SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “USER FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2019

Profiling at Oliktok Point to Enhance Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) Experiments (POPEYE) Field Campaign Report

The arctic region is rapidly evolving, and enhanced predictive capabilities, for both weather and climate, are urgently required. Therefore, the international community is executing an extended period of focused observations and modeling of the arctic environment, dubbed the Year of Polar Prediction or YOPP. The YOPP featured two special observing periods (SOPs) (and will feature a third in 2020). The first of the completed SOPs occurred in the spring of 2018, and the second during the late summer and early fall of 2018. Here, we summarize the deployment of additional U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility resources to the third ARM Mobile Facility (AMF3) at Oliktok Point, Alaska during the second three-month SOP (1 July 2018–30 September 2018). This deployment, named POPEYE (Profiling at Oliktok Point to Enhance YOPP Experiments), included the launching of extra radiosondes (one more per day) and operation of ARM-operated unmanned aircraft (DataHawk 2s) and ARM-operated tethered balloons. These instruments conducted routine profiling activities over the course of the special observing period to obtain measurements of atmospheric thermodynamic structure, cloud and precipitation properties, and aerosol properties. These measurements are expected to be used for a variety of purposes, including: 1) to conduct detailed studies of arctic cloud and aerosol processes; 2) to inform YOPP modeling efforts through real-time availability for assimilation into operational and research analysis products; 3) to evaluate and improve retrieval algorithms involving ARM remote sensors; 4) to evaluate and improve a variety of modeling tools being used to forecast arctic weather and climate; and 5) to initialize and evaluate simulations associated with a potential arctic large-eddy (LES) simulation framework similar to the ongoing LES ARM Symbiotic Simulation and Observation (LASSO) project.

Oliktok Point, Arctic processes, unmanned aerial v↗

DOE OSTI2019

Chemical Imaging of Atmospheric Organic Particles in the Eastern North Atlantic Field Campaign Report

The ability to reliably predict future climate is hindered, in major part, by an insufficient understanding of atmospheric aerosol-radiation interactions and aerosol-cloud interactions. (IPCC 2013; Bony and Dufresne 2005) Factors affecting marine stratocumulus clouds are particularly important given that they are the dominant cloud type globally. Global climate models frequently misrepresent ubiquitous marine stratocumulus clouds for a variety of reasons, including a lack of understanding of how these cloud properties change with aerosol cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and composition.(Nam et al. 2012) Limited information is available regarding the sources of CCN in remote regions where marine stratocumulus clouds dominate. Measurements in these marine locations, which are periodically influenced by anthropogenic emissions, provide additional opportunity to study the impact of humans on cloud characteristics. The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) observatory on Graciosa Island in the Azores is well suited to study these problems. The ENA site is exposed to a multitude of air masses as well as a variety of cloud regimes, as documented by passive and active satellite cloud retrieval. (Tselioudis et al. 2013) Thus, placing detailed aerosol and cloud measurements at the ARM ENA site may help gain a better understanding of the CCN budget and cloud interactions in remote environments. To provide detailed information on aerosol morphology, composition, and microphysical properties, size- segregated sampling was carried out at the ENA observatory on Graciosa Island during two intensive operating periods (IOPs). IOP1 occurred from June 17 to July 18, 2017, and IOP2 occurred from January 9 to February 21, 2018. Daytime and nighttime sampling were carried out separately to investigate any diurnal differences of aerosol composition due to differing meteorology. For both IOPs, a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) was used to collect particles for microscopic and microphysical analysis. A variety of microscopic substrates (formvar coated copper grids, silicon chips, silicon nitride windows, or molybdenum substrates) were used. Microscopic chemical characterization was carried out using computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (CCSEM-EDX) and the synchrotron-based scanning transmission X-ray microscopy coupled with near-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (STXM-NEXAFS). (Laskin et al. 2006; Kilcoyne et al. 2003; Moffet et al. 2010) Two light sources were used for this analysis: 1) the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and 2) The Canadian Light Source.

Eastern North Atlantic, ACE-ENA field campaign, Gr↗

DOE OSTI2019

Improving Vertical Velocity Retrievals from Doppler Radar Observations of Convection Field Campaign Report

Our National Science Foundation (NSF)-supported project was designed to address two longstanding challenges in radar-, meso-scale-, and hydro-meteorology: (1) mitigating the effects of non-simultaneous data collection on radar data-based analysis products, and (2) improving estimates of the vertical velocity (w) field in dual-Doppler wind analyses. Errors associated with the non-simultaneous data collection introduce errors in all Doppler analyses, and impose a lower limit on the time and space scales that can be studied. For many investigations the w field is of prime meteorological importance, but it is the velocity component most difficult to accurately synthesize from dual-Doppler wind observations. Our original plan proposed for short field campaigns at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility (CF) was to use multiple-Doppler radial wind data from the scanning ARM X-band radars to test and refine our multiple-Doppler wind analysis algorithms. An important part of our plan was the use of high-temporal-resolution w observations to verify the analyses. In our original plan, these data would be obtained from Doppler lidars, 915 MhZ profilers and Ka-band ARM Zenith Radar (KAZR) zenith-pointing radars at the CF and nearby ARM facilities in north-central Oklahoma. Using the data, we planned to test the utility of new spatially variable advection-correction/analysis procedures, the utility of the anelastic vertical vorticity equation as a constraint in variational multiple-Doppler wind analysis, and other Doppler wind analysis procedures. Idealized tests with numerically-simulated supercell data had suggested the vorticity constraint could help improve the vertical velocity field if the data were gathered with sufficiently high temporal resolution (e.g., volume scans completed in 30-60 sec), so we were interested in exploring the use of rapid-scan data from the X-band Scanning ARM Precipitation Radars (XSAPRs).

Southern Great Plains, convection, KAZR, XSAPR, ve↗

DOE OSTI2019

One-Year Electric Field Study at the North Slope of Alaska Field Campaign Report

The Global Electric Circuit (GEC) of the atmosphere provides a unique prospective of the changing climate around the Earth. Monitoring this global electrical signature provides details of the global nature of electrified clouds and thunderstorms that are occurring. Using this very inexpensive measurement system, we can provide much-needed information about the vast electrical system that surrounds us, as well as gaining an understanding of how the electrical properties of global precipitation systems are changing over time. Prior to the OYESNSA field campaign (http://atmos.tamucc.edu/oyesnsa/; https://www.arm.gov/research/campaigns/nsa2017oyesnsa/), much of the electric field data used to compare to the physical properties of electrified clouds were collected in the Antarctica. With the inclusion of this high-quality data set in the Arctic, it allows for the simultaneous observation of the electric field at both poles. Preliminary results from the One-Year Electric Field Study-North Slope of Alaska (OYESNSA) field campaign already show that the GEC appears to be indeed a truly global phenomenon, with very similar fair-weather observations being taken at both poles. This first six months of data has already been uploaded to the ARM Data Center, and preliminary results have been presented at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2017 meeting with very positive feedback (http://atmos.tamucc.edu/oyesnsa/AGU_2017_Poster.pdf). The North Slope of Alaska provides a unique location for collecting these electric field measurements. Besides being at the opposite pole from many previous measurements, this site provides a rare opportunity to use the other instruments at the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s Barrow, Alaska observatory, such as the Ka-band radar, upwardfacing lidar, vertical profile of meteorological measures, and other aerosol measurements. This allows for the unique chance to not only provide information about the global signature of the GEC, but also the physical inputs to the local electric field, by analyzing the physical properties of the simultaneous cloud, wind, and aerosol properties occurring with the electric field. Barrow, Alaska is home to some unique cloud formations that undoubtedly influence the electric field. This field campaign allows for the quantification of the influence to the electric field of these cloud types, as well as other unique phenomenon such as blowing snow. Already, the first six months of data have shown correlations of the electric field to radar reflectivity properties, cloud types, and increased wind (blowing snow and aerosol). Providing an understanding of these inputs to the local electric field, will improve modeling techniques of this system both locally and globally.

North Slope of Alaska, micropulse lidar, Ka-band r↗

DOE OSTI2019

ARM Radiosondes for Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Validation Field Campaign Report

The Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Radiosonde Field Campaign has been a coordinated multi-year effort involving the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility, the University of Wisconsin at Madison (UW-M), and the JPSS project to validate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) JPSS operational satellite sounding products. In this arrangement, funding for radiosondes has been provided by the JPSS project to ARM. These radiosondes have been launched coincident with JPSS satellite overpasses at ARM field sites, with UW-M personnel coordinating the radiosonde launch schedules. This work has been a fundamental, integral, and costeffective part of both the Suomi National Polar-Orbiting Partnership (SNPP) and NOAA20 satellite validation efforts and has provided critical accuracy assessments of the temperature and water vapor soundings. It is anticipated that these effort will continue throughout the lifetime of NOAA20. JPSS validation efforts began in July 2012, with radiosonde launches targeting overpasses of the recently launched SNPP satellite from the ARM sites at the North Slope Alaska (NSA), Southern Great Plains (SGP), and Tropical West Pacific (TWP) at Manus Island, Papua New Guinea. Launches at TWP ceased in May 2014, with the closure of the site, and launches began at the Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) site in February 2015. Radiosonde launches targeting SNPP continued through January 2018 and a total of 204/443/482/190 SNPP overpasses were targeted at the ENA/NSA/SGP/TWP sites respectively. More information about the SNPP radiosonde launches is provided in Table 1.

Satellite meteorology, radiosondes, North Slope of↗

DOE OSTI2019

Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA) Field Campaign Report

With their extensive coverage, low clouds greatly impact global climate. Presently, low clouds are poorly represented in global climate models (GCMs), and the response of low clouds to changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases and aerosols remains the major source of uncertainty in climate simulations. The poor representations of low clouds in GCMs are in part due to inadequate observations of their microphysical and macrophysical structures, radiative effects, and the associated aerosol distribution and budget in regions where the aerosol impact is the greatest. The Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) is a region of persistent but diverse subtropical marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds, whose albedo and precipitation are highly susceptible to perturbations in aerosol properties. Boundary-layer aerosol in the ENA region is influenced by a variety of sources, leading to strong variations in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and aerosol optical properties. A permanent ENA site was established by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility on Graciosa Island in the Azores, providing invaluable information on MBL aerosol and low clouds. At the same time, the vertical structures and horizontal variabilities of aerosol, trace gases, cloud, drizzle, and atmospheric thermodynamics are critically needed for understanding and quantifying the budget of MBL aerosol, the radiative properties, precipitation efficiency, and lifecycle of MBL clouds, and the cloud response to aerosol perturbations. Much of this data can be obtained only through aircraft-based measurements. In addition, the interconnected aerosol and cloud processes are best investigated by a study involving simultaneous in situ aerosol, cloud, and thermodynamics measurements. Furthermore, in situ measurements are also necessary for validating and improving ground-based retrieval algorithms at the ENA site. The Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA) project was motivated by the need for comprehensive in situ characterizations of boundary-layer structure, and associated vertical distributions and horizontal variabilities of low clouds and aerosol over the Azores. The ARM Aerial Facility (AAF) Gulfstream-1 (G-1) aircraft was deployed during two intensive measurement periods (IOPs). The first deployment took place from June 21 to July 20, 2017, and the second one took place from January 15 to February 18, 2018. Flights were carried out in the Azores, near the ARM ENA site on Graciosa Island. Deployments during both seasons allow for examination of key aerosol and cloud processes under a variety of representative meteorological and cloud conditions. The science themes for the deployments include: (1) Budget of MBL CCN and its seasonal variation; (2) Effects of aerosol on cloud and precipitation; (3) Cloud microphysical and macrophysical structures, and entrainment mixing; (4) Advancing retrievals of turbulence, cloud, and drizzle; and (5) Model evaluation and processes studies.

Eastern North Atlantic, Graciosa Island, aerosols,↗

DOE OSTI2019

Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor (WIBS4) for MARCUS Field Campaign Report

The Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor Mk. 4 (WIBS4) of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) was operated as part of the Measurements of Aerosols, Radiation, and Clouds over the Southern Ocean (MARCUS) field campaign from November 2017 to March 2018. WIBS4 was integrated in the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility second ARM Mobile Facility (AMF2), which was installed on the RSV Aurora Australis Australian Antarctic supply vessel during MARCUS. The aim of this campaign was to characterize the Southern Ocean boundary layer coarse-mode aerosol in terms of the fraction of biological or biogenic compounds. This work was done in close collaboration with Greg McFarquhar from the University of Oklahoma, the principal investigator (PI) for MARCUS, as well as Paul DeMott from Colorado State University, who concurrently sampled particle filters for off-line analysis of the ice nucleating particle concentrations. During four voyages of the vessel between Hobart, Tasmania and the Australian Antarctic stations Davies, Casey, and Mawson, as well as Macquarie Island, fluorescent biological aerosol particles (FBAP) were monitored by the WIBS4 in the size range from 0.5 to 10 μm. A FBAP is defined by its fluorescent behavior that gives simultaneous signals in the F1 (λexcitation=280nm, λemission=310- 400nm) and F3 (λexcitation=370nm, λemission=420-650nm) channels of the WIBS4 (Toprak and Schnaiter, 2013).

MARCUS field campaign, aerosols, Southern Ocean, A↗

DOE OSTI2019

ARM-Related Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) and Tethered Balloon System (TBS) Operational Requirements and Approval

This procedure addresses the requirements and process for obtaining approval for Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) and Tethered Balloon System (TBS) operations at DOE Office of Science (SC) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement user facility observatories (ARM sites), ARM-supported training flights, atmospheric instrument development flights, and campaigns at non-ARM sites. ARM sites include both ARM observatories and ARM mobile facility deployments. The protection of people, property, and the environment during UAS and TBS operations is the foundation of executing a successful mission using UAS or TBS. This procedure is designed to facilitate safe mission execution. It does not address obtaining approval for ARM-supported research, which is approved through the ARM Field Campaign (AFC) or Engineering Evaluation (EE) processes. Approval of UAS and TBS operations is a prerequisite for final approval of an AFC or EE by the Infrastructure Management Board (IMB) and may be conducted in parallel with preparation and submittal of the AFC or EE proposal to the IMB. This procedure addresses UAS and TBS requirements; mission planning; documentation; maintenance; risk assessment; airworthiness determination; operation approval; training and qualification requirements and responsibilities for UAS remote pilots; TBS operators; visual observers; maintenance technicians; and A&P mechanics. It also addresses the responsibilities of ARM site managers, the Office of Science Aviation Safety Manager, principal investigators, requesting organizations, and Range Safety Officers. This procedure is derived from DOE O 440.2C, Aviation Management and Safety, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations (FARs), 14 CFR 107, and 14 CFR 101. It contains two sections: Section 3.0 addresses UAS operations; Section 4.0 addresses TBS operations.

unmanned aerial systems, tethered balloon systems,↗

DOE OSTI2019

INL WTB Overview Capabilities Future v14_040419

INL Wireless Test Bed Mission Provide highly-regarded cellular, wireless and communications technical expertise, systems and environment to enable: Test & Demonstrate full scale wireless systems and equipment With and without controlled interference Terrestrial, Subterranean and Airborne Demonstrate new & emerging wireless technologies Develop and Train to Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) for wireless systems In a real world environment and configurations at real frequencies and real power levels to make informed decision State-of-the-Art INL WTB Assets and Capabilities Instrumentation: RF waveform analyzers, generators Protocol analyzers Noise generators for controlled interference Established Services & Processes: Spectrum approval & monitoring Safety, Medical, Fire, Security (physical) Resource management - personnel, networks, configuration control Secure, IP protected multi-user facility Broadband data access – entire INL Range Hardware prototyping, scientific labs Visitor – US citizen & foreign national

2G↗

DOE OSTI2020

Pilot Plant Reliability Metrics for Grinding and Fast Pyrolysis of Woody Residues

The reliability of biomass size reduction, feeding, and conversion processes remains a critical technical hurdle and important cost driver for biomass conversion systems. While Biorefinery projects have typically focused on scaling up conversion technologies that maximize yield of desired products, e.g. fuels and chemicals, solids handling and reactor feeding systems are often considered secondarily. These are frequently scaled down or adapted from other industries, without a full appreciation of how biomass heterogeneity and variability impact process reliability. Here we present the effects of feedstock variability on relative throughput, mass loss, plant uptime, operator intervention, product yield, and product quality for grinding and fast pyrolysis operations at the pilot scale. Loblolly pine residues were sourced and collected using commercial harvesting techniques. Grinding and pyrolysis experiments were performed at INL's Biomass Feedstock National User Facility and NREL's Thermal and Catalytic Process Development Unit, respectively. Preprocessing throughput using a hammer mill varied between 31-48% of nameplate capacity (5 tons/hr), and fast pyrolysis throughput varied between 57-72% of nameplate capacity (20 kg/hr) for an overall system throughput of 18-35% of nameplate capacity across biomass preprocessing and conversion to pyrolysis oil. Pyrolysis oil yields varied between 46-53% (feedstock carbon to oil, dry basis). Grinder overloads in the size reduction step were more prevalent for lower ash and higher moisture materials. During fast pyrolysis operations, downtime was caused by bridging in the feed and char removal systems and plugging in the condensation system, and significant variation in the type and frequency of operator intervention was observed between feedstocks. Cohesion of solids (feedstock and char) leading to system plugging appeared less problematic for higher ash feedstocks, and differences in condenser plugging behavior between high and low ash feedstocks indicates the composition and physical nature of the deposited material is important for process reliability and is feedstock dependent.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2020

HPC at NREL: FY 2019

Brochure featuring Fiscal Year 2019 accomplishments at the NREL High-Performance Computing User Facility and Data Center at the Energy Systems Integration Facility, including information on the facility's HPC systems as well as highlights from several modeling and simulation projects across the spectrum of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2020

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Brochure

The Biological and Environmental Research (BER) program advances fundamental research and scientific user facilities to support Department of Energy (DOE) missions in scientific discovery and innovation, energy security, and environmental responsibility. BER seeks to understand the biological, biogeochemical, and physical principles needed to predict a continuum of processes occurring across scales, from molecular and genomics-controlled mechanisms at the smallest scales to environmental and Earth system change at the largest scales.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2020

The Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) 2020 Fact Sheet

EMSL, the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Research at EMSL supports BER’s mission to understand the biological, biogeochemical, and physical principles needed to predict a continuum of processes occurring at the molecular and genomics-controlled smallest scales to environmental and Earth system change at the largest scales. EMSL is in Richland, WA, at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2019

NSUF Research Reactor Fitness Workshop Results

The Nuclear Science User Facilities has been working with the National Organization of Test, Research, and Training Reactors to collect input from the US university reactor community on their current and future needs. The effort started with a web survey in March to collect initial data. NSUF held a follow-up workshop in July at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies in Idaho Falls. We identified four areas of interest in the university research reactor community that can affect future operations and sustainability of the reactors: capital infrastructure, regulatory burden, staffing and knowledge transfer, and utilization and relevancy. Members of the community presented challenges and best practices from their facilities. Discussions were held to create and distill the list of challenges for each area. A working group was formed for each area to continue the discussion and prioritize the challenges. NSUF and the working groups intend to create a final recommendations report by the end of the year. This panel session will discuss the workshop and summarize the discussion in the four topic areas. The audience is encouraged to add to the discussion.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2017

NERSC & JGI Seek Elusive Proteins for Gene Editing

A video just released by the Supercomputing 2017 (SC17) conference shows how biologists at UC Berkeley and the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) – a Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility – are using NERSC, the Office of Science’s primary supercomputing center, to identify a class of enzymes capable of editing out genes responsible for disease. This revolutionary work requires petaflops of computing power to sift through billions of DNA sequences in the JGI data portals to identify proteins like Cas9 that, combined with the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR), can “edit” a genome. First discovered by researchers at UC Berkeley, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has the power to permanently correct disease-causing mutations in cells, animal models, and eventually human patients to cure certain types of cancer, cardiovascular disease, sickle cell disease, and retinal degeneration. Since the CRISPR system was first identified in the early 2000s, it has become the most promising technology for treating genetic disease in humans and enabling plants to survive stress caused by pests and the environment. The annual SC17 conference will take place November 12-17 in Denver, Colorado. The over 12,000 attendees from academia, government and industry are leaders in researching and delivering high performance computing, networking, data storage and analysis in support of scientific discovery. http://sc17.supercomputing.org Producer: Jennifer Boyd, Boyd Productions DP: Damon Hennessey Audio: Richard K. Pooler Score: Michael Bacon Music

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2019

Turning on Light at the Advanced Light Source

Angelic Lucero, Accelerator and Floor Operator at the ALS, will talk about the process involved in “turning on the light” that drives experiments at the ALS. The Advanced Light Source is a DOE Office of Science User Facility. The International Day of Light is recognized by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Using Light for Research at the Advanced Light Source

Ziheng Yao, ALS Doctoral Fellow in Residence and a Ph.D. student at Stony Brook University, will share how he uses infrared light at the ALS to study a range of samples, including battery and biological materials, meteors, and more. The Advanced Light Source is a DOE Office of Science User Facility. The International Day of Light is recognized by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2019

Using X-ray Light to Study Solar Materials at the Advanced Light Source

Shambhavi Pratap, ALS Doctoral Fellow in Residence and a Doctoral Researcher at the Technical University of Munich, will discuss how she studies thin-film solar energy materials using X-rays at the ALS. The Advanced Light Source is a DOE Office of Science User Facility. The International Day of Light is recognized by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗