Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ASME Code”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Update on the United States Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Program with Full Scale Component Fabrication to Develop Utility Scale Power Plants with 760°C Steam Temperature

Following the successful completion of a 15-year effort to develop and test materials that would allow coal-fired power plants to be operated at advanced ultra-supercritical (A-USC) steam conditions, a United States-based consortium is presently engaged in Phase 2 of a project which includes an advanced manufacturing effort to complete US-based supply chain development for full commercial scale (800-850 MWe) A-USC components made of nickel-based alloys, components operating at up to 760°C. The project, funded under U.S. Department of Energy Award No. DE-FE0025064, falls under the US DOE overall goal to Develop cost-effective, reliable technologies to improve the efficiency of new and existing coal-fired power plants. A-USC steam cycles have the potential to improve cycle efficiency, reduce fuel costs, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Current development and demonstration efforts are focused on enabling the construction of A-USC plants, operating with steam temperatures as high as 1400°F (760°C) and steam pressures up to 5000 psi (35 MPa), which can potentially increase cycle efficiencies to 47% HHV (higher heating value), or approximately 50% LHV (lower heating value), and reduce CO 2 emissions by roughly 25%, compared to today’s U.S. fleet. A-USC technology provides a lower-cost method to reduce CO 2 emissions, compared to CO 2 capture technologies, while retaining a viable coal option for owners of coal generation assets. Among the specific goals of Phase 2 of the ComTest Project are to: validate that components made from advanced nickel-based alloys can operate and perform under A-USC conditions accelerate the development of a U.S.-based supply chain for the full complement of A-USC components close the remaining gaps and reduce the risks for manufacturing components from advanced materials for commercial demonstration fabricate full-scale versions of selected key components made of nickel-based alloys validate a qualified U.S. supply chain, to provide greater cost certainty for components obtain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code approval for new materials, components and processes Additional benefit: Manufacturing technology will be applicable to other advanced fossil energy high temperature cycles, and can support increased flexibility of existing power plants The ComTest project is managed by Energy Industries of Ohio, and technically directed by the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc., with General Electric designing the A-USC components. As stated earlier, the current phase of the effort is primarily funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, through the National Energy Technology Laboratory. This presentation outlines the motivation for the project, explains the project’s structure and schedule, and provides some of the technical details on the design of the ComTest components.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

NuScale Pressure and Temperature Limits Methodology Using Finite Element Analysis

Per 10 CFR 50 Appendix G, the pressure-temperature (P-T) limits curves and minimum temperature must be established to provide adequate margins for ferritic pressure-retaining components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary; this is to protect against brittle failure during any normal operating conditions, including anticipated operational occurrences and system hydrostatic tests, to which the pressure boundary may be subjected over its service lifetime. Specifically, ASME Code Section XI Appendix G procedures must be used for P-T limits calculation considering the pressure and temperature at various operating transient conditions. However, the elastic fracture mechanics solutions in Section XI are only suitable for cylindrical reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline without geometric discontinuities. Hence, these solutions are not suitable for postulated flaws near the core support blocks attached to the NuScale RPV inside surface, which is part of the beltline. As a result, NuScale has used finite element analysis to calculate thermal stress and stress intensity factor for the postulated flaws. The solutions using finite-element analysis have been validated using the formulations for straight cylinders for both axial and circumferential flaws. In addition, special considerations are given to the RPV beltline nil-ductility transition temperature (RTNDT) due to neutron irradiation occurring at lower temperatures than conventional plants. The paper summarizes the methodology and finite-element models used to develop P-T limits curves for NuScale RPV at the end of its 60-year design life.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Graphite Oxidation Studies Irradiated Graphite, GIF Summary, ASME Task Force, ASTM Activities

Introduction Comparison of Graphite Oxidation Rates for Irradiated and Unirradiated NBG-25 (Rebecca Smith and Austin Matthews, INL) Annealing effect over range of oxidation temperatures Irradiation effect (~6.5 dpa) over range of oxidation temperatures Dose dependency of irradiation effect Generation IV International Forum High Level Deliverable Summary of DOE ART Historic Oxidation Research (Cristian Contescu, ORNL) Publications issued over the last ~10 years Acute and chronic oxidation ASME Graphite Oxidation Task Force (C. Contescu, Paul Ryan, ORNL, Joe Bass, A. Matthews, R. Smith, INL) Collaborative effort headed by ORNL and engaging INL and others Initial review of relevant oxidation discussion in ASME code ASTM Activities (C. Contescu) Virtual Meetings New and Revised Standards

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Report on FY19 scoping creep and creep-fatigue testing on heat treated Alloy 709 base metal

Alloy 709 is a high temperature austenitic steel with potential for replacing Type 316 stainless steel. Efforts have been underway to lay the groundwork for an ASME code case by first refine the processing conditions to manufacture Alloy 709 plate. This effort continued into this year, as well as work examining the range of allowable solution annealing temperatures, the ability to recover material that was solution annealed at a temperature that was found to produce poor mechanical properties, and to examine the effects of pre-aging the material prior to testing.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Review of HAYNES® 282® alloy for supercritical CO2 structural applications

In this paper, HAYNES® 282® alloy (282® alloy) properties, microstructure, high temperature oxidation resistance, weldability, and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code case highlights are reviewed. The long term performance of high temperature, high strength, creep resistant alloys is critical to the success of supercritical carbon dioxide equipment. Several modern power generation technologies require alloys that can operate continuously at or above 700oC. 282® alloy is a precipitation strengthened nickel based super alloy that meets these requirements. The results of 282® alloy research reviewed in this paper include longterm cyclic oxidation behavior in air and sCO2, independent research and validation of 100k hour creep life, and successful welding of the alloy in the age hardened condition. The latter is critical for joining of hardened components (flanges, piping, heat exchanger internal, etc.) and field repair. Several highlights from the code case for this ASMEapproved material are also presented.

Tossey, Brett↗

Portable self-contained pressure testing manifold and associated methods

A portable, case-enclosed pressure test manifold, configured to support both pneumatic and hydrostatic pressure testing, and comprising a downstream fluid path (e.g., a system test gauge, a ball valve, a system test port, a system relief valve, and other components/piping) and an upstream fluid path (e.g., a low-pressure gauge, a high-pressure gauge, and other components/piping). A regulator and/or the ball valve selectively operate the downstream fluid path, defining a hydrostatic pressure testing path, to receive a liquid; and the upstream fluid path in combination with the downstream fluid path, defining a pneumatic pressure testing path, to receive a gas. Manifold components are pressure rated based on use and are ASME Code B31.3 compliant. A flexible hose connects with either of the pneumatic pressure testing path and the hydrostatic pressure testing path of the manifold. The case includes parking receptables and a carrying handle configured to stow the hose during transport.

Milholland, Roger A.↗

Irradiation Testing of Additively Manufactured Materials for LWR Applications: Alloy 718 and 316L Stainless Steel

The objective of this NSUF Project is to assess the changes in irradiated additively manufactured (AM) material properties as compared to non-irradiated material. Type 316L stainless steel and Alloy 718 samples were produced using Direct Metal Laser Melting (DMLM) fabrication. Materials produced from this fabrication method have several potential applications within the nuclear industry as reactor internal repair parts, fuel debris resistant filters, or fuel spacers within existing light water reactors (LWRs). AM materials have been shown to achieve equivalent mechanical behavior in simulated reactor environments as compared to wrought materials, but have significantly more flexibility when it comes to unique design features. The increased component design flexibility makes these AM materials an attractive choice for both current LWR applications as well as for small modular reactor (SMR) designs. Prior to use of these materials in reactor fleet operation, the industry as a whole must evaluate the effects of irradiation on their material properties. Standard 0.4 inch thick Compact Tension specimens and SSJ3 type tensile bars were neutron irradiated at the Advanced Test Reactor to ~1 dpa for the purpose of performing a variety of mechanical tests in a range of simulated environments applicable to LWRs. For the ductile austenitic Type 316L stainless steel, the irradiated data will be used to confirm that the AM process produces materials with properties that are equivalent to wrought materials under testing conditions applicable to LWR operation. Transmission electron microscopy analysis was also performed in order to understand microstructural and microchemical changes induced in each material in response to neutron irradiation. If possible, data collected from these AM 316L samples will be used to remove fluence limits from specifications of ASME code cases for this alloy, which will give vendors much more flexibility in building future components.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Development of ASME Division 5 Code proposal on temperature limits for simplified design methods

This report establishes proposed upper temperature limits for the ASME BP&V Code Section III, Division 5, Nonmandatory Appendix HBB-T design by elastic analysis provisions for bounding ratcheting strain and creep-fatigue damage in Class A high temperature nuclear reactor components. Limitations on the use of these design options are required because the design by elastic analysis methods rely on bounding theories that assume a non-unified, decoupled model of creep-plasticity. However, at high temperatures creep and plastic deformation become coupled and bounding theorems relying a decoupled material response may fail. The report describes a method for selecting appropriate upper temperature limits, demonstrates directly through a comparison to full inelastic simulations that the existing Code provisions can be nonconservative at high temperatures, and develops the requisite Code language required to implement the temperature limits in Section III, Division 5.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Draft ASME Section III Division 5 Code Cases to extend EPP strain limits and creep-fatigue design methods to Grade 91

This report describes the drafting of Code Cases extending the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B design by elastic perfect-plastic (EPP) analysis methods to Grade 91 steel. The primary technical challenge is that Grade 91 steel is a cyclic softening material and so modifications to the current ASME design approach for austenitic stainless steel were required to produce conservative designs. Previous work established the technical basis required to support these modifications. This report provides the full package for balloting by ASME – both revised Code Case language and associated background documentation for two nuclear code cases: N-861 covering ratcheting strain limits and N-862 covering creep-fatigue damage. The completion of this work and successful balloting at ASME, currently underway, allows designers to apply the efficient EPP methods to Grade 91 high temperature structural components.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Manufacturing and Hydro Testing of a 10 MWe sCO2 Axial Turbine

Abstract Supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles designed for thermodynamic efficiencies above 50% push component designs into pressure and temperature combinations that approach the limits of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and ASME Piping Design Codes with Turbine inlet conditions near 250 bar and 715 °C. These design conditions which limit available materials to high nickel alloys are compounded by the high fluid densities of sCO2 at these conditions which result in very compact machinery at the 10 MWe class which are currently being developed for the DOE supercritical transformational electric power (STEP) program. Design of the STEP Turbine is complete with integrated lessons learned from a previous 1 MWth subscale demonstration of a high temperature 10 MWe Turbine designed under the DOE SunShot Program. Fabrication of the STEP Turbine is nearing completion with all housings and pressure containing components in hand. This paper provides a detailed look at design intentions and limitations for the pressurized sections of the main pressure casing and the fabrication of key turbine components. Additional discussion is provided regarding postfabrication inspection and acceptance of the casing for use after issues with casing welds were identified late in the fabrication process.

Engineering↗

Structural Design and Modeling of MARVEL Primary Coolant System Using the ASME Section III, Division 5, Code

This paper presents the structural design and supporting analysis for the Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) primary coolant system (PCS) using the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5, rules. MARVEL is a liquid metal–cooled microreactor intended to provide experimental capabilities for the rapid testing and development of microreactor technologies. The PCS utilizes high-temperature sodium-potassium liquid metal as the primary coolant and operates at a design temperature of 570°C, necessitating the consideration of creep-related failure mechanisms. The base metal for the PCS is 316H stainless steel, and the weldments are made with a 16-8-2 filler. The design approach incorporates the current base code rules along with ASME code cases N-924, N-861, and N-862 to address primary load, ratcheting, and creep-fatigue evaluations, respectively. The reactor’s operation involves complex thermal and mechanical interactions due to natural convective flow and differential thermal expansion between components. In conclusion, this paper discusses the structural engineering challenges encountered, such as managing thermal stresses in the distribution plenum and guard vessel, and outlines the strategies implemented to meet the code requirements, including design modifications and operational constraints.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

Consistency of fatigue crack growth behavior of pipeline and low-alloy pressure vessel steels in gaseous hydrogen

Here, this study investigates the fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) behavior of pipeline and low-alloy pressure vessel steels in high-pressure gaseous hydrogen. Despite a broad range of yield strengths and microstructures ranging from ferrite/pearlite, acicular ferrite, bainite, and martensite, the FCGR in gaseous hydrogen remained consistent (falling within a factor of 2–3). Steels with higher fractions of pearlite, typical of older vintage pipeline steels, exhibited modestly lower crack growth rates in gaseous hydrogen compared to steels with lower fractions of pearlite. Crack growth rates in these materials exhibit a systematic dependence on stress ratio and partial pressure of hydrogen, as captured in the recently published fatigue design curves in ASME B31 code case 220 for pipeline steels and ASME BPVC code case 2938 for pressure-vessel steels.

08 HYDROGEN↗

MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PRINTED CIRCUIT HEAT EXCHANGER CORE EXPERIMENTS UNDER TENSION AND PRESSURE LOADING

The printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) has small channels with high surface area, making them an efficient solution for next-generation nuclear plants (NGNPs). These PCHEs are fabricated through a diffusion bonding process. This fabrication step changes the microstructure of wrought metal plates. The current ASME design code does not support the PCHE design for NGNPs due to a lack of test data. Hence, there has been initiative towards elevated temperature mechanical property characterization of the diffusion bonded material. One of the most common channel shapes is a semicircular channel with sharp corners. These corners act as a stress riser at the diffusion bonding interface. Evaluating elevated temperature mechanical performance of diffusion bonded material in the presence of stress risers is an essential step towards the ASME code development of PCHE design. This study selected two specimen geometries: the first is a PCHE bar specimen for tensile loading with three rows and three columns of channels, and the second is a lab-scaled PCHE with six rows and eight columns of channels. A set of elevated temperature monotonic and cyclic tests were conducted on the PCHE bar specimen to evaluate the mechanical performance under axial tensile loadings to study the failure mechanism. The lab-scaled PCHE specimens were tested under overpressure loads at room temperature, and pressure creep and pressure creep-fatigue loadings to mimic the realistic loading conditions observed in typical NGNPs. The X-ray scans of channeled specimens show interesting observations. The test results and observations are presented in the paper.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Draft ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Cases and Technical Bases for Use of Alloy 617 for Constructions of Nuclear Component Under Section III, Division 5

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code currently only allows five materials for use in construction of nuclear components for high temperature service. These are: 2.25Cr-1Mo and V-modified 9Cr-1Mo steels, Types 304 and 316 stainless steels and the high nickel Alloy 800H. Since 2005, the US high temperature gas-cooled reactor program has been characterizing elevated temperature mechanical properties of Alloy 617 as the leading candidate construction material for the intermediate heat exchanger. After analysis of these experimental results, along with historical data and additional results available through the Generation IV International Forum, Very High Temperature Reactor, Materials Program Management Board Materials Handbook, a draft ASME Code Case to allow nuclear construction with Alloy 617 for temperatures up to 1750°F (954°C) has been developed. This report contains the Code Case for Low Temperature Service Construction of Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart A, Class A and Subsection HC, Subpart A, Class B components, which has been approved in Section II, Materials, and Section III, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components. Supporting technical justification for the low temperature Code Case is also included. This Code Case allows use of Alloy 617 up to 800°F (425°C). This report also contains an updated draft of a Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B, Class A Code Case for Alloy 617 to qualify it for use in construction of nuclear components up to 1750°F (954°C) for service life up to 100,000 hours. The draft contained in Appendix 4, subject to editorial revision and approval by the ASME Special Task Group on Alloy 617 Code Qualification, will be submitted for approval by letter ballot by the appropriate ASME Committees. The technical justification supporting the Code Case is presented in Appendix 5 of this report. This background document is part of the information package that will be submitted with the Code Case for ballot.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Updated Draft ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case for Use of Alloy 617 for Construction of Nuclear Components for Section III Division 5

Early in the United States’ very high temperature reactor program, several candidate nickel alloys were considered for use in construction of the intermediate heat exchanger. Based primarily on technical maturity, a downselection was made to focus on Alloy 617. After this downselection, the primary goal of the research and development program was to develop sufficient information on the high temperature properties of the material to qualify it for construction of high temperature nuclear components in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code. Alloy 617 is a solid solution strengthened material with nominal Ni Cr Co Mo composition, originally developed for aerospace applications such as burner can liners for turbine engines by Huntington Alloys. (Huntington Alloys is now Special Metals Division of Precision Castparts, Inc.) The ASME BPV Code allows use of Alloy 617 for construction of non nuclear pressure vessels, and Alloy 617 is used in fossil fired power plants. Section III, Division 1, Subsection NB of the ASME BPV Code was developed for construction of nuclear components in light water reactors and allows use of ferritic materials up to 700°F and austenitic alloys up to 800°F. Subsection NH of Section III Division 1 was written to allow higher temperature construction with a primary focus on sodium cooled reactors. Recently, a new Division 5 of Section III was published specifically for high temperature reactors (regardless of the primary working fluid) and incorporates both Subsections NB and NH. There are only five alloys currently allowed for use in high temperature nuclear components: 2.25Cr 1 Mo and V modified 9Cr 1Mo steels, Types 304 and 316 stainless steels, and the high nickel austenitic Alloy 800H. This very sparse set of allowed materials is in contrast with the collection of more than 150 materials that are allowed for use in non nuclear pressure vessel construction. A draft Code Case to add Alloy 617 to the list of qualified alloys for use in high temperature nuclear design was submitted to ASME in the early 1990s, but it was withdrawn prior to formal Code action.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Code Standard Evaluation for ASME AG-1-2019, Section FL

ASME AG-1 Section FL Deep Bed Sand Filters includes a requirement to use Special Test Sections to provide a representative assessment of the filter efficiency. The SRPPF project design basis is to test the entire filter bed (versus a representative sample) following the same basis methodology to test the existing filters at the Savannah River Site. Using a combination of: 1) the filter testing experience at SRS since the early 1970’s, 2) the methodology found in ASME AG-1 for testing high capacity HEPA filter housings and 3) requirements for stack or duct sampling systems published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Special Test Sections methodology for Deep Bed Sand (DBS) filters in ASME AG-1 Section FL has been replaced with a methodology to test the entire DBS filter system.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗