Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “mathematical physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56

AMPX and SCALE Nuclear Data Libraries for Depletion [Slides]

This presentation touches on AMPX and SCALE nuclear data libraries for depletion. AMPX is a nuclear data processing code suite that generates continuous-energy and multigroup neutron and gamma libraries used in SCALE and VERA, covariance data used in S/U calculations, and depletion, activation and decay origin data for Oak Ridge Isotope Generation code (ORIGEN).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

FY22 NCSP accomplishments for U and Pu Evaluations [Slides]

This presentation covers fiscal year 2022 for Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) accomplishments for Uranium (U) and Plutonium (Pu) evaluations. This presentation includes an overview on plutonium and uranium. Additionally, this presentation covers the inclusion of sub-thermal data for 235 U and the inclusion of LANL ratio capture-to-fission data for 233 U and 235 Pu. The presentation ends with a discussion on 239 Pu Primary fit of Mosby's data as reported and a look at the uncertainty quantification.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

RECENT AMPX developments [Slides]

This presentation covers recent AMPX developments. Presentation highlights include the news of AMPX being openly available, link to source and configure options are included. The interconnections between AMPX and Generalized Nuclear Database Structure (GNDS) are additionally highlighted as well.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Status of ORNL TSL evaluations [Slides]

This presentation is on the status of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Thermal Scattering Evaluation (TSL) evaluations. A focus of this presentation centers on the preliminary work on Teflon and Polyethylene evaluation validation.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Hand Calculation Methods for Nuclear Criticality Safety

This primer provides an overview of the most common hand calculation methods used for criticality safety calculations. The most widely used tools available to a nuclear criticality safety (NCS) practitioner are probably the common Monte Carlo or deterministic criticality safety codes, which can be used to model very complex systems. However, use of these codes can obscure the parameters to which a particular fissile system may be sensitive, whereas the hand calculation methods can be used to delve into the ways each parameter may affect the reactivity of a fissile material system. Furthermore, practitioners must avoid using computer codes as devices that take inputs and simply provide outputs (i.e., a “black box”). Many years ago, pioneers such as Joe Thomas, David Smith, and Hugh Paxton, among others in the field of nuclear criticality safety, took the time before the advent of high-speed desktop computers to create simple hand methods for criticality safety analyses. Some of the methods can be used for single fissile units; others are applicable to fissile units arranged into simple array configurations. This primer discusses the applicability of the various methods, illustrates how they are used, and provides an interpretation of the various results. The NCS practitioner will need to spend time to master the methods that could be most useful; however, they can provide the practitioner with fast and accurate answers to criticality safety problems if they are used correctly and if critical data exist for the problem at hand. Hand calculation methods can be used as a starting point for more advanced calculations, and in many circumstances, they can provide sensitivity and perturbation information more quickly than using a criticality code.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

NCSP Nuclear Data Program [Slides]

This talk covers wide-ranging information on the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) Data Program. The Lecture includes slides on the history and mission of the NCSP along with charts and graphs on budgets from 2005 onwards. This lecture additionally mentions NCSP critical assemblies, differential experiments, and data measurements and evaluation work. The talk concludes with a gaze into NCSP benefits and successes.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Fast On-The-Fly Monte Carlo Sampling of Temperature Dependent Thermal Scattering [Slides]

This presentation highlights the process of developing a thermal data library for MCNP6 to support on-the-fly S(alpha, beta) sampling for temperature ranges applicable to nuclear criticality safety. Advanced on-the-fly (OTF) strategy driven libraries have been developed for six materials based on ENDF/B-VIII.0. Validation of the OTF libraries is being conducted currently.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Enabling URR Self Shielding Functionality in SAMMY [Slides]

This lecture is on enabling Unresolved Resonance Energy Range (URR) self-shielding functionality in SAMMY. This presentation covers Fiscal Year 2022 milestones, and motivations driving this endeavor. This presentation includes slides depicting the current self-shielding correction workflow. Additionally, this presentation includes a look into the doppler broadening issue and the verification of capture. This lecture concludes with envisioned future work.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Short-Depth QAOA circuits and Quantum Annealing on Higher-Order Ising Models (Rev.2)

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) and Quantum Annealing (QA) are quantum algorithms that are both based on the adiabatic theorem and both have the goal of sampling the optimal solution(s) of combinatorial optimization problems. Quantum annealing has been physically instantiated on D-Wave devices using superconducting flux qubits, and QAOA can be programmed on digital gate-model quantum computers such as the programmable superconducting transmon qubits devices of the IBMQ series, for instance ibm washington. QAOA and QA address the same types of problems, but it is unclear how they will scale to large problem sizes and to larger and higher-fidelity quantum computers. In this article, we present a direct comparison between QAOA, one and two rounds, run on all 127 qubits of ibm washington and QA run on D-Wave Advantage system4.1 and Advantage system6.1. The problems which allow for this comparison are random Ising model problems whose connectivity matches the heavy hexagonal lattice topology of ibm washington and the Pegasus graph connectivity of the two D-Wave devices. We create two classes of problem instances for this comparison: one with higher order terms (ZZZ variable interactions), linear terms, and quadratic terms, and a separate problem type with only linear and quadratic terms. Our QAOA circuits are novel and extremely short depth, with a CNOT depth of 6 per round, which allows whole chip usage of ibm washington’s heavy hexagonal lattice and can be applied to future heavy-hex chips. We also test the effectiveness of the error suppression technique digital dynamical decoupling on the QAOA circuits. The QAOA circuits compiled to ibm washington are composed of several thousand circuit instructions, approximately 3, 000 depending on the details of the circuit, making these some the largest quantum circuits ever executed on a digital quantum processor. QAOA and QA are compared against the classical heuristic algorithm of simulated annealing and all problem instances are exactly solved using CPLEX in order to evaluate which samplers, if any, correctly found the ground state solution(s) of the problem instances. We find that (i) QA outperforms QAOA on all problem instances, (ii) QAOA samples the problems better than random sampling, and (iii) QAOA angle computation exhibits clear parameter concentration across the ensemble of Ising models.

127 Qubits↗

Notes on Davis EOS: Historical Perspective, Derivations & Physical Considerations

Davis reactant and product semi-empirical EOS have been introduced in a series of publications by W. C. Davis. These EOS are convenient to use in conjunction with reactive burn models to parameterize the thermodynamic response of quiescent high explosives (HE) and the mixture of HE decomposition products. There is a history of development of these EOS with different formulae and functional forms found in different papers. The goal of the present notes is to track that history, clarify the physical motivation behind various modifications to Davis EOS over time, and collect all the relevant formulae in one place.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

Graph-theoretical KMC Framework for Calculating Effective Diffusivity in TPBAR Components: Effective Diffusivity of Tritium in α-Zr Grain Boundaries

We report the development of a computer simulation tool based on the Graph-theoretical kinetic Monte Carlo (GT-KMC) approach that can be used to simulate diffusion and derive effective diffusivity of species in complex structures of TPBAR components. The GT-KMC framework was implemented in AKSOME, an on-lattice self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo tool developed at PNNL and was previously used to study solute diffusion in metal alloys. This newly developed tool will be helpful in simulating atom diffusion and extracting their effective diffusivities in grain boundaries and interfaces in various TPBAR components. Once benchmarked, the tool will be used to simulate the diffusion of tritium (hydrogen) along grain boundaries in α-Zr using the activation energy barrier data previously obtained from Density Functional Theory calculations.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

An Overview of the Molten Salt Thermal Properties Database–Thermophysical, Version 2.1.1 (MSTDB-TP v.2.1.1)

The current status of the Molten Salt Thermodynamic Database- Thermal Physical (MSTDB-TP) is reported. Building off of MSTDB-TP and through the direction of the Roadmap for thermal property measurement of Molten Salt Reactor systems, MSTDB-TP 2.1.1 has now been released containing a total 448 salt entries (data from 140+independent studies) compared to the original commit of 62, containing thermophysical properties including density, viscosity, thermal conductivity, and heat capacity. Along with the new database release, further advancement of Saline, a C++application programming interface (API), and a graphical user interface (GUI) has facilitated increased user/developer interaction with the database. Furthermore, estimation techniques, first principles calculations (Ab-Initio) and interpolation/extrapolation methods (Redlich-Kister/Muggianu), have shown great promise in the future of thermophysical property determination for filling out compositional spaces and investigating experimentally difficult salts (hazardous/expensive). This report describes the database composition, development and advancement of database tools, and the strategy of advancing and implementing estimation data into future iterations of the database for MSTDB-TP.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Verification of the DIF3D Software to Support Fast Reactor Analysis (Rev. 3)

Ongoing design activities at Argonne National Laboratory are requiring a thorough verification of the Argonne Reactor Computation codes be performed. DIF3D is central to this system. The driver for this effort requires the 3D Cartesian, triangular-Z, and hexagonal-Z core geometry options of DIF3D be verified. Previous work identified the DIF3D features required to be verified to support current design activities, features of which are generally applicable to hexagonal-Z fast reactor designs. The scope of this verification effort includes verifying DIF3D’s ability to correctly translate the user’s model in to DIF3D’s preferred format, verifying that options planned for use have the desired effect, and verifying the correctness of the eigenvalue, fixed-source, forward, and adjoint solvers in DIF3D-FD and DIF3D-VARIANT. This manuscript provides the verification tasks and their results with respect to the features needed for current design activities. Since analytic solutions of the neutron diffusion and transport equations are either limited in scope or not possible, multiple tiers of problems unique to each solver and geometry type were implemented. Each of these tiers tests features independent and complementary arguments for why the separate testing of functionalities is acceptable. Finally, this separate testing was also supplemented with a high-level integral check of each the diffusion and transport capabilities and applicable geometries. To accommodate cases which an analytic solution is not feasible, MCNP6.2 was relied upon to provide a higher-order reference solution. This therefore required that the capabilities within MCNP6.2 which were relied upon for this work are also verified in this work. No MCNP discrepancies were noted in this effort. Note that the MCNP6.2 verification included in this work does not stand as a full verification of MCNP6.2, but merely verifies the features used in verifying DIF3D. The verification effort identified no issues that are debilitating or otherwise impactful to design usage of DIF3D, and thus DIF3D version 11.0, release 3012 is considered verified. As some additional changes have been made to the ARC software since this point all versions between release 3012 and 3266 can be considered verified as version 3253 was used for all updates in this revision. The types of issues that were identified were predominantly in the areas of: unclear documentation, software bugs which were inconsequential to final results, editing options which were ignored in favor of printing more information than requested, bugs in the outputs of intermediate results, or secondary output binary file information which was not present. While not a bug, this verification report also identified that the algorithm used to evaluate the peak fast flux in a nodal transport solution can be quite unreliable due to the methodology used and the location of the peak within the mesh. The authors of the report therefore recommend the usage of the EvaluateFlux software (distributed with ARC) as a more robust alternative noting that DIF3D will properly notify the user when the peaking values it is providing are potentially incorrect.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Athena-I CUBIT Journal Files

The Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP)1 transport code version 6 (also known as MCNP6) has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models embedded into con structive solid geometry (CSG) cells. This feature has been developed for performing calculations of complex geometry models because manually creating CSG models is a time-consuming and error prone process as the complexities of geometries increase. The UM capability was originally designed to work with UM models created with the Abaqus software and ASCII input files that it generates. The MCNP code version 6.0 and later can process UM models formatted as Abaqus input files. Starting with version 6.3, MCNP can also process HDF5 mesh input files. External codes must be used to generate Abaqus input files for MCNP UM calculations. CUBIT, the Sandia National Laboratory automated mesh generation toolkit, can generate a UM model formatted as an Abaqus input file. However, the Abaqus input files exported from CUBIT cannot be used for MCNP simulations because it lacks the proper syntax. A Python script was developed to convert an Abaqus file created by CUBIT to an Abaqus file format that MCNP can process. Creating UM models for complex geometries is not an easy task. The process of creating UM models in CUBIT for MCNP simulations is detailed in. CUBIT provides several user interface options including a graphical user interface (GUI) and a command line interface. A GUI provides an easy way to use CUBIT without learning the CUBIT command syntax. When using CUBIT with either interface option, command lines are written into an ASCII file known as a journal file; this journal file can be edited and archived so that it can be played back in CUBIT to automatically generate a UM model. This report describes the CUBIT journal files of the UM models developed for Athena-I. The Athena platform, an energy-tuning assembly, was developed to spectrally shape the National Ignition Facility (NIF) deuterium-tritium fusion neutron source to a thermonuclear (fusion) plus prompt fission neutron spectrum with capability to act as a short-pulse neutron source. MCNP6 was used for the Athena experiment design analysis.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Earth Filter Mathematica Toolbox V4 User’s Guide: Simplifying, Visualizing and Quick Modeling of All Fission Products from 60 Nuclear Sources

The Earth Filter Mathematica toolbox is a set of user-friendly routines that accurately calculate the ingrowth and decay of any of the 908 fission products for an infinite combination of sources over a large dynamic range and large time scales. This toolbox was developed by Dr. W. P. Brug at Los Alamos National Laboratory and eliminates the need for the user to define and solve differential equations by automatically scanning the ENDF-349 dataset and creating a complete set of differential equations (including delayed neutron branches to both the ground and metastable states) for every fission product. Additionally, this code allows the user to choose the data source for half-lives from several key references (i.e., TORI, IAEA, ENDF or NUDAT.) The complete set of ENDF-349 independent and cumulative fission yields for all 60 isotopic targets and 4 different neutron spectrums are included. This allows nearly any nuclear fission source to be accurately modeled as a linear combination of endpoint sources. The Earth Filter Toolbox has no limit as to the length of split list, and split lists of 5 or more endpoint sources can be quite common.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗