Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FEEDSTOCK”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

IEA Bioenergy Task 40 Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade: Securing Supply and Demand (Country Report 2014—United States)

Logistical barrier are tied to feedstock harvesting, collection, storage and distribution. Current crop harvesting machinery is unable to selectively harvest preferred components of cellulosic biomass while maintaining acceptable levels of soil carbon and minimizing erosion. Actively managing biomass variability imposes additional functional requirements on biomass harvesting equipment. A physiological variation in biomass arises from differences in genetics, degree of crop maturity, geographical location, climatic events, and harvest methods. This variability presents significant cost and performance risks for bioenergy systems. Currently, processing standards and specifications for cellulosic feedstocks are not as well-developed as for mature commodities. Biomass that is stored with high moisture content or exposed to moisture during storage is susceptible to spoilage, rotting, spontaneous combustion, and odor problems. Appropriate storage methods and strategies are needed to better define storage requirements to preserve the volume and quality of harvested biomass over time and maintain its conversion yield. Raw herbaceous biomass is costly to collect, handle, and transport because of its low density and fibrous nature. Existing conventional, bale-based handling equipment and facilities cannot cost-effectively deliver and store high volumes of biomass, even with improved handling techniques. Current handling and transportation systems designed for moving woodchips can be inefficient for bioenergy processes due to the costs and challenges of transporting, storing, and drying high-moisture biomass. The infrastructure for feedstock logistics has not been defined for the potential variety of locations, climates, feedstocks, storage methods, processing alternatives, etc., which will occur at a national scale. When setting up biomass fuel supply chains, for large-scale biomass systems, logistics are a pivotal part in the system. Various studies have shown that long-distance international transport by ship is feasible in terms of energy use and transportation costs, but availability of suitable vessels and meteorological conditions (e.g., winter time in Scandinavia and Russia) need to be considered. However, local transportation by truck (both in biomass exporting and importing countries) may be a high-cost factor, which can influence the overall energy balance and total biomass costs.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Collaboration for the Advancement of Indirect 3D Printing Technology

Amorphous powders often possess high hardness values and other useful mechanical properties. However, densifying these powders into complex shapes while retaining their unique properties is a challenge with standard processing routes. Pressureless sintering, for example, can densify intricate green parts composed of rapidly-solidified powders. But this process typically involves long exposures to elevated temperatures, during which the non-equilibrium microstructure of the powder can evolve towards lower energy configurations with inferior properties. Pressure-assisted compaction techniques, by contrast, can consolidate green parts with simple shapes while preserving the microstructure and properties of the powder feedstock. But parts made with these processes generally require additional post-processing, including machining, which introduces new challenges due to the high hardness of these materials. One processing route that can potentially avoid these issues is Indirect 3D Printing (I-3DP; aka Binder Jetting) followed by melt infiltration. In I-3DP, an organic binder is used to join powder feedstock, layer-by-layer, into a green part. In melt infiltration, this green preform is densified by placing it in contact with a molten alloy that wets the preform and wicks into the pores as a result of capillary forces. When these processes are paired together, they offer two key advantages for the densification of rapidly-solidified powders. The first advantage is that the timescale associated with melt infiltration is on the order of seconds for parts with cm-scale dimensions. So in many instances, infiltration requires only a brief thermal excursion that does not degrade the feedstock’s microstructure. The second advantage is that the combination of binder-jet 3D printing and melt infiltration gives fully-dense net shape objects, minimizing the need for subsequent post-processing. In this work, fully-dense, net shape objects have been fabricated from an amorphous powder using I-3DP and molten bronze infiltration while maintaining the amorphous microstructure. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and differential thermal analysis were used to characterize the structural evolution of the powder feedstock during an infiltration heating cycle. Microindentation and bend tests were performed on the infiltrated material to evaluate its mechanical properties. It was found that infiltration improved both the ductility and strength of the sintered preforms by eliminating the stress concentration at the interparticle necks. The infiltrated material had an 11 GPa Vickers hardness and moderate damage tolerance, making it well-suited for applications requiring hard, net shape parts.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2016

Feasibilities of a Coal-Biomass to Liquids Plant in Southern West Virginia

This project has generated comprehensive and realistic results of feasibilities for a coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plant in southern West Virginia; and evaluated the sensitivity of the analyses to various anticipated scenarios and parametric uncertainties. Specifically the project has addressed economic feasibility, technical feasibility, market feasibility, and financial feasibility. In the economic feasibility study, a multi-objective siting model was developed and was then used to identify and rank the suitable facility sites. Spatial models were also developed to assess the biomass and coal feedstock availabilities and economics. Environmental impact analysis was conducted mainly to assess life cycle analysis and greenhouse gas emission. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis were also investigated in this study. Sensitivity analyses on required selling price (RSP) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of CBTL fuels were conducted according to feedstock availability and price, biomass to coal mix ratio, conversion rate, internal rate of return (IRR), capital cost, operational and maintenance cost. The study of siting and capacity showed that feedstock mixed ratio limited the CBTL production. The price of coal had a more dominant effect on RSP than that of biomass. Different mix ratios in the feedstock and conversion rates led to RSP ranging from $104.3 - $157.9/bbl. LCA results indicated that GHG emissions ranged from 80.62 kg CO 2 eq to 101.46 kg CO2 eq/1,000 MJ of liquid fuel at various biomass to coal mix ratios and conversion rates if carbon capture and storage (CCS) was applied. Most of water and fossil energy were consumed in conversion process. Compared to petroleum-derived-liquid fuels, the reduction in GHG emissions could be between -2.7% and 16.2% with CBTL substitution. As for the technical study, three approaches of coal and biomass to liquids, direct, indirect and hybrid, were considered in the analysis. The process models including conceptual design, process modeling and process validation were developed and validated for different cases. Equipment design and capital costs were investigated on capital coast estimation and economical model validation. Material and energy balances and techno-economic analysis on base case were conducted for evaluation of projects. Also, sensitives studies of direct and indirect approaches were both used to evaluate the CBTL plant economic performance. In this study, techno-economic analysis were conducted in Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) environment for indirect, direct, and hybrid CBTL plants with CCS based on high fidelity process models developed in Aspen Plus and Excel. The process thermal efficiency ranges from 45% to 67%. The break-even oil price ranges from $86.1 to $100.6 per barrel for small scale (10000 bbl/day) CBTL plants and from $65.3 to $80.5 per barrel for large scale (50000 bbl/day) CBTL plants. Increasing biomass/coal ratio from 8/92 to 20/80 would increase the break-even oil price of indirect CBTL plant by $3/bbl and decrease the break-even oil price of direct CBTL plant by about $1/bbl. The order of carbon capture penalty is direct > indirect > hybrid. The order of capital investment is hybrid (with or without shale gas utilization) > direct (without shale gas utilization) > indirect > direct (with shale gas utilization). The order of thermal efficiency is direct > hybrid > indirect. The order of break-even oil price is hybrid (without shale gas utilization) > direct (without shale gas utilization) > hybrid (with shale gas utilization) > indirect > direct (with shale gas utilization).

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2017

Biofuels and Bioproducts from Wet and Gaseous Waste Streams: Challenges and Opportunities

This report draws together activities related to wet and gaseous waste feedstocks into a single document. It enables an amplified focus on feedstocks in the relevant technology and potential markets category. Also, this report helps to inform and support ongoing wet and gaseous resource recovery activities in the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) and in the broader federal space. Historically, the office has identified wet and gaseous waste feedstocks as potentially advantageous, but has not pursued them with a sustained focus. This document seeks to position these waste streams appropriately alongside more traditional feedstocks in BETO efforts.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Mississippi State University Sustainable Energy Research Center

The Sustainable Energy Research Center (SERC) project at Mississippi State University included all phases of biofuel production from feedstock development, to conversion to liquid transportation fuels, to engine testing of the fuels. The feedstocks work focused on non-food based crops and yielded an increased understanding of many significant Southeastern feedstocks. an emphasis was placed on energy grasses that could supplement the primary feedstock, wood. Two energy grasses, giant miscanthus and switchgrass, were developed that had increased yields per acre. Each of these grasses was patented and licensed to companies for commercialization. The fuels work focused on three different technologies that each led to a gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel product. The three technologies were microbial oil, pyrolysis oil, and syngas-to liquid-hydrocarbons

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Assessment of Startup Fuel Options for a Test or Demonstration Fast Reactor

This document explores startup fuel options for a proposed test/demonstration fast reactor. The fuel options considered are the metallic fuels U-Zr and U-Pu-Zr and the ceramic fuels UO 2 and UO 2 -PuO 2 (MOX). Attributes of the candidate fuel choices considered were feedstock availability, fabrication feasibility, rough order of magnitude cost and schedule, and the existing irradiation performance database. The reactor-grade plutonium bearing fuels (U-Pu-Zr and MOX) were eliminated from consideration as the initial startup fuels because the availability and isotopics of domestic plutonium feedstock is uncertain. There are international sources of reactor grade plutonium feedstock but isotopics and availability are also uncertain. Weapons grade plutonium is the only possible source of Pu feedstock in sufficient quantities needed to fuel a startup core. Currently, the available U.S. source of (excess) weapons-grade plutonium is designated for irradiation in commercial light water reactors (LWR) to a level that would preclude diversion. Weapons-grade plutonium also contains a significant concentration of gallium. Gallium presents a potential issue for both the fabrication of MOX fuel as well as possible performance issues for metallic fuel. Also, the construction of a fuel fabrication line for plutonium fuels, with or without a line to remove gallium, is expected to be considerably more expensive than for uranium fuels. In the case of U-Pu-Zr, a relatively small number of fuel pins have been irradiated to high burnup, and in no case has a full assembly been irradiated to high burnup without disassembly and re-constitution. For MOX fuel, the irradiation database from the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is extensive. If a significant source of either weapons-grade or reactor-grade Pu became available (i.e., from an international source), a startup core based on Pu could be reconsidered.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Final Report: Room Temperature Electrochemical Upgrading of Methane to Oxygenate Fuels

The overall objective of this project is to discover the nature of the electrochemically active sites and to uncover the mechanisms for the electrocatalytic transformation of small organic molecules to oxygenate products such as methanol, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and acetylene. Among the feedstocks of interest in this study are: methane, carbon dioxide, and acetic acid. Methane is an incredibly attractive potential feedstock because of the recent discovery of large shale deposits; carbon dioxide is potentially a very available feedstock from carbon capture technologies; acetic acid (as well as CH 4 and CO 2 and ethanol) has potential as a bio-derived feedstock. This report summarizes the major results to date regarding the electrochemical transformation of CH 4 , CO 2 and acetic acid to chemicals and fuels – with a primary focus on methane. Finer details are available in each of the projects annual reports. In addition to the primary objective, the work in this project has led to synergistic discoveries that are advantageous to other fields including: catalyst layer deposition, anion exchange membrane fuel cells, CO 2 capture and li-ion batteries. Those are very briefly discussed as well.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Chemical Characterization and Conversion Assessment of BurCell® System Treated MSW Materials

Cornerstone Resources has developed a proprietary advanced preprocessing technology, the BurCell® System, for production of a high quality organic biomass feedstock from numerous waste resources. While suitable for a variety of feedstock, the focus of development for the BurCell® System has been thus far Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). In MSW, the system technology is able to capture non-recyclable waste paper, cardboard, and organic materials, homogenize these materials and allow for separation of the non-organic fraction. The resulting homogenized organic material typically represents in excess of 50% of the raw MSW feed. The recently released Billion Ton Study now includes MSW as a feedstock resource showing it to be one of the lowest cost and most widely distributed biomass resources available; however, acknowledging the concerns with the potential physical and chemical variability of an MSW based feedstock stream. The focus on MSW has also been driven by MSW being a resource with a clear, well understood and mature supply-chain. Treating MSW in the BurCell® System will make that source of biomass substantially more accessible. To further promote the use of this MSW derived biomass and beneficially exploit the use of the BurCell® System for processing of biomass for Bioenergy production facilities, more detailed lab data is now required

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Innovative Gasification to Produce Fischer-Tropsch Jet and Diesel Fuel

The primary objective of this project and the U.S. DOE’s integrated biorefinery (“IBR”) program was to demonstrate conversion of biomass and waste-derived feedstocks into military spec liquid fuels. Frontline’s proposed integrated process was to incorporate several novel technologies and innovative applications of existing technologies that would serve both to increase plant efficiency and also to lower the cost of the produced biofuels. The project was intended to demonstrate Frontline Bioenergy’s technologies for gasification and synthesis gas clean-up configuration to produce a syngas stream suitable for a proven Fischer-Tropsch (“F-T”) unit that would produce F-T intermediate products. These F-T intermediate products were to be upgraded to military spec diesel and jet fuel, including F76, JP5, and JP8. Specifically, these technologies consisted of: 1. Frontline’s PMFreeGas® ultra low particulate matter (PM) hot gas filtration technology 2. Application of Frontline’s TarFreeGas® ultra low-tar gasification technology 3. Frontline’s novel approach to syngas conditioning The proposed gasifier system was to operate at 10 tpd capacity while the F-T plant was capable of approximately one barrel per day. Although the gasifier output would have been roughly ten times the F-T plant’s required input, the 10 tpd capacity was chosen to enable scaling to commercial capacity. Project partners included i) SGC Energia, owner of the F-T technology and owner of the proposed demonstration site in Pasadena, Texas; ii) Stanley Consultants, a reputable engineering company that provided detailed electrical engineering services; and iii) Delphi Engineering & Construction LLC, a consulting company that provided project management advisory services. The integrated plant was never constructed due to lack of cost share funds. However, the commercialization plan and associated financial model suggested such a plant could be economically viable when the price of oil exceeds $70 per barrel. The price of feedstock plays a significant role in the profitability of the plant for a given value of oil. An integrated biorefinery capable of producing liquid transportation fuels and other chemical feedstocks would benefit the public by providing a sustainable pathway to convert domestically available feedstocks into fuels that might otherwise be imported from countries or regions of the world that are typically hostile to the United States.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Consumptive Water Use in the Production of Ethanol and Petroleum Gasoline — 2018 Update

The production of energy feedstocks and fuels requires substantial water input. Not only do biofuel feedstocks like corn, switchgrass, and agricultural residues need water for growth and conversion to ethanol, but petroleum feedstocks like crude oil and oil sands also require large volumes of water for drilling, extraction, and conversion into petroleum products. Moreover, in many cases, crude oil production is increasingly water dependent. Competing uses strain available water resources and raise the specter of resource depletion and environmental degradation. Water management has become a key feature of existing projects and a potential issue in new ones. This report examines the growing issue of water use in energy production by characterizing current consumptive water use in liquid fuel production. As used throughout this report, “consumptive water use” is the sum total of water input less water output that is recycled and reused for the process. The estimate applies to surface and groundwater sources for irrigation but does not include precipitation. Water requirements are evaluated for five fuel pathways: bioethanol from corn, ethanol from cellulosic feedstocks, gasoline from Canadian oil sands, Saudi Arabian crude, and U.S. conventional crude from onshore wells. Regional variations and historic trends are noted, as are opportunities to reduce water use.

02 PETROLEUM↗
DOE OSTI2012

Role of Alternative Energy Sources: Pulverized Coal and Biomass Co-firing Technology Assessment [Slides]

This analysis evaluates the role of coal and biomass co-firing power in the future energy portfolio of the U.S. Coal and biomass co-firing power is evaluated with respect to resource base, growth potential, environmental profile, costs, barriers, risks, and expert opinions. Co-firing is seen as a way of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of existing coal-fired power plants, but the incorporation of biomass into an existing coal-fired system increases the complexity of feedstock acquisition. Further, the acquisition of biomass has unique GHG burdens that offset, in part, the GHG reductions from the displacement of coal with biomass. Due to the higher feedstock prices of biomass, the co-firing of biomass at a 10 percent share of feedstock energy can increase the cost of electricity by as much as 31 percent. Other risks include regulatory uncertainty; without policies that encourage the use of renewable feedstocks, there is no incentive for producers to invest in co-fired systems.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2020

At-source Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Mine Drainage

Conventional acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment consists of pH adjustment, oxidation, and separation of solid precipitates from discharge quality water. Alkaline addition increases the pH to the range 7 to 9 to precipitate the regulated metals Al and Mn ions as hydroxides. Mechanical or chemical oxidation then converts the reduced iron species Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ which precipitates at a low pH value as ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH) 3 ). Co-precipitation of Rare Earth Elements (REEs) with hydroxides creates a gangue-rich matrix from which REEs must be separated. Fe(OH)3 is generally the most abundant gangue-forming metal. Current research by the project team has shown raw, untreated AMD has an average total rare earth element content (TREE) of about 287 μg/L (0.287 ppm). Operators of AMD-producing facilities are obliged to treat it to neutralize acidity and remove regulated metals (e.g., iron (Fe), aluminum (Al), and manganese (Mn)) prior to discharge. Ongoing research indicates conventional AMD treatment concentrates TREE in resulting precipitates (AMD sludge) by an average factor of 2,635x to an average dry weight, elemental concentration of 708 g/t (ppm). While the economics of recovering REEs from AMD sludge are appealing, much of the cost of REE recovery would be incurred during separation of REEs from the gangue metals: Fe, Al, and Mn. Significant gains can be made by precipitating REEs when most of these gangue metals are still in solution. Significant improvements in REE extraction efficiency can be obtained through separation of REEs from the aqueous phase AMD, upstream of conventional AMD treatment by: 1) creating an enriched REE feedstock, 2) producing a more consistent feedstock, 3) reducing transportation costs to an REE refinery, 4) reducing acid consumption in the acid leaching step, and 5) reducing the volume of waste produced at the ALSX plant. This project is exploring two novel approaches for extracting REEs upstream of the conventional AMD treatment plants to create a purified REE feedstock while leaving the bulk of the Fe, Al, and Mn in solution for subsequent treatment. While the average TREE concentration of raw AMD is low and individual sites range between 10 and 2,200 μg/L, successful at-source REE separation will generate a superior feedstock to a conventional ALSX process and significantly improve the economics and environmental performance of REE extraction from AMD. AMD can be classified into two types: type A is net acid and iron is partly oxidized while type B is net alkaline, and iron occurs in the reduced, ferrous state. In Case A, the pH is raised slightly, which will precipitate Fe 3+ and Al 3+ but not REEs. The other important type of AMD is net alkaline water found in flooded, anoxic deep mines. These generally have a pH > 6.0 and are net alkaline. REE concentrations are also much lower than those found in acidic AMD while the volumes and flux are much higher. Most of these are pumped discharges with almost no Al. Case B AMD is strongly reduced and, like Case A water, Fe and Mn ions are similarly reduced and therefore soluble at pH <9.0. REEs and an array of transition ions will be the only trivalent cations in this type of AMD. In Case B, both upward pH adjustment under reducing conditions and application of an electrochemically stimulated supported liquid membrane strategy to separate REEs from ferrous ion will be explored.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2019

US-India Consortium for Development of Sustainable Advanced Lignocellulosic Biofuel Systems

This multi-institutional project had as it main objectives to develop a fully integrated platform for the production of advanced biofuels, specifically butanol, from sustainably produced switchgrass and biomass sorghum and to develop economic models that could guide the establishment of a crop to fuel value chain. The project was organized into three work packages: (1) WP1 Feedstock Development and Supply. Activities in this WP resulted in the development of improved biomass sorghum cultivars and biomass hybrids that generate high yields of biomass with limited inputs of water, fertilizer and agri-chemicals and that display less recalcitrance to enzymatic saccharification at the biorefinery; the identification of physiological responses and genes associated with sorghum’s tolerance to water logging as the basis for the development of biomass sorghums that can be cultivated on land prone to flooding; the identification of water-logging tolerant switchgrass genotypes among existing germplasm; the identification of management practices that maximize switchgrass biomass yield (fertilizer applications, harvest regimens) on commercial farms on different types of soil in Missouri. (2) WP2 Biorefinery Technologies. This WP included the development of a recombinant E. coli strain able to convert fermentable sugars derived from biomass sorghum and switchgrass to butyrate as a precursor for the advanced biofuel butanol. Butanol is toxic to most microbes, so that yields tend to be low. In contrast, butyrate can be produced in high titer and high yield by several naturally occurring bacteria, but these species are strictly anaerobic, which complicates commercial production. Our strategy involved developing a recombinant strain of E. coli able to produce high yields and high titers of butyrate. The butyrate can then be reduced to butanol via chemical conversion. In addition, a techno-economic analysis of converting sorghum and switchgrass biomass to ethanol was conducted based on data obtained at a pilot biorefinery. These data combined with small-scale butanol production data were used as the basis for a techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-butanol conversion. Furthermore, the biorefinery stillage was evaluated as a source of fertilizer or soil amendment. In contrast to the use of biochar as a soil amendment, stillage resulted in enhanced microbial activity in the soil and release of CO2. Stillage was determined to be a suitable feedstock for biogas production in an anaerobic digester. Biorefinery lignin can be blended with polymers to create novel UV-resistant materials promising for application in outer space, and as a source of organic acids for use in plastics. These applications offer opportunities to create value from the biorefinery residues. (3) WP3. This WP focused on development of economic models that can help define the most successful strategy for implementing biofuel production from bioenergy crops. Southeastern Missouri was determined to be the best location for a bio-butanol facility that processes biomass crops, due to the abundance of feedstock within a small radius of the facility. The most effective transportation method is by rail car. Feedstock availability was considered a more important driver for commercial success than the availability of a butanol market. The average cost of producing switchgrass biomass was calculated to be $65/ton assuming a biomass yield of 8 tons per hectare (the upper end of the yield in the commercial trials in WP2). Lower yields drive up costs, but improved genotypes will conversely reduce costs. Based on farmer surveys, conducting university extension activities was determined to positively influence farmers’ willingness to consider switchgrass. Other factors included experience with pasture land and forest land, and the availability of policies that provide a safety net to the farmers in case of instability in the biofuels market. This instability can be mitigated in part by ensuring adequate biomass supplies through diversification. The project supported the training of 20 graduate students and resulted in 57 peer-reviewed journal articles (with eight additional in review or in progress), eight book chapters and five patents.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Room Temperature Electrochemical Upgrading of Methane to Oxygenate Fuels

The overall objective of this project is to discover the nature of the electrochemically active sites and to uncover the mechanisms for the electrocatalytic transformation of small organic molecules to oxygenate products such as methanol, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and ethylene. Among the feedstocks of interest in this study were: methane, carbon dioxide, and acetic acid. Methane is an incredibly attractive potential feedstock because of the recent discovery of large shale deposits; carbon dioxide is potentially a very available feedstock from carbon capture technologies; acetic acid (as well as CH4 and CO2 and ethanol) has potential as a bio-derived feedstock. This report summarizes the major results to date regarding the electrochemical transformation of CH4, CO2 and acetic acid to chemicals and fuels – with a primary focus on methane. It should be noted that this was a grant that was transferred to the University of South Carolina following the PI’s move from the University of Connecticut. Therefore, this report – as a summary document – contains the results over the entire duration of the project. In addition to the primary objective, the work in this project has led to synergistic discoveries that are advantageous to other fields including: catalyst layer deposition, anion exchange membrane fuel cells, CO2 capture and li-ion batteries. Those are very briefly discussed as well.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2020

FLC Notable Technology Award Oleo-Furan Surfactant

It’s a well-kept secret that laundry detergents are harmful to the environment. The important chemical in laundry detergent, called a surfactant. Surfactants are the workhorses of laundry detergent and soaps, and they're attracted to things like grease on your hands and dirt in your clothes to wash them away. Surfactants are used in everything from shampoo, hand soap, laundry detergent, and cosmetics. Many current surfactants are made from petroleum feedstock. These petroleum-derived building blocks come with a big carbon footprint. As the need for greener feedstock alternatives for synthesizing surfactants became obvious, manufacturers turned to natural oils, such as palm kernel and coconut oil. However, these oils are costly, particularly in areas where they are not domestically produced, and using them for surfactant synthesis competes with the food supply chain. Surfactants deactivate and do not work in hard water. Hard water is common - 85% of the U.S. water supply is considered hard because of the presence of small metal ions. These metal ions cover the surfactants making them useless. To solve this problem, many manufacturers add chemicals called chelators to bind the metal ions and make the water less hard, enhancing the effectiveness of the laundry detergent. However, this solution leads to more problems, including increased cost of detergent production and a large output of environmentally harmful chemicals. There remains a strong need for effective laundry detergents that do not negatively impact the environment and are available to consumers at an affordable cost. The American Cleaning Institute (ACI), a surfactant manufacturer organizing body, is emphasizing commitment to developing bio-renewable alternatives to current surfactants in laundry detergents. That’s why chemists at SIRONIX Renewables partnered with Los Alamos National Laboratory to further develop Oleo-furan surfactants (OFS). OFS are a new class of non-toxic, non-irritating surfactants for laundry detergent. It is the only surfactant that performs effectively in cold and hard water without chelators to bind the metal ions in hard water. OFS can be produced readily from sustainable, bio-derived molecules. They are multi-functional molecules - performing the role of a surfactant and a chelator in one - and are completely bio-degradable. OFS does not rely on petroleum feedstock and is synthesized from non-food, bio-renewable cellulosic feedstock. OFS solves each of the pertinent problems facing detergents and our environment today.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Chemical Recycling of Mixed Plastics and Valuable Metals in the Electronic Waste Using Solvent-Based Processing

Annually, 20-55 million tons of electronic waste (e-waste) is produced worldwide (5% of all municipal solid waste). Although e-waste embodies only 2% of America’s municipal waste, it accounts for a significantly larger proportion of the heavy metals and flame retardants present in the waste stream. Currently, less than 20% of all e-waste is recycled in the United States because the heterogeneity of the feedstock limits the opportunity for reuse in high value products and processing of the waste itself is often too costly to justify handling. To address this concern, the aims of this study are: 1) to identify the major plastic and metal compositions within electronic shredder residue (ESR), 2) to formulate solvents and processing conditions to separate 90% of the plastics targeted from consumer shred ESR, and 3) to develop a process design model to estimate the cost and energy efficiency of the proposed solvent-based processing. In this study, a pre-sorted heterogeneous ESR feedstock (one where aluminum, magnetic components, and hazardous battery materials removed by an e-waste recycling facility) was used, with the major compositions of the ESR characterized. It was found that 25 wt.% of the feedstock was composed of plastics, 6 wt.% rubber, 27 wt.% printed circuit boards, 23% wire, and the remainder metals and capacitors. Within the plastic portion, polystyrene (PS, 40 wt.%), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS, 25 wt.%), and styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN, 9wt.%) were identified to compose the majority of the screened plastics using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Next, selective solvents were screened using Hansen Solubility Parameter Theory (HSP) for dissolving PS and ABS. The pre-screening results show that methylene chloride (dichloromethane, DCM) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) are capable of dissolving the most PS and ABS, while methanol (MeOH) and ethylene glycol (EG) are capable of precipitating the most PS and ABS. These solvents were subsequently used to recover polymers and remove. flame retardants within the ESR feedstock. By optimizing the dissolution time and the solvents used, the highest polymer dissolution yield (99 wt.%%) was achieved using DCM for 48 hr. Both pre-screened anti-solvents (MeOH and EG) showed the highest polymer precipitation yield (71 wt.%). In terms of flame retardant removal rate, EG was found to have a high phosphorus-containing flame retardant removal rate (up to 98%). Characterization shows that the proposed solvent-based processing can preserve a high molecular weight fraction of the polymers and effectively remove flame retardants. Cost analysis indicates that the amount of the solvent/anti-solvent recovered after the reaction would play a critical role in reducing the operating costs. The energy analysis shows that the proposed solvent-based processes can save up to 60% of the embodied energy used to manufacture plastics used in electronics (PS and ABS were used for calculations). The results from this project prove the potential of solvent-based processing to produce secondary materials (plastics and metals) from e-waste for cross-industry reuse.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2022

Enabling Sustainable Landscape Design for Continual Improvement of Operating Bioenergy Supply Systems

This unique and highly effective project catalyzed collaboration among government, university, and private sector partners through a multi-state research and technology transfer project designed to support continuous improvement of bioenergy feedstock supply systems. Conceived and built upon the foundation created by prior DOE investments in the Billion Ton Study, Sun Grant Regional Project, and many other feedstock production, harvest, storage and transportation studies, this project addressed seven tasks with more than 29 subtasks. All goals were met with key accomplishments being: (1) on-farm establishment of potential perennial plant mixtures that could not only become sustainable feedstock sources but also enhance soil health, (2) a reduction in potential wind and water erosion by improving corn stover harvest techniques and incorporating cover crops into current row-crop production systems, (3) reduced potential for surface and groundwater contamination while also increasing potential biodiversity and sustainability of Midwestern USA landscapes, and (4) development of site-specific land management, data visualization, and sustainability assessment tools. Twenty-two Case Studies highlighting accomplishments and lessons learned through this public-private partnership investment are incorporated into this final report. On-farm and replicated field plot studies were used to provide the real-world data needed to verify baseline assumptions for extensive feedstock logistic modeling and greenhouse gas (GHG) assessments needed to develop sustainable bioenergy and bio-product industries at national and international scales.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Abstract for CRADA between NETL and Eion Corp (AGMT-1287)

The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and Eion Carbon (Participant) will collaborate in the development of critical metals (CM) extraction from mafic feedstocks prior to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) removal (CDR) strategies. Mafic/ultramafic feedstocks may provide a source of energy relevant CM (e.g. Co, Cu, Ni, REE) in addition to reducing atmospheric CO 2 through enhanced weathering and subsequent ocean alkalinity enhancement. This research will identify candidate feedstocks with salable CM and methods for CM extraction as value added byproducts for the principal intended use of these alkaline feedstocks by Eion as a permanent CDR approach on farmland.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗