Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “MITIGATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Mitigation for Removal of Building 01-103 in the Area 1 Subdock, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

Building 01-103, the Drill Bit Repair Building was originally recorded as SHPO Resource No. B18848 in 2020 during an architectural survey of the Area 1 Subdock (Collins et al. 2022). It was recommended individually eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criteria A and C and contributing to the significance of the Area 1 Subdock Historic District. The SHPO concurred with these determinations in a letter dated April 29, 2022 (Reed 2022). The Drill Bit Repair Building retains all seven aspects of integrity. The location, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association have not changed since its original construction. The design was modified slightly in 1996 with the addition of a removable and non-destructive chain-link fence. Nearby buildings 01-101 and 01-102 were removed (Collins and Menocal 2020) but the other buildings and storage yards remain. Therefore, the integrity of setting has been changed, but not to the degree that the building no longer conveys its significance (see Figures 4 and 5 for comparison). Building 01-103 was constructed in 1985 to coincide with the relocation of the Area 3 Subdock to Area 1. The design for the new Subdock provided a centralized cluster of buildings surrounded by two large storage yards. The buildings included administrative and engineering office space, warehouses, a radiograph building, and Building 01-103 as the drill bit maintenance and repair building, among others. The Drill Bit Repair Building was critical to the success of underground nuclear testing and is eligible under Criterion A for its contribution to broad patterns of history by maintaining specially designed equipment for underground nuclear testing at the NNSS. It is also eligible under Criterion C as it is the only recorded example of a facility built specifically for the maintenance of big-hole drill bits on the NNSS. As it retains both significance and integrity, it remains individually eligible under Criteria A and C. In addition to its individual significance, the Drill Bit Repair Building also contributes to the significance of the Area 1 Subdock Historic District as a representative of a big-hole drilling support facility necessary for underground nuclear testing. The building and the equipment therein were designed specifically for testing at the NNSS, where much of the early technology and methods for big-hole drilling were developed. Its removal will result in not only the demolition of a contributing element but also a change in the physical features of the district’s setting that contribute to its historic significance. The change in setting will diminish the district’s integrity. However, the district still contains numerous examples of other buildings constructed for the purpose of supporting big-hole drilling and remains eligible under Criteria A and C.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mitigation for Removal of Building 01-202681 in the Main Storage Yard of the Area 1 Subdock, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

The Main Storage Yard was originally recorded as SHPO Resource No. S2772 in 2020 during an architectural survey of the Area 1 Subdock (Collins et al. 2022). It was recommended individually eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criteria A and C and as contributing to the significance of the potential Area 1 Subdock Historic District. The SHPO concurred with these determinations in a letter dated April 29, 2022 (Reed). The Main Storage Yard retains all seven aspects of integrity. The location, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association have not changed since the original construction. Since the purpose of the yard is to maintain storage equipment that is actively being used, the design and feeling will change each time equipment is moved. Such actions reinforce the integrity of design and feeling. Buildings 01-101 and 01-102 were removed (Collins and Menocal 2020), but the other buildings and storage yard remain. Therefore, the setting has been changed, but not to the degree that the Main Storage Yard no longer conveys its significance (see Figures 4 and 5 for comparison). The Main Storage Yard was designed to facilitate the relocation of the Area 3 Subdock to Area 1 in 1985. The design for the overall Subdock provided a centralized cluster of buildings surrounded by two large storage yards. While the North Storage Yard largely serves as overflow storage, the Main Storage Yard holds the majority of drill rigs and drilling equipment needed to support big hole drilling. The Main Storage Yard and its contents were essential elements of the nuclear testing drilling program on the NNSS thus making it eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A for its contribution to broad patterns of history by storing specially designed equipment for underground nuclear testing at the NNSS. It is also eligible under Criterion C as it is an engineered landscape that now serves as an open-air repository of drilling technology and nuclear testing. In addition to its individual significance, the Main Storage Yard also contributes to the significance of the Area 1 Subdock Historic District as it showcases a variety of big-hole drilling equipment, support facilities, and warehouses that were specially designed for nuclear testing at the NNSS. Despite the demolition of two contributing elements to date, the district still contains numerous examples of other facilities with the purpose of supporting big-hole drilling; therefore, the district still remains eligible under Criteria A and C.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Direct Air Capture (DAC) Deployment Assessment in Deep Mitigation Pathways Toward 2075 in the U.S.: MARKAL-NETL Modeling Results

Presentation made at the 2024 Annual International Pittsburgh Energy and Carbon Management Conference (PECMC) OCTOBER 7 - 9, 2024 (virtual). The presentation summarized the methodology and results from energy market scenario analyses of the deployment of Direct Air Capture technologies under net-zero CO2 requirements by 2050. The results showed strong deployment of DAC under all scenarios, with increased value of the technology when other CO2 reduction pathways were unavailable or minimized.

Victor, Nadejda↗
DOE OSTI2025

Evaluating GHG Mitigation Potential from ESPC Projects [Slides]

This report explores the impact of implemented ESPC projects on the projected greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions in the U.S. buildings sector, and the associated projected annual cost savings and marginal abatement costs. It is important to investigate the role that energy retrofits can play in achieving GHG emission reduction targets given the use of ESPC by public agencies to reduce emissions from energy use in addition to the historical use of ESPC to to achieve cost/energy savings and ancillary benefits (e.g., addressing deferred maintenance, aging infrastructure, etc.). The analysis draws from LBNL’s eProject Builder (ePB) database, which contains approximately 3,000 energy retrofit projects implemented by energy service companies (ESCOs), mostly energy savings performance contract (ESPC) projects. This is the first report to model GHG emission reductions from ongoing ESPC projects in the U.S public sector based on ePB project data. It is intended for policymakers, federal, state and local government officials and other potential ESPC customers, the ESCO industry, researchers, and other energy policy professionals.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Report series: finding of effect and mitigation documentation for the mercury solar photovoltaic array and battery energy storage system, area 23, nevada national security site, nye county, nevada

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) proposes to install solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation arrays and an associated battery energy storage system (BESS) for the town of Mercury at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) in Nye County, Nevada (Figure 1). The purposes of the development of this facility are to support long-term efforts to modernize Mercury and to provide energy-resilient infrastructure and address climate adaptation needs. Because it is within the boundary of the Mercury Historic District (MHD), it is subject to the terms of the Programmatic Agreement Between the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding Modernization and Operational Maintenance of the Nevada National Security Site, at Mercury in Nye County, Nevada (hereafter referred to as the Mercury PA). An identification and evaluation report prepared for this undertaking determined that a contributing element to the MHD, the Mercury airstrip (26NY15777), is within the APE (Haynes 2024). The Mercury airstrip was developed following the closure of Camp Desert Rock in 1957 and used until late 1963 or 1964 when the Camp Desert Rock Airport was renovated, and the Mercury Bypass road constructed. The town of Mercury and the immediate surrounding area have been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) as the MHD (SHPO Resource No. D230) under Criteria A and C for its importance in supporting nuclear testing and scientific research from 1951 through 1992 (Reed 2019). Originally recorded in 2016, 26NY15777 was determined individually not eligible for listing in the NRHP because it lacked sufficient integrity to convey its significance (Palmer 2016). It was subsequently determined in 2018 to be a contributing element of the MHD in an architectural survey of the district (Palmer 2018) and identified in Appendix C of the Mercury PA as a Category I contributing element. However, as per Stipulation IV.B.2, because the airstrip had already been formally evaluated and determined not to be individually eligible for the NRHP in consultation with the SHPO, this categorization was an error. NNSA/NFO reported this to the SHPO in Haynes 2024 and the SHPO concurred on June 11, 2024 (Reed). Accordingly, the airstrip is a Category II Property for the purposes of complying with the Mercury PA. The Mercury airstrip is a historic property for the purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and subject to the stipulations of the Mercury PA.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Parylene-N Coatings of Thin Foils for the Mitigation of Neutral Contaminant Desorption and Plasma Formation

Previous experiments utilizing the planar MITL foil platform (T.J. Smith et al. RSI 2021) on the 1-MA, 100-ns Mykonos facility have shown neutral atomic and molecular hydrogen in the gap after rapid heating of the foil surfaces before breakdown. Additionally, previous attempts at using parylene-N as a coating for power flow surfaces on the 1-MA, 100-ns Zebra facility have shown tamping of the electrothermal instability at thicknesses of 50-60 μm (T.M. Hutchinson et al. Phys. Rev. E 2018).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Determining Drying Conditions to Mitigate Hanford Transfer Line Corrosion

Hanford Site Background • Hanford site located in Washington State and established in 1943: 1460 km2 • Since 1988 the site has been engaged in a comprehensive environmental clean-up effort. Waste Tanks • 177 underground tanks with 56 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste and chemical waste in 150 Single Shell Tanks (SSTs) and 27 Double Shell Tanks (DSTs)

Shukla, Pavan K. [Savannah River National Laborato↗
DOE OSTI2025

Mitigating field emission in SSR2 cryomodules for PIP-II

The SSR2 cavities for PIP-II have consistently been affected by field emission since the first cold tests with the unity coupler. A comprehensive root cause analysis was conducted to investigate the origin of this issue and to identify the fabrication, processing, and handling factors that have the greatest impact on field emission onset. New techniques were developed and effectively implemented to achieve field emission-free SSR2 cavities. In addition, effort was dedicated both to relating the radiation level measured at the test stand with the expected levels in the LINAC tunnel and to understand the evolution of field emission through the assembly steps. The challenge of overcoming field emission also led to a reassessment of design choices, enhancing our understanding of their effects on cavity performance.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Mitigate Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) in High-strength Al Castings (CRADA 508)

Development of high strength, corrosion resistant, aluminum alloys is important to a number of industries, including automotive, aerospace, power, etc. Understanding how processing methods such as casting, chemistry, additives and recycle content affect an alloy’s microstructure and performance in real world environments is crucial to their implementation. One major concern is how the repeated exposure to saline solutions can be detrimental to the structural integrity of aluminum alloy components. This study was undertaken as a collaboration between Eck Industries and PNNL to investigate the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) and corrosion behavior of aluminum alloys. This work examines the SCC response of three different materials set. First is cast A206 Al alloy produced by three different casting techniques (i.e., permanent mold, and sand casting with and without chill) and with or without nano forming additives as potential grain refiners. The second materials set comprises Al alloy tubes extruded by PNNL’s ShAPE process and produced using raw material with three different ratios of twitch and pre-consumer Al 6061 scrap. Finally, the third materials set comprises two Al-Si-Mg-Fe alloys with controlled Si% and Fe% to mimic recycle grade Al alloys. The corrosion behavior of these materials was characterized using SCC testing and scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) technique; mechanical behavior was characterized using tensile testing, and microstructure was characterized using optical and electron microscopy techniques. Of the A206 Al alloys, the samples with nano forming additives performed poorly compared to those without. The best SCC performance (i.e. least degradation in mechanical properties) was demonstrated by A206 alloy sand cast with chill while the permanent mold sample showed the worst SCC performance. The SECCM was performed on A206 alloy sand cast with chill to understand the effect of microstructure and determine the location-dependent corrosion properties on grain boundaries (GB) and inside grains (IG) on the sample. The corrosion potential and current measured on GB and IG at various points on the sample established that the GB locations are more cathodic and corrosive than the IG locations. Further work needs to be conducted to investigate the mechanisms behind the observed dependence of SCC on casting technique and nano forming additives. Among the ShAPE extruded tubes, SECCM data suggests the decreasing order of tendency to corrode as follows: 100% twitch > 75% twitch > 50% twitch. Finally, both variants of the Al-Si-Mg-Fe alloys showed a large volume fraction of Fe- and Si-containing intermetallics and additional work is needed to discern differences in their respective corrosion responses. In summary, correlating local electrochemical behavior (e.g. via SECCM) with micro/nanostructure, in conjunction with bulk mechanical behavior, can help identify the right fabrication method and alloy chemistry to minimize SCC issues in Al alloys.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mitigating Stranded Asset Risks to Utility Customers: an Exploration of Securitization and Retiring Coal Generation

Coal generation currently accounts for approximately 19.5 percent of electricity generated in the United States, down from 51.7 percent of the generation mix in 2000. In 2023, the EIA expects 8.9 gigawatts (GW) of planned retirements of coal-fired capacity. Many of the coal-fired power plant retirements that have already occurred or are planned for the next decade will be plants that have not yet reached the end of their useful life, and are therefore not fully depreciated. Ensuring that utility customers do not face an undue burden in paying for these stranded assets will become an increasingly important issue over the next few years for PUCs overseeing the safety, reliability, and affordability of investor-owned utility service. This report reviews the role that securitization can play in reducing the costs associated with stranded assets due to early coal plant retirements.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2025

Renewable Hydrogen to Vehicle (RH2V) – Operation Verification and Risk Mitigation Studies: Original Agreement (Modification 0) (CRADA Final Report)

Toyota has announced plans for commercial fuel cell vehicle deployment in 2015. To fully realize the benefits of fuel cell vehicles (zero emission with no performance loss in terms of vehicle range and capability), hydrogen produced efficiently from renewable sources is necessary. Most of the hydrogen fueling stations today utilize hydrogen reformed from natural gas (produced onsite or delivered). This enables more stations to be deployed cost-effectively within a network. Producing and using cost-effective renewable hydrogen in fuel cell vehicles will enable realization of the full potential. A viable option of green hydrogen that reliably delivers on the full suite of benefits for Toyota fuel cell vehicle drivers is needed. NREL is in a unique position to analyze and optimize renewable hydrogen production scenarios using the Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF), a facility that is specifically designed to evaluate renewable energy integration technologies. As the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) primary national laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development, NREL has extensive knowledge of photovoltaic systems as well as alternative renewable technologies for efficient and reliable production of green hydrogen.

08 HYDROGEN↗