SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Documentation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2022

Distances to Prompt Effects for a Nuclear Device

In 2010, nuclear weapon effects experts at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) were asked to provide a quick reference document containing estimated prompt nuclear effects. This report is an update to the 2010 document that includes updated model assumptions. This report addresses only the prompt effects associated with a nuclear detonation (e.g., blast, thermal fluence, and prompt ionizing radiation). The potential medium- and longer-term health effects associated with nuclear fallout are not considered in this report because, in part, of the impracticality of making generic estimates given the high dependency of fallout predictions on the local meteorological conditions at the time of the event. The results included in this report also do not consider the urban environment (e.g., shielding by or collapse of structures) which may affect the extent of prompt effects. It is important to note that any operational recommendations made using the estimates in this report are limited by the generic assumptions considered in the analysis and should not replace analyses made for a specific scenario/device. Furthermore, nuclear effects experts (John Hogan, SNL, and Byron Ristvet, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)) have indicated that the accuracy of effects predictions below 0.5 kilotons (kT) or 500 tons nuclear yield have greater uncertainty because of the limited data available for the prompt effects in this regime. The Specialized Hazard Assessment Response Capability (SHARC) effects prediction tool was used for these analyses. Specifically, the NUKE model within SHARC 2021 Version 10.2 was used. NUKE models only the prompt effects following a nuclear detonation. The algorithms for predicting range-to-output data contained within the NUKE model are primarily based on nuclear test effects data. Probits have been derived from nuclear test data and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) protective action guides. Probits relate the probability of a hazard (e.g., fatality or injury) caused by a given insult (e.g., overpressure, thermal fluence, dose level). Several probits have been built into SHARC to determine the fatality and injury associated with a given level of insult. Some of these probits differ with varying yield. Such probits were used to develop the tables and plots in this report.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2021

Attenuator, PC-2.92mm, Fixed (Proficiency Test Report; PT ID Number 6679665)

The PSL has reviewed the documentation and data provided by NNSS–Livermore Operations with respect to this proficiency test. This proficiency test was performed to assess NNSS–Livermore Operations’ ability to perform scattering parameter calibrations. The level of documentation was satisfactory. On 12/28/2021, NNSS–Livermore Operations reported the data for the proficiency test conducted on the attenuator. NNSS–Livermore Operations performed this proficiency test using an Anritsu vector network analyzer, an electronic calibration module, and verification kit. The PSL used a Keysight vector network analyzer and mechanical calibration kit. The PSL results included in this proficiency test report were taken on June 23, 2020.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2022

Stochastic Neutronics Primer (Volume I)

The purpose of this document is to introduce the elementary concepts and to build a concrete understanding of the stochastic theory of neutron transport to the motivated undergraduate student, the Ph.D. engineer/physicist/mathematician, and the staff scientist or professor learning yet another new skill. The authors understand that there are many learning types- from visual to analytical to repetitive to word-based to analogy-based (and combinations thereof)- and so we have tasked ourselves with providing as many representations as possible within to ensure every reader a fruitful endeavor. This document is written as a set of chapters that continually build upon the previous chapter. In this chapter, we provide the discussion, motivation, and background topics for the remainder of the text.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2022

NSRC New Hire Orientation: Resources and What to Expect

Hello, New Hire! Right now, you are likely very excited to begin your position at the Laboratory. We are happy you are here! This document will walk you through different facets of your pre-security clearance interval at the Lab. This is a general guide not firm documentation. Its contents were compiled by National Security Research Center (NSRC) team members to make your transition easier. To begin, you will need a security clearance to do your job. A security clearance is essentially an extremely detailed background check. After you complete and turn in your security paperwork, the clearance process can take as little as three months or as long as one year. You may wonder, “If I can’t do my job until after I receive a clearance, what will I be doing?” There is plenty of unclassified work and professional development to be done. Waiting for a clearance can be trying, but we are here to help. This guide details what to expect during pre-clearance, resources to stay industrious, entry points to Lab networking and culture, and tips for success. Patience, flexibility, and productivity are key. Your workday responsibilities and priorities will vary depending on the self-study, assigned duties, and client-driven projects designated by your manager. This guide is here to help, and so are your NSRC colleagues.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗

DOE OSTI2022

Hanford Site Composite Analysis: LLBG-200-W B Vadose Zone Model

The objectives of the vadose modeling for the updated Hanford Site Composite Analysis (CA) are to simulate the flow and transport of water and radionuclide releases from the surface to the water table and to provide radionuclide transfer rates to the CA saturated zone model (CP-57037, Model Package Report: Plateau to River Groundwater Model, Version 8.3). Water additions include natural recharge and water discharged to the ground as a result of industrial processes associated with Hanford Site operations. Contaminant sources include radionuclides in water discharged to the ground during operations and radionuclides disposed “dry” in solid waste burial grounds or other means. The following 16 radionuclides were selected for this modeling effort: carbon-14 (C-14), chlorine-36 (Cl-36), tritium (H-3), iodine-129 (I-129), neptunium-237 (Np-237), rhenium-187 (Re-187), strontium-90 (Sr-90), technetium-99 (Tc-99), uranium-232 (U-232), uranium-233 (U-233), uranium-234 (U-234), uranium-235 (U-235), uranium-236 (U-236), uranium-238 (U-238), radium-226 (Ra-226), and thorium-230 (Th-230). The simulation time starts in 1943 and ends at 12070, which is 10,000 years after assumed Hanford Site closure in 2070. The parallel version of the Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (STOMP 1 ) simulator, officially named the exascale Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (eSTOMP), is used to simulate flow and transport for the vadose models. The documentation for the STOMP code is comprehensive. The theoretical and numerical approaches applied in the STOMP code are documented in a published theory guide (PNNL-12030, STOMP Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Version 2.0 Theory Guide). The code has undergone a rigorous verification procedure against analytical solutions, laboratory-scale experiments, and field-scale demonstrations. The application guide (PNNL-11216, STOMP Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Application Guide) provides instructive examples in the application of the code to classical groundwater problems. The user’s guide (PNNL-15782, STOMP: Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Version 4.0: User’s Guide) describes the general use, input file formatting, compilation, and execution of the code. The primary output of the vadose zone modeling is radionuclide transfer rates to the groundwater for input into the saturated zone model. The rates will be summed over the 100 by 100 m saturated zone model grid cells that fall within the vadose zone model source domain.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

A publication proposal to the University of California

The purpose of this book is to profile, chapter by chapter, each of the 18 Nobel laureates who contributed to the laboratory’s wartime efforts. Through narrative, nonfiction profiles with fascinating historical photos and documents, readers will learn who these scientists were, what they accomplished, and why it mattered. The goal of this book is to educate readers by creating a published chronicle of this important history based on documents and photographs that are a part of the Los Alamos National Laboratory’s National Security Research Center. These 18 scientists have two things in common: their wartime work at Los Alamos and their Nobel Prizes. For the first time ever, both are presented as one story.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2022

A publication proposal to Texas A&M Press

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2022

EUCLID Sensitivity Database

This report documents the EUCLID sensitivity database along with its several use-cases. EUCLID computed sensitivities for the following integral responses: Criticality of ICSBEP critical assemblies, LLNL pulsed-sphere neutron-leakage spectra, reaction rates in selected ICBSEP critical assemblies, delayed neutron factions of selected ICSBEP critical assemblies, reactivity coefficients in two ICSBEP critical assemblies, sub-critical assembly responses and Rossi-alpha of selected critical assemblies. It is described for each response what the reported observable constitutes, the method we used to obtain the sensitivities, and which integral experiments were studied. It is also documented briefly in what format these sensitivities are stored. These sensitivities were used for many aspects of the EUCLID project, like ML-supported large-scale nuclear-data validation, or optimization of integral experiments. But these sensitivities can also be applied for more established processes in the nuclear-data application field such as adjustment or assessing the upper sub-critical limit.

Delayed Neutron Fraction↗

DOE OSTI2022

Research to Develop Flood Barrier Testing Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants

This report presents results of research performed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to identify and develop strategies for testing nuclear power plant (NPP) flood barriers. This research project began with a literature review that documented the results of previous NRC-funded research, work performed by other government agencies, reports generated by industry organizations, NRC licensee submittals, information from testing facilities, and information from commercial firms engaged in NPP decommissioning. This literature review was then used to develop a simplified flood protection categorization scheme and related glossaries. Using this categorization scheme and glossaries, a survey of currently used flood barriers was conducted, focusing on both permanent and temporary flood barriers. External flood barriers such as levees and berms were outside the scope of this survey. This research project also assessed the current state of NPP decommissioning for potential flood barrier harvesting opportunities, surveyed capabilities of domestic and international flood testing facilities, and explored technical challenges to harvesting and testing of flood barriers. Other factors that should be considered in developing flood barrier testing strategies were also explored and are documented in this report (e.g., selection of flood barriers for testing, codes and standards for flood barrier testing, potential alternatives to harvesting such as in-situ testing, testing performance criteria, and testing parameters).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

SIERRA Code Coupling Module: Arpeggio User Manual (V.5.2.)

The SNL Sierra Mechanics code suite is designed to enable simulation of complex multiphysics scenarios. The code suite is composed of several specialized applications which can operate either in standalone mode or coupled with each other. Arpeggio is a supported utility that enables loose coupling of the various Sierra Mechanics applications by providing access to Framework services that facilitate the coupling. More importantly Arpeggio orchestrates the execution of applications that participate in the coupling. This document describes the various components of Arpeggio and their operability. The intent of the document is to provide a fast path for analysts interested in coupled applications via simple examples of its usage.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2021

MELCOR Code Change History: Revision 18019 to 21402

This document summarily provides brief descriptions of the MELCOR code enhancement made between code revision number 18019and 21440. Revision 18019 represents the previous official code release; therefore, the modeling features described within this document are provided to assist users that update to the newest official MELCOR code release, 21440. Along with the newly updated MELCOR Users’ Guide [2] and Reference Manual [3], users are aware and able to assess the new capabilities for their modeling and analysis applications.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2021

Sierra/SD - How To Manual - 5.4

The How To Manual supplements the User’s Manual and the Theory Manual. The goal of the How To Manual is to reduce learning time for complex end to end analyses. These documents are intended to be used together. See the User’s Manual for a complete list of the options for a solution case. All the examples are part of the Sierra/SD test suite. Each runs as is. The organization is similar to the other documents: How to run, Commands, Solution cases, Materials, Elements, Boundary conditions, and then Contact. The table of contents and index are indispensable. The Geometric Rigid Body Modes section is shared with the Users Manual.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2022

SIERRA Code Coupling Module: Arpeggio User Manual (V.5.4)

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2022

Singe Library Review: XCAP Review Report

Singe is a computational library for simulating thermonuclear reactions written in C++14. It was inspired by the earlier Singe library, developed by Joann Campbell. From the beginning of the Singe project, the goal has been to create a library that provides the necessary functionality, runs efficiently, and is flexible enough to connect to a variety of multi-physics host codes. Such a library allows subject-matter experts to focus on development within the library, while library staff can support host-code staff in integrating Singe into their multi-physics codes. A common library used across multiple multi-physics codes allows those subject-matter experts to roll out new features to all host codes simultaneously, and eases the process of code-to-code comparison between codes that are leveraging the same physics in different ways. The Singe effort was established by Joann Campbell, who provided significant guidance on the goals, requirements, and philosophy of the library. It has been developed by Brendan K. Krueger, CJ Solomon, Jesse Canfield, and Terry Adams, with computer science support from Tyler Reddy and Karen Tsai. Discussions with multiple potential stakeholders have been critical to the planning of such a cross-cutting project, including representatives from multiple host codes and Brian Haines who helped define usage and needs for the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) program. This document is based on the XCAP review process. It is an updated version of the initial document distributed to the reviewers, memo XCP-2:21-005. We want to acknowledge the time and effort of the reviewers who participated in this process: Philipp Edelmann, Alan Harrison, Christopher Malone, Edward Norris, Ryosuke Park, Galen Shipman, CJ Solomon, and any others who may have contributed to the feedback that was provided to us.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

DOE OSTI2022

Sierra/SolidMechanics 5.4 Theory Manual

Presented in this document are the theoretical aspects of capabilities contained in the Sierra / SM code. This manuscript serves as an ideal starting point for understanding the theoretical foundations of the code. For a comprehensive study of these capabilities, the reader is encouraged to explore the many references to scientific articles and textbooks contained in this manual. It is important to point out that some capabilities are still in development and may not be presented in this document. Further updates to this manuscript will be made as these capabilities come closer to production level.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗

DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of the SRNL-Washed Tank 51 Sludge Batch 10 Qualification Sample

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel have been requested to qualify the next sludge batch (Sludge Batch 10 – SB10) for processing at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). To accomplish this task, Savannah River Remediation (SRR) sent SRNL two 3-L samples of Tank 51H slurry to be characterized, washed, and then used in a lab-scale demonstration of the DWPF flowsheet. Sample HTF-51-19-114 was received on January 28, 2020, and HTF-51-20-15 was received on February 4, 2020. SRNL washed the Tank 51H sample per the Tank Farm washing strategy. During washing, material from H Canyon Tanks 16.3 and 16.4 was also added to the Tank 51 samples to simulate canyon discharges subsequent to sampling. A part of the qualification process is extensive radionuclide and chemical characterization of the SRNL-washed Tank 51H slurry. This report documents the chemical characterization of the washed slurry; radiological characterization will be documented in a separate report. The major supernatant components, elements on a weight percent calcined basis, and the weight percent solids of the SRNL-washed sample were comparable to the Tank Farm projections, with the exception of free hydroxide and carbonate. Therefore, this SRNL-washed sample is suitable for further SB10 qualification activities and SRR planning for SB10.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Predictive Flow Simulation with the P2R Model for the Composite Analysis Base Case

In order to meet the requirements of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, a composite analysis (CA) must be completed for the Central Plateau at the Hanford Site. The CA requires estimates of fate and transport of radionuclides in the groundwater from multiple sources within the modeling domain. This document details the application of the Plateau-to-River (P2R) Model version 8.3 to predict the flow of groundwater on the Central Plateau for the 10,000-year simulation to support the CA. The simulated flow field will support the simulation of fate and transport of contaminants for use in predicting dose as part of the CA. This document describes the changes made to model inputs in order to simulate the predictive flow field for the CA.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

FECM/NETL CO 2 Transport Cost Model (2022): Model Overview [Slides]

The FECM/NETL CO 2 Transport Cost Model (CO 2 _T_COM) is an Excel spreadsheet model that calculates the cost of transporting CO 2 from the beginning to the end of a pipeline. This document provides an overview of the model. This document is intended to provide a user with a briefer description of the model and how to use the model than the user’s manual.

42 ENGINEERING↗