Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Waste Repository”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,027 records · Page 57
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Operational Aspects of an International Sub-seabed HLW Repository - 18450

The advantages of and the need for an internationally available repository for SNF and other HLW has been recognized since the 1980's. Various proposals have been pursued over the years but none have been able to overcome the hurdle of the Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) syndrome. Sub-seabed disposal has no NIMBY concerns because the disposal facilities are located in sediments below approximately 4000 meters of international waters. This simple approach precisely emplaces HLW canisters using penetrators released from a ship and driven by gravity ∼50 meters into the sub-seabed ooze. The concept was actively studied and demonstrated by 200+ researchers from 10 different countries for over 12 years. Although it was found to be technically feasible and cost effective, social pressures to keep the oceans off-limits to most disposal activities resulted in termination of the coordinated international effort. By 1994 an International Maritime Organization (IMO) treaty, commonly referred to as the 'London Convention/ London Protocol' was in place banning all such activities. However, the list of banned activities has been amended as recently as 2006. The sub-seabed repository effort has been conducted on three fronts. First, previous research was evaluated to confirm the technical feasibility and identify areas requiring additional research or development. Secondly, the probability of successfully amending the London Convention/London Protocol was assessed. Third, an operational and business model was developed to ensure the private enterprise endeavor was worth pursuing from a business standpoint. The latter is the focus of this paper. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

In-Field Performance Testing of the Fork Detector for Quantitative Spent Fuel Verification

Expanding spent fuel dry storage activities worldwide are increasing demands on safeguards authorities that perform inspections. The European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) require measurements to verify declarations when spent fuel is transferred to difficult-to-access locations, such as dry storage casks and the repositories planned in Finland and Sweden. EURATOM makes routine use of the Fork detector to obtain gross gamma and total neutron measurements during spent fuel inspections. Data analysis is performed by modules in the integrated Review and Analysis Program (iRAP) software, developed jointly by EURATOM and the IAEA. Under the framework of the US Department of Energy–EURATOM cooperation agreement, a module for automated Fork detector data analysis has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) using the ORIGEN code from the SCALE code system and implemented in iRAP. EURATOM and ORNL recently performed measurements on 30 spent fuel assemblies at the Swedish Central Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel (Clab), operated by the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB). The measured assemblies represent a broad range of fuel characteristics. Neutron count rates for 15 measured pressurized water reactor assemblies are predicted with an average relative standard deviation of 4.6%, and gamma signals are predicted on average within 2.6% of the measurement. The 15 measured boiling water reactor assemblies exhibit slightly larger deviations of 5.2% for the gamma signals and 5.7% for the neutron count rates, compared to measurements. These findings suggest that with improved analysis of the measurement data, existing instruments can provide increased verification of operator declarations of the spent fuel and thereby also provide greater ability to confirm integrity of an assembly. These results support the application of the Fork detector as a fully quantitative spent fuel verification technique.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Robust disposal concept, uniform regulations, and trust in the messenger; three fundamental building blocks for consent-based HLW-disposal solutions in the USA - 15104

Pending enabling legislation, the USA's HLW-disposal program had been held in political abeyance since 2009 at the crossroads to one or both of the Yucca Mountain candidate (since 1987) HLW-repository in Nevada and/or the consent-based siting of the new HLW-disposal and centralized HLW-storage facilities proposed in 2012; a road not previously travelled. The consent-based siting approach would require the following gap between the reality (A) and the requirement (B) for public trust, acceptance and sustained support (PASS) to be bridged: A. Less than 1% of the general public in any given country fully comprehends the scientific-underpinnings and the projected health risks imposed by a HLW repository. B. More than 50% of the general public in a given geographical area would have to accept to host it from start to end. The following PASS-building blocks, successfully used at the WIPP-site in New Mexico and abroad to get from A to B during the past 30+ years, are thus highly recommended: 1. Defining the consent footprint upon host-county/state boundaries and/or radiation/health-risks and/or to identify/designate the directly affected parties (DAPs). 2. Using databases and lessons-learned by other repository programs to advantage. 3. Presenting the information in terms and/or by examples more readily understood by laypeople, because both their acceptance and opposition/rejection are influenced by: a. The type, number, problems, and status of 'similar' disposal concepts; and b. The level of i. Radiation protection provided by applicable regulations; ii. Involvement and decision-making authority vested in the DAPs; and iii. Their trust in the 'spokesperson/messenger. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Tailored Perovskite Waste Forms for Plutonium Trapping

Perovskite ceramics have been extensively studied as host matrixes for radionuclide entrapment for nuclear waste disposal. As an expansion of these investigations, cerium, neodymium, and plutonium were incorporated into a perovskite phase, ACu 3 FeTi 3 O 12 (A = Nd, Ce, Pu), using sol–gel methods under oxidizing and reducing atmospheres. The targeted materials contained varying levels of Ce 3+ and Nd 3+ on the A site, yielding potential compositions of Nd 1–x Ce x Cu 3 FeTi 3 O 12 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.8). However, interrogation of these materials shows that the maximum Ce 3+ loading is achieved near x ≈ 0.2. A single composition with plutonium was targeted, Nd 0.9 Pu 0.1 Cu 3 FeTi 3 O 12 , in order to properly model more realistic loading levels for a repository-destined material. These compounds were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinements of the structures and by a variety of spectroscopic techniques. Finally, the data suggest that, in order to achieve Pu 3+ substitution onto the A sites in the Nd 0.9 Pu 0.1 Cu 3 FeTi 3 O 12 , a reducing atmosphere must be employed. Otherwise, the redox activity of plutonium results in substitution onto multiple sites in the material as well as the formation of secondary phases such as TiO 2 .

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 145: Challenges and Opportunities in Establishing a System for Transportation of SNF/UNF

Issues associated with establishing a SNF Transportation System in the U.S. are complex. In part, this is because in the US when discussing SNF, there are two distinct categories. The two categories represent significant differences in ownership, transportation-regulator, and even the physical characteristics of the SNF. Specifically, the physical differences in the SNF include size of the rods, associated quantities to be shipped, cladding material, and radionuclide content/enrichment. The first is commercial SNF (i.e., that associated with nuclear power plants), owned by utilities, until a permanent repository is built with DOE obligated by law to then assume the responsibility for shipping and ownership of the SNF. Since no-permanent repository currently exists, most commercial SNF is stored near the reactor in which it was installed, hence requiring no shipments. Although current shipments of commercial SNF are very limited, the few that do occur are generally performed to support a utilities SNF consolidation effort utility and for post irradiation examination/testing. However, with approximately 83,000 metric tons currently being stored at more than 70 sites around the U.S., when a permanent repository becomes available, the required number of shipments will be extensive. The second category is DOE and research reactor fuel. These fuel rods are generally much smaller in length than commercial fuel rods, with the quantity of rods transported in a shipment significantly less than the number of rods in a typical commercial fuel assembly. Currently, most of the SNF shipments within the U.S come from this category. DOE is currently managing about 2500 metric tons of heavy metal of SNF. This panel focused on updates and status of transportation of SNF/UNF. Panelists provided updates and information on continuing impacts, risk assessment, equipment (rail cars, handling, securement), possible rail routing, and proposed inspection equipment/routing prior to shipments. Panelists with presentations: Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation (Daniel Ogg); Challenges and Opportunities in Establishing a System for Transportation of SNF/UNF (Kathy Langan); UNF Transportation: Challenges and Opportunities (Michael Valenzano)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Development in corrosion resistance by microstructural refinement in Zr-16 SS 304 alloy using suction casting technique

Highlights: • Grain refinement was made in Zr–16 wt.% SS alloy while prepared by suction casting process. • Distribution of Laves phase, e.g., Zr{sub 2}(Fe, Cr) was raised in suction cast (SC) Zr–16 wt.% SS. • Corrosion resistance was improved in SC alloy compared to that of arc-melt-cast alloy. • Grain refinement in SC alloy assisted for an increase in its corrosion resistance. - Abstract: Zirconium (Zr)-stainless steel (SS) hybrid alloys are being considered as baseline alloys for developing metallic-waste-form (MWF) with the motivation of disposing of Zr and SS base nuclear metallic wastes. Zr–16 wt.% SS, a MWF alloy optimized from previous studies, exhibit significant grain refinement and changes in phase assemblages (soft phase: Zr{sub 2}(Fe, Cr)/α-Zr vs. hard phase: Zr{sub 3}(Fe, Ni)) when prepared by suction casting (SC) technique in comparison to arc-cast-melt (AMC) route. Variation in Cr-distribution among different phases are found to be low in suction cast alloy, which along with grain refinement restricted Cr-depletion at the Zr{sub 2}(Fe, Cr)/Zr interfaces, prone to localized attack. Hence, SC alloy, compared to AMC alloy, showed lower current density, higher potential at the breakdown of passivity and higher corrosion potential during polarization experiments (carried out under possible geological repository environments, viz., pH 8, 5 and 1) indicating its superior corrosion resistance.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Model Development for Thermal-Hydrology Simulations of a Full-Scale Heater Experiment in Opalinus Clay

Disposal of commercial spent nuclear fuel in a geologic repository is studied. In situ heater experiments in underground research laboratories provide a realistic representation of subsurface behavior under disposal conditions. Here, this study describes process model development and modeling analysis for a full-scale heater experiment in opalinus clay host rock. The results of thermal-hydrology simulation, solving coupled nonisothermal multiphase flow, and comparison with experimental data are presented. The modeling results closely match the experimental data.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Summary of Investigations on Technical Feasibility of Direct Disposal of Dual-Purpose Canisters

This report is a revision of the Fiscal Year (FY)-15 summary report on the investigations on technical feasibility of direct disposal of dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) in a geological repository. Notable progress has been made in the postclosure criticality area supporting direct disposal of DPCs in FY-16 and FY-17. As such, this revision updates the postclosure criticality related studies to capture the advances made over the last two FYs.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS2006

Logistics Lessons Learned in NASA Space Flight

The Vision for Space Exploration sets out a number of goals, involving both strategic and tactical objectives. These include returning the Space Shuttle to flight, completing the International Space Station, and conducting human expeditions to the Moon by 2020. Each of these goals has profound logistics implications. In the consideration of these objectives,a need for a study on NASA logistics lessons learned was recognized. The study endeavors to identify both needs for space exploration and challenges in the development of past logistics architectures, as well as in the design of space systems. This study may also be appropriately applied as guidance in the development of an integrated logistics architecture for future human missions to the Moon and Mars. This report first summarizes current logistics practices for the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) and the International Space Station (ISS) and examines the practices of manifesting, stowage, inventory tracking, waste disposal, and return logistics. The key findings of this examination are that while the current practices do have many positive aspects, there are also several shortcomings. These shortcomings include a high-level of excess complexity, redundancy of information/lack of a common database, and a large human-in-the-loop component. Later sections of this report describe the methodology and results of our work to systematically gather logistics lessons learned from past and current human spaceflight programs as well as validating these lessons through a survey of the opinions of current space logisticians. To consider the perspectives on logistics lessons, we searched several sources within NASA, including organizations with direct and indirect connections with the system flow in mission planning. We utilized crew debriefs, the John Commonsense lessons repository for the JSC Mission Operations Directorate, and the Skylab Lessons Learned. Additionally, we searched the public version of the Lessons Learned Information System (LLIS) and verified that we received the same result using the internal version of LLIS for our logistics lesson searches. In conducting the research, information from multiple databases was consolidated into a single spreadsheet of 300 lessons learned. Keywords were applied for the purpose of sorting and evaluation. Once the lessons had been compiled, an analysis of the resulting data was performed, first sorting it by keyword, then finding duplication and root cause, and finally sorting by root cause. The data was then distilled into the top 7 lessons learned across programs, centers, and activities.

Evans, William A.↗
DOE OSTI2015

International Collaboration Activities in Different Geologic Disposal Environments

This report describes the current status of international collaboration regarding geologic disposal research in the Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) Campaign. Since 2012, in an effort coordinated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, UFD has advanced active collaboration with several international geologic disposal programs in Europe and Asia. Such collaboration allows the UFD Campaign to benefit from a deep knowledge base with regards to alternative repository environments developed over decades, and to utilize international investments in research facilities (such as underground research laboratories), saving millions of R&D dollars that have been and are being provided by other countries. To date, UFD’s International Disposal R&D Program has established formal collaboration agreements with five international initiatives and several international partners, and national lab scientists associated with UFD have conducted specific collaborative R&D activities that align well with its R&D priorities.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

The transportation factor in site evaluations for spent nuclear fuel storage and disposal facilities - 15460

New facility siting studies will be necessary to fulfill the Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) on America's Nuclear Future 2012 recommendation to develop consolidated interim storage (CIS) for spent nuclear fuel in the next decade. Future site evaluations for used nuclear fuel (UNF) storage and disposal facilities must address transportation requirements, especially access to mainline railroads, early in the site selection process. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 2013 proposed a strategy for managing spent nuclear fuel in accordance with the BRC recommendations by establishing a pilot interim storage facility by 2021 and a consolidated interim storage facility by 2025. The authors demonstrate that currently available geographic information systems and already adopted siting criteria (defining favorable and unfavorable conditions) allow the identification of the transportation portion of a storage facility siting process to begin without delay. Ready access to the mainline rail system is absolutely critical since existing rail access, or easily constructed access, is a highly favorable condition for successful siting. Despite widespread rail abandonments over the past three decades, vast areas of the United States retain mainline rail service or could connect to existing mainlines by building new rail spurs of less than 25-50 miles. This precondition for transportation planning is critical. Planners need to start with the beginning - availability of rail transportation to and from the interim storage facility/facilities. A second step in transportation screening would be to evaluate those potential site locations within 50 miles of existing mainline railroads using other appropriate variables. This effort could begin with the application of the 1984 repository siting guidelines for transportation (10 CFR 960.5-2-7)[1]. Repository surface facilities have essentially the same transportation requirements as storage facilities. The guidelines in 10 CFR 960 provide a readily available template for evaluating sites based on transportation risks, impacts and costs. Initial site screening, after considering proximity to mainline railroads as the precursory step, should evaluate: 1) proximity to highly populated areas; 2) proximity to interstate highways; 3) proximity to environmentally sensitive areas and lands protected by federal, state, or tribal governments; and 4) proximity to military installations, hazardous materials facilities, or other facilities that might impact transportation safety and security.Several challenges exist which prevent effective transportation planning. The diversity of canister and cask types and SNF characteristics and conditions, the increasingly limited rail access at the shipping sites and the ease with which public attention can be marshalled against a waste management program, all suggest that future efforts need to identify potential storage sites that reduce transportation impacts and costs by reducing near-site transportation construction and reduce total system transportation impacts. This can most easily be accomplished by reducing shipping distances in a process that is easily defined and implemented. The paper concludes that the DOE should develop a site screening and evaluation program with transportation as a central consideration. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Integrated Solutions for Interim Used Fuel Management: From Pool Unloading to Safe Delivery to Recycling or Repository Facilities - 17235

Safe management of used nuclear fuel (UNF) is key to the survival of the nuclear industry. That is why it is more important than ever to have a consent-based, practical, credible, and sustainable roadmap for managing the back-end of the nuclear cycle. Worldwide UNF Light Water Reactors (LWR) inventories are currently around 200,000 tons and are estimated to grow to more than 350,000 tons by 2030, and operating nuclear reactors in the U.S. continue to discharge UNF every 18 to 24 months. International experience has demonstrated that the development of a permanent geological repository can be a multi-decade process, especially in the face of public acceptance challenges. Meanwhile, the solution for permanent disposal of UNF in the U.S. is moving at a glacial pace. As a result, industrial stakeholders have been forced to find practical interim UNF storage solutions in order to continue safely operating their reactors. Among those interim solutions are the cask- or canister-based dry storage systems that have dramatically increased in the last 10 years as they provide flexibility for expansion with a low up-front investment. With interim dry storage in place for more than 30 years, our industry is entering a new phase as we are forced to prepare for a few more decades before geological repositories begin operating. Consequently, interim dry storage has to be extended for 80 years or more. Thus, new considerations have to be taken into account to ensure the safety of this stored used fuel: - Interim storage systems are aging; - High burn-up fuel behavior overtime is uncertain; - Used fuel is losing its self-protection; - The number of shutdown sites without a fuel transfer facility, such as a pool, is increasing; - Some owners of Independent Spent Fuel Storage installation (ISFSI) at shutdown sites are not nuclear operators anymore. With increasing uncertainties, AREVA TN -- based on its long expertise with used fuel transportation and interim storage systems -- is adapting its portfolio to develop integrated and flexible solutions that will remove the burden of interim used fuel management from nuclear operators. AREVA TN is developing comprehensive solutions to reduce risks including the continued supply of proven safe high-performance dry storage systems; on-site services to safely transfer used fuel from pool to pad; the optimization of fuel heat load in the storage pool and pad; innovative aging management services including inspection, monitoring and repair; a realistic solution for consolidated interim storage with a priority to remove Used Nuclear Fuel stored in dry storage systems from shutdown sites; world-class transport and logistics services to safely move the used fuel from nuclear reactor sites to consolidated storage and repository or recycling as applicable, and turnkey management of shutdown ISFSIs. Due to the lack of an available path for transporting used fuel away from reactors, nuclear operators are faced with many challenges and growing uncertainties. Our presentation will describe the practical solutions developed and being developed in order to manage used fuel on behalf of nuclear operators and allows them to continue focusing on the important job of producing carbon-free clean energy. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

The decommissioning imperative - motivating progress in us used fuel management - 15185

When the Yucca Mountain project was terminated in 2010 there was approximately 3500 metric tons of used fuel stored at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) at which there was no operating reactor (10 shutdown plant sites and the GE Morris facility). By 2015, four additional sites with five reactors will have shut down, causing the amount of used fuel 'stranded' at sites where there is no operating reactor to nearly double to approximately 6900 metric tons which will be stored at a total of 15 sites. At each of these sites, once the reactors are decommissioned, the only thing preventing the land from being returned to communities for other uses is the remaining presence of the used fuel. The cost of maintaining 15 stand-alone ISFSIs is born by electric ratepayers and taxpayers. Going forward, the costs of maintaining stand-alone ISFSIs is certain to grow even if the number of stand-alone ISFSIs does not grow beyond the already announced shutdown of the Oyster Creek reactor in 2019 (which would increase the amount of stranded used fuel by another 10% and create a 16. stand-alone ISFSI). One reason for this cost escalation will be the need for ISFSI owners to renew storage licenses, and implement aging management programs to support these renewals, due to the continued delay in the federal program for removing the used fuel. Storage licenses at 10 of 16 stand-alone ISFSIs will expire by 2021, which is the earliest projected date at which the Department of Energy (DOE) has indicated it could have a pilot interim storage facility available - and nearly 3 decades before DOE projects a repository will be available. The burden and cost of continuing to renew storage licenses - and manage aging storage facilities - at 16 stand-alone sites instead of moving stranded used fuel to a single consolidated storage location or repository will likely be significant. Industry resources are increasingly being channeled into dry storage aging management activities as public and regulator interest in potential long-term degradation mechanism continues to grow. Whether the ultimate destination for used fuel is Yucca Mountain or some other location, the current stalemate preventing progress in the federal program to move it must be broken - and the increasing prominence of the decommissioned reactor quandary may very well be a pivotal factor in breaking that stalemate. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Canada's Underground Research Laboratory (1980-2014) - 16274

In 1980, Canada initiated a long-term, comprehensive research and development program of geologic characterization and large-scale in situ geotechnical experiments in a subsurface facility, the Underground Research Laboratory (URL). The URL was excavated specifically to evaluate the concept of permanent disposal of used CANDU{sup R} nuclear reactor fuel in a deep geological repository (DGR) constructed in Canadian Shield granite. Key phases of the URL included siting, detailed site characterization and monitoring, construction, operation, decommissioning, and closure. Much collaborative research with international organizations was undertaken at the URL and continues, even after the closure of the facility, through the ongoing Enhanced Sealing Project (ESP). The ESP monitors the engineered performance of a full-scale composite shaft seal that was emplaced during URL closure to permanently seal the main URL access shaft across a sub-horizontal hydraulically active fracture zone. Currently the ESP is jointly funded by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) (Canada), Posiva (Finland), and Andra (France), and monitoring is planned to continue until the end of 2016. Decades of programmatic experience at the URL have shown that knowledge continuity is integral to supporting the development of a safe geological disposal facility for high level nuclear waste. This paper outlines the history of the URL and describes some technical lessons learned from its 30-plus years of construction, operation, and closure activities. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

LANL Salt International Update

This milestone presents material relating to international salt investigations during the 2018 fiscal year. Overall salt efforts this year were divided between the currently in-progress borehole experiments (see test plan TP-18-001, rev. 0 and DOE Milestone M3SF-18LA010303014), model development (see DOE milestone M3SF-18LA010303015), and validation of numerical modeling for generic salt repository applications domestically (intranational) and abroad (international). The present milestone focuses on the last of these subject areas. Work for international dissemination was conducted during the first half of the 2018 fiscal year and includes two international conference presentations - Geological Society of America (GSA) and the International Society for Porous Media (IntePore) - and a manuscript which is currently in review in Vadose Zone Journal.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Demonstration of friction stir Welding (FSW) Technology for packaging of used nuclear fuel - 15025

With uncertainty surrounding the disposal of US Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF), the nuclear industry is making an effort to identify an interim storage solution. One of the alternatives is to simply manage UNF on-site until a permanent repository can be established - extended storage. In an effort to provide a technical basis for extended storage, the Department of Energy (DOE) performed a gap analysis identifying several issues that need to be addressed. One of the issues relates to the performance of the UNF dry storage container (DSC). DSC container welds (fabricated using conventional fusion welding processes) are sensitive to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC), and their extended-term performance is questionable. Fluor, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) believe that Friction Stir Welding (FSW) technology may be able to address the DSC issue. The Fluor team collaborated on a project to demonstrate feasibility of FSW for DSC packaging (closure-welding). This paper reports on a 2-year project in which FSW process conditions were established (for DSC container materials and dimensions) and used in the preparation of mechanical and corrosion specimens for testing and evaluation. In addition to FSW test specimens, fusion welded specimens were prepared and tested in like manner for comparative purposes. The results show excellent mechanical properties (meeting construction code requirements) and significant improvement in corrosion performance - over the fusion welded specimens. It is believed these findings will be of significant value to efforts underway to provide a technical basis for DSC extended storage performance. FSW technology appears to be an acceptable alternative or candidate process, capable of addressing the SCC sensitivity issues associated with fusion-welded DSC fabrication welds. In addition, as an alternative to on-site, extended storage of UNF, the DOE has proposed the development and construction of a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF). UNF would be accepted from the many, local sites for consolidation at one or more CISFs until a permanent repository could be established. A recent CISF study indicates that UNF currently packaged into DSCs will likely be re-packaged into containers suitable for permanent storage. The study also indicates that re-packaging is best performed under water in a pool. FSW technology has several specific advantages for this application, 1) because it utilizes machine-tool equipment, a welding station can easily perform a cutting operation, and 2) FSW has been successfully demonstrated capable of joining container materials under water. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

The Effect of DPC Fillers on FEPs Relevant to Disposal of SNF

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is investigating the use of different materials that could be used to fill the void space inside a dual-purpose canister (DPC) loaded with spent nuclear fuel (SNF) just before it is emplaced in a deep geologic repository. The purpose of adding filler material is to maintain subcritical conditions in the repository during the postclosure period, which can span up to 1,000,000 years. Several types of materials have been proposed, including metals, cements, particulates, and glass. Part of this investigation addresses how the presence of filler material inside a DPC will affect the performance of the repository with respect to the repository features; the consequences of events that may occur; and the multiple thermal, hydrologic, chemical, and mechanical processes that may occur in a deep geologic repository over long timescales. This report describes some of the filler materials that have been proposed and studied; identifies 11 features, 6 events, and 25 processes that may be affected by the presence of filler materials; and discusses the effects that may require consideration for each feature, event, or process. The results of this study can be used to direct appropriate research and to develop suitable models if the DOE decides to use fillers to maintain subcritical conditions in DPCs used to dispose of SNF.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

System-Level Logistics for Dual Purpose Canister Disposal

The analysis presented in this report investigated how the direct disposal of dual purpose canisters (DPCs) may be affected by the use of standard transportation aging and disposal canisters (STADs), early or late start of the repository, and the repository emplacement thermal power limits. The impacts were evaluated with regard to the availability of the DPCs for emplacement, achievable repository acceptance rates, additional storage required at an interim storage facility (ISF) and additional emplacement time compared to the corresponding repackaging scenarios, and fuel age at emplacement. The result of this analysis demonstrated that the biggest difference in the availability of UNF for emplacement between the DPC-only loading scenario and the DPCs and STADs loading scenario is for a repository start date of 2036 with a 6 kW thermal power limit. The differences are also seen in the availability of UNF for emplacement between the DPC-only loading scenario and the DPCs and STADs loading scenario for the alternative with a 6 kW thermal limit and a 2048 start date, and for the alternatives with a 10 kW thermal limit and 2036 and 2048 start dates. The alternatives with disposal of UNF in both DPCs and STADs did not require additional storage, regardless of the repository acceptance rate, as compared to the reference repackaging case. In comparison to the reference repackaging case, alternatives with the 18 kW emplacement thermal limit required little to no additional emplacement time, regardless of the repository start time, the fuel loading scenario, or the repository acceptance rate. Alternatives with the 10 kW emplacement thermal limit and the DPCs and STADs fuel loading scenario required some additional emplacement time. The most significant decrease in additional emplacement time occurred in the alternative with the 6 kW thermal limit and the 2036 repository starting date. The average fuel age at emplacement ranges from 46 to 88 years. The maximum fuel age at emplacement ranges from 81 to 146 years. The difference in the average and maximum age of fuel at emplacement between the DPC-only and the DPCs and STADs fuel loading scenarios becomes less significant as the repository thermal limit increases and as the repository start date increases. In general, the role of STADs is to store young (30 year or younger) high burnup (45 GWD/MTU or higher) fuel. Recommendations for future study include detailed evaluation of the feasible alternatives with regard to the costs and factors not considered in this analysis, such as worker dose, dose to members of the public, and economic benefits to host entities. It is also recommended to conduct an additional analysis to evaluate the assumption regarding the transportability and disposability of DPCs for the next iteration of the direct disposal of DPCs study.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗