Results for “test plan” — Page 56

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Integrated Impact of Diet on Human Immune Response, the Gut Microbiota, and Nutritional Status During Adaptation to Spaceflight

Long-duration spaceflight impacts human physiology, including well documented immune system dysregulation. Diet, the microbiome, and immune system function are interlinked, but diet is the only one of these factors that we have the ability to easily, and significantly, alter on Earth or during flight. As we better understand dietary impacts on physiology, we may then improve the spaceflight diet to improve crew health and potentially reduce spaceflight-associated physiological decrements. Increasing the consumption of fruits and vegetables and bioactive compounds (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids, lycopene, flavonoids) and therefore enhancing overall nutritional intake from the nominal shelf-stable, fully-processed, space food system is expected to serve as a countermeasure to detrimental impacts to human physiology, including dysregulation in immunological profiles, the taxonomic profile of the gut microbiota, and nutritional status during spaceflight. In this study, first we sought to determine the effect of the nominal shelf-stable spaceflight diet compared to an "enhanced" shelf-stable spaceflight diet on human biochemistry, immunology, and the microbiome in a ground-based, simulated space mission. The ground analog portion of this study was conducted in the NASA Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) Campaign 4 missions, which consisted of four 45-day missions with closed chamber confinement and realistic mission simulation to study effects on crew health and performance. As reported previously, analyses indicate beneficial associations between diet and markers of nutritional status, stress, the microbiome, and cognitive performance. Intake and beneficial associations varied by subject. This data will be used as a ground-based control for spaceflight, where the spaceflight environment (e.g., radiation, microgravity) will have additional impacts and the potential to evaluate effects of the diet will be greater. The second phase of this study is to occur on the International Space Station, where it is currently being implemented. The test plan is similar to that used in the HERA missions. The enhanced diet is intended to provide 25% of the crews’ diet with foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids, lycopene, and flavonoids, along with more fruits and vegetables in general (the other 75% of the diet will be obtained from standard and crew preference items available on the ISS). Biological samples (blood, urine, stool, and saliva) are being collected from participants at selected time points before, during, and after the mission. Data collection also includes dietary intake recording and body mass measurement. Currently, 6 of 9 planned astronauts have completed data collection. Analysis of immune markers, latent herpes virus reactivation, the taxonomic and metatranscriptomic profile of the gut microbiome, and nutritional status biomarkers and biochemical metabolites will occur in batch to minimize sample handling variations. Mixed models statistical analyses will be used, incorporating random effects to account for repeated measures within individuals to assess the impact of diet on physiological outcomes. We expect this study to provide evidence of beneficial impact of this enhanced diet on crew health and adaptation to spaceflight. These data will aid in evidence-based mass-risk trades for food system design and development of targeted dietary interventions for future exploration-class space missions.

Grace L. Douglas↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Beyond Gravity Single Launch Payload Accommodations Shock Testing

The Vulcan Centaur launch vehicle is purpose-built to meet all the U.S. government’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) needs. A shock test for the Centaur V’s payload accommodations (PLA), single launch (SL) configuration was successfully conducted at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in Huntsville, Alabama, in May 2021. This test was a joint effort between MSFC, Beyond Gravity and United Launch Alliance. The primary purpose of the shock test was to characterize the shock environment induced by the separation event on components attached to the PLA and its interfaces. Additional test requirements included: (1) verifying the payload fairing (PLF) did not contact the flight hardware during the mechanical separation of the PLF horizontal separation system (HSS) and (2) evaluating the performance of the HSS spring packages during jettison. The data acquired during the PLF SL shock test will be used to validate the shock predictions from pre-test analysis of the launch vehicle and the PLF separation analysis. This paper provides an overview of the PLA SL shock test planning and execution as well as the required catch system, instrumentation and results.

separation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Beyond Gravity Single Launch Payload Accommodations Shock Testing

The Vulcan Centaur launch vehicle is purpose-built to meet all the U.S. government’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) needs. A shock test for the Centaur V’s payload accommodations (PLA), single launch (SL) configuration was successfully conducted at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in Huntsville, Alabama, in May 2021. This test was a joint effort between MSFC, Beyond Gravity and United Launch Alliance. The primary purpose of the shock test was to characterize the shock environment induced by the separation event on components attached to the PLA and its interfaces. Additional test requirements included: (1) verifying the payload fairing (PLF) did not contact the flight hardware during the mechanical separation of the PLF horizontal separation system (HSS) and (2) evaluating the performance of the HSS spring packages during jettison. The data acquired during the PLF SL shock test will be used to validate the shock predictions from pre-test analysis of the launch vehicle and the PLF separation analysis. This paper provides an overview of the PLA SL shock test planning and execution as well as the required catch system, instrumentation and results.

separation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Initial Test Results for NASA Goddard’s Low-Cost Optical Terminal Adaptive Optics System

This presentation presents the testing approach and initial laboratory test results of the Adaptive Optics (AO) Subassembly (AOS) for the Low-Cost Optical Terminal (LCOT), a low-cost and flexible optical communications ground terminal. Leveraging commercial components and subassemblies wherever possible, LCOT is being developed by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Advanced Communications Capabilities for Exploration and Science Systems (ACCESS) project. An economical ground terminal allows NASA to create a global optical terminal network and enables the expansion of direct-to-Earth (DTE) optical communications. Located at the Goddard Geophysical and Astronomical Observatory (GGAO), LCOT is in the development phase and will receive first light during initial testing beginning in 2023. This new optical terminal includes a 700 mm Ritchey-Chretien commercial telescope, able to track Low Earth Orbit (LEO) spacecraft, receive instruments specified from 1500 - 1600 nm, and an uplink transmit optical system. Demodulation of optical coherent modulation formats requires downlink signal coupling into single-mode fiber. Due to atmospheric turbulence, signals experience wavefront distortions creating speckle patterns larger than the fiber core and high jitter requiring precise beam steering. AO is necessary to correct atmospheric turbulence effects and allow efficient coupling of received signals. In 2020, GSFC contracted with General Atomics to provide the LCOT AO system. This system has been delivered to GSFC in September 2021 and has been tested in laboratory to evaluate performance. This paper describes the laboratory testing approach, turbulence phase plate design, test results, and the AO field testing plan when installed on the LCOT telescope.

Adaptive Optics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Beyond Gravity Single Launch Payload Accommodations Shock Testing

The Vulcan Centaur launch vehicle is purpose-built to meet all the U.S. government’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) needs. A shock test for the Centaur V’s payload accommodations (PLA), single launch (SL) configuration was successfully conducted at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in Huntsville, Alabama, in May 2021. This test was a joint effort between MSFC, Beyond Gravity and United Launch Alliance. The primary purpose of the shock test was to characterize the shock environment induced by the separation event on components attached to the PLA and its interfaces. Additional test requirements included: (1) verifying the payload fairing (PLF) did not contact the flight hardware during the mechanical separation of the PLF horizontal separation system (HSS) and (2) evaluating the performance of the HSS spring packages during jettison. The data acquired during the PLF SL shock test will be used to validate the shock predictions from pre-test analysis of the launch vehicle and the PLF separation analysis. This paper provides an overview of the PLA SL shock test planning and execution as well as the required catch system, instrumentation and results.

separation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA NDE Fracture Critical Detectable Flaw Sizes History and Methodology

NASA requires that NDE methods and inspectors demonstrate 90% Probability of Detection (POD) with 95% confidence for critical flaw sizes when inspecting fracture critical metallic components. NASA addresses the known variability of NDE inspector capability in two ways. The first, Special NDE, requires that every inspector demonstrate the required 90/95 POD, which is resource intensive. The second approach is Standard NDE for which conservative flaw sizes for different NDE methods are provided such that it is expected that most properly trained inspectors will exceed the 90/95 POD requirement. As such, individual POD demonstration testing is not required. The origin of NASA Standard NDE dates to the start of the Space Shuttle Program in the early 1970’s. In the first study to quantitatively assess NDE methods and inspectors, the performance of multiple inspectors was evaluated for different NDE methods using a large set of fatigue cracked specimens. A rudimentary POD analysis was performed to estimate the 90/95 POD flaw size for each inspector for each method. Additionally, the average and standard deviation of the 90/95 POD flaw size across the multiple inspectors was calculated to estimate the flaw size for which 95 percent of inspectors would provide the 90/95 POD capability. These estimated 90/95/95 POD flaw sizes evolved into the NASA Standard NDE flaw sizes still in use for structural analysis five decades later. The methodology for performing Standard NDE POD studies was never documented in NASA requirements. Furthermore, POD analysis methods have significantly evolved since this seminal study. Likewise, NDE methods have improved and there has been a push to reassess Standard NDE flaw sizes for existing methods, and to develop Standard NDE flaw sizes for new methods such as digital radiography. In this study, a Standard NDE POD methodology was developed and baselined using the historical data. This reanalysis of the historical data identified several deficiencies in the original test plan as well as an overall lack of conservatism in the estimated 90/95/95 POD flaw sizes. The results of this historical review and the new methodology are being incorporated into an update of NASA NDE POD requirements.

Nondestructive Evaluation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

W8 Facility Overview and DTF Test Layout

Summary of W8 capabilities and DTF test plans for discussion with Gulfstream during a GRC/Gulfstream workshop.

Joel Lauer↗

NASA NTRS2023

Multi-Star Wavefront Control at the Occulting Mask Coronagraph Testbed: Monochromatic Laboratory Demonstration for the Roman Coronagraph Instrument

The Astro2020 decadal survey recommended the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO), NASA’s direct imaging flagship mission, with a goal to achieve a statistically robust mission yield of 25 or more potentially habitable exoplanets. One way to achieve is to increase the instrument effectiveness by introducing additional bright, nearby targets. A majority of Sun-like stars have a stellar companion that can introduce additional noise into the field of view of any high-contrast imaging instrument and enabling exoplanet discovery around binary stars represents a path to increased corona graphic instrument efficiency by increasing the available science target pool of bright nearby stars. This includes both of the Alpha Centauri A and B stars which would represent the top science target for direct imaging if companion leakage could be suppressed. Multi-Star Wavefront Control(MSWC) is a technique that removes stellar leakage from both stellar components, enabling direct imaging of exoplanets in many binary star systems which can potentially increase corona graphic instrument effectivenessWe present the latest testbed results obtained with MSWC as part of the technology development effort focusing on demonstrations conducted on the Occulting Mask Coronagraph (OMC) testbed at JPL during thevacuum test window last winter, with an additional vacuum test planned for this fall. The MSWC mask consists of a shaped pupil mask similar to the one used for the Wide-Field of View mode, but also includes a set of superimposed, regularly-spaced dots that serve as a diffraction grating. OMC has a layout similar to the RomanSpace Telescope coronagraph instrument and configured with a binary imaging mode with a MSWC mask using same design as the contributed mask for the Roman coronagraph. Our testbed results represent the first demonstrations of this technique using the recently installed full binary source. We present results demonstrating suppression in the Super-Nyquist regime for the 3rd diffraction order reaching 8.7e-9 contrast with the Roman pupil. In addition, we present results obtained with a physical binary source and running MSWC in a binary star regime demonstrating 9.6e-8 contrast for a geometry matching potential Alpha Centauri observations in a515 nm monochromatic wavelength (similar but bluer than for Band 1) using the 5th diffraction order. Planned demonstrations in the upcoming vacuum window this fall will focus on Band 3d and Band 4 using the full MSWC mode for an Alpha Centauri geometry.

Roman Coronagraph Instrument↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Segmented Hexagonal Antenna Reflector Concentrically Stacked Using Shape Memory Composite Tubular Hinges

A new architecture for solid surface reflector antennas scalable to sizes greater than 10 m is presented. The design combines the compact, lightness and simplicity characteristics of advanced deployable structures to create sub-reflectors that can be assembled in space into larger units using a robotic arm and operations under development by a related parallel project. The seven-panel hexagonal sub-reflector is divided into hexagonal panels of that efficiently stack concentrically and vertically. The central panel is connected to each side panel on the back side by a pair of tubular shape memory composite hinges that enable the required deployment kinematics. A secondary mechanism ultimately closes the interpanel gap. The focus of the paper is on the development of the sub-reflector elements, namely the tubular hinges that use embedded heaters and sensors for actuation, the actuation mechanisms, and the lightweight sandwich construction panels. A finite element analysis parametric study assessed how design features of the hinge affect its stowage and deployment dynamics. The component fabrication and testing plans for the two-panel assembly breadboard model are outlined.

deployable reflectors↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Segmented Hexagonal Antenna Reflector Concentrically Stacked Using Shape Memory Composite Tubular Hinges

A new architecture for solid surface reflector antennas scalable to sizes greater than 10 m is presented. The design combines the compact, lightness and simplicity characteristics of advanced deployable structures to create sub-reflectors that can be assembled in space into larger units using a robotic arm and operations under development by a related parallel project. The seven-panel hexagonal sub-reflector is divided into hexagonal panels of that efficiently stack concentrically and vertically. The central panel is connected to each side panel on the back side by a pair of tubular shape memory composite hinges that enable the required deployment kinematics. A secondary mechanism ultimately closes the interpanel gap. The focus of the paper is on the development of the sub-reflector elements, namely the tubular hinges that use embedded heaters and sensors for actuation, the actuation mechanisms, and the lightweight sandwich construction panels. A finite element analysis parametric study assessed how design features of the hinge affect its stowage and deployment dynamics. The component fabrication and testing plans for the two-panel assembly breadboard model are outlined.

deployable reflectors↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Crew Seat for Human Exploration in Multiple Gravity Environments

This work attempts to develop a single crew seating solution that is applicable across a range of gravity environments encountered by spacecraft proposed in several conceptual spacecraft architectures. All of these spacecraft will need to provide some sort of stationary accommodation for the crew for performing various activities such as work in science laboratories, maintenance and repair facilities, medical care facilities, and spacecraft operations centers, as well as for basic habitation in crew quarters, entertainment / relaxation facilities, and crew dining facilities. Depending on the spacecraft or architecture, this stationary accommodation may be experienced continuously in microgravity, such as would be the case for the Deep Space Exploration Vehicle. Alternately, it could be in continuous lunar or Martian gravity, such as the Common Habitat base camps. It could experience fractional gravity, such as a Pressurized Rover for In-Space Missions at a Near Earth Asteroid or one of the Martian moons. It could alternate between artificial gravity and microgravity, such as the Nautilus-X. It could alternate between microgravity and lunar or Martian gravity, such as the SpaceX Starship Human Landing System or the Blue Origin Blue Moon Block 2 Human Landing System. Or it could be in continuous Earth gravity, such as ground trainer systems. Prior human spaceflight systems for stationary accommodation have been focused on microgravity applications. These systems have their own limitations and cannot be used in a gravity environment. A public crowdsourcing campaign generated dozens of ideas, which ultimately generated a Gecko Mobility Aids system for crew translation and the Multi-Gravity Crew Seat (MGCS) for stationary accommodation. The MGCS functions in gravity as a traditional terrestrial seat, performing functions of load for the overall body and forearms, as well as head and neck load relief while positioning the body within range of an intended task. In microgravity, the MGCS functions as a body restraint, securing the body against inadvertent drifting by applying a restraining pressure at the front and back of the thighs, shoulders, and back. The initial MGCS concept was developed in a NASA hackathon and was refined through a review of dozens of terrestrial seating styles. Additionally, a review of anthropometry and biomechanics data related to the neutral body posture was conducted to help inform the microgravity configuration of the MGCS. A series of CAD models were iteratively developed, with subject matter expert reviews leading to design improvements. A scale model was constructed and used with a humanoid model to demonstrate MGCS accommodation of a human-like body in both gravity and microgravity modes. Work to develop a full-scale protype of the MGCS is discussed, including design and fabrication of the headrest, arm rest, seat back, seat pan, seat base, and the conversion mechanisms. A 1-g human-in-the-loop evaluation of the prototype assessed the acceptability of performing seated activities in the MGCS, collecting data on the usability, comfort, and ease of ingress/egress. Based on the evaluation results, design modifications needed for reduced gravity testing are documented and initial work is indicated for a reduced gravity test plan.

Restraints and Mobility Aids↗

NASA NTRS2024

Updates to NASA’s Break-in-Prebreathe Rules Due to Type II Decompression Sickness Risk Considerations

INTRODUCTION. Investigation of a central neurological decompression sickness (DCS) case during ground testing at Johnson Space Center identified a break-in-prebreathe (BIP) 13 minutes prior to depressurization as the leading credible cause despite applicable prebreathe payback rules being followed. Applicable NASA rules, for ground and flight, directed 2:1 payback of breaks up to 10 mins in duration, regardless of when a break occurs relative to depress. Full restart of prebreathe is directed following breaks > 10 min. The adequacy of NASA’s BIP rules was evaluated prior to resuming hypobaric ground testing or ISS extravehicular activities. METHODS. The following information sources were reviewed prior to formulating recommendations: i) Type II DCS case report and investigation findings; ii) documented rationale for existing flight rules, iii) consultations with subject matter experts involved in definition of existing flight rules (several of whom had since left NASA), iv) relevant published literature, v) model estimates of tissue on-gassing and off-gassing, and vi) NASA’s operational experience with late breaks in prebreathe. RESULTS. NASA’s nominal prebreathe protocols are validated via extensive ground testing to ensure DCS risk is reduced to within acceptable limits. Conversely, there exists a paucity of data, no validated models, and limited documentation regarding BIP risk for NASA prebreathe protocols. Flight rules implemented for shuttle and later ISS are based primarily on expert opinion and an assumption of symmetric on-gassing and off-gassing, which would make 2:1 payback a conservative mitigation for a BIP. Assumption of exponential gas kinetics makes late breaks higher risk, or require greater payback, than earlier breaks. Two BIPs have occurred using the current ISS prebreathe protocol, each of which was followed by greater than 2:1 payback and at least 59 minutes of 100% O2 pre-depress. No DCS cases have been reported during shuttle or ISS EVA operations. DISCUSSION. Interim changes were implemented to protect against late breaks during ground and flight prebreathes by ensuring negligible difference in conservatively modeled ppN2 pre-depress compared to nominal validated protocols. Additional documentation and literature review as well as chamber test planning are ongoing with the objective of further ground and flight rule updates and validation of a BIP risk model.

Prebreathe↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of 8 human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (reduced pressures, Oxygen concentrations, etc.) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last eighteen months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing, and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina Aurora Anchondo↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of 8 human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (reduced pressures, Oxygen concentrations, etc.) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last eighteen months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing, and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina A Anchondo↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental Verification of the Parabolic Deformable Mirror for the ExoSpec Project

For the Habitable Worlds Observatory, it is essential to broaden the controllable wavelength bandwidth for high-contrast imaging and spectroscopy to increase the exoEarth yield and characterization. The Parabolic Deformable Mirrors (PDM) under the NASA Headquarters directed ExoSpec Work package is specifically tailored to do so. We have successfully procured a generation 1 (Gen 1) PDM device and completed in-depth characterization of the device. This robust evaluation has become instrumental in informing subsequent stages of development, particularly in shaping the design and specifying requirements for the next generation, Gen2, PDM device. We have built a testbed in an environmentally controlled cleanroom to experimentally demonstrate the use of a parabolic DM in a coronagraph instrument as well an integral field spectrograph (IFS). This versatile testbed is designed to test different DM architectures, various low-order wavefront schemes, and a lenslet based IFS. This provides us with a basis for comparison with different DM configurations – 1) flat DM, 2) parabolic DMs, and 3) a flat DM and parabolic DMs. In this communication, we will discuss the testbed design and updates, parabolic DM characterization, Gen 2 requirement definitions, and different tests planned for the testbed.

Hari Subedi↗

NASA NTRS2024

Updates to NASA’s Break-in-Prebreathe Rules Due to Type II Decompression Sickness Risk Considerations

INTRODUCTION. Investigation of a central neurological decompression sickness (DCS) case during ground testing at Johnson Space Center identified a break-in-prebreathe (BIP) 13 minutes prior to depressurization as the leading credible cause despite applicable prebreathe payback rules being followed. Applicable NASA rules, for ground and flight, directed 2:1 payback of breaks up to 10 mins in duration, regardless of when a break occurs relative to depress. Full restart of prebreathe is directed following breaks > 10 min. The adequacy of NASA’s BIP rules was evaluated prior to resuming hypobaric ground testing or ISS extravehicular activities. METHODS. The following information sources were reviewed prior to formulating recommendations: i) Type II DCS case report and investigation findings; ii) documented rationale for existing flight rules, iii) consultations with subject matter experts involved in definition of existing flight rules (several of whom had since left NASA), iv) relevant published literature, v) model estimates of tissue on-gassing and off-gassing, and vi) NASA’s operational experience with late breaks in prebreathe. RESULTS. NASA’s nominal prebreathe protocols are validated via extensive ground testing to ensure DCS risk is reduced to within acceptable limits. Conversely, there exists a paucity of data, no validated models, and limited documentation regarding BIP risk for NASA prebreathe protocols. Flight rules implemented for shuttle and later ISS are based primarily on expert opinion and an assumption of symmetric on-gassing and off-gassing, which would make 2:1 payback a conservative mitigation for a BIP. Assumption of exponential gas kinetics makes late breaks higher risk, or require greater payback, than earlier breaks. Two BIPs have occurred using the current ISS prebreathe protocol, each of which was followed by greater than 2:1 payback and at least 59 minutes of 100% O2 pre-depress. No DCS cases have been reported during shuttle or ISS EVA operations. DISCUSSION. Interim changes were implemented to protect against late breaks during ground and flight prebreathes by ensuring negligible difference in conservatively modeled ppN2 pre-depress compared to nominal validated protocols. Additional documentation and literature review as well as chamber test planning are ongoing with the objective of further ground and flight rule updates and validation of a BIP risk model.

Prebreathe↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simplified Vehicle Control Concept for a Lift Plus Cruise eVTOL Vehicle

Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) vehicles have the potential to enable cost effective Urban Air Mobility (UAM) applications. These concepts may also pose several challenging handling and control problems, which must be addressed prior to safe and efficient urban operations. This paper investigates a simplified vehicle control concept that is designed to address some of these challenges for a conceptual Lift Plus Cruise vehicle. This concept also includes several variations of a transition-to-hover function, designed to assist pilots in capturing and maintaining a stabilized hover prior to landing. The different simplified control architectures for this concept are presented along with preliminary findings. Preliminary results show that the simplified control concept can be effective in assisting pilots to achieve safe and reliable hover landings, and that transition-to-hover functions have the potential of reducing workload while increasing accuracy. A follow on evaluation will be performed in the Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) at NASA Ames Research Center. The planned tests will focus on more operationally representative scenarios, while building upon these operations with additional test cases exploring variations in glidepath angles and wind conditions.

simplified vehicle control↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a Lunar Dust Radiator Performance Test Platform at GRC

The Risk of Radiator Dust Demonstration (R2D2) was designed to assess the effects of lunar regolith on the thermal performance of radiators. A methodology was created based off of DMFlex—a dust mitigation testing platform used for solar arrays—to deposit dust simulant onto radiator prototypes in a thermal vacuum [1]. This completely onsite demonstration allows for quick turnarounds and agile adaptations to the test plan.

R Leibach↗