Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Unit Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54

CCPDVANALYSIS Documentation

This document contains all relevant code and descriptions of working components of CCPDVANALYSIS software toolkit.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

ADVANCED TEST REACTOR (ATR) CONVERSION TO LOW ENRICHED URANIUM (LEU) FUEL

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM) is working to convert research reactors globally from highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. MMM and its predecessor programs have converted or verified the shutdown of 88 HEU research reactors and isotope production facilities, using LEU fuel developed in the 1980s. However, there is a small set of high performance research reactors which require a new high density LEU fuel for conversion, including six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRRs), which include the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and the ATR Critical (ATRC) Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) near Idaho Falls, ID; University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) at Columbia, MO; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR) at MIT in Cambridge, MA; High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) near Oak Ridge, TN; and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) in Gaithersburg, MA. These reactors will share the same uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) fuel plate design. The U-Mo fuel meat foil will have a zirconium (Zr) diffusion barrier with aluminum cladding. Three different application methods for the Zr diffusion barrier layer are being pursued – co-rolled, electroplating and plasma spraying. Fabrication of the higher density LEU U-Mo fuel has presented several challenges. Because the U-Mo fuel fabrication process uses the existing stockpile of 93% highly enriched uranium (HEU) to be blended with molybdenum and depleted uranium (DU) to form 19.75% LEU, cost benefits of enriching to 19.75% will not be realized. Homogeneity of the U-235 and molybdenum in the metal foil is a challenge due to U-Mo casting process results in variations between adjacent cast U-Mo plates. LEU will not require less U-235 as previously believed due to self-shielding properties of U-238 requiring additional U-235 to be loaded in each fuel element. Although the overall dimensions of the ATR fuel element remain unchanged, the weight of the LEU ATR fuel element is 72% greater than a HEU ATR fuel element. During waste recovery and recycling efforts, separation of aluminum cladding from the HEU fuel meat is a relatively simple chemical dissolution, however, separation of the Zr diffusion barrier from the U-Mo fuel meat is significantly more challenging.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Thermal-hydraulics modeling for prototype testing of the W7-X high heat flux scraper element

The long-pulse operation of the Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) stellarator experiment is scheduled to begin in 2020. This operational phase will be equipped with water-cooled plasma facing components to allow for longer pulse durations. Certain simulated plasma scenarios have been shown to produce heat fluxes that surpass the technological limits on the edges of the divertor target elements during steady-state operation. In order to reduce the heat load on the target elements, the addition of a “scraper element” (SE) is under investigation. The SE is composed of 24 water-cooled carbon fiber reinforced carbon composite monoblock units. Multiple full-scale prototypes have been tested in the GLADIS high heat flux test facility. Previous computational studies revealed discrepancies between the simulations and experimental measurements. In this work, single-phase thermal-hydraulics modeling was performed in ANSYS CFX to identify potential causes for such discrepancies. Possible explanations investigated were the effects of a non-uniform thermal contact resistance and a potential misalignment of the monoblock fibers. And while the difference between the experimental and computational results was not resolved by a non-uniform thermal contact resistance, the computational results provided insight into the potential performance of a W7-X monoblock unit. Circumferential temperature distributions highlighted the expected boiling regions of such a unit. Finally, simulations revealed that modest angles of fiber misalignment in the monoblocks result in asymmetries at the unit edges and provide temperature differences similar to the experimental results.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗