Results for “refrigerators” — Page 56

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Updating the Thermal Vacuum Chambers at the NASA Johnson Space Center

Chambers A and B are two large thermal vacuum chambers at Johnson Space Center which enable space simulation for unmanned and human-rated missions, respectively. With the resurgence in deep space missions for scientific research and various private commercial ventures, these chambers are expected to be used frequently for at least the next decade. For qualifying the James Webb Space Telescope, upgrades to Chamber A were performed which included the addition of a 12.5 kW refrigeration system with helium shrouds capable of simulating deep space environment and an efficient and reliable LN2 natural flow thermosiphon system for the thermal shield. Continuous improvements since then have focused on ensuring operational readiness by modernizing the data acquisition, recording, controls, and visualization systems for both chambers and clean room. These upgrades will be the focus of this paper. Controlling the Cryochambers was enhanced by moving from a 32-bit SCADA system to a 64-bit architected system. Infrastructural changes involved installing redundant power circuits, adding new servers, network switches, and including load balancing with fail-over between servers to minimize downtime. Instead of distributed servers, 3 redundant servers are used to share configurations. Configurations are now kept in a shared SQL instance making it easy to deploy and maintain. During this upgrade process many sub-systems (PLCs and NI PXI interfaces to sensors) were upgraded from the prior OPC-DA to the more secure OPC-UA protocol. Cryo-system PLCs were updated to allow Ganni cycle floating pressure calculations from any cold box to be sent to any compressor. During the project, the team recreated over 70,000 live data points, 50000 historical data points, and 4000 alarms. Finally, the graphical interfaces were upgraded to support HTML 5 in conjunction shared pages were implemented reducing the total number of webpages by over 75%. These system updates reinvigorated the previous SCADA system which had reached its end of life. The same look and feel was maintained while providing operators with an updated interface to control, troubleshoot, and record. The new system architecture is more robust and easier to maintain creating a path forward to address remaining problem points and implement additional features.

Cody Schaefer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Critical Current Stability of 2G REBCO Tape for Space-Flight HTS Leads

High reliability is an essential requirement for all spaceflight hardware. XRISM, a follow-on mission to the Hitomi x-ray observatory, also uses 2G REBCO tapes as current leads for the superconducting magnets that are a key component of the Adiabatic Demagnetization Refrigerator (ADR) that cools the detector array. While the Hitomi Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS) worked flawlessly in orbit, during its development there were indications that the critical current of its specialized REBCO tapes could degrade over time when exposed to normal-humidity air. To demonstrate that the updates to the XRISM HTS lead assemblies had mitigated this risk, a series of tests were carried out to measure the stability of Ic of dozens of samples over a period greater than the flight assemblies were exposed to air during integration and test. The test rig allowed not only the measurement of the sample Ic, but also the localization of the voltage rise as the current approached Ic. We will discuss the trends in the critical current of the samples, as well as localization of lower Ic regions.

Edgar R. Canavan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Four-Stage Continuous ADR for Space Missions

The cryogenics group at NASA-Goddard has provided adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) for cooling detectors to sub-Kelvin temperatures in space. These ADRs were single-shot devices that produced cooling at 0.05 K for tens of hours before needing to be recycled. Our group also developed a four-stage laboratory ADR system which holds one stage continuously at 0.05K, or colder, while using the other stages to pump heat from the continuous stage up to a heat sink near 4K. This continuous ADR (CADR) provides a useful cooling power that is more than 10 times greater at 0.050 K than what was required by the single-shot space systems. Over the past several years, this system was updated so that it can withstand the rigors of a launch into space. We describe this development process and report its final results.

Continuous ADR↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Four-Stage Continuous ADR for Space Missions

The cryogenics group at NASA-Goddard has provided adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) for cooling detectors to sub-Kelvin temperatures in space. These ADRs were single-shot devices that produced cooling at 0.05 K for tens of hours before needing to be recycled. Our group also developed a four-stage laboratory ADR system which holds one stage continuously at 0.05K, or colder, while using the other stages to pump heat from the continuous stage up to a heat sink near 4K. This continuous ADR (CADR) provides a useful cooling power that is more than 10 times greater at 0.050 K than what was required by the single-shot space systems. Over the past several years, this system was updated so that it can withstand the rigors of a launch into space. We describe this development process and report its final results.

Continuous ADR↗

NASA NTRS2023

Simulations of Zero Boiloff, Densification, and Solidification in a Large-Scale Liquid Hydrogen Tank

The current research utilizes an Energy of Fluid (EOF) approach to develop a finite volume-based Computation Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model to create a benchmark simulation of the densification of liquid hydrogen (LH2) in an experimental Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) tank at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The computational code will incorporate the FLUENT pressure-based model with User Defined Functions (UDF) to implement the EOF model. The enhanced model will solve the energy equation in terms of internal energy and provide temperature and pressure calculations for a given tank geometry. Specifically, a convection term will be added to an already existing code for a more accurate simulation of LH2 densification. However, currently the research focuses on utilizing User Defined Scalars (UDS) with FLUENT to show the built-in solvers are as accurate as the written UDS. This will reduce the computational time down significantly by utilizing an already built in solver for the momentum equation. A custom UDF has been written to solve transient and steady state conduction, and results obtained using the UDF agree with results obtained using the built-in FLUENT solver. Currently, a convection UDF is being added and will be verified using known solutions for solidification and validated with the experimental results from the Cryogenics Test Laboratory (CTL) at KSC for the IRAS densification process.

Colin Philip Mahony↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cryogenics and Fluids at NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center

Abstract: Spacecraft thermal design presents unique thermal and fluid challenges caused by a variety of harsh spacecraft thermal environments. In addition, at cryogenic temperatures (i.e., less than 123 K (-150° C), and sometimes as low as 50 milliKelvin), more challenges arise, such as the increasing importance of mitigating thermal radiation, the effects of coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches between different materials, changes in the physics behavior of materials, and increasing thermodynamic difficulty of lifting heat up large temperature gradients. In this talk, Dr. Rueger will present a broad overview of spacecraft thermal environments; cryogenic design practices; components of interest for the Cryogenics and Fluids Branch (e.g., cryocoolers, adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators, heat switches, and superconducting leads); cryogenic considerations in some current NASA mission examples (e.g., the DragonFly mission to Titan and the X-ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission); and capabilities of the Cryogenics and Fluids Branch at NASA.

Paul Rueger↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Orbit Selection of Cryocooler Drive Frequencies for XRISM/Resolve

The XRISM/Resolve instrument cooling system uses adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) to cool the detectors to 50 mK and two types of cryocoolers to reduce heat load on the He tank, Joule-Thomson and Stirling cryocoolers. Resolve was designed with tunable cryocooler frequencies so that any mechanical interference and its effect on performance could be minimized. Measurements at different cryocooler drive frequencies were used to quantify the interference and narrow the acceptable range of frequency options. For Resolve the choice of cryocooler drive frequencies dramatically influences the instrument performance. Poor choices have been shown to degrade ADR cooling power and degrade the spectroscopic performance of the instrument. However, good choices have been shown to be free of undesirable features, allowing the instrument to satisfy its performance requirements with significant margin. Thus, the choice of drive frequencies is a critical factor for overall instrument performance. The drive frequencies of the Joule-Thomson cooler operating near 52 Hz, and the Stirling coolers operating near 15 Hz were adjusted in three distinct scan sequences to efficiently narrow the candidate frequency options. The frequency choices were based on stability of the 50 mK control thermometer, changes in the ADR demagnetization rate, and changes in detector noise. Scans across the drive frequency range of each cryocooler were performed multiple times during ground testing. Surprisingly, the results were not repeatable across test campaigns and did not conform to any discernable trend, but they were repeatable when remeasured within a single cool-down cycle. The conclusion was that the good/bad drive frequencies changed during Dewar warmup/cooldown, and possibly after mechanical vibration tests. Therefore, the settings could not be finalized before launch, and scans during instrument commissioning were necessary. This paper describes the cryocooler frequency scan measurements and compares the results during instrument commissioning to those performed during ground tests.

Gary A. Sneiderman↗

NASA NTRS2024

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion Capabilities and Applications to Human Exploration

The current focus on lunar exploration and future human missions to Mars is driving in-space propulsion system requirements toward higher performance cryogenic systems with long-duration storage and operational capabilities. Not only do these systems offer higher performance than storable propellant options, but they also enable the potential for in-situ propellant production. Future Mars transit systems are envisioned to utilize either high-thrust nuclear thermal propulsion (with liquid hydrogen propellant), or hybrid systems with both cryogenic chemical systems (likely LOX/CH4) for high acceleration maneuvers and nuclear electric systems for long duration high Isp maneuvers. Exploration architectures based on either of these options require the use of high-performance cryogenic propellants with long-duration storage capabilities for both in-space transportation as well as planetary descent and ascent functions. Current efforts focusing on lunar exploration also rely on cryogenic propellants (either LOX/LCH4 or LOX/LH2) for lunar transit and descent/ascent transportation functions. In-space cryogenic propulsion systems pose numerous technology challenges with respect to long-duration propellant storage and usage, including advanced insulation, tank stratification and pressure management, cryogenic refrigeration to reduce propellant loss through boil off, low leakage cryogenic valves, low temperature liquid acquisition, and cryogenic propellant transfer. NASA has invested in technology development efforts, demonstrating individual technologies and systems-level operations. NASA Marshal Space Flight Center has also invested in multiple test facilities and modular test rigs that allow ground demonstration of numerous integrated technologies and systems concepts of operations. Additional investments have been made to mature analytical capabilities and design tools. These capabilities, both test/demonstration & engineering design/analysis, are available to support internal efforts and industrial partners in the development of exploration and science mission systems. With this increased interest, it is critical to understand the current state of in-space cryogenic propulsion technology, determine risks to its successful application to human exploration, and prepare the engineering, test, and evaluation capabilities to support the ambitious plans for future systems. This paper provides a survey of recent developments in in-space cryogenic propulsion and cryogenic propellant management technologies, as well as facilities and engineering/analytical capabilities ready to support current and future exploration efforts.

Cryogenic propulsion, cryogenic fluid management, ↗

NASA NTRS2024

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion Capabilities and Applications to Human Exploration

The current focus on lunar exploration and future human missions to Mars is driving in-space propulsion system requirements toward higher performance cryogenic systems with long-duration storage and operational capabilities. Not only do these systems offer higher performance than storable propellant options, but they also enable the potential for in-situ propellant production. Future Mars transit systems are envisioned to utilize either high-thrust nuclear thermal propulsion (with liquid hydrogen propellant), or hybrid systems with both cryogenic chemical systems (likely LOX/CH 4 ) for high acceleration manoeuvres and nuclear electric systems for long duration high Isp manoeuvres. Exploration architectures based on either of these options require the use of high-performance cryogenic propellants with long-duration storage capabilities for both in-space transportation as well as planetary descent and ascent functions. Current efforts focusing on lunar exploration also rely on cryogenic propellants (either LOX/LCH 4 or LOX/LH 2 ) for lunar transit and descent/ascent transportation functions. In-space cryogenic propulsion systems pose numerous technology challenges with respect to long-duration propellant storage and usage, including advanced insulation, tank stratification and pressure management, cryogenic refrigeration to reduce propellant loss through boil off, low leakage cryogenic valves, low temperature liquid acquisition, and cryogenic propellant transfer. NASA has invested in technology development efforts, demonstrating individual technologies and systems-level operations. NASA Marshal Space Flight Center has also invested in multiple test facilities and modular test rigs that allow ground demonstration of numerous integrated technologies and systems concepts of operations. Additional investments have been made to mature analytical capabilities and design tools. These capabilities (both test/demonstration & engineering design/analysis) are available to support both internal efforts and industrial partners in the development of exploration and science mission systems. With this increased interest, it is critical to understand the current state of in-space cryogenic propulsion technology, determine risks to its successful application to human exploration, and prepare the engineering, test, and evaluation capabilities to support the ambitious plans for future systems. This paper provides a survey of recent developments in in-space cryogenic propulsion and cryogenic propellant management technologies, as well as facilities and engineering/analytical capabilities ready to support current and future exploration efforts.

Cryogenic propulsion↗

NASA NTRS2024

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion Capabilities and Applications to Human Exploration

The current focus on lunar exploration and future human missions to Mars is driving in-space propulsion system requirements toward higher performance cryogenic systems with long-duration storage and operational capabilities. Not only do these systems offer higher performance than storable propellant options, but they also enable the potential for in-situ propellant production. Future Mars transit systems are envisioned to utilize either high-thrust nuclear thermal propulsion (with liquid hydrogen propellant), or hybrid systems with both cryogenic chemical systems (likely LOX/CH4) for high acceleration maneuvers and nuclear electric systems for long duration high Isp maneuvers. Exploration architectures based on either of these options require the use of high-performance cryogenic propellants with long-duration storage capabilities for both in-space transportation as well as planetary descent and ascent functions. Current efforts focusing on lunar exploration also rely on cryogenic propellants (either LOX/LCH4 or LOX/LH2) for lunar transit and descent/ascent transportation functions. In-space cryogenic propulsion systems pose numerous technology challenges with respect to long-duration propellant storage and usage, including advanced insulation, tank stratification and pressure management, cryogenic refrigeration to reduce propellant loss through boil off, low leakage cryogenic valves, low temperature liquid acquisition, and cryogenic propellant transfer. NASA has invested in technology development efforts, demonstrating individual technologies and systems-level operations. NASA Marshal Space Flight Center has also invested in multiple test facilities and modular test rigs that allow ground demonstration of numerous integrated technologies and systems concepts of operations. Additional investments have been made to mature analytical capabilities and design tools. These capabilities, both test/demonstration & engineering design/analysis, are available to support internal efforts and industrial partners in the development of exploration and science mission systems. With this increased interest, it is critical to understand the current state of in-space cryogenic propulsion technology, determine risks to its successful application to human exploration, and prepare the engineering, test, and evaluation capabilities to support the ambitious plans for future systems. This paper provides a survey of recent developments in in-space cryogenic propulsion and cryogenic propellant management technologies, as well as facilities and engineering/analytical capabilities ready to support current and future exploration efforts.

Cryogenic propulsion, cryogenic fluid management, ↗

NASA NTRS2024

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion Capabilities and Applications to Human Exploration

The current focus on lunar exploration and future human missions to Mars is driving in-space propulsion system requirements toward higher performance cryogenic systems with long-duration storage and operational capabilities. Not only do these systems offer higher performance than storable propellant options, but they also enable the potential for in-situ propellant production. Future Mars transit systems are envisioned to utilize either high-thrust nuclear thermal propulsion (with liquid hydrogen propellant), or hybrid systems with both cryogenic chemical systems (likely LOX/CH 4 ) for high acceleration manoeuvres and nuclear electric systems for long duration high Isp manoeuvres. Exploration architectures based on either of these options require the use of high-performance cryogenic propellants with long-duration storage capabilities for both in-space transportation as well as planetary descent and ascent functions. Current efforts focusing on lunar exploration also rely on cryogenic propellants (either LOX/LCH 4 or LOX/LH 2 ) for lunar transit and descent/ascent transportation functions. In-space cryogenic propulsion systems pose numerous technology challenges with respect to long-duration propellant storage and usage, including advanced insulation, tank stratification and pressure management, cryogenic refrigeration to reduce propellant loss through boil off, low leakage cryogenic valves, low temperature liquid acquisition, and cryogenic propellant transfer. NASA has invested in technology development efforts, demonstrating individual technologies and systems-level operations. NASA Marshal Space Flight Center has also invested in multiple test facilities and modular test rigs that allow ground demonstration of numerous integrated technologies and systems concepts of operations. Additional investments have been made to mature analytical capabilities and design tools. These capabilities (both test/demonstration & engineering design/analysis) are available to support both internal efforts and industrial partners in the development of exploration and science mission systems. With this increased interest, it is critical to understand the current state of in-space cryogenic propulsion technology, determine risks to its successful application to human exploration, and prepare the engineering, test, and evaluation capabilities to support the ambitious plans for future systems. This paper provides a survey of recent developments in in-space cryogenic propulsion and cryogenic propellant management technologies, as well as facilities and engineering/analytical capabilities ready to support current and future exploration efforts.

Cryogenic propulsion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measuring the Liquid Helium Volume on XRISM and Predicting the Liquid Lifetime

The XRISM/Resolve instrument uses an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator (ADR) to cool microcalorimeters to 50 mK. The cryogenic system to support the ADR consists of a liquid helium dewar and 5 cryocoolers that provide a semi-redundant system. Operation of the ADR requires either a liquid helium heat sink at 1.2 K or 4.5 K heat sink provided by a multi-stage cryocooler system. The 5 cryocoolers also provide thermal protection to the liquid helium dewar. To calculate the expected lifetime of the liquid helium system, the liquid helium volume was measured before launch and several techniques were employed to determine on-orbit boil off rate.

Michael Dipirro↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Orbit Selection of Cryocooler Drive Frequencies for XRISM/Resolve

The XRISM/Resolve instrument cooling system uses adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) to cool the detectors to 50 mK and Joule-Thomson and Stirling cryocoolers to reduce heat load on the He tank supporting the ADRs. Resolve was designed with tunable cryocooler drive frequencies so that interference could be avoided. The cryocooler generated micro-vibration changes with drive frequency and that micro-vibration causes interference and degrades instrument performance. Poor drive frequency choices have been shown to dramatically impact ADR cooling power, temperature stability, detector noise, and degrading spectroscopic performance. However, some choices are free of these features, allowing the instrument to satisfy its performance requirements with significant margin. Thus, the choice of drive frequencies is critical to achieving peak instrument performance. The drive frequencies of the Joule-Thomson cooler, near 52 Hz, and the Stirling coolers, near 15 Hz, were adjusted in three scan sequences while measuring interference to narrow candidate frequency options. Choices were based on stability of the 50 mK control thermometer, changes in the ADR demagnetization rate, and changes in detector noise. These scans were performed routinely during ground testing. Surprisingly though, the results were not repeatable after the Dewar was warmed and re-cooled but were repeatable when remeasured during the same test campaign. Since the good/bad drive frequencies change during Dewar warmup/cooldown, and possibly after vibration events, the drive frequencies could not be finalized before launch. This paper describes the cryocooler frequency scan measurements and compares the results during instrument commissioning to those performed during ground tests.

XRISM↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Orbit Selection of Cryocooler Drive Frequencies for XRISM/Resolve

The XRISM/Resolve instrument cooling system uses adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) to cool the detectors to 50 mK and two types of cryocoolers to reduce heat load on the He tank, Joule-Thomson and Stirling cryocoolers. Resolve was designed with tunable cryocooler frequencies so that any mechanical interference and its effect on performance could be minimized. Measurements at different cryocooler drive frequencies were used to quantify the interference and narrow the acceptable range of frequency options. For Resolve the choice of cryocooler drive frequencies dramatically influences the instrument performance. Poor choices have been shown to degrade ADR cooling power and degrade the spectroscopic performance of the instrument. However, good choices have been shown to be free of undesirable features, allowing the instrument to satisfy its performance requirements with significant margin. Thus, the choice of drive frequencies is a critical factor for overall instrument performance. The drive frequencies of the Joule-Thomson cooler operating near 52 Hz, and the Stirling coolers operating near 15 Hz were adjusted in three distinct scan sequences to efficiently narrow the candidate frequency options. The frequency choices were based on stability of the 50 mK control thermometer, changes in the ADR demagnetization rate, and changes in detector noise. Scans across the drive frequency range of each cryocooler were performed multiple times during ground testing. Surprisingly, the results were not repeatable across test campaigns and did not conform to any discernable trend, but they were repeatable when remeasured within a single cool-down cycle. The conclusion was that the good/bad drive frequencies changed during Dewar warmup/cooldown, and possibly after mechanical vibration tests. Therefore, the settings could not be finalized before launch, and scans during instrument commissioning were necessary. This paper describes the cryocooler frequency scan measurements and compares the results during instrument commissioning to those performed during ground tests.

XRISM↗

NASA NTRS2024

Development and Testing of a Superconducting Ground Plane on Transition Edge Sensors

Much of the normal matter in the universe is thought to exist as diffuse hot gas near 1.0 × 10 6 K, which can be detected through its 0.1–0.5 keV line emission. Distinguishing among multiple temperature regions and emission mechanisms along a line of sight requires resolving individual spectral lines in this particularly crowded spectral range. This requires 1–2 eV spectral resolution, which is currently only possible using grating spectrometers, which are suitable only for point sources, but not for the diffuse sources we wish to observe. We aim to measure individual spectral lines in this energy band using transition edge sensors (TES) that have the required 1–2 eV non-dispersive spectral resolution on a sounding rocket. While TESs offer sufficient energy resolution, they are very sensitive to ambient magnetic fields, e.g. from earth’s field and stray fields from the adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator (ADR) that is used to cool TESs to their ∼70 mK transition temperature. Strict space and weight limitations on the sounding rocket payload will limit the use of conventional high permeability magnetic shielding. Further design challenges arise in designing shielding with at least a 45∘ field of view, which is required to maintain a large enough throughput to obtain a useful spectrum on a brief (∼300 s) sounding rocket flight. Here we explore adding a superconducting ground plane (SGP) to the backside of the TES to reduce its field sensitivity and minimize attenuation requirements for the external shielding, which is based on prior work from (de Wit et al. 2022). We tested the feasibility of SGPs with novel materials, geometries, and on larger TESs with different biasing conditions.

Astrophysics↗

NASA NTRS2015

Thermodynamic Analysis of the 3-Stage ADR for the Astro-H Soft X-Ray Spectrometer Instrument

The Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS) instrument on Astro-H will use a 3-stage ADR to cool the microcalorimeter array to 50 mK. In the primary operating mode, two stages of the ADR cool the detectors using superfluid helium at 1.20 K as the heat sink. In the secondary mode, which is activated when the liquid helium is depleted, two of the stages continuously cool the (empty) helium tank using a 4.5 K Joule-Thomson cooler as the heat sink, and the third stage cools the detectors. In the design phase, a high-fidelity model of the ADR was developed in order to predict both the cooling capacity and heat rejection rates in both operating modes. The primary sources of heat flow are from the salt pills, hysteresis heat from the magnets and magnetic shields, and power dissipated by the heat switches. The flight instrument dewar, ADR, detectors and electronics were integrated in mid-2014 and have since undergone extensive performance testing, in part to validate the performance model. This paper will present the thermodynamic performance of the ADR, including cooling capacity, heat rejection to the heat sinks, and various measures of efficiency.

space cryogenics↗

NASA NTRS2015

Thermodynamic Performance of the 3-Stage ADR for the Astro-H Soft X-Ray Spectrometer Instrument

The Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS) instrument[1] on Astro-H[2] will use a 3-stage ADR[3] to cool the microcalorimeter array to 50 mK. In the primary operating mode, two stages of the ADR cool the detectors using superfluid helium at ≤1.20 K as the heat sink[4]. In the secondary mode, which is activated when the liquid helium is depleted, the ADR uses a 4.5 K Joule-Thomson cooler as its heat sink. In this mode, all three stages operate together to continuously cool the (empty) helium tank and singleshot cool the detectors. The flight instrument - dewar, ADR, detectors and electronics - were integrated in 2014 and have since undergone extensive performance testing. This paper presents a thermodynamic analysis of the ADR's operation, including cooling capacity, heat rejection to the heat sinks, and various measures of efficiency.

adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator↗

NASA NTRS1963

THE COMBINED USE OF LIQUID AND GASEOUS HELIUM TO PROVIDE NEAR ACTUAL SPACE ENVIRONMENT

Because of the extremely low density of the gas in Interplanetary space, the most important remaining mode of external heat transfer Is radiation. Studies of this phenomenon in its multiple ramifications are being made presently and will continue In both theoretical and experimental areas. These experiments should, most desirably, be made under conditions which duplicate outer space; otherwise, errors may be introduced which cannot be estimated and will only be discovered in the actual environment. Many facilities are presently available which will reproduce the space environment only approximately[1,2]. The facility which will be discussed here has as its goal, at least for the phenomena connected with radiation heat transfer, the provision of conditions in space as accurately as they are known. The conditions to be reproduced are: (1) the solar electromagnetic radiation spectrum; (2) the low pressure and density of space (∼10-14 mm Hg); and (3) the black radiation sink of space (4°K).

LIQUID HELIUM↗