Repository Performance Metrics and Other Quantities of Interest.
Abstract not provided.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Abstract not provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Predicting molecular activity against protein targets is difficult because of the paucity of experimental data. Approaches like multitask modeling and collaborative filtering seek to improve model accuracy by leveraging results from multiple targets, but are limited because different compounds are measured with different assays, leading to sparse data matrices. Profile-QSAR (pQSAR) 2.0 addresses this problem by fitting a series of partial least squares models for each target, using as features the predictions from single-task models on the remaining targets. Here, this method has been shown to produce better results than single task and multitask models. However, the factors determining the success of pQSAR 2.0 have as yet not been characterized. In this paper we examine the experimental conditions that lead to better pQSAR models. We limit the amount of data available to the method by retraining with decreasing amounts of data and explore the model’s ability to generalize to compounds that have never been assayed. Finally, we look at the properties of training data needed to demonstrate pQSAR improvement.
The emerging use of the physics-based athermal recombination-corrected displacement per atom (arc-dpa) model for the displacement damage efficiency has motivated a re-evaluation of the historical empirically-derived GaAs damage response function with the purpose of highlighting needs for future analytical and experimental work. The 1-MeV neutron damage equivalence methodology used in the ASTM E-722 standard for GaAs has been re-evaluated using updated nuclear data. This yielded a higher fidelity representation of the GaAs displacement kerma and, through the use of the refined PKA recoil energy-dependent damage efficiency model, an updated 1-MeV(GaAs) displacement damage function. This re-evaluation included use of the Norgett-Robinson-Torrens (NRT) model for an updated threshold treatment, rather than the sharp-threshold Kinchin-Pease model used in the current ASTM standard. The underlying nuclear data evaluations have been updated to use the ENDF/VIII.0 {sup 75}As and TENDL-2019 {sup 71}Ga/{sup 69}Ga evaluations. The displacement kerma and 1-MeV-equivalent damage responses were calculated using a modified NJOY-2016 code which allowed for refinements in some of the damage models. This paper shows that an updated displacement damage function, based upon the latest nuclear data, is consistent with the experimental data used to develop the current ASTM E-722 GaAs standard. Using a double ratio approach to compare the available experimental data with the calculated response, the average legacy double ratio was found to be 0.97 ± 0.05 and the average updated double ratio was found to be 0.94 ± 0.05. (authors)
The data is contained within an oral presentation with graphical results of PFAS process simulation pertaining to an ongoing WaterTAP analysis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.