DOE OSTI2015
For application in criticality safety, numerical code systems require profound validation against experimental data. In terms of burn-up credit, this refers to the inventory determination as well as the subsequent criticality calculation. Within this framework, a dedicated, conservative estimation of uncertainties, bias and bias uncertainties for the resulting calculated multiplication factor k{sub eff} is indispensable. However, measures to reduce excess conservatism may become desirable, depending on the application case. For this reason GRS implemented a methodology to validate a calculation code system for criticality safety analyses for systems with irradiated nuclear fuel. The work at hand demonstrates this methodology by means of the GRS home-built inventory determination system KENOREST and ORNL's well-known SCALE 6 CSASS criticality safety calculation sequence. A number of 40 radiochemical analysis samples taken from SFCOMPO and elsewhere have been calculated to derive isotopic correction factors in different ways, depending on the required level of conservatism and the calculational efforts to be carried out. This includes bounding methods as well as different Monte Carlo sampling approaches. Furthermore, from the ICSBEP a number of 515 critical benchmark experiment configurations comprising water moderated low enriched UO{sub 2} fuel rods and water moderated mixed oxide (MOX) fuel rods have been selected and evaluated. Important absorber and structure materials are also covered. Various trending and sensitivity and uncertainty analysis methods have been applied, again to derive conservative estimates on the various contributions to k{sub eff} uncertainties. The overall methodology is applicable to low enriched, water moderated PWR uranium dioxide fuels in a burn-up range of about 10 to 60 GWd/tHM, and validates the reactivity contributions of the major uranium and plutonium isotopes. The methodology itself has no limitation which requires the exclusion of further isotopes as e.g. fission products. However, its application is constrained by the experimental database being publicly available. After the potential provision of an extended database in the future, the range of applicability can easily be extended to more nuclides. In addition, it is not limited to the code systems being used here but can also be applied using different numerical tools. For a generic PWR spent fuel pool rack and different enrichment and burn-up combinations, the impact of the current level of validation on k{sub eff} is demonstrated and quantified. (authors)
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗