Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “stratospheric”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,027 records · Page 57
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Analysis and Impact of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Stratospheric Water Vapor Plume

On Jan. 15, 2022, the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption injected SO2 and H2O into the 31 middle stratosphere. The eruption produced a persistent mid-stratospheric sulfate aerosol and H2O layer mostly confined to Southern Hemisphere (SH) tropics (Eq. to 30°S). These layers are still present in the tropics 5 ½ months after the eruption. The SH tropical confinement is simulated using a trajectory model. Measurements following the eruption show that the H2O layer is slowly rising while the aerosol layer is descending. The H2O layer’s upward movement is consistent with the residual vertical velocity. Gravitationally settling explains the descent of the aerosol layer. A -4K temperature anomaly coincident with the H2O enhancement is observed and is caused by thermal adjustment to the additional H2O IR cooling. A simple model of volcanic water injection at the time of the eruption simulates the observed vertical distribution H2O.

Atmospheric science↗
NASA NTRS2022

Tracking the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'Apai Aerosol Cloud in the Upper and Middle Stratosphere Using Space-Based Observations

On 15 January 2022, the submarine Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption lofted materials high into the upper stratosphere, reaching a record-breaking altitude of ~58 km, unprecedented in the satellite observations era. Within two weeks, the bulk of the injected material circulated the globe between 20 – 30 km altitude, as observed by satellite instruments. We estimate that the stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) is the largest since the Pinatubo eruption and is at least twice as great as the sAOD after the 2015 Calbubo eruption despite the similar SO 2 injection from that eruption. We use space-based observations to monitor the Hunga-Tonga volcanic plume evolution and transport at different altitudes as it circulates the globe. While the main aerosol layer remains trapped in the tropical pipe, small parts have already made it to both the northern and southern hemisphere poles by April, which is almost certain to influence this year's ozone hole.

Atmospheric science↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quantifying SAGE II (1984-2005) and SAGE III/ISS (2017-2022) Observations of Smoke in the Stratosphere

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE II) operated for over 20 years (1984-2005) and collected near global observations of aerosol extinction coefficient from the upper troposphere to about 40 km. SAGE III has flown aboard the International Space Station (ISS) since 2017 and has collected comparable aerosol measurements during this period. The SAGE II record is dominated by recovery from El Chichón (1982) and the Pinatubo eruption of 1991 with a few smaller volcanic events that are detectable in the data set. In addition, a number of pyrocumulus events injected smoke into the lower stratosphere with magnitudes that are comparable to the smaller volcanic events. The shorter SAGE III/ISS record is qualitatively different than SAGE II’s with a number of small to moderate volcanic eruptions in both low and high latitudes (e.g., Ambae in 2018 and Raikoke in 2020) as well several smoke events including the two largest events seen by SAGE-like instruments: the BC pyrocumulus event in 2017 and the Australian brush fires of 2020/2021. In this paper, I will review the detection and quantification of the magnitude of these smoke events with a particular focus on the differences between the two data periods.

Smoke↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quantifying SAGE II (1984-2005) and SAGE III/ISS (2017-2022) Observations of Smoke in the Stratosphere

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE II) operated for over 20 years (1984-2005) and collected near global observations of aerosol extinction coefficient from the upper troposphere to about 40 km. SAGE III has flown aboard the International Space Station (ISS) since 2017 and has collected comparable aerosol measurements during this period. The SAGE II record is dominated by recovery from El Chichón (1982) and the Pinatubo eruption of 1991 with a few smaller volcanic events that are detectable in the data set. In addition, a number of pyrocumulus events injected smoke into the lower stratosphere with magnitudes that are comparable to the smaller volcanic events. The shorter SAGE III/ISS record is qualitatively different than SAGE II’s with a number of small to moderate volcanic eruptions in both low and high latitudes (e.g., Ambae in 2018 and Raikoke in 2020) as well several smoke events including the two largest events seen by SAGE-like instruments: the BC pyrocumulus event in 2017 and the Australian brush fires of 2020/2021. In this talk, I will review the detection and quantification of the magnitude of these smoke events with a particular focus on the differences between the two data periods.

Smoke Stratosphere SAGE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quantifying SAGE II (1984-2005) and SAGE III/ISS (2017-2022) Observations of Smoke in the Stratosphere

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE II) operated for over 20 years (1984-2005) and collected near global observations of aerosol extinction coefficient from the upper troposphere to about 40 km. SAGE III has flown aboard the International Space Station (ISS) since 2017 and has collected comparable aerosol measurements during this period. The SAGE II record is dominated by recovery from El Chichón (1982) and the Pinatubo eruption of 1991 with a few smaller volcanic events that are detectable in the data set. In addition, a number of pyrocumulus events injected smoke into the lower stratosphere with magnitudes that are comparable to the smaller volcanic events. The shorter SAGE III/ISS record is qualitatively different than SAGE II’s with a number of small to moderate volcanic eruptions in both low and high latitudes (e.g., Ambae in 2018 and Raikoke in 2020) as well several smoke events including the two largest events seen by SAGE-like instruments: the BC pyrocumulus event in 2017 and the Australian brush fires of 2020/2021. In this talk, I will review the detection and quantification of the magnitude of these smoke events with a particular focus on the differences between the two data periods.

SAGE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Stratospheric Operations Market

This presentation has been prepared for the 2024 Stratospheric Operations and Research Symposium (SOaRS2024) held at the University of North Dakota. The presentation includes contributions from NASA, the FAA and results of a market study carried out by LMI for NASA. It provides an overview for industry and other government agencies why this novel traffic management system, called upper Class E Traffic Management System - ETM, will lead to an increase in access to the Stratosphere. The slides emphasize that expected High-Altitude Balloons, solar-powered High-Altitude long Endurance Aircraft, Airships, Supersonic and Hypersonic aircraft will benefit from this concept by exemplifying how markets in telecommunication, public safety and transportation are expected to grow. By comparing expected demand and showing that current concepts, such as Altitude Reservation (ALTRV) will not be able to meet demand as such showing that the ETM concept aims to increase safety, efficiency and fairness in a collaborative environment. Further, past work and engagement with Industry participants is highlighted.

stratosphere↗
NASA NTRS2024

The ARGOS Instrument for Stratospheric Aerosol Measurements

Atmospheric aerosols represent an important component of the Earth’s climate system because they can contribute both positive and negative forcing to the energy budget. We are developing the Aerosol Radiometer for Global Observations of the Stratosphere (ARGOS) instrument to provide improved measurements of stratospheric aerosols in a compact package. ARGOS makes limb scattering measurements from space in eight directions simultaneously, using two near-IR wavelengths for each viewing direction. The combination of forward and backward scattering views along the orbit track gives additional information to constrain the aerosol phase function and size distribution. Cross-track views provide expanded spatial coverage. ARGOS will have a demonstration flight through a hosted payload provider in the fall of 2024. The instrument has completed pre-launch environmental testing and radiometric characterization tests. The hosted payload approach offers advantages in size, weight, and power margins for instrument design compared to other approaches, with significant benefits in terms of reducing infrastructure requirements for the instrument team.

stratospheric aerosol↗
NASA NTRS1996

Stratospheric Horizontal Wavenumber Spectra of Winds, Potential Temperature, and Atmospheric Tracers Observed by High-Altitude Aircraft

Horizontal wavenumber power spectra of vertical and horizontal wind velocities, potential temperatures, and ozone and N(2)O mixing ratios, as measured in the mid-stratosphere during 73 ER-2 flights (altitude approx. 20km) are presented. The velocity and potential temperature spectra in the 100 to 1-km wavelength range deviate significantly from the uniform -5/3 power law expected for the inverse energy-cascade regime of two-dimensional turbulence and also for inertial-range, three-dimensional turbulence. Instead, steeper spectra approximately consistent with a -3 power law are observed at horizontal scales smaller than 3 km for all velocity components as well as potential temperature. Shallower spectra are observed at scales longer than 6 km. For horizontal velocity and potential temperature the spectral indices at longer scales are between -1.5 and -2.0. For vertical velocity the spectrum at longer scales become flat. It is argued that the observed velocity and potential temperature spectra are consistent with gravity waves. At smaller scales, the shapes are also superficially consistent with a Lumley-Shur-Weinstock buoyant subrange of turbulence and/or nonlinear gravity waves. Contemporaneous spectra of ozone and N(sub 2)O mixing ratio in the 100 to 1-km wavelength range do conform to an approximately uniform -5/3 power law. It is argued that this may reflect interactions between gravity wave air-parcel displacements and laminar or filamentary structures in the trace gas mixing ratio field produced by enstropy-cascading two-dimensional turbulence.

TRACE GAS MIXING RATIO FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2020

First Analysis of Earth's Stratospheric γ ‐Ray Emission in Geographical Coordinates With Fermi LAT

Abstract From low‐Earth orbit, the Earth is an extremely bright γ ‐ray source compared to distant astrophysical objects. The high‐energy γ ‐ray emission, from the Earth's upper atmosphere, is produced by the interactions between cosmic rays (CRs) and air molecules. As CRs are predominantly charged particles, the geomagnetic field acts as a spectrometer, forbidding CRs below a certain energy to arrive and interact with the atmosphere at a given geomagnetic location from a given direction. We use photon data between 0.2 and 20 GeV as observed by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) to create, for the first time, stratospheric γ ‐ray emission maps of the Earth in the geographical coordinate system, for different viewing directions from LAT altitude. These maps confirm a strong association between measured γ ‐ray fluxes and geomagnetic cutoffs for CRs. We also report the spectrum of the Earth's stratospheric γ ‐ray emission in cardinal directions and use the geomagnetic spectrometer effect to infer the atmosphere's yield function of γ rays per incoming CR proton as a function of CR rigidity at the altitude of the Fermi spacecraft. This work is relevant to the study of near‐Earth radiation exposure for astronauts and spacecraft, modeling the geomagnetic field, and CR‐air interactions.

Madlee, S.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Stratospheric Climates in Chemistry Versus No‐Chemistry Climate Models

Using nine chemistry-climate and eight associated no-chemistry models, we investigate the persistence and timing of cold episodes occurring in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere during the period 1980–2014. We find systematic differences in behavior between members of these model pairs. In a first group of chemistry models whose dynamical configurations mirror their no-chemistry counterparts, we find an increased persistence of such cold polar vortices, such that these cold episodes often start earlier and last longer, relative to the times of occurrence of the lowest temperatures. Also the date of occurrence of the lowest temperatures, both in the Arctic and the Antarctic, is often delayed by 1–3 weeks in chemistry models, versus their no-chemistry counterparts. This behavior exacerbates a widespread problem occurring in most or all models, a delayed occurrence, in the median, of the most anomalously cold day during such cold winters. In a second group of model pairs there are differences beyond just ozone chemistry. In particular, here the chemistry models feature more levels in the stratosphere, a raised model top, and differences in non-orographic gravity wave drag versus their no-chemistry counterparts. Such additional dynamical differences can completely mask the above influence of ozone chemistry. The results point toward a need to retune chemistry-climate models versus their no-chemistry counterparts.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Perturbation of Tropical Stratospheric Ozone Through Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Chemistry Due To Pinatubo

Abstract The Pinatubo eruption in 1991 injected 10–20 Tg SO 2 into the stratosphere, which formed sulfate aerosols through oxidation. Our modeling results show that volcanic heating significantly perturbs the heterogeneous and homogeneous chemistry including NO x and HO x catalytic cycles in the tropical stratosphere. The simulated tropical chemical ozone tendency is positive at 20 mb while negative at 10 mb in the tropics. The simulated ozone chemical tendency is of the same magnitude as the dynamical ozone tendency caused by the accelerated tropical upwelling, but with the opposite sign. Our study finds that the tropical ozone chemical tendency due to homogeneous chemistry becomes more important than heterogeneous chemistry 3 months after eruption. Sensitivity simulations further suggest that the tropical ozone tendency through heterogeneous chemistry is saturated when the injected amount exceeds 2 Tg.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Acoustic Waves From a Distant Explosion Recorded on a Continuously Ascending Balloon in the Middle Stratosphere

Abstract A helium‐filled mylar balloon carrying a smartphone and infrasound sensors ascended to a stratospheric height of 35 km over the surface detonation of a chemical explosive, with a total acoustic propagation distance of 127 km. The smartphone was configured to collect multi‐modal data at high rates from internal sensors. Analysis of the data shows successful collection of the explosion signal by both the smartphone's microphone and its accelerometers, the first from an ascending balloon. Comparison of the acoustic signal with that collected by other infrasound sensors, both airborne and ground‐based, provides insight into the possibilities and limitations of collecting acoustic data from the stratosphere.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2024

Emulating inconsistencies in stratospheric aerosol injection

Abstract Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) would involve the addition of sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere to reflect part of the incoming solar radiation, thereby cooling the climate. Studies trying to explore the impacts of SAI have often focused on idealized scenarios without explicitly introducing what we call ‘inconsistencies’ in a deployment. A concern often discussed is what would happen to the climate system after an abrupt termination of its deployment, whether inadvertent or deliberate. However, there is a much wider range of plausible inconsistencies in deployment than termination that should be evaluated to better understand associated risks. In this work, we simulate a few representative inconsistencies in a pre-existing SAI scenario: an abrupt termination, a decade-long gradual phase-out, and 1 year and 2 year temporary interruptions of deployment. After examining their climate impacts, we use these simulations to train an emulator, and use this to project global mean temperature response for a broader set of inconsistencies in deployment. Our work highlights the capacity of a finite set of explicitly simulated scenarios that include inconsistencies to inform an emulator that is capable of expanding the space of scenarios that one might want to explore far more quickly and efficiently.

Farley, Jared (ORCID:0000000322062272)↗
DOE OSTI2020

Multihour Stratospheric Flights with the Heliotrope Solar Hot-Air Balloon

Standard meteorological balloons can deliver small scientific payloads to the stratosphere for a few tens of minutes, but achieving multihour level flight in this region is more difficult. We have developed a solar-powered hot-air balloon named the heliotrope that can maintain a nearly constant altitude in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere as long as the sun is above the horizon. It can accommodate scientific payloads ranging from hundreds of grams to several kilograms. The balloon can achieve float altitudes exceeding 24 km and fly for days in the Arctic summer, although sunset provides a convenient flight termination mechanism at lower latitudes. Two people can build an envelope in about 3.5 h, and the materials cost about $30. The low cost and simplicity of the heliotrope enables a class of missions that is generally out of reach of institutions lacking specialized balloon expertise. Here, we discuss the design history, construction techniques, trajectory characteristics, and flight prediction of the heliotrope balloon. We conclude with a discussion of the physics of solar hot-air balloon flight.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Learning Forecasts of Rare Stratospheric Transitions from Short Simulations

Abstract Rare events arising in nonlinear atmospheric dynamics remain hard to predict and attribute. We address the problem of forecasting rare events in a prototypical example, sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs). Approximately once every other winter, the boreal stratospheric polar vortex rapidly breaks down, shifting midlatitude surface weather patterns for months. We focus on two key quantities of interest: the probability of an SSW occurring, and the expected lead time if it does occur, as functions of initial condition. These optimal forecasts concretely measure the event’s progress. Direct numerical simulation can estimate them in principle but is prohibitively expensive in practice: each rare event requires a long integration to observe, and the cost of each integration grows with model complexity. We describe an alternative approach using integrations that are short compared to the time scale of the warming event. We compute the probability and lead time efficiently by solving equations involving the transition operator, which encodes all information about the dynamics. We relate these optimal forecasts to a small number of interpretable physical variables, suggesting optimal measurements for forecasting. We illustrate the methodology on a prototype SSW model developed by Holton and Mass and modified by stochastic forcing. While highly idealized, this model captures the essential nonlinear dynamics of SSWs and exhibits the key forecasting challenge: the dramatic separation in time scales between a single event and the return time between successive events. Our methodology is designed to fully exploit high-dimensional data from models and observations, and has the potential to identify detailed predictors of many complex rare events in meteorology.

Finkel, Justin↗
DOE OSTI2021

Tropospheric and stratospheric wildfire smoke profiling with lidar: mass, surface area, CCN, and INP retrieval

We present retrievals of tropospheric and stratospheric height profiles of particle mass, volume, surface area, and number concentrations in the case of wildfire smoke layers as well as estimates of smoke-related cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentrations from backscatter lidar measurements on the ground and in space. Conversion factors used to convert the optical measurements into microphysical properties play a central role in the data analysis, in addition to estimates of the smoke extinction-to-backscatter ratios required to obtain smoke extinction coefficients. The set of needed conversion parameters for wildfire smoke is derived from AERONET observations of major smoke events, e.g., in western Canada in August 2017, California in September 2020, and southeastern Australia in January–February 2020 as well as from AERONET long-term observations of smoke in the Amazon region, southern Africa, and Southeast Asia. The new smoke analysis scheme is applied to CALIPSO observations of tropospheric smoke plumes over the United States in September 2020 and to ground-based lidar observation in Punta Arenas, in southern Chile, in aged Australian smoke layers in the stratosphere in January 2020. These case studies show the potential of spaceborne and ground-based lidars to document large-scale and long-lasting wildfire smoke events in detail and thus to provide valuable information for climate, cloud, and air chemistry modeling efforts performed to investigate the role of wildfire smoke in the atmospheric system.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Important role of stratospheric injection height for the distribution and radiative forcing of smoke aerosol from the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires

More than 1 Tg smoke aerosol was emitted into the atmosphere by the exceptional 2019–2020 southeastern Australian wildfires. Triggered by the extreme fire heat, several deep pyroconvective events carried the smoke directly into the stratosphere. Once there, smoke aerosol remained airborne considerably longer than in lower atmospheric layers. The thick plumes traveled eastward, thereby being distributed across the high and mid-latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, enhancing the atmospheric opacity. Due to the increased atmospheric lifetime of the smoke plume, its radiative effect increased compared to smoke that remains in lower altitudes. Global models describing aerosol-climate impacts lack adequate descriptions of the emission height of aerosols from intense wildfires. Here, we demonstrate, by a combination of aerosol-climate modeling and lidar observations, the importance of the representation of those high-altitude fire smoke layers for estimating the atmospheric energy budget. Through observation-based input into the simulations, the Australian wildfire emissions by pyroconvection are explicitly prescribed to the lower stratosphere in different scenarios. Based on our simulations, the 2019–2020 Australian fires caused a significant top-of-atmosphere (TOA) hemispheric instantaneous direct radiative forcing signal that reached a magnitude comparable to the radiative forcing induced by anthropogenic absorbing aerosol. Up to +0.50 W m -2 instantaneous direct radiative forcing was modeled at TOA, averaged for the Southern Hemisphere (+0.25 W m -2 globally) from January to March 2020 under all-sky conditions. At the surface, on the other hand, an instantaneous solar radiative forcing of up to -0.81 W m -2 was found for clear-sky conditions, with the respective estimates depending on the model configuration and subject to the model uncertainties in the smoke optical properties. Since extreme wildfires are expected to occur more frequently in the rapidly changing climate, our findings suggest that high-altitude wildfire plumes must be adequately considered in climate projections in order to obtain reasonable estimates of atmospheric energy budget changes.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs

Previous climate modeling studies demonstrate the ability of feedback-regulated, stratospheric aerosol geoengineering with injection at multiple independent latitudes to meet multiple simultaneous temperature-based objectives in the presence of anthropogenic climate change. However, the impacts of climate change are not limited to rising temperatures but also include changes in precipitation, loss of sea ice, and many more; knowing how a given geoengineering strategy will affect each of these climate metrics is vital to understanding the limits and trade-offs of geoengineering. Here, we first introduce a new method of visualizing the design space in which desired climate outcomes are represented by 2-D surfaces on a 3-D graph. Surface orientations represent how different injection choices influence that objective, and intersecting surfaces represent objectives which can be met simultaneously. Using this representation as a guide, we present simulations of two new strategies for feedback-regulated aerosol injection, using the Community Earth System Model with the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – CESM1(WACCM). The first simultaneously manages global mean temperature, tropical precipitation centroid, and Arctic sea ice extent, while the second manages global mean precipitation, tropical precipitation centroid, and Arctic sea ice extent. Both simulations control the tropical precipitation centroid to within 5 % of the goal, and the latter controls global mean precipitation to within 1% of the goal. Additionally, the first simulation overcompensates sea ice, while the second undercompensates sea ice; all of these results are consistent with the expectations of our design space model. In addition to showing that precipitation-based climate metrics can be managed using feedback alongside other goals, our simulations validate the utility of our design space visualization in predicting our climate model behavior under a given geoengineering strategy, and together they help illustrate the fundamental limits and trade-offs of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗