SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Tanks”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Results of Use of Heat Flux Sensors on Liquid Hydrogen Tanks

Heat flux sensors were used to characterize the performance of insulation on the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER), a large-scale test article designed to simulate upper stage cryogenic propellant tank thermal performance in simulated space environments. Usually, the insulation heat loads are derived from calculations removing all other heat sources and attributing the residual heat load to the insulation system. Testing for SHIIVER included the tank being just insulated with spray-on-foam insulation as well as covering the domes with multilayer insulation while leaving the barrel section insulated with spray-on-foam. Heat flux sensors were located at multiple locations on both domes as well as on the barrel section of the tank. Results from the SHIIVER testing using the heat flux sensors are compared to other calculated heat inputs for both liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen testing as a function of tank fill level. Further investigation into the transient nature of the SHIIVER testing including the heat flux sensors provided insight into heat flow patterns that may not have been otherwise seen using temperature sensors and calculated insulation heat loads. While the demonstrated uncertainties in the absolute values in the heat flux sensors are high, the values and the trends match well with other calculation methods. The results of SHIIVER allow for the use of heat flux sensors for measurements of insulation performance and dynamic system thermal response for future applications.

Cryogenic Fluid Management↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Autogenous Pressurization of a Cryogenic Tank Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Well-validated simulation tools can be used to predict long-term storage and transfer of cryogenic propellants, which are essential to NASA’s mission plan to return to the Moon and continue to Mars. Autogenous pressurization of propellant tanks is used to supply rocket engine turbopumps with pressurized liquid fuel and oxidizer, preventing cavitation. Additionally, autogenous pressurization can be used to pressurize propellant tanks to support on-orbit propellant transfer. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate predictive computational models of these processes can be used to reduce system and propellant mass as well as mission risk. Using simulation tools also reduces the cost of analyzing and developing this technology. This study presents a multiphase computational fluid dynamics model capable of simulating autogenous pressurization of a large cryogenic tank using the commercial code STAR-CCM+. Experimental data from a full-scale tank pressurization test under terrestrial gravity is compared to simulation results using transient error metrics. Comparisons show good agreement and give confidence in using these and other validated simulation tools to develop cryogenic pressurization systems.

Cryogenics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Autogenous Pressurization of a Cryogenic Tank using Computational Fluid Dynamics

cryogenics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Results of Use of Heat Flux Sensors on Liquid Hydrogen Tanks

ABSTRACT: Heat flux sensors were used to characterize the performance of insulation on the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER), a large-scale test article designed to simulate upper stage cryogenic propellant tank thermal performance in simulated space environments. Usually, the insulation heat loads are derived from calculations removing all other heat sources and attributing the residual heat load to the insulation system. Testing for SHIIVER included the tank being just insulated with spray-on-foam insulation as well as covering the domes with multilayer insulation while leaving the barrel section insulated with spray-on-foam. Heat flux sensors were located at multiple locations on both domes as well as on the barrel section of the tank. Results from the SHIIVER testing using the heat flux sensors are compared to other calculated heat inputs for both liquid nitrogen and liquid hydrogen testing as a function of tank fill level. Further investigation into the transient nature of the SHIIVER testing including the heat flux sensors provided insight into heat flow patterns that may not have been otherwise seen using temperature sensors and calculated insulation heat loads. While the demonstrated uncertainties in the absolute values in the heat flux sensors are high, the values and the trends match well with other calculation methods. The results of SHIIVER allow for the use of heat flux sensors for measurements of insulation performance and dynamic system thermal response for future applications.

Cryogenic Fluid Management↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Cryogenic Propellant Tank Self-Pressurization by Leveraging Reduced Order Modeling within Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

Validation of cryogenic propellant tank self-pressurization was performed using a hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and reduced order modeling methodology. Data from a liquid hydrogen ground test conducted at the K-site facility at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center was used for the validation effort. Liquid phase dynamics were explicitly resolved with a CFD tool. Vapor phase dynamics were modeled as a point mass that communicated heat from the tank wall to the liquid phase via a boundary condition used at the gas-liquid interface. The method proved to be more accurate, robust, and efficient than explicit resolution of the dynamics using a standard Volume of Fluid (VOF) methodology. The subject pressurization process was found to be heavily dependent upon both the relatively high liquid temperature gradient near the gas-liquid interface and the natural convection flow path. Modeling the gas-liquid interface as an immovable surface eliminated temperature gradient destroying gas-liquid interface velocities observed in VOF simulations, and correspondingly enabled more rapid simulation since interface advection was not allowed. The single phase computational domain also facilitated the ability to demonstrate spatial resolution convergence of natural convection cells within the liquid which significantly impacted the tank pressurization rate. This work was used to demonstrate the critical physics for tank self-pressurization and numerical methodologies that may be used to best resolve those physics. The findings informed development and operation of production level CFD tools used in the Fluid Dynamics Branch at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center.

J. M. Brodnick↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimizing Consumable Gas Tank Usage while Maintaining Emergency Reserves Between Two Pressure Control Systems on Gateway

Two of NASA’s Lunar Space Station (Gateway) modules, the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO) and International Habitat (IHAB) contain a pressure control system (PCS) that is used to supply Nitrogen (N2) and Oxygen (O2) to maintain a habitable environment within Gateway, with only one of the PCS active at any given time. To protect the crew during a contingency that is affecting pressure control and therefore gas consumables, Gateway is required to have sufficient amount of reserve consumable gas across the entire habitable Gateway stack of modules until the gas can be replenished by crew changing out a gas tank. This will occur in a non-contingency setting either on the current mission or on the next mission. To access the stack reserve Gateway features a Nitrogen Oxygen Transfer System (NOTS) between HALO and IHAB that allows each module’s PCS to access the gas tanks in the other module. The PCS designs are different between the two modules and lack interchangeable tanks so which module has active PCS must be accounted for in logistics planning. This paper describes the logistics resupply planning analysis used to determine the most efficient use of the tanks within each PCS, and a method for switching which module is active for PCS while maintaining the stack reserve that preserves enough gas to cover contingency cases.

Rachel Anne Sturtz↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cryogenic Propellant Tank Self-Pressurization and Active Pressure Control

This AIAA Short Course lecture will present an overview of different experiments and computational modeling work that has been done to examine different aspects of pressurization and pressure control of a Cryogenic propellant tank. The lecture will cover several large-scale ground-based liquid Hydrogen cryogenic self-pressurization experiments that were performed at NASA Glenn and NASA Marshall, LN2 Nitrogen autogenous pressurization experiments, pressure control experiments using both subcooled jet mixing and subcooled droplet injection, and experiments that examined pressure drops that occur during tank sloshing. Numerical modeling and simulations that were done in association to these experiments as part of a comprehensive model validation effort will also be presented and discussed. Finally, the results of two simulant fluid pressurization and pressure control microgravity investigations performed as part of the Tank Pressure Control Experiment (TCPE) and The Zero-Boil-Off Tank (ZBOT)Experiment will also be presented.

Propellant Management↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Predicting Tank Self-Pressurization in the Ground-Based K-Site Experiment

A two-phase CFD model for self-pressurization of a cryogenic storage tank partially filled with liquid hydrogen is presented using the Volume-Of-Fluid approach for representing the phase boundary and the associated interfacial heat, mass and momentum transfer between the liquid and the vapor regions. The CFD model is validated against self-pressurization experiment performed in the K-site flightweight hydrogen storage tank at NASA Glenn Research Center. Laminar and turbulent simulations together with conjugated heat transfer analysis are performed. Effects of turbulence, as well as tank wall conduction are presented and discussed. Predicted tank pressures and fluid temperatures are compared with the experimental data at two different heat loads for validating the CFD model.

phase change↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Cryogenic Propellant Tank Filling using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

Validation of cryogenic propellant tank filling was performed using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver Loci/STREAM-VoF. The validation effort helped identify modeling methodologies that enable NASA to best support its partners in both launch pad and on-orbit filling operations. Data from liquid hydrogen ground tests filled via jet injection were used for the validation effort which include a sensitivity to initial tank wall temperature. Initially hot walls are expected to yield rapid evaporation and possibly boiling. A Volume of Fluid (VoF) methodology was used to capture the gas-liquid interface. Rapid breakup of the liquid jet was observed in simulation results as liquid evaporated and expanded. Inflowing liquid transitioned to a contiguous jet as tank temperatures decreased, gas pressure increased, and saturation conditions at the incoming liquid temperature were approached. The final phase of filling was distinguished by rapid gas pressure rise due to a higher rate of gas volume compression than condensation at the liquid surface. Key physics of propellant tank filling were captured in the computational predictions, and opportunities for added simulation robustness and efficiency in future modeling efforts were identified.

CFM↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Cryogenic Propellant Tank Filling using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

The Fluid Dynamics Branch at MSFC has positioned itself to support a wide range of customers in need of Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) analysis. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool used for all manner of internal and external propulsion applications has been extended and refined to better model cryogenic propellant storage and tanking operations. Through the CFM Portfolio project, several validation activities were initiated. Validation of propellant tank self-pressurization, autogenous pressurization, slosh-induced ullage collapse, and jet-induced mixing all aid in defining model accuracy. The on-going validation effort has enabled confident application of the tool to in-line design and evaluation of CFM hardware and operations. Recent project support included defining the impact of in-space slosh dynamics on reaction control system mass for Space Launch System (SLS) upper stages. Propellant mixing strategies were defined to improve performance of a thermal vent system for a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) partner. Design support of in-space maneuvers, tank hardware, and autogenous pressurization operations was also provided through Human Landing System (HLS) collaboration work. The branch has engaged the CFM community to share recent findings and capabilities through several forums including conferences, technical interchange meetings, and workshops. Development and demonstration of CFM modeling capabilities continues in this work on the no-vent fill of propellant tank in micro-gravity to meet the needs of NASA and its industry partners in the endeavor to sustainably reach the Moon and beyond.

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Predicting Tank Self-Pressurization in the Ground-Based K-Site Experiment

A two-phase CFD model for self-pressurization of a cryogenic storage tank partially filled with liquid hydrogen is presented using the Volume-Of-Fluid approach for modeling two-phase flow, as well as interfacial heat, mass and momentum transfer between the liquid and the vapor regions. The CFD model is validated against self-pressurization experiment performed using the K-site flightweight hydrogen storage tank at NASA Glenn Research Center1. Laminar and turbulent simulations are performed together with conjugated heat transfer analysis. Effects of turbulence, the value of accommodation coefficient used for predicting phase change rates, as well as tank wall geometry are presented and discussed. Predicted tank pressures, fluid and wall temperatures are compared with the experimental data at 49% fill level and two different heat loads for validating this CFD model.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Predicting Tank Self-Pressurization in the Ground-Based K-Site Experiment

A two-phase CFD model for self-pressurization of a cryogenic storage tank partially filled with liquid hydrogen is presented using the Volume-Of-Fluid approach for modeling two-phase flow, as well as interfacial heat, mass and momentum transfer between the liquid and vapor regions. The CFD model is validated against self-pressurization experiment performed using the K-site flightweight hydrogen storage tank at NASA Glenn Research Center 1 . Laminar and turbulent simulations are performed together with conjugate heat transfer analysis. Effects of turbulence, the value of accommodation coefficient used for predicting phase change rates, as well as tank wall geometry are presented and discussed. Predicted tank pressures, fluid and wall temperatures are compared with the experimental data at 49% fill level and two different heat loads for validating this CFD model.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

DOE OSTI2013

Methods for heel retrieval for tanks C-101, C-102, and C-111 at the Hanford Site

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the prospects of using bulk waste characteristics to determine the most appropriate heel retrieval technology. If the properties of hard to remove heels can be determined before bulk retrieval, then a heel retrieval technology can be selected before bulk retrieval is complete. This would save substantially on sampling costs and would allow the deployment of the heel retrieval technology immediately after bulk retrieval. The latter would also accelerate the heel removal schedule. A number of C-farm retrievals have been fully or partially completed at the time of this writing. Thus, there is already substantial information on the success of different technologies and the composition of the heels. There is also substantial information on the waste types in each tank based on historical records. Therefore, this study will correlate the performance of technologies used so far and compare them to the known waste types in the tanks. This will be used to estimate the performance of future C Farm heel retrievals. An initial decision tree is developed and employed on tanks C-101, C-102, and C 111. An assumption of this study is that no additional characterization information would be available, before or after retrieval. Note that collecting additional information would substantially increase the probability of success. Deploying some in-situ testing technologies, such as a water lance or an in-situ Raman probe, might substantially increase the probability of successfully selecting the process conditions without having to take samples from the tanks for laboratory analysis.