These results also provide an improved foundation for future BISON model development, FFRD susceptibility calculations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

SAM: A Modern System Code for Advanced Non-LWR Safety Analysis

The System Analysis Module (SAM), developed at Argonne National Laboratory and by collaborators at other organizations, is for advanced non–light water reactor safety analysis. SAM aims to provide fast-running, modest-fidelity, whole-plant transient analysis capabilities that are essential for fast-turnaround design scoping and engineering analyses of advanced reactor concepts. To facilitate code development, SAM utilizes the MOOSE object-oriented application framework, its underlying finite element library, and linear and nonlinear solvers to leverage modern advanced software environments and numerical methods. SAM aims to solve tightly coupled physical phenomena, including fission reaction, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and thermal-mechanical responses in advanced reactor structures, systems, and components with high accuracy and efficiency. Finally, this paper gives an overview of the SAM code development, including goals and functional requirements, physical models, current capabilities, verification and validation, software quality assurance, and examples of simulations for advanced nuclear reactor applications.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Species Transport Framework Development in SAM for System-Level Tritium Source Term Analysis

The SAM code is under development as a modern system-level modeling and simulation tool for advanced non–light water reactor safety analyses, with recent efforts to add capabilities to evaluate radiological source term risks in these novel reactor concepts. By leveraging the established system-level multiphysics thermal-hydraulic models in SAM, a framework for tightly coupled species transport modeling has been integrated into the code for engineering-scale source term evaluation. This species transport framework was first applied to the simulation of tritium, which is a well-known source term in conventional light water reactors. Tritium poses a unique risk in salt-cooled reactors, especially those with lithium-bearing salts such as the fluoride salt–cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) concept, as tritium is generated in the salt coolant in significant quantities due to neutron interactions. A compounding factor is the increased mobility of tritium at high temperatures, which is able to permeate through metals while also potentially being retained in graphite pebbles and structures. Engineering-scale models for the tritium transport pathways in a FHR have been developed using the new species transport framework in SAM. The capabilities are assessed through analytical verification problems and validated with data from a graphite retention experiment. In conclusion, the system-level model is demonstrated by performing an initial estimate of baseline tritium generation and flows in a generic reference SAM FHR model, setting a foundation for future studies of source term transient analysis with the potential for further multiscale and multiphysics integration.

SAM↗
DOE OSTI2022

CFD Simulations to Support Pronghorn Modeling of a Molten Salt Fast Reactor

To assist with the deployment of next generation molten salt reactors (MSRs), the DOE NEAMS program is developing advanced simulation capabilities. As part of this work, the high-fidelity CFD tool, Nek5000 was used to inform model development for the engineering scale tool, Pronghorn. The particular case chosen was the EVOL molten salt fast reactor concept. This concept uses an open core design, which is well known to be sensitive to the particular geometry and can have complex flow behavior that varies across a range of conditions. This makes it an idea candidate for demonstration of the Hi2Lo concept of using higher fidelity models to benchmark lower fidelity models. Simulations of the EVOL design were performed using both LES (high-fidelity) and RANS (moderate-fidelity) in Nek5000. The LES results indicated discrepancies in 2-D axisymmetric RANS, indicating that the core is better modeled in RANS with a 3-D wedge representation of a portion of the core, which can accurately account for the effect of the inlet channels. Finally, results from the 3-D RANS were used to modify an existing turbulence model in Pronghorn. Improvement in the calibrated Pronghorn model was demonstrated. Future work is suggested to focus on expanding the LES calculation to provide a more direct point of comparison for both the RANS and Pronghorn models as well as incorporating more of the relevant MSR physics (such as delayed neutron precursor tracking) into the model.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Survey and Assessment of Computational Capabilities for Advanced (Non-LWR) Reactor Mechanistic Source Term Analysis.

A vital part of the licensing process for advanced (non-LWR) nuclear reactor developers in the United States is the assessment of the reactor’s source term, i.e., the potential release of radionuclides from the reactor system to the environment during normal operations and accident sequences. In comparison to source term assessments which follow a bounding approach with conservative assumptions, a mechanistic approach to modeling radionuclide transport, which realistically accounts for transport and retention phenomena, is expected to be used for advanced reactor systems. As the designs of advanced reactors increase in maturity and progress towards licensing, there is a need to advance modeling and simulation capabilities in analyzing the mechanistic source term (MST) of a prospective reactor concept. In the present work, a survey is provided of existing computational capabilities for the modeling of advanced reactors MSTs. The following reactors are considered: high temperature gas reactors (HTGR); molten salt reactors (MSR) which include salt-fueled reactors and fluoride salt-cooled high temperature reactors (FHR); and sodium- and lead-cooled fast reactors (SFR, LFR). A review of relevant codes which may be useful in providing information to MST analyses is also completed, including codes that have been used for source term analyses of LWRs, as well as those being developed for other aspects of advanced reactor system modeling such as reactor physics, thermal hydraulics, and chemistry. A discussion of MST modeling capabilities for each reactor type is provided with additional focus on important phenomena and functional requirements. Additionally, a comprehensive survey is provided of tools for consequence modeling such as atmospheric transport and dispersion (ATD).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assessment of Microreactor Safety Analysis Challenges and Recommendations for Utilization of the Comprehensive Reactor Analysis Bundle

To enable the broad deployment of microreactors in fundamentally new application regimes (i.e., mobile and autonomous operations), their safety must be indisputable in terms of possessing inherent resistance to severe offsite dose consequences. Therefore, mechanistic beyond-design-basis event source term calculations that demonstrate a sufficiently large margin of safety will be required to accommodate these new application regimes, which have no history of commercial regulation. Even for traditional reactor operation configurations, safety analysis expertise and familiarity with accident phenomena and conditions in microreactors—specifically those with heat pipe primary cooling arrangements—are lacking compared with other advanced reactor concepts and small modular reactors. Recently, modeling and simulation tools to account for unique heat pipe design aspects have been developed by Sandia National Laboratories with MELCOR and by the US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation Program with BlueCRAB. However, further demonstration and assessment of potential knowledge gaps are needed to support these codes’ broad usage by the microreactor community. Through the DOE Microreactor Program, an initial assessment of these two tools and guidance on how an evaluation model could be constructed was performed and is reported herein. Moreover, a proposed approach for demonstrating an evaluation model using these two tools is outlined.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Openpronghorn

OpenPronghorn is a simulation tool specifically tailored for modeling thermal-hydraulic phenomena in advanced nuclear reactors. It is built on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE), an open-source platform that facilitates the development of high-performance scientific computing applications. OpenPronghorn solves the Navier-Stokes equations, which describe the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy in fluid flows, using the finite volume numerical method. The code supports a wide range of fluid flow conditions that are applicable to nuclear reactors, including incompressible and weakly compressible flows, as well as single-phase and multiphase flows. It is capable of modeling diverse flow regimes, including laminar and turbulent flows, using various turbulence models such as the standard k-epsilon models, the v2f model, and the mixing length model. For multiphase flows, OpenPronghorn employs a mixture a Eulerian modeling approach with mixture, drift-flux, and full Eulerian models, and includes open-sourced interfacial transfer correlations for drag, exchange, and heat transfer coming from the scientific literature. OpenPronghorn's modular design allows it to handle multiscale simulations, ranging from detailed Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations to coarse-mesh and lumped parameter models. This flexibility enables users to perform high-fidelity simulations of specific reactor components as well as system-level analyses of entire reactor circuits. The code can be coupled with other MOOSE-based tools using the MultiApp system, allowing for the transfer of coupling quantities such as mass flow rates, heat fluxes, and boundary conditions between different simulation scales. One of the main features of OpenPronghorn is the it includes built-in validation cases from the open-source scientific literature and supports the implementation of user-defined models and correlations through MOOSE's FunctorMaterial system. OpenPronghorn is designed to be computationally efficient, leveraging the SIMPLE projection method for large-scale problems, and can be run on high-performance computing systems to handle the extensive computational demands of detailed reactor simulations. Overall, OpenPronghorn is a versatile and robust tool that provides critical insights into the thermal-hydraulic behavior of advanced nuclear reactors, supporting the design, safety, and optimization of next-generation nuclear energy systems.

Retamales, Mauricio Eduardo Tano [Idaho National L↗
DOE OSTI2025

Numerical Method Improvements in Griffin for Pebble Bed Reactors with a Focus on the Computation of Burnup

Griffin, a MOOSE (Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment) based application targeting transient multiphysics modeling of advanced reactors, has been used recently to model both high-temperature gas-cooled and fluoride-salt-cooled pebble bed reactors (PBRs). Griffin uses deterministic methods for solving neutron transport and an Eulerian approach to model pebble movement. An Eulerian approach is also used to directly compute burnup instead of using a pass approach like other tools such as VSOP or PANGU. This work discusses verification efforts and numerical method improvements related specifically to the Eulerian modeling approach implemented for directly computing pebble burnup.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Assembling Multiphysics Nuclear Reactor Simulations Using the MOOSE Framework

The Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) [1] is an open-source, parallel finite element framework which provides the foundation for many advanced modeling and simulation tools developed under the Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program [2] for the analysis of advanced reactors. The MOOSE framework provides the common foundational capability on which many NEAMS codes for reactor analysis are built. The MOOSE framework also includes several systems to assemble unique workflows and couplingamong MOOSE-based applications. In particular, the MultiApp and Transfer Systems are widely used to assemble different MOOSE-based or MOOSE-wrapped physics applications together to perform loosely or tightly coupled multiphysics simulations. The National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) Virtual Test Bed (VTB) [3] hosts publicly available nuclear reactor multiphysics simulation examples which leverage MOOSE’s MultiApp System to meet the modeling needs of different reactor types. The flexibility and robustness of coupling provided by MOOSE permits rapid development of coupled physics models for a wide range of reactor types and events

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Advancements in NEAMS Tool Capabilities for Multiphysics Simulation of Fast Reactor Core Bowing and Identification of Validation Test Data

Under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program, an integrated multiphysics approach is being developed to model the core bowing phenomena important to liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Core bowing is an important passive safety mechanism in liquid metal-cooled fast reactors and involves Multiphysics effects including radiation transport, fluid flow, heat transfer, and mechanical response to temperature and flux gradients. This report summarizes recent progress on developing a multiphysics, MOOSE-based workflow to predict core bowing and associated reactivity feedback. Last year, thermal fluids and mechanics were coupled on a multi-assembly benchmark problem based on ABR-1000 design. This year, the reactor physics code Griffin was assessed for readiness of core bowing calculations. Preliminary integration of Griffin’s ring-heterogeneous model with thermal fluids and thermal mechanics solvers was performed. Specifically, thermal-mechanics and reactor physics were coupled for single- and multi-assembly problems, and reactor physics and subchannel methods were coupled for a single assembly model. Finally, the workflow of all three physics was preliminarily demonstrated on a single assembly model. Caveats and future development needed have been identified. To supplement the multiphysics demonstration, verification and assessment efforts of thermos-mechanical capabilities for modeling thermo-mechanical core bowing behavior were continued by analyzing IAEA Verification Problem 5 which includes radiation swelling and creep. Additionally, a small core reactor physics benchmark defined by Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) was performed to assess neutronics models for estimating reactivity feedback. Finally, Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) validation test data for core bowing phenomena has been identified and summarized, with a recommended path forward for validation once this capability is mature.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Artificial Intelligence for Multiphysics Nuclear Design Optimization with Additive Manufacturing

The geometric flexibility of additively manufactured metals and ceramics generates a very large and open design space that requires advanced modeling and simulation tools for physics simulations and the rigorous definition of design problems. This effort deploys artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to understand the design space, evaluate potential designs, and more efficiently generate optimized results. The Transformational Challenge Reactor (TCR) program is leveraging advances in several scientific areas—including materials, manufacturing, sensors and control systems, data analytics, and high-fidelity modeling and simulation—to accelerate the design, manufacturing, qualification, and deployment of advanced nuclear energy systems. Through a manufacturing-informed design approach, the TCR program seeks to integrate digital data for rapid nuclear innovation; accelerate the adoption of advances in manufacturing, materials, and computational sciences for nuclear applications; and dramatically reduce deployment costs and timelines for new nuclear reactor technologies. This report documents efforts under the TCR program to leverage advanced modeling and simulation techniques driven by AI/ML algorithms on high-performance computing (HPC) systems to yield more optimized TCR core designs. A multiphysics ML surrogate model was developed to run on the HPC architectures. The surrogate model is trained on high-fidelity simulation data of coupled neutronics and thermofluidics and is used to quickly evaluate thousands of candidate core designs in parallel, which drives the evolution of the cooling channel shapes to minimize temperature peaking and material stress. Outcomes from these activities provide design information and feedback into the core design efforts.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Advancing Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling Capabilities for Molten Salt Reactors in Pronghorn

This is an M2 report for the NEAMS program. This work focuses on advancing the modeling and simulation capabilities for Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) within Pronghorn, addressing key thermal-hydraulic challenges that must be addressed for the safe and efficient operation of these advanced reactors. This report summarizes the development and validation of the following new models in Pronghorn: (i) two-equation RANS turbulence models, (ii) near-wall turbulence corrections due to curvature and roughness, and (iii) multidimensional two-phase drift-flux models. For each of these cases, along with the experimental validation, an application study of interest to MSRs is presented. In addition, this report also presents recent improvements in the domain-overlapping coupling between Pronghorn and SAM to address the cases of weakly compressible flow and flow reversal. Finally, an MSR action that greatly simplifies the setup of MSR models using NEAMS tools is described.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Enabling BWR fuel rod analysis in the BISON fuel performance code

Nuclear fuel vendors around the world are pursuing approaches to sustain the existing nuclear reactor fleet consisting primarily of pressurized-water reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). To support the industry's efforts, advanced modeling and simulation tools need to be capable of analyzing both legacy reactor concepts. BWR fuel rods are significantly different than those used in PWRs, which can affect fuel performance analysis. BWR fuel rods include: (1) an extensive use of gadolinia dopant as a burnable absorber, (2) an axial variation in fuel enrichment and gadolinia content, (3) the inclusion of a liner on the inner cladding surface to mitigate the impact of pellet-clad mechanical interaction (which impacts hydrogen and hydride distribution), (4) a lower initial fill gas pressure, (5) bottom-entry control rods, and (6) a lower coolant pressure that results in the two-phase flow boiling phenomenon. Although the primary focus of BISON has been in the area of PWR and advanced reactor fuel analyses, this paper presents the developments in BISON to support BWR fuel performance analysis. An overview of the models that account for the effects of gadolinia is highlighted. Internal mesh generation capabilities to include a liner is presented. Normal operating and transient (reactivity insertion accident) demonstration problems are presented to illustrate the impact of gadolinia, the hydrogen and hydride evolution due to the presence of the liner, and BISON's ability to simulate axially varying enrichments and dopant concentration. Bottom-entry control effects are captured by the axial power peaking factors present in the demonstration cases. Comparisons to integral experiments from the Halden IFA-681 experiments are discussed as initial validation. Reasonable comparisons are obtained for fuel centerline temperature and rod internal pressure as a function of time. In conclusion, simulations of additional experiments containing Gd 2 O 3 -bearing fuel are necessary to completely validate the code for BWR applications.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

VERA-Grizzly Ex-Core Calculations: Watts Bar Unit 1 Cycles 1-2

The critical structures that comprise light-water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plants are subjected to operating environments that can challenge their integrity. Structures in close proximity to the reactor core, such as the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) and the biological shield wall, are subjected to high levels of radiation emanating from the core, as well as elevated temperatures. As the US fleet of operating LWRs ages, the effects of these operating environments on the integrity of these structures must be considered to ensure their continued safe operation. Extending the lifetime of commercial reactors and maintaining the aging reactor fleet require accurate prediction of the exposure of ex-core components to neutron and photon radiation. In particular, concrete degradation studies must be performed to evaluate the safety and long-term operation of reactors with lifetime extensions. The concrete reactor bioshield is important for providing radiological protection during operation and must last for the entire lifetime of the reactor. Recent interest in lifetime extensions furthers the need to accurately simulate concrete material degradation in the reactor bioshield. As a result of this need, the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program has funded this study to couple its tools, Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) and Grizzly. VERA allows users to set up models to calculate time-dependent and fully coupled solutions (with thermal feedback) for ex-core quantities of interest such as vessel and coupon fluence and detector responses for multiple statepoints and cycles. Grizzly is a finite-element application based on the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework that is used to enable aging materials calculations. This report highlights the work performed to calculate the fluence in the vessel and concrete for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 (WBN1) Cycles 1 and 2. The fluences obtained from VERA were successfully transferred to Grizzly using a Python script. Four simulations were run with Grizzly: (1) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the instantaneous modulus, (2) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the delayed modulus, (3) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the delayed modulus with the addition of the effects of micro-damage caused by irradiation, and (4) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the instantaneous modulus, and with the addition of micro-damage and creep. Details regarding the methods used to obtain the fluence and the statistical errors associated with the VERA Monte Carlo Shift calculations are discussed in greater detail in this report. The results obtained from the four Grizzly models are also presented in this report.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

DireWolf

DireWolf is an integrated micro-reactor capability being developed using an advanced multiphysics modeling and simulation capability for heat pipe-cooled micro-reactor concepts. The DireWolf application is built on INL’s Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) development and runtime framework and is composed of the following MOOSE- based applications as submodules, coupled together using the MOOSE MultiApps and Transfers capability and executed as a single application: Griffin (reactor physics and radiation transport), BISON (nuclear fuel performance), Grizzly (structural mechanics), Sockeye (heat pipe technology), and RELAP-7 (open-air and super-critical CO2 Brayton cycle).

Permann, Cody↗
DOE OSTI2021

Embedding Sensors in 3D Printed Metal Structures

The Transformational Challenge Reactor (TCR) program is leveraging recent advances in modeling and simulation, materials, and additive manufacturing (AM) technologies to design a modern nuclear reactor. Some of the main TCR technologies include in situ monitoring and the integration of sensors during the manufacturing of quality-significant nuclear reactor components. This report describes the general procedure and process optimization for embedding sensors within generic stainless steel 316 (SS316) components using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). A more detailed, quality-significant test plan and supporting procedures are available upon request (ORNL/TM-2021/2127). LPBF involves the use of a scanning laser to selectively melt regions of a powder bed, additively building a part layer by layer. This report describes the LPBF processing technique and discusses the effects of LPBF processing parameters on the success of the sensor embedding process. Experiments used machined cavities in the form of channels in an SS316 base for the sensors to lay in while material is additively built over the top, thereby embedding them in an SS316 matrix. A preliminary investigation involved using empty SS316 sheaths as surrogates to explore the effects of various LPBF processing parameters and the dimensional requirements of the machined channels. Microstructural investigations showed that a smaller channel width/depth combination closer to the sensor’s diameter was best for the embedding process. After the desired parameters were selected, Type-K thermocouples were embedded and evaluated post-embedding using nondestructive thermal testing, as well as destructive sectioning and microscopy. Post-build characterization showed that the thermocouples were well-bonded to the SS316 matrix and were fully functional after embedding. During thermal testing to temperatures up to 500 °C, the embedded thermocouples read consistently with one another and deviated only slightly from the readings of a nonembedded thermocouple located within the furnace. This slight discrepancy was most likely due to differences in the thermal time constants for a nonembedded thermocouple vs. a thermocouple embedded in a solid SS316 block. The results presented in this report will serve as the foundation for future work that will focus on embedding sensors in relevant TCR reactor components and eventually testing those components under neutron irradiation.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗