Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FLASH”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hunting Energetic Radiation from Thunderstorms

The true nature and mechanisms of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) have remained mysterious since their discovery in the 1990s. Despite decades of detections, their violent origins and irregularity make them particularly difficult to observe directly. Combined with the wide range of measured characteristics, this has kept the details of these energetic events in the dark. The recent ALOFT (Airborne Lightning Observatory for FEGS and TGFs) campaign has undertaken the challenge of hunting these elusive flashes from an airborne platform. This was performed by the NASA ER-2 aircraft in July 2023 equipped with a host of meteorological, electric field, and gamma-ray instruments to study intense tropical thunderstorms and their connection to gamma-ray production. Here we present on the campaign's success alongside some of its exciting preliminary results.

Lightning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GOES-16 GLM Observations for National Climate Assessments

The heating of air by a lightning discharge, followed by rapid cooling, leads to the production of lightning nitrogen oxides (“LNO x ” for brevity, where NO x = NO + NO 2 ). The LNO x are important trace gases because they control the concentration of the greenhouse gas ozone (O 3 ) and the highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH). In fact, LNO x are the most important source of NO x in the upper troposphere at tropical and subtropical latitudes, and climate is most sensitive to O 3 in the upper troposphere. Since lightning indirectly influences the Earth's climate, it is a key variable to monitor in National Climate Assessment (NCA) studies. In this work, GOES-16 Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) flash counts and flash optical properties (i.e., optical energy, optical area, …) that are linked to LNO x production are examined in detail for the continental United States analysis region, and are compared with ground-based National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) observations.

Lightning↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

3D Lightning Geolocation With the CubeSpark Constellation

The new CubeSpark mission concept is being developed as a constellation of up to six satellites for high-resolution 3D lightning mapping. Each satellite in low-Earth orbit (LEO) will use optical and radio frequency (RF) sensors to geolocate individual sources from lightning flashes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential accuracies and feasibilities of RF-based geolocation methods. This is done using a robust simulation framework to accurately depict the ionosphere’s effect on propagating RF signals, using their arrival times at each station to reconstruct source locations. We identified the primary sources of error as geometric, ionospheric, and instrumental. These are each analyzed to determine their quantitative effect on geolocation uncertainty. CubeSpark’s science objectives include mapping thundercloud charge regions and even individual flash channel structure for applications across a wide range of fields from climatology to hydrology. These applications require geolocation accuracy better than 1-2 km in each dimension, thus special care must be taken to optimize constellation design, minimize the main sources of error, and maximize CubeSpark’s potential. The algorithms developed in this study show promising results, with large regions having both horizontal and vertical uncertainties less than 1 km. After the removal of the Lightning Imaging Sensor from the International Space Station, an observational gap has been left for lightning observers from LEO. It therefore becomes increasingly vital to evaluate and improve on the current state of lightning mapping to prepare for the next generation of 3D lightning geolocation.

lightning↗
NASA NTRS2024

Thermal Inspection of Low Emissivity Surfaces Using a Pulsed Light Emitting Diodes (PLED) Heat Source

Thermal inspections of a structure typically utilize a flash or quartz lamp heat source located on the same side of an infrared camera. The heat source provides light energy for heating while the infrared camera measures the surface transient temperature response. The inspection can be difficult for low emissivity surfaces for several reasons. First, the high intensity light can reflect off the surface and cause “burn-in” to the camera’s detector. The “burn-in” can take time for the sensors to recover and potentially damage the detector. Secondly, the heat source after pulsing, has a transient cool down component. The cool down component can be reflected and therefore superimposed over the structure’s thermal response which can cause an error (false defect indications) in the inspection. Lastly, the heat source is spectrally broad and therefore while heating, infrared components of the heat source can produce non-uniformity in the measured temperature field. Typically for the inspection of reflective surfaces, paint or other emissivity enhancing coatings are applied before inspection. In this paper, a pulsed light emitting diodes (PLED) heat source is used. The PLED heat source is spectrally narrow, contained within the visible band, and therefore not detectable by the infrared camera. The PLED heat source is configured to reduce any transient cool down components that could produce false defect indications. The PLED thermal inspections are compared to commercially available flash thermography inspections on unpainted aluminum samples with simulated corrosion and additively manufactured Ti-6AL-4V metal specimens.

thermal nondestructive evaluation↗
NASA NTRS2024

Thermal Inspection of Low Emissivity Surfaces Using a Pulsed Light Emitting Diodes (PLED) Heat Source

Thermal inspections of a structure typically utilize a flash or quartz lamp heat source located on the same side of an infrared camera. The heat source provides light energy for heating while the infrared camera measures the surface transient temperature response. The inspection can be difficult for low emissivity surfaces for several reasons. First, the high intensity light can reflect off the surface and cause “burn-in” to the camera’s detector. The “burn-in” can take time for the sensors to recover and potentially damage the detector. Secondly, the heat source after pulsing, has a transient cool down component. The cool down component can be reflected and therefore superimposed over the structure’s thermal response which can cause an error (false defect indications) in the inspection. Lastly, the heat source is spectrally broad and therefore while heating, infrared components of the heat source can produce non-uniformity in the measured temperature field. Typically for the inspection of reflective surfaces, paint or other emissivity enhancing coatings are applied before inspection. In this paper, a pulsed light emitting diodes (PLED) heat source is used. The PLED heat source is spectrally narrow, contained within the visible band, and therefore not detectable by the infrared camera. The PLED heat source is configured to reduce any transient cool down components that could produce false defect indications. The PLED thermal inspections are compared to commercially available flash thermography inspections on unpainted aluminum samples with simulated corrosion and additively manufactured Ti-6AL-4V metal specimens.

thermal nondestructive evaluation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

3D Lightning Geolocation with the CubeSpark Constellation

The new CubeSpark mission concept is being developed as a constellation of up to six satellites for high-resolution 3D lightning mapping. Each satellite in low-Earth orbit (LEO) will use optical and radio frequency (RF) sensors to geolocate individual sources from lightning flashes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential accuracies and feasibilities of RF-based geolocation methods. This is done using a robust simulation framework to accurately depict the ionosphere’s effect on propagating RF signals, using their arrival times at each station to reconstruct source locations. We identified the primary sources of error as geometric, ionospheric, and instrumental. These are each analyzed to determine their quantitative effect on geolocation uncertainty. CubeSpark’s science objectives include mapping thundercloud charge regions and even individual flash channel structure for applications across a wide range of fields from climatology to hydrology. These applications require geolocation accuracy better than 1-2 km in each dimension, thus special care must be taken to optimize constellation design, minimize the main sources of error, and maximize CubeSpark’s potential. The algorithms developed in this study show promising results, with large regions having both horizontal and vertical uncertainties less than 1 km. After the removal of the Lightning Imaging Sensor from the International Space Station, an observational gap has been left for lightning observers from LEO. It therefore becomes increasingly vital to evaluate and improve on the current state of lightning mapping to prepare for the next generation of 3D lightning geolocation.

lightning↗
NASA NTRS2024

Simulated Feasibility of 3D Lightning Mapping from Space

In addition to the awe it inspires, lightning can illuminate the microphysical processes hidden away within deep convection. The current generation of space-based lightning mapping uses mostly 2D optical imaging to connect overall flash characteristics to their parent storm dynamics, but are missing a dimension’s worth of information. With lightning now classified as an essential climate variable, future spaceborne mappers will need improved capabilities to take advantage of the 3D structure of lightning flashes to support meteorological and climate modeling. We report here on a study of the feasibility of implementing a radio frequency (RF)–based network of satellites for 3D lightning mapping in high resolution from low Earth orbit (LEO). Lightning sources are simulated using existing tools of the Lightning Mapping Array (LMA), modified for orbital detection, and spatially reconstructed using a Levenberg-Marquardt geolocation algorithm to assess sources of uncertainty in these solutions. We analyze the benefits and limitations of this approach compared to existing orbital and ground-based methods. Results of this study show that lightning can be mapped in 3D with a vertical location accuracy better than 2 km using as few as five satellites in LEO capable of measuring the time-of-arrival of impulsive RF signals in the very high frequency (VHF) band. The consequence of this study is that high-resolution, spaceborne 3D mapping of lightning is achievable across most of the globe, having crucial implications for our understanding of not only lightning, but also severe weather development, climate science, and more.

CubeSpark↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Oblique Eccentric Gaze Holding Evokes Larger Horizontal than Vertical Rebound Nystagmus

Rebound nystagmus (RN) has been used to probe the adaptation mechanisms of the gaze holding system. This type of nystagmus is invoked upon returning to central gaze after prolonged fixation at an eccentric point and it is thought to reflect a set-point adaptation of the neural integrator circuit. Previous studies have only observed horizontal RN after horizontal eccentric gaze holding, reflecting adaptation of the horizontal neural integrator. The current study seeks to elucidate how eccentric gaze at oblique target locations, where there are equal horizontal and vertical components, affects the characteristics of the resulting RN. For a given trial, subjects were instructed to fixate a central flashing target for 5 seconds, then fixate an eccentric continuous target for 30 seconds at one of six possible locations (4 oblique and 2 horizontal targets), and finally fixate centrally at a flashing target for 15 seconds where RN is assessed. Binocular eye-tracking data were collected at 250 Hz. Slow-phase velocity (SPV) or the slow drift part of the nystagmus was used to quantify the magnitude of RN. Subjects showed elevated SPV in the horizontal component (2.3 deg/s), but less in the vertical component (1.4 deg/s) after oblique eccentric gaze holding, reflecting an oblique RN. The smaller vertical RN may reflect a different behavior of the horizontal and vertical neural integrators which are anatomically separated. Under the current paradigm, oblique gaze holding would appear to have a smaller effect on adaptation of the vertical integrator than in the horizontal integrator. Further investigation is needed to establish the reference frame of this distinction between the horizontal and vertical integrator circuits.

gaze holding↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Next Generation of Lightning Mapping

With the removal of the Lightning Imaging Sensor from the International Space Station, a gap has opened in lightning observation from low-Earth orbit. The CubeSpark mission concept aims to fill this role using a constellation of satellites with radio frequency (RF) sensors and bi-spectral optical imagers to observe lightning flashes more completely and with better resolution than is currently possible from space. In this study, we assess the feasibility of multiple methods of not only mapping lightning locations, but also inferring 3D flash and charge structures. This is done primarily by simulating lightning emissions in the very high frequency (VHF) band, modeling their propagation to orbital sensors, and reconstructing their locations using time-of-arrival (TOA) minimization algorithms. Constellation shape, number, and atmospheric conditions are varied in order to quantify the three main sources of geolocation error: geometric, ionospheric, and instrumental effects. The promising results presented here demonstrate 3D resolution better than 1-2 km in many cases, enabling new applications in meteorology and climate sciences.

CubeSpark↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Diurnal Cycles of Intense Thunderstorms As Seen By Satellites

Spaceborne sensors cannot directly measure aspects of severe weather occurring at ground-level. Tools from Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) can be related to storm intensity and likelihood of severe weather. Visible and Infrared (GEO and LEO) measure cloud-top properties and horizontal structure. Some properties have empirical correlations with severe weather occurrence. Precipitation Radar (LEO) measures vertical profile of reflectivity related to particle size and concentration, but attenuates (2.2-cm and shorter wavelengths) well above the surface in intense thunderstorms. Lightning mappers (GEO and LEO) measure lightning flash rates and flash properties, which relate to updraft properties including size and vigor. SAR and optical sensors can detect damage paths on the surface after a storm has passed. (Depends on the vegetation type and maturity.)

Daniel J Cecil↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dependence of Lightning Cloud-Top Optical Emissions on Channel Characteristics Using Boltzmann Radiative Transfer Modeling

With an estimated global flash rate of 46 lightning per second, a significant amount of lightning nitrogen oxides (LNOx) are produced within the climate system. In turn, LNOx affect the concentrations of ozone (O 3 , an important greenhouse gas) as well as the very reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH, that affect all greenhouse gases). Thus, space-based estimation of LNOx is highly sought [Koshak 2017; Koshak et al. (2015)]. Total lightning channel length, L , is a proxy for the total flash energy (and hence LNOx production). Geostationary lightning mappers provide cloud-top 2D views of the diffuse (i.e., blurry) optical images of lightning, thereby making it difficult to determine L (and other channel features). Transient Boltzmann radiative transfer modeling is applied here to investigate the dependence of the spatio-temporal pattern of cloud-top lightning optical emissions on L and other channel characteristics (e.g., orientation, propagation direction, amplitude, location, ...).

William J Koshak↗
NASA NTRS1965

An expansion of the EV system

Expansion of additive value system to include filter factors and transmittance for high brightness electronic flash photography

FLASH↗
NASA NTRS2006

Microdose Induced Data Loss on Floating Gate Memories

Heavy ion irradiation of flash memories shows loss of stored data. The fluence dependence is indicative of microdose effects. Other qualitative factors identifying the effect as microdose are discussed. The data is presented, and compared to statistical results of a microdose target-based model.

radiation effects↗
NASA NTRS2016

Reliability Characterization of TaOx-Based Commercial ReRAM in Combination with Radiation

We present reliability data combined with total dose gamma radiation for one of the first commercially available resistive memory devices. These Tantalum Oxide (TaOX)-based resistive memory chips demonstrate operation in dynamic program and erase testing up to ~130 Krad(Si) of 60Co gamma dose. In static and unbiased conditions, the stored data in the memory cells were able to withstand up to 50Mrad(Si) of exposure. The access circuitry, though, seemed less robust to gamma radiation and was able to operate only up to a total dose of 3Mrad(Si). Post exposure reliability as indicated by endurance, cycling error rate, and data retention tests showed no detectable impact from the combination with prior gamma irradiation. Overall, the total dose radiation tolerance of the commercial TaOx-based resistive memory chip appears to be higher than flash memory chips and in agreement with prior tests conducted with single cell resistive memories.

total ionizing dose↗