DOE OSTI2020
MXenes are 2D materials composed of layered transition metal nitrides or carbides. These materials are synthesized by HF exfoliation from MAX phases (Ti{sub 3}AlC{sub 2}). The 2D nanomaterial was synthesized by the removal of the 'A' element, resulting in a Mxene product (Ti{sub 3}C{sub 2}). MXenes have the general formula M{sub n+1}X{sub n}T{sub x}, where M is an early transition metal, X is Carbon and/or Nitrogen, and T accounts for surface terminated functional groups such as Fluoride, hydroxyl, and oxygen. These materials have very unique properties, similar to graphene, that allows them to be applied in a variety of trace detection techniques including surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). MXenes have also been demonstrated to selectively uptake uranyl ion, UO{sub 2}{sup 2+}. If this property can be combined with SERS or fluorescence detection, it may be possible to use MXenes as the basis for an alternative method to kinetic phosphorescence analysis (KPA) for trace uranyl measurements. Objectives: To confirm that MXene Nano materials are suitable substrates for SERS and sensor development by enhancing Raman signaling. To determine if certain MXene preparation methods yield materials that are more suitable for trace sensing methods. To determine uranyl uptake properties of these MXene materials and test them for analytical signals. Sample Preparation: Preparation of Ti{sub 3}C{sub 2}MXene (at FSU). MXenes were prepared by etching Al from Ti{sub 3}AlC{sub 2} (MAX phase)material. Two etching techniques yield different MXene products: LiF/HCl: Milder reaction, larger MXene flakes. HF: Harsher reaction, smaller flakes, larger layer separation. Products washed to remove etchant, vacuum filtered, and dried. Dried MXene flakes are air-stable. Film preparation for sensor testing (at SRNL): Suspend powder in diH{sub 2}O, purge with Ar, sonicate for 30 min. Centrifuge and collect supernate with suspended particles. Observed LiF-etched Mxene yielded a higher density of particles and darker collected solution. Drop-cast (4 ml) supernate onto slides and dried with Ar. For Rhodamine B (RhB) testing, drop-cast 4 ml drops onto Mxene spots and dried with Ar. Scanning Electron Microscopy conditions: 10 kV Beam energy, high vacuum; Working distance of 8 mm; beam penetration depth appx. 4 microns, beam spot size appx. 2 nanometers. Results: Detection of aluminum correlates with bright spots on image. Presence of aluminum shows that LiF/HCl etching was less thorough than HF etching. Trace Cl detection in LiF images suggests incomplete rinsing. HF has smaller feature size, more layer structure, and increased homogeneity, consistent with expectations. Macroscopic Raman spectroscopy measurements: 532 nm excitation, ∼50 mW with a ∼100 micron spot size (InPhotonics RPB probe). Kaiser Optical Holospec f/1.8 spectrometer with cooled (-60 deg.C) Andor iDus OE420 CCD. LiF 1x supernate showed good signal for trace measurements of Rhodamine B. HF and 1/4x LiF supernates showed little Mxene or Rhodamine B signal. Low deposition densities led to excess background signal from glass slides. For LiF film, response is linear with Rhodamine B concentration over range tested. Will retest with Raman microscope (∼1 micron spot size) to characterize SERS of more dilute LiF and HF etched Mxenes. Conclusions: The LiF etched material was more suitable for macroscopic SERS measurements because it was more concentrated, resulting in a thicker film than the HF etched Mxene and diluted LiF sample. However, the other materials may give greater SERS enhancements, which we hope to determine from measurements with the Raman microscope. From characterization with SEM we concluded that the HF etched Mxene is more uniform/homogenous and has smaller particle size than the LiF etched Mxene. There is still aluminum present in both samples indicating that etching wasn't complete, but the removal of the aluminum was more efficient in the HF method. Path Forward: Observe SERS with Raman microscopy, to obtain better signals for the more diluted samples and be able to compare enhancement effects for the different MXenes. Characterize uranyl sorption into MXene films and test Raman and fluorescence signals. Revisit the etching conditions to improve removal of aluminum. FSU and SRNL will continue to collaborate to create and characterize different Mxene materials and test their usefulness for sensor applications.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗