Reactivity and Mechanisms of Methane, Ethane, and Benzene C–H Amination with an Iodine(III) Bistriflimide Complex
The iodine(III) bistriflamide complex (C 6 F 5 ) III I(NTf 2 ) 2 in HNTf 2 (bistriflimide acid; (CF 3 SO 2 ) 2 NH) selectively aminates methane and ethane. At a 100 °C reaction with methane after 3 h, it resulted in the exclusive formation of MeNTf 2 with a yield of approximately 40%. For ethane, at 100 °C in 2 h, a > 80% yield was found for a combination of monofunctionalized and difunctionalized amination products. In contrast to alkanes giving functionalized products, the reaction of (C 6 F 5 ) III I(NTf 2 ) 2 with benzene resulted in being stalled at (C 6 F 5 )I III (Ph)(NTf 2 ) with a <5% conversion to PhNTf 2 even at 120 °C. PWPB95-D3(BJ) density functional theory calculations indicate that C–H activation is the lowest energy pathway to break the hydrocarbon bonds and is lower in energy than radical, electron-transfer, proton-coupled electron-transfer, or hydride substitution pathways. For methane, from the (C 6 F 5 )I III (CH 3 )(NTf 2 ) intermediate, there is a one-step amine functionalization mechanism that avoids a carbocation intermediate. For ethane, from the (C 6 F 5 )I III (Et)(NTf 2 ) intermediate, dynamics simulations suggest the possibility of a competitive two-step functionalization pathway that involves a short-lived carbocation intermediate. As a result, a reaction coordinate strain analysis provides a straightforward model for understanding the relative reactivity rates for alkyl versus aryl functionalization.