Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Connector”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

System and Method for Loading a Test Asset

A test structure includes a frame, a shear reduction plate configured to couple to a first end of a test asset, and multiple rockers. Each rocker includes a first end that has a curved contact surface configured to contact the shear reduction plate and a second end having a connector movably coupled to the frame and configured to pivot, responsive to a bending moment applied to the test asset, such that the curved contact surface rocks in contact with the shear reduction plate.

Schilling, Kenneth P.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Development of an Inflatable Airlock for a Deep Space Gateway

Inflatable structures technology utilizes high-strength fabric materials and internal pressure to create a stiffened pressure vessel that can replace traditional metallic primary structure in a habitable spacecraft. The flexibility of fabric structures allows them to be compactly stowed for launch and expanded in space, providing significant launch volume savings. The unique construction and design flexibility of these structures can be customized for a variety of uses in space including landing bags, decelerators, long duration in-space and planetary surface habitats, and even airlocks. An airlock is often a required component of a crewed spacecraft to allow for maintenance and human exploration outside of the vehicle. Airlock designs in use today rely on complex hatches and seals connected by metallic walls. Recent developments towards the design of an inflatable airlock structure show feasibility and a significant launch volume savings over a traditional metallic design. This paper will provide a high-level summary of these projects and the current state-of-the-art in inflatable airlock development with additional references and detail about previous and on-going research, providing guidance for the design of a softgoods airlock system. The use of inflatables in space has been in development since the 1960’s for both habitats and airlocks. The first ever EVA was conducted by the USSR in 1965 using an inflatable airlock known as the Volga. This airlock was attached to the Voskhod 2 spacecraft and turned the vehicle into a dual chamber airlock. The airlock was successfully deployed, used and jettisoned after Alexey Leonov’s historic spacewalk. Additional work on human-rated inflatable structures was not continued until the late 1990’s when NASA-JSC led an effort to demonstrate these structures as feasible long-term pressurized elements with the TransHab project. The technology developed and pioneered during this project led to multiple patents and proven feasibility that inflatables could be used for large habitable structures. Following TransHab, Bigelow Aerospace continued the development of inflatable structures with technical support from NASA. This partnership eventually led to the successful flight certification, launch, attachment and deployment of the Bigelow Expandable Activities Module (BEAM) on the ISS in 2016. Inflatable and expandable airlock structures have undergone various detailed feasibility studies and testing for over 15 years, most notably with the Advanced Inflatable Airlock (AIA), Dual-Chamber Hybrid Inflatable Suitlock (DCIS), Minimalistic Advanced Soft Hatch (MASH), and Lightweight External Inflatable Airlock (LEIA). During this time, full-scale articles have been built and pressure-tested, and mock-ups and demonstrators have been constructed and evaluated. During the 2001-2003 timeframe, the AIA concept was matured through requirements development, conceptual design, subscale and full-scale engineering breadboards subjecting various test articles to deployment and pressure testing up to four times operating pressure. These tests proved the feasibility of successful deployment and structural integrity of an inflatable crewlock. Additional testing was performed in the ensuing years, as funding permitted, to further refine additional structural and deployment concepts and to understand the EVA crewmember interfaces, hatches and EVA support equipment interfaces that would be required for a fully functioning airlock. This work resulted in a refinement of the structural requirements and an accounting of the systems needed in an inflatable airlock. In 2014, the MASH project developed an ultra-lightweight airlock concept with a fabric hatch that utilized a unique pressure vessel shape to minimize structural loads around a linear seal. The concept uses an automated zipper-like seal that allows for crew egress/ingress. Most of the development work on the project thus far has focused on the design, analysis and testing of the primary structure and the zipper-like seal system is in the preliminary stages of development with a successful proof-of-concept test. As part of the 2017 LEIA effort, studies were conducted on EVA crewmember interfaces on the inside of an inflatable airlock. These efforts included the design of an internal secondary structure and placement of handholds and foot restraints to enable hatch opening, closing and translation through the airlock. Structural design, analysis and testing was completed on several secondary structure candidates. Crew interface testing was also completed using an inflatable crewlock mockup and the JSC Active Response Gravity Offload System (ARGOS) to simulate the movement of an EVA crewmember through an inflatable crewlock in microgravity. The results of these tests helped demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing an inflatable structure as an airlock and informed the required volume, hatch size, and configuration and location of translation aids for crewmembers in a microgravity crewlock. The ISS Quest airlock uses a dual-chamber design with isolated compartments known as the equipment-lock and the crewlock. The equipment-lock houses the Servicing, Performance and Checkout Equipment (SPCE) items (suit batteries, consumables, etc.) while the crewlock has limited internal hardware and is the nominally depressurized compartment during US EVAs. While inflatable dual chamber airlocks have been studied, the current state of the art emphasizes an inflatable crewlock-type structure attached to a rigid equipment-lock type or habitat structure. Since a large portion of the hardware in the equipment-lock are rigid components and connectors that are installed on the ground - and an inflatable structure does not achieve full structural capabilities until pressurized in space - a depressurized fabric structure cannot provide the capabilities of a full equipment-lock. The use of an inflatable as a crewlock, however, provides all the required capabilities for EVA operations in a small launch package that offers significant volume savings over a metallic crewlock. The functions of a traditional equipment lock, including the SPCE, could be provided by a spacecraft’s habitat module or node and not necessarily in a separate equipment lock. An inflatable crewlock would be attached to the vehicle and launched in a packed and compressed state, saving volume under the launch shroud and mass for the overall airlock element compared to a rigid crewlock. Work is currently underway to continue development of an inflatable airlock with a variety of focus areas including the consideration of crew-induced loads and interfaces, the design and development of an internal sub-structure to provide translation aids and restraints, the thermal considerations of a fabric shell depressurized during an EVA, the micrometeorite environment in deep space, and the packaging and deployment of an inflatable airlock.

Deep Space Exploration↗
NASA NTRS2015

State-of-the-Art Instrumentation Package to Support Model Organism Research in Space

Hardware was developed for the Ames student Fruit-Fly Experiment (AFEx) to support fly growth and analysis during spaceflight. The hardware consists of a 1.5U vented aluminum box that houses an acrylic habitat, video camera, LED lighting, and environmental sensors. Power is provided via two USB connectors, one of which also supports data downlink. While the hardware was designed for use with fruit flies, it will house plants on an upcoming mission and could be adapted for use with other systems.

Fruit-Fly Experiment↗
NASA NTRS2019

Characterization of Low-Temperature, Co-Fired Ceramic-Manufactured Electrostatic Thruster-Closeout Report

The goal of the project was to evaluate prototypes of an experimental thruster developed by the University of Arkansas (UA), Fayetteville, AR. The design under evaluation is a radio frequency (RF) electrostatic thruster that was fabricated using the low-temperature, co-fired ceramic (LTCC) materials and fabrication process. This materials system is analogous to printed circuit board (PCB) technology with the most significant difference being that the laminate is replaced by a ceramic material and the copper layer is replaced by printed sinterable silver paste. LTCC designs are baked after fabrication and assembled to realize an entirely monolithic structure with internal conductors, vias, and cavities. In this process, the LTCC electrostatic thruster (LTCC-ET) that is the subject of the present work becomes a monolithic ceramic thruster capable of withstanding temperatures in excess of 500 ºC. The UA and NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) jointly performed prototype testing on the LTCC-ET under a NASA Cooperative Agreement Notice (CAN) award. The LTCC-ET was tested at MSFC in May 2018 over a 1-week period. There were two goals for the test program: (1) Testing to determine the operating parameters required to create plasma ignition in the test articles. This was explored by setting a propellant flowrate and increasing RF power until plasma ignition was observed. Testing was conducted with both argon and krypton. (2) Investigate the thrust and specific impulse (Isp) performance of the thruster as a function of propellant flowrate and grid voltage. This goal was not met during the project as technical challenges in maintaining stable plasma ignition arose due to stress and heating of the RF power feed. In summary, a prototype thruster design (consisting of three packaged units) was fabricated by UA and tested for the first time under vacuum conditions at MSFC to experimentally determine basic performance metrics and functionality. It was found that the design was not sufficiently optimized or robust enough in its initial iteration to support a significant test campaign or characterization program. It was concluded that the propellant outlet channels must be reduced in size with the flowpaths adjusted to increase propellant residence time in the thruster, and that the RF connector must be replaced with a version capable of handling higher power throughput and heating. However, even in its unoptimized form, a plasma could be produced in the LTCCET, demonstrating the efficacy of the design approach. The design is especially compelling due to its low cost to manufacture and, more importantly, its scalability of size and power throughput. Low cost and scalability are also important in that additional functionalities, such as thrust vectoring and plume charge neutralization, can be integrated into future designs with minimal additional cost. This project has matured the LTCC-ET development Technology Readiness Level (TRL) from 1 to 2. The low-cost RF plasma source portion of the LTCC device was matured from TRL 2 to 4 through the demonstration of RF plasma ignition under vacuum conditions.

Huang, P.-H. A.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Design, Prototyping, and Testing of a Novel Flowpath with an Array of Six 3D Matrix Vitvo Bioreactors for the NASA Bioculture System

The NASA Bioculture System is an advanced cell culture closed-loop system containing highly automated flowpaths designed to conduct long term biology experiments on ISS with earth remote controllable medium flow, temperature, gas composition, medium exchange, cell sampling and fixation. This technology was already demonstrated with successful cardiomyocyte and osteocyte cultures experiments onboard the ISS and is now supporting NASA PI science. The Bioculture System, however, can only support 10 cassettes with disposable flowpaths, each containing a single hollow fiber bioreactor with a culture capacity of about 2ml. This constraint not only severely limits the number of investigators that can conduct experiments in space, but also subjects the experiments to limitations in the number of replicates and conditions that can be studied. To address these limitations, we sought a novel design solution to maximize the number of separate bioreactor cultures and volume that can be conducted simultaneously. To this end we designed, prototyped, and are now testing a six-Vitvo 3D Matrix 2ml bioreactor insert that replaces the conventional Bioculture System hollow fiber bioreactor. This design will allow the Bioculture System to support up to 60 different bioreactors and samples at once. Specifically, the novel gas-tight containment housing insert contains six COTS Rigenerand VITVO bioreactors stacked on each side of a heat sink powered by the existing heating element and pair of temperature sensors. Medium will be distributed into each bioreactor's cell-free chamber via its built-in Luer connector, then across the 3D matrix to the cell chamber, dissipating laminar flow and limiting fluid shear stresses that might mechanostimulate cell cultures. Gas (5% CO2 in air) will be supplied directly to the bioreactor gas-tight housing for exchange via the bioreactor flat-surface gas-permeable membranes, eliminating the need for the existing Bioculture System cassette oxygenator. If successfully implemented on ISS, this new multi-bioreactor insert for the Bioculture System has the potential to make real-time cell science experimentation in space more efficient and accessible to more investigators.

Ma, Kristin R.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Simulating Fleet Noise for Notional UAM Vehicles and Operations in New York

This paper presents the results of systems-level simulations using Metrosim that were conducted for notional Urban Air Mobility (UAM)-style vehicles analyzed for two different scenarios for New York (NY). UAM is an aviation industry term for passenger or cargo-carrying air transportation services, which are often automated, operating in an urban/city environment. UAM-style vehicles are expected to use vertical takeoff and landing with fixed wing cruise flight. Metrosim is a metroplex-wide route and airport planning tool that can also be used in standalone mode as a simulation tool. The scenarios described and reported in this paper were used to evaluate a fleet noise prediction capability for this tool. The work was a collaborative effort between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Intelligent Automation, Inc (IAI), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ). One scenario was designed to represent an expanded air-taxi operation from existing helipads around Manhattan to the major New York airports. The other case represented a farther term vision case with commuters using personal air vehicles to hub locations just outside New York, with an air-taxi service running frequent connector trips to a few key locations inside Manhattan. For both scenarios, the trajectories created for the entire fleet were passed to the Aircraft Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) to generate Day-Night Level (DNL) noise contours for inspection. Without data for actual UAM vehicles available, surrogate AEDT empirical Noise-Power-Distance (NPD) tables used a similar sized current day helicopter as the Baseline, and a version of that same data linearly scaled as a first guess at possible UAM noise data. Details are provided for each of the two scenario configurations, and the output noise contours are presented for the Baseline and reduced noise DNL cases.

Glaab, Patricia↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Tessellation and Numerical Simulation of the in-Space Assembled Telescope (iSAT) Reflector

A novel tessellation method has been developed to allow the use of uniform truss modules to form curved or doubly curved surfaces. To illustrate the method, the structural support for the doubly curved in-Space Assembled Telescope primary reflector is developed. The method intentionally leaves gaps at the nodes between identical connecting modules; the gaps are relatively small, on the order of 0.5% of the lattice characteristic cell size. Uniquely shaped nodal connectors called multi-nuts are generated to fill in the nodal gaps and connect adjacent modules. With optimization techniques, the size of these nodal gaps can be minimized to thereby minimize the incurred structural efficiency losses. Finite element analyses of the primary reflector were performed, and the structural efficiency losses amounted to a natural frequency reduction of 5%. The benefits of having uniform truss modules outweigh the structural penalties as it will greatly simplify assembly and lower manufacturing costs.

Tessellation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Micro-grid for Future Planetary Surface Needs

Under the current Artemis Program, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will send its next set of astronauts (first woman and next man) to the Moon by 2024 and establish a sustainable presence on the lunar surface by 2028. The challenge of creating a sustained lunar surface presence is significantly different than previous efforts. Lunar surface operations will require access to continuous and highly reliable power to support mission needs, such as to support ISRU operations. Adding to this challenge, the lunar surface operations are not going to be established over a single effort, rather the system and operations will evolve and grow over time (years). The first initial loads that arrive on the lunar surface will be integrated to their own dedicated power sources. As the lunar surface operations grow, so will the demand for power and at some point these individual loads will require more power than can be generated with any single power device. This power demand drives the need for inter-connecting the loads and power devices to share power between them, resulting in a micro-grid. One of the advantages of developing a lunar surface micro-grid is that allows lunar surface operations to resemble electrical utility operations on Earth; it allows power to be generated where it is convenient and allows power to be consumed where it is convenient, rather than negotiating between generation and consumption. The micro-grid concept also provides another benefit of affording the ability to increase overall system reliability by integrating dissimilar power generation and energy storage devices together, for example modifying the power generation strategy to include both solar arrays and nuclear. Creating a lunar surface micro-grid has its advantages, however there are significant challenges associated with an evolvable micro-grid concept. The challenges include how to efficiently transmit large amounts of power (10kW+) long distances (1kW+), how to effectively integrate dissimilar power generation and energy storage devices to maximize power consumption and minimize downtime, and how to physically connect these devices together with a connector that can survive the lunar environment (dust, extreme cold temperatures) and is capable of both astronaut and robotic operation. The basic components of the micro-grid have to be designed to ensure the system is sustainable, modular, and reconfigurable. An interface to the micro-grid has to be designed that allows for additional technologies, some of which may not yet be fully designed, to easily integrate into the micro-grid concept. This presentation discusses these lunar challenges in some more depth and offers a path forward in designing an evolvable micro-grid to meet the needs of the lunar surface operations and proposes a Universal Micro-grid Interface Converter to connect these dissimilar power sources and mission loads to the micro-grid.

Jeffrey Csank↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Tessellation and Numerical Simulation of the in-Space Assembled Telescope (iSAT) Reflector

A novel tessellation method has been developed to allow the use of uniform truss modules to form curved or doubly curved surfaces. To illustrate the method, the structural support for the doubly curved in-Space Assembled Telescope primary reflector is developed. The method intentionally leaves gaps at the nodes between identical connecting modules; the gaps are relatively small, on the order of 0.5% of the lattice characteristic cell size. Uniquely shaped nodal connectors called multi-nuts are generated to fill in the nodal gaps and connect adjacent modules. With optimization techniques, the size of these nodal gaps can be minimized to thereby minimize the incurred structural efficiency losses. Finite element analyses of the primary reflector were performed, and the structural efficiency losses amounted to a natural frequency reduction of 5%. The benefits of having uniform truss modules outweigh the structural penalties as it will greatly simplify assembly and lower manufacturing costs.

Tessellation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Alternative Setup for Long-Duration Low-Duty-Cycle 600°C Ambient Testing of SiC Integrated Circuits

A scalable, compact oven testbed system for simultaneously evaluating a multitude of high temperature integrated circuits (ICs) for prolonged operating times of up to 600 °C has been prototyped. The new testbed system enables long-duration high temperature testing in sufficient statistical quantities consistent with standard aerospace electronics engineering standards. This setup is comprised of multiple compact ovens housing chips or packages mounted to ceramic circuit boards. Each oven is a compact 15.2 cm length by 15.2 cm width by 12.7 cm depth with a maximum 400 Watts of heating power. The custom-made silicon oxide ceramic heating block inside each oven is based on a 3D printed design adapted for the easy insertion of the IC device under test (DUT). This innovative design provides the quick insertion of ICs with or without a ceramic package into a 600 °C environment by utilizing a movable 11.43 cm long ceramic substrate with electrical traces extending from the oven hot zone to external standard plastic-based board connectors. Another key oven design feature is the minimization of the DUT exposure to electromagnetic interference (EMI) by utilizing a filtered DC power source to reduce heating element noise. Additionally, the ovens can be configured in a parallel arrangement allowing global data monitoring over a single industrial RS422 serial port. This feature is important for scaling up to test multiple ICs semi-simultaneously. A USB serial port is provided to independently control the operating parameters of each oven such as the oven target temperature and oven ramp rate. The oven temperature can reach up to 600 °C with a confirmed +/- 4 °C maximum deviation across the test zone region. The ramp rate can be programmed from 1 °C/minute up to 10 °C/minute. Furthermore, a programmable switchboard is used to interface with the DUT. This switchboard comprises a National Instruments Peripheral Component Interconnect eXtension for Instrumentation (NI PXI) system and a breakout board to send and receive power, analog or digital test signals. By using this unique oven testbed system, a variety of ICs can now be tested in parallel using the same test components configured for a diverse set of requirements.

DC Powered Oven↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons for Future In-Space Telerobotic Servicing from Robotic Refueling Mission

The Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) was a multi-phased technology development effort by the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). The program leveraged the existing robotic systems and expertise of the International Space Station (ISS) program and the tool design and satellite servicing expertise of NASA’s Exploration & In-space Services (NExIS) Projects Division at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to evaluate new hardware and techniques for on-orbit telerobotic servicing. Between 2011 and 2021, two external ISS payloads housed over a dozen robotic tools and adapters designed to service a variety of existing and novel satellite interfaces. Robot operators at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC) and CSA used the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) to retrieve and operate these tools for tasks such as cutting wires or multi-layer insulation blanketing, removing valve caps, mating electrical connectors, transferring fluids, and performing visual inspections inside a vehicle. Each phase of RRM involved years of preparation. Tool and interface designs were prototyped and evaluated using both NASA and Canadian ground robotic systems. Procedures were developed by GSFC engineers and vetted in partnership with JSC and CSA robot operators. GSFC engineers were trained to provide real-time support during on-orbit operations. These preparatory efforts and the successful on-orbit evaluations yielded an array of lessons for future in-space telerobotic missions. Designing robotic tools for the space environment requires special consideration of materials, indicators, and differences between ground and flight use cases and environments. When there is a limited window for on-orbit operations, devoting time and high-fidelity hardware to ground testing can be critical. Needs during potential troubleshooting are more essential to camera view quality, frame rate, and position requirements more than nominal operations. Detailed hardware manuals, nominal and contingency procedures, along with clearly defined operations team roles and protocols are vital for efficiency. RRM also demonstrated how the ISS can be utilized to increase the technology readiness levels required for future missions and led to additional technology partnerships between NExIS and the ISS program. The lessons from RRM are currently being applied to designs, operations concepts, and ground test methodology for missions such as On-orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing1(OSAM-1)and Mars Sample Return.

Zakiya Tomlinson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

How to Educate Decision Makers on the Value and Necessity of Modal Testing and Model Correlation: Tips for Young Engineers

Engineers need to effectively communicate the justification and value of their modal testing and model correlation in terminology familiar to decision makers as it relates to the program’s risk tolerance. This communication must relate to the program’s risk tolerance and the metrics used to judge the performance of both the program and individual decision makers. The challenge is the terminologies familiar to engineers and decision makers are quite different and seemingly unrelated. The engineering profession has developed a specific terminology to solve highly technical issues, which are many times themselves unique to very specific engineering problems. It is all too easy for engineers to believe that everyone in their organization, including the decision makers, has an intrinsic understanding of what they do and the value it brings to the program’s success. This is especially true for young engineers who have recently spent the last four plus years in an academic engineering learning environment, which has a highly technical research oriented atmosphere. Effective communication with decision makers is increasingly important as the technical breadth and practical program and project experience level for up and coming decision makers diminishes. It is not unusual for the decision makers to have technical knowledge in a domain different from structural dynamics (e.g., electronics or systems). Competition among satellite manufactures has increased the focus on programmatic cost and ability to deliver on schedule. NASA programs are also seeing more restrictive programmatic cost and schedule constraints, which impact both analysis and testing. It should also be noted that a comprehensive suite of tests are required to verify a satellite’s design capability with some margin. These tests include static strength verification tests, shock, acoustic, and vibration tests (sine and random) of systems, subsystems, and components. Each of these verification tests provide opportunities for model correlation and risk reduction. It is important to recognize dynamic loads/modal test models may not include all of the flight hardware (i.e., harness, coax, waveguides, connectors, etc.) and the previously mentioned tests are still required for qualification/verification of the design. This paper provides tips to young engineers on how to bridge this communications gap, have a better understanding of the environment in which decision makers operate, and assist them to better support successful missions. While this paper primarily focuses on modal testing and model correlation as related to spacecraft missions, the concepts and recommendations presented here are equally applicable to other fields such as aeronautics, automotive, power generation, etc.

Decision Maker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coolant Leak from ISS External Active Thermal Control System (EATCS) – An Examination of Most Probable

The Port (P1) and Starboard (S1) External Active Thermal Control Systems (EATCS) are single phase, mechanically pumped ammonia loops that operate independently to cool the majority of the hardware and payloads onboard the International Space Station (ISS). A slow ammonia leak was detected using pressure and quantity telemetry five years after the P1 EATCS was activated. The leak gradually accelerated to a rate that locating and isolating the leak became imperative to maintain cooling capability. Partial pressure measurements from the Robotic External Leak Locator (RELL) scan surveys narrowed the search to the supply and return jumpers connecting one of three radiators to the system. Subsequently, the ISS crew performed high definition video surveys during an Extravehicular Activity (EVA), or spacewalk, and ammonia flakes were observed projecting from the jumpers. Thus, the ground teams were confident that the culprit for the ammonia leak was the jumpers. The ammonia leak stopped after ground teams remotely isolated and vented those jumpers and associated radiator. Both jumpers were removed and returned to the ground, and a root cause investigation was conducted. A calibrated leak test determined the bulk of the ammonia leaked through a pair of seals in a Quick Disconnect (QD), or connector, on one end of the return jumper. The return jumper QD was dissected, visually inspected, chemically tested and evaluated. The results indicated the most probable cause of the accelerating ammonia leak was due to defective seals, plating delamination underneath the seals, and on-orbit thermal cycles exacerbating the delamination. Both jumpers were refurbished, relaunched to the ISS, and scheduled to be reinstalled during an EVA in 2022. It appeared the issue was unique, but recently the S1 EATCS is showing signs of an accelerating ammonia leak, and RELL scans narrowed the source to a similar pair of radiator jumpers.

Thermal Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

How to Educate Decision Makers on the Value and Necessity of Modal Testing and Model Correlation: Tips for Young Engineers

Engineers need to effectively communicate the justification and value of their modal testing and model correlation in terminology familiar to decision makers as it relates to the program’s risk tolerance. This communication must relate to the program’s risk tolerance and the metrics used to judge the performance of both the program and individual decision makers. The challenge is the terminologies familiar to engineers and decision makers are quite different and seemingly unrelated. The engineering profession has developed a specific terminology to solve highly technical issues, which are many times themselves unique to very specific engineering problems. It is all too easy for engineers to believe that everyone in their organization, including the decision makers, has an intrinsic understanding of what they do and the value it brings to the program’s success. This is especially true for young engineers who have recently spent the last four plus years in an academic engineering learning environment, which has a highly technical research oriented atmosphere. Effective communication with decision makers is increasingly important as the technical breadth and practical program and project experience level for up and coming decision makers diminishes. It is not unusual for the decision makers to have technical knowledge in a domain different from structural dynamics (e.g., electronics or systems). Competition among satellite manufactures has increased the focus on programmatic cost and ability to deliver on schedule. NASA programs are also seeing more restrictive programmatic cost and schedule constraints, which impact both analysis and testing. It should also be noted that a comprehensive suite of tests are required to verify a satellite’s design capability with some margin. These tests include static strength verification tests, shock, acoustic, and vibration tests (sine and random) of systems, subsystems, and components. Each of these verification tests provide opportunities for model correlation and risk reduction. It is important to recognize dynamic loads/modal test models may not include all of the flight hardware (i.e., harness, coax, waveguides, connectors, etc.) and the previously mentioned tests are still required for qualification/verification of the design. This paper provides tips to young engineers on how to bridge this communications gap, have a better understanding of the environment in which decision makers operate, and assist them to better support successful missions. While this paper primarily focuses on modal testing and model correlation as related to spacecraft missions, the concepts and recommendations presented here are equally applicable to other fields such as aeronautics, automotive, power generation, etc.

Decision Maker↗
NASA NTRS2020

Event-Driven Modeling and Execution of Robotic Activities and Contingencies in the Europa Lander Mission Concept Using BPMN

TRACE (Traceable Robotic Activity Composer and Executive) is a tool designed to address the model-ing, verification, and execution of planned and con-tingent activities during robotic space missions. These activities can be modeled (i.e., planned) graph-ically in TRACE using the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) language. This standardized language is used to model a sequence of robotic ac-tivities tied together by logical constructs, events, and time. TRACE includes verification tools to en-sure feasibility before mission models are executed by TRACE’s executive, which is integrated into the autonomy subsystem via a connector. In this paper, we describe TRACE in detail as it would apply to a conceptual Europa Lander surface mission with planned excavation and sample collection activities, as well as, contingency activities when execution is off-nominal—all highlighting our novel use of BPMN as a lingua franca for the pipeline from mis-sion planning to autonomous execution.

Lim, Grace↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coolant Leak from ISS External Active Thermal Control System (EATCS) – An Examination of Most Probable

The Port (P1) and Starboard (S1) External Active Thermal Control Systems (EATCS) are single phase, mechanically pumped ammonia loops that operate independently to cool majority of the hardware and payloads onboard the International Space Station (ISS). A slow ammonia leak was detected using pressure and quantity telemetry five years after the P1 EATCS was activated. The leak gradually accelerated to a rate that locating and isolating the leak became imperative to maintain cooling capability. Partial pressure measurements from the Robotic External Leak Locator (RELL) scan surveys narrowed the search to the supply and return jumpers connecting one of three radiators to the system. Subsequently, the ISS crew performed high definition video surveys during an Extravehicular Activity (EVA), or spacewalk, and ammonia flakes were observed projecting from the jumpers. Thus, the ground teams were confident that the culprit of the ammonia leak were the jumpers. The ammonia leak stopped after ground teams remotely isolated and vented those jumpers and associated radiator. Both jumpers were removed and returned to the ground, and a root cause investigation was conducted. A calibrated leak test determined the bulk of the ammonia leaked through a pair of seals in a Quick Disconnect (QD), or connector, on one end of the return jumper. The return jumper QD was dissected, visually inspected, chemically tested and evaluated. The results indicated the most probable cause of the accelerating ammonia leak was due to defective seals, plating delamination underneath the seals, and on-orbit thermal cycles exacerbating the delamination. Both jumpers were refurbished, relaunched to the ISS, and scheduled to be reinstalled during an EVA in 2022. It appeared the issue was unique, but recently the S1 EATCS is showing signs of an accelerating ammonia leak, and RELL scans narrowed the source to a similar pair of radiator jumpers.

Thermal Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coolant Leak from ISS External Active Thermal Control System (EATCS) – An Examination of Most Probable

The Port (P1) and Starboard (S1) External Active Thermal Control Systems (EATCS) are single phase, mechanically pumped ammonia loops that operate independently to cool majority of the hardware and payloads onboard the International Space Station (ISS). A slow ammonia leak was detected using pressure and quantity telemetry five years after the P1 EATCS was activated. The leak gradually accelerated to a rate that locating and isolating the leak became imperative to maintain cooling capability. Partial pressure measurements from the Robotic External Leak Locator (RELL) scan surveys narrowed the search to the supply and return jumpers connecting one of three radiators to the system. Subsequently, the ISS crew performed high-definition video surveys during an Extravehicular Activity (EVA), or spacewalk, and ammonia flakes were observed projecting from the jumpers. Thus, the ground teams were confident that the culprit of the ammonia leak were the jumpers. The ammonia leak stopped after ground teams remotely isolated and vented those jumpers and associated radiator. Both jumpers were removed and returned to the ground, and a root cause investigation was conducted. A calibrated leak test determined the bulk of the ammonia leaked through a pair of seals in a Quick Disconnect (QD), or connector, on one end of the return jumper. The return jumper QD was dissected, visually inspected, chemically tested and evaluated. The results indicated the most probable cause of the accelerating ammonia leak was due to defective seals, plating delamination underneath the seals, and on-orbit thermal cycles exacerbating the delamination. Both jumpers were refurbished, relaunched to the ISS, and scheduled to be reinstalled during an EVA in 2022. It appeared the issue was unique, but recently the S1 EATCS is showing signs of an accelerating ammonia leak, and RELL scans narrowed the source to a similar pair of radiator jumpers.

Darnell Cowan↗