SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Solvers”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Boundary-Layer Transition Prediction Through Loose Coupling of OVERFLOW and LASTRAC

Transition prediction based on linear stability theory is expected to more accurately reflect the causality of transition onset than phenomenological transition models based on RANS-like transport equations. To help achieve the CFD vision 2030 aim of building a CFD tool chain with automated prediction of boundary layer transition, a technique to loosely tie the NASA OVERFLOW CFD solver with the LASTRAC stability analysis tool is described. The coupled solver is then used to compute transition over selected over a flat plate in a freestream with sufficiently low levels of turbulence, NLF(1)-0416 airfoil, the 6:1 prolate spheroid at an angle of attack, and a NASA juncture flow model with symmetric wing configuration. The findings show that the loosely coupled approach can reliably predict the transition location accurately in scenarios that are dominated by a single transition mechanism involving Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities, crossflow instabilities, or separation bubble-induced transition, or include a mixture of selected mechanisms. The toolset presents here appears to be robust to the prescription of the initial transition location, and it can lead to a converged solution in four or five rounds of the mean flow calculation and stability analysis, with minimal input from the user.

boundary layer transition↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison between Computational and Experimental Wall-Shear Stress and Pressure Measurements in a Supersonic Wind Tunnel

We study the performance of two selected RANS models (SST-$k$-$\omega$ and Baldwin-Lomax) to simulate the mean wall-shear and pressure data obtained from a distributed-roughness-related experimental campaign conducted at Ahmic Aerospace, LLC, located in Ohio, US. A structured compressible Navier-Stokes in-house solver, DPLR, is used to conduct the RANS simulations. As the final objective is to perform the studies under high-enthalpy flow conditions, such as inside the AHF facility at NASA-Ames Research Center (ARC), the current investigation focuses on the low-enthalpy cases using Ahmic's high-Reynolds-number supersonic wind tunnel as the initial step to simplify the flow physics. Furthermore, the wind tunnel simulations are conducted with perfectly-smooth walls to further simplify the problem and perform the initial testing of different solver-based RANS models. The Baldwin-Lomax model is observed to be more accurate than the SST model. However, when these RANS models and their roughness augmentation models are utilized to study their accuracy with respect to the experimental datasets, where the roughness effects are activated, both models perform well for a low roughness height case. However, as the roughness height increases, the SST model more accurately predicts the wall data (shear and pressure) than the Baldwin-Lomax model. Therefore, this present work has built a solid foundation for selecting the best RANS model to study the wall data under high-enthalpy flow conditions at the AHF facility soon.

Prakash Shrestha↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Toward Verification of the γ-Reθt Transition Model in OVERFLOW and FUN3D

The results of an ongoing assessment of the transition modeling capability in NASA's OVERFLOW and FUN3D programs are presented, with a focus on the Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt transition model in combination with the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model. While the effect of numerics and boundary conditions on the accuracy and iterative convergence of RANS solutions for fully turbulent flows has been well documented, especially in the context of canonical flow configurations, the same cannot be said for transport-equation-based transition models coupled with RANS-based turbulence models. Given the criticality of transition modeling for new aircraft design and optimization, there has been a renewed focus on the accuracy of such transition models and their inconsistent implementation across different flow solvers as seen from the AIAA and NATO-AVT workshops. In this work, we aim to establish the verification of such models via these two well established CFD codes with different numerics. The goal is to produce high-quality data, such as grids, solutions, and other auxiliary data, that may be utilized for code verification by others in the CFD community. As a first step, the work reported here is focused on the Langtry-Menter transition model as applied to two simple 2D configurations, namely the flat plate, and the NLF-0416, respectively. The paper also highlights how the boundary conditions and baseline turbulence model can affect the solutions from the SST-based Langtry-Menter transition model. A preliminary evaluation of the automatic mesh adaption capabilities of these solvers and potential benefits for flow configurations involving a mix of laminar, transitional, and fully turbulent flows is also reported.

CFD Modeling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.8 TransonicTruss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Variable Camber ContinuousTrailing Edge Flap

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.8 Tran-sonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft with the Variable Camber Continuous TrailingEdge Flap (VCCTEF). An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small dis-turbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to modeshapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method is developed to provide a rapidaircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. Aeroelastic trim drag optimization studies areconducted for a VCCTEF configuration with 6-spanwise sections. Three different flight condi-tions corresponding to Mach 0.8 are selected for the aeroelastic trim drag optimization at thedesign and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show thatthe TTBW aircraft with the optimized VCCTEF deflection achieves a drag reduction of about 9.2 counts, 9.6 counts, and 12.3 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.661, 0.695, and0.729, respectively. When accounting for the actuator weight penalty, the corresponding dragreductions are 1.77%, 1.82%, 2.41%. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to validatethe aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

Aeroelastic trim drag↗

NASA NTRS2022

VULCAN-CFD User Manual: Ver. 7.2.0

VULCAN-CFD offers a comprehensive set of capabilities to enable the simulation of continuum flowfields from subsonic to hypersonic conditions. The governing equations that are employed include allowances for both chemical and thermal nonequilibrium processes, coupled with a wide variety of turbulence models for both Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulations. The software package can simulate two-dimensional, axisymmetric, or three-dimensional problems on structured multiblock meshes or fully unstructured meshes. A parabolic (i.e., space-marching) treatment can also be used for any subset of a structured mesh that can accommodate this solution strategy. The flow solver provides a significant level of geometric flexibility for structured grid simulations by allowing for arbitrary face-to-face C(0) continuous and non-C(0) continuous block interface connectivities. The unstructured grid paradigm allows for mixed element unstructured meshes that contain any combination of tetrahedral, prismatic, pyramidal, and hexahedral cell elements. The flow solver is also fully parallelized using MPI (Message Passing Interface) libraries in a data-parallel fashion, allowing for efficient simulations on modern High Performance Computing (HPC) systems. This document provides information related to the installation and execution of the VULCAN-CFD software package. A detailed description of the physical and numerical models available in the software are provided in the VULCAN-CFD Theory Manual.

VULCAN-CFD User Manual↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Toward an IMU-based Space Suit Motion Capture System

Spacesuits are complex engineering systems that sustain human health and enable performance outside of Earth-like environments. These systems must support human mobility and physical workload demands while minimizing injury risk during extravehicular activity (EVA). Future EVA on the lunar surface during the Artemis program is expected to be more frequent and require higher physical workloads than previous EVAs during the ISS, Shuttle, or Apollo programs. Hence it is important to optimize future as well as current spacesuits to be efficient and comfortable for the success of space and planetary missions. To enable this, an efficient method is needed to test these spacesuits on the ground.When testing spacesuits in ground environments, it is often necessary to understand the kinematics of the suit to validate the design against relevant requirements or characterize the physical workload necessary to operate the suit. This is a challenging task for traditional optical motion capture (OMC) approaches: suit-mounted OMC markers are easily occluded by the subject or environment and may become detached during testing. Controlling lighting and reflectivity of objects in the motion capture volume is also difficult. Fixed-position OMC cameras also constrain testing to a small and contrived laboratory environment, disallowing kinematics capture in field environments.One promising alternative is the use of suit-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs). These sensors are small, unobtrusive, and portable, but come at the cost of increased sensor noise and complexity of the software and mathematics to analyze the collected data. To this end, engineers at NASA are developing the Augmented Suit Inverse Kinematics (ASIK) system, a complete motion capture methodand inverse kinematics solver which relies solely on a network of wireless IMUs attached to the major kinematic segments of the spacesuit. The ASIK modeling language allows for the simple inclusion of probabilistic priors such as suit size and shape or IMU positions and rotations. Furthermore, to increase accuracy and reduce operational overhead to use this motion capture approach, the developed inverse kinematics solver exploits so-called self-calibratingalgorithmic techniques, which reduce the need for precise alignment of the sensors on the segments or scripted functional calibration procedures. The ASIK system was tested in a 7-subject pilot study. Each subject donned NASA’s new prototype exploration spacesuit in the Active Response Gravity Offload System (ARGOS) facility at the NASA Johnson Space Center. The subjects were outfitted with a set of 14 APDM (Portland, OR, USA) Opal IMUs, 12 of which were used in the ASIK model to estimate lower body and trunk kinematics. The subjects were also outfitted with a set of reflective OMC markers and traditional OMC data was collected and processed. Presented results will include characterization of ASIK-derived suit joint angles accuracy against an optical motion capture datum. Discussion of these results, as well as discussion of system calibration and nuances of mathematical observability, will be included.If successful, IMU-based motion capture will enable testing and validation of spacesuits more frequently, with less overhead, in more extreme environments. Future work will apply these techniques to common spacesuit testing tasks, such as gait, mobility, and balance assessment, physical workload characterization, and ergonomics evaluations.

Timothy Mcgrath↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Study of Graphite Ablation at Arc-Jet Conditions using Finite-Rate and Equilibrium Chemistry Models

Moving at hypersonic speeds through the atmosphere generates immense amount of heat that triggers thermo-chemical non-equilibrium effects in the flow approaching the vehicle and leads to surface chemical reactions that cause ablation and consume the material mass. This complex behavior and interaction of the aerothermal environment with a graphite surface is com- putationally modeled in the present work using a fully-coupled simulation between flow solver CHAMPS NBS-Cart and material response solver KATS-MR. In this study, we account for the thermo-chemical non-equilibrium effects occurring in the flow and use an 11-species air-carbon re- action model to simulate the ablation of the material. The reactions at the surface such oxidation, nitridation and recombination are modeled with a newly developed air-carbon reaction model. The coupled simulation is applied to study two experimental cases performed at IHF arc-jet facility at NASA Ames research center. The obtained results are compared against the measured data of surface recession, as well as surface and in-depth temperatures. Additionally, uncoupled sim- ulations, performed with equilibrium chemistry at the wall, point out the substantial differences between the coupled and uncoupled solutions, leading to higher deviation of the predicted temper- atures. Overall, we show excellent agreement between the coupled simulation predictions and the experimental data in all measured quantities.

EDL↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards the Prediction of Entry Capsule Dynamic Stability Characteristics with Reduced Free Flight Motion in FUN3D

Work is done to verify FUN3D's 6-DOF path and begin active application to flight projects. This work moves towards a computational predictive capability for entry capsule dynamic stability such that data from concurrent ground testing will enable validation efforts of this solver and its continued use on EDL vehicles. Applications of the solver to the Dragonfly mission to Titan and the Mars Sample Return - Earth Entry System are discussed.

Eli Shellabarger↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Partitioned -Task Parallel Implementation of the NASA Multiscale Analysis Tool for High Performance Computing

The NASA Multiscale Analysis Tool (NASMAT) is a “plug and play” software package that allows users to conduct massively multiscale modeling of hierarchical and nonlinear materials. This work extends the scalability and improves the High Performance Computing friendliness of NASMAT by adopting a Partitioned Task-Parallel approach. Interoperability of NASMAT with external software is enhanced through preCICE, a open source library for multiphysics coupling in a partitioned manner. Enhancement through preCICE allows for easy integration of NASMAT to other macro solvers and dissociates the parallelization strategy adopted within NASMAT from the macro solver. The task-parallel framework based on Master-Worker approach is implemented as the parallelization scheme. The scheme accounts for hierarchy of multiple scales (task-dependence) and heterogeneous nature (dynamic load balancing) of computations. The applicability and scalability of the framework will be evaluated by analyzing large scale engineering problems through massively multiscale methods.

NASMAT↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Time-Accurate Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of a Supersonic Turbine to Assess Structural Mode Excitation

Gas turbines can experience significant unsteady loading during operation which can cause damage such as blade cracking or bearing wear. While computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of full three-dimensional gas turbine flow to verify meanline design performance is standard practice within the industry, the use of time-accurate CFD makes it possible to assess the unsteady loading which can be especially problematic at operating conditions where unsteady fluid loading aligns with structural modes. The Fluid Dynamics branch (ER42) at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center has developed a time-accurate CFD analysis methodology using the unstructured, density-based, Loci-CHEM solver which is capable of simulating the relative motion required for turbomachinery applications through sliding interface meshes. The highly-parallel unstructured solver allows for full three-dimensional, time-accurate simulation of turbines including upstream and downstream components such as manifolds, nozzles, and stators, any of which could excite a turbine structural mode. Recently, Loci-CHEM was used to analyze the FASTRAC supersonic turbine to assess the loading on the rotor. Overall performance and time-averaged loading on the rotor was computed, including the axial force over the entire rotor disk which is required for force balance calculations on the turbopump. The FASTRAC turbine has supersonic nozzles upstream of the rotor that result in significant unsteady loading on the rotor blades at multiples of the nozzle pass frequency. The unsteady blade pressure loading was decomposed into the frequency domain for direct use in structural forced response analysis. Utilizing this type of CFD analysis coupled with structural analysis has proven to be a valuable tool in identifying structural modes that are being excited by unsteady fluid loading.

M.V. Fischels↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiphase Simulations of the SLS Launch Environment

NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), which will send astronauts back to the Moon in the next few years, is powered by four RS-25 engines and two RSRMV solid rocket boosters (SRBs). During launch the SLS propulsion system generates intense acoustics and other powerful waves, such as ignition overpressure (IOP) which, if unmitigated, have the potential to damage the vehicle and possibly cause loss of mission or crew. To protect the vehicle from these powerful waves, the SLS launch pad design includes an ignition overpressure/sound suppression (IOP/SS) system which sprays 270,000 gallons per minute of water very close to the SRB and RS-25 nozzles. The SRB and RS-25 engine plumes, and the proximity of the IOP/SS water, create a complex multiphase (gas and liquid) environment during the SLS ignition sequence. The interplay among these systems creates challenges related to water spray into/onto engine nozzles, potential debris transport, and additional transient loads due to strong plume-water interactions - all of which the SLS vehicle must be able to withstand. Prior to the Artemis I launch, the SLS multiphase liftoff environment was largely unknown due to differences from the Space Shuttle and other programs. Some data was available from tests of individual systems, but no integrated testing or analysis was available. Even post-launch analysis of Artemis I cannot provide a full understanding of the complex physics involved due to limited (or obstructed) camera views and instrumentation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is being used to investigate the details of the multiphase environment which could not be measured, help comprehend the data gathered from the launch, and ultimately identify phenomena that are a concern for future flights. Project Details Engineers at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) have executed simulations using the Loci/STREAM-Volume of Fluid (VoF) multiphase CFD solver to understand this environment. Initial efforts successfully validated the CFD solver on various tests, giving confidence to simulate the SLS multiphase liftoff environment prior to the Artemis I launch. The CFD simulation of the SLS ignition sequence was conducted in three phases. First the IOP/SS water system was simulated for approximately 6 seconds to reach a quasi-steady state. Next, the RS-25 engine plumes were activated and held at full power for 1 second. Lastly, the SRB booster was activated and the simulation was carried out until just prior to vehicle motion. This simulation process mimics the conditions that exist at launch. Results and Impact The SLS ignition sequence simulation results provide deep understanding of the underlying physics occuring during launch. Observations from the simulation include reduction of water splashing into/onto the engine nozzles, change in angling of the dense water sheets, and the origin of the powerful ignition overpressure (IOP) wave. These observations directly inform the SLS program on subjects including plume-water induced side loads, debris transport, and the acoustic launch environment. Additionally, with post launch comparison of CFD observations to flight data, these tools can be applied to launch vehicles and environments other than SLS with confidence. Why HPC Matters The SLS ignition sequence CFD simulations are conducted on meshes up to hundreds of millions of cells on thousands of processors for weeks at a time. These simulations generate terabytes of data that must also be stored and archived for future use on HPC systems. Simply put, the CFD simulations would not be possible without NASA HPC resources. What’s Next Comparisons between the Artemis I flight data and the CFD simulations will be continued to both improve confidence in the CFD results and provide deeper understanding into the SLS multiphase launch environment. This will be used to provide insight for decision making for the first manned SLS flight, Artemis II. Future simulations will target new configurations of the SLS IOP/SS water required to support the more powerful variants of the SLS vehicle, such as Block 1B. Additionally, this capability provides NASA the ability to investigate launch environments for vehicles other than SLS to support other missions.

Travis Rivord↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Time-Accurate Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of a Supersonic Turbine to Assess Structural Mode Excitation

M V Fischels↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre-and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre-and post-buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the span wise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024: Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000-R Turbulence Model

This is an invited paper for the SciTech 2023 special session, High-Fidelity CFD Verification Preworkshop. The paper presents three test cases for verification of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solvers. The verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model, SA-neg-QCR2000-R. The test cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a subsonic three-dimensional flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in a tunnel, and a subsonic flow around a wing-body configuration developed by Boeing for verification of solvers participating in the High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The turbulence-model formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and the desired outcome are described in detail. Solutions for the test cases computed by established codes are shown.

CFD↗

NASA NTRS2023

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024: Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000-R Turbulence Model

This is an invited paper for the SciTech 2023 special session, High-Fidelity CFD Verification Pre-Workshop. The paper presents three benchmark cases for verification of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solvers. The verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model, SA-neg-QCR2000-R. The benchmark cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a subsonic three-dimensional flow around an extruded NACA0012 wing in a tunnel, and a subsonic flow around a wing-body configuration developed by Boeing for verification of solvers participating in the High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The turbulence-model formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and the desired submission data are described in detail. Reference solutions computed by established codes are shown.

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of the ASPIRE SR03 Supersonic Parachute Flight Test

Research into parachute performance continues to be a source of significant investment from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to mitigate risks and to enable a variety of exploration missions, including landing on Mars as well as returning to Earth. The cost of flight tests to certify any changes to the current state-of-the-art parachute designs limits the development of next generation parachute systems. Fluid-structure interaction simulations could help accelerate this process once validated. The Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics team is developing the capability to perform such fluid-structure interaction simulations by coupling a higher-order Cartesian immersed boundary computational fluid dynamics solver with adaptive mesh refinement to a finite element structural dynamics solver in space and time. We continue the effort to validate this tool with the Advanced Supersonic Parachute Inflation Research Experiments SR03 flight test featuring a strengthened parachute akin to the Mars 2020 mission that landed the Perseverance rover on Mars, and a higher freestream dynamic pressure prior to inflation. The effect of the flow conditions’ angle of attack and of the initial parachute shape are quantified. The impact of relaxing modeling assumptions with regards to radial stiffeners on the parachute canopy is also investigated. Results demonstrate improvements in agreement with the pull force recorded during the SR03 flight test as the initial conditions of the flow and parachute are brought closer to those experienced in flight, and further improved when the radial stiffener modeling assumptions are relaxed.

ESM↗