Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “entry”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53

An Overview of Experiments in The Entry Systems Modeling Project

The Entry Systems Modeling (ESM) project has invested in experiments designed to enhance understanding of salient interactions between thermal protection materials (TPS) and mission-relevant planetary entry environments. An arc-jet campaign has been carried out at the Aerodynamic Heating Facility (AHF) to investigate the spallation of fiber particles as a function of gas composition and to measure the effect of pyrolysis gas flow on the in-depth temperature response of phenolic impregnated carbon ablator (PICA). Moreover, fundamental insights into the pyrolysis and oxidation mechanisms of the phenolic binding agent of FiberForm will be discussed. Finally, two new apparatus developed at NASA will be presented that were designed to interrogate phenomena associated with the production of gases and particles generated under simulated flight conditions.

Material Response↗

Towards the Prediction of Entry Capsule Dynamic Stability Characteristics with Reduced Free Flight Motion in FUN3D

Work is done to verify FUN3D's 6-DOF path and begin active application to flight projects. This work moves towards a computational predictive capability for entry capsule dynamic stability such that data from concurrent ground testing will enable validation efforts of this solver and its continued use on EDL vehicles. Applications of the solver to the Dragonfly mission to Titan and the Mars Sample Return - Earth Entry System are discussed.

Eli Shellabarger↗

Earth Entry System Atmosphere Model Study

The Mars Sample Return Campaign has the ambitious goal of returning Mars samples back to Earth [1]. The Earth Entry System (EES), containing the samples, conducts entry, descent, and landing (EDL) on a direct Earth trajectory. During EDL, the EES traverses through many regions of Earth’s atmosphere before impacting the ground at Utah Test and Training Range (UTTR). This poster highlights preliminary results from a study that assessed the flight mechanics simulation sensitivity to atmosphere model settings and investigated the validity of current atmosphere models as compared to available atmospheric data measurements.

Rohan Deshmukh↗

Effect of Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation on Surface Pressure Predictions for Atmospheric Entry Simulations

A metric-based mesh adaptation capability has been developed for the advanced compressible flow solver US3D. Metric-based mesh adaptation is a solution informed mesh adaptation strategy that improves the resolution of the mesh along anisotropic flow features, like strong shock waves or shear layers. An anisotropic error indicator is reconstructed based on a provided Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solution which prescribes the locally desired element size and orientation. The benefits of this mesh adaptation strategy is twofold: first, it simplifies the manual meshing labor that typically needs to be carried out by the CFD engineer because the mesh adaptation is informed by the provided solution. Second, the computational cost is kept to a minimum while improving the resolution of the simulation. The aim here is to demonstrate how anisotropic mesh adaptation can be employed to improve the predictions of surface pressure for atmospheric entry vehicles. In this work, we compare CFD simulations that use this newly developed anisotropic mesh adaptation capability for US3D with pressure data that was collected by Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation (MEDLI2) suite.

Dirk Ekelschot↗

Entry Systems and Vehicle Development Branch (Code TSS)

- TSS was established in 2009 to work with discipline-oriented branches (TSA, TSM, TSF) and provide a leadership approach for sub-system design and hardware components that comprise entry systems. - Currently, branch comprises 11 civil servants and 11 contractors. - 19 NASA Honor Awards in Exceptional Service (2), Achievement (2), Engineering Achievement (5), Early Career Achievement (5), and Outstanding Leadership (5). - In the last decade, TSS has built up core competencies that enable the branch to deliver end-to-end entry systems and vehicle development capabilities.

Antonella Alunni↗

Status of the 3-MDCP, the 3-D Woven TPS enabling MSR Earth Entry System Development

While the HEEET project established the dual-layer, 3-D Woven TPS at TRL 6 for extreme entry environment missions such as Saturn and Ice-Giant Probe missions, subsequent to the completion of HEEET project in 2018, further development was undertaken to assess the viability of a variant of the 3-D Woven, a single, insulating layer alone as a viable TPS for Mars Sample Return mission. MSR Earth Entry System (EES) baselined it and named the TPS as 3D, mid-density, carbon-phenolic (3MDCP). MSR program invested in building a new loom and the weaver T.E.A.M. Inc is currently weaving 80” wide 1.2” thick insulating layer. Unlike HEEET, where a set of tiles and seams are integrated to form the heat-shield, 3MDCP is a seamless heatshield by wrapping and shaping a flat panel into the heatshield shape and then rigidizing the preform through resin infusion. MSR EES is investing in technology maturation of 3MDCP for the current mission launch in 2027. This lighting talk will provide key developments and time line for 3MDCP technology maturation to show that 3MDCP will be ready to support future UOP or Saturn Probe mission. In addition, the limitations of the capability will be presented so that Saturn mission proposers as well as UOP flagship mission study can be fully informed as to the 3MDCP capability.

HEEET↗

Status of the Development of 3MDCP, the 3-D Woven TPS enabling the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System

- The Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System is being designed to withstand entry environments of: - Peak Heat Flux of > 3000 W/cm2 - Peak Dynamic Pressure of > 2 atmospheres - Peak Shear of > 3000 Pa. - The TPS Material System Selected to support MSR EES is “3MDCP”, 3D Mid Density Carbon Phenolic. 3MDCP is a derivative of the HEEET material system, using the “Insulation Layer” only. - Implementation of 3MDCP on EES is monolithic instead of a tile architecture in order to meet MSR reliability demands. - The EES TPS Team has recently completed a number of major engineering development milestones in support of delivering the flight 3MDCP TPS hardware: - Weaving Scale-Up completed, > 80” width woven preform production underway - Full Scale Forming & Manufacturing Attrition completed to verify delivered thickness capabilities. - Recent Design Change: EES design has been changed from a 45 degree sphere cone to a 52.5 degree sphere cone to allow for additional system mass.

Z. Young↗

Efficient Parametric Uncertainty Analysis of an Earth Entry Vehicle Concept Using Least Angle Regression

The objective of this work was to outline and apply an efficient and accurate parametric un-certainty propagation approach to the analysis of convective heating on an Earth entry vehicle concept. The described approach was based on Least Angle Regression used to solve a sparse and underdetermined linear system in the point-collocation non-intrusive polynomial chaos surrogate method. This approach involved an iterative process to computing the non-zero terms of the underlying polynomial chaos model using only enough samples to converge uncertainty interval predictions and Sobol index values based global nonlinear sensitivity estimates. The Earth entry vehicle was analyzed at three points along a representative trajectory for a Mars return mission. 329 sources of uncertainty were identified in the computational fluid dynamics model used to predict the forebody convective heating. These included uncertainty in flow field chemical rates, collision integrals, heats of formation, surface finite rate char model reaction rates, wall roughness height, and the turbulent Schmidt number. Results from this study showed that convective heating uncertainty as high as 50% of the nominal was predicted with only about 50 evaluations of the computational model. This was far fewer than would be required for a sampling-based approach or a full basis polynomial chaos model, which would have required over 50,000 samples. Additionally, results showed that over 90% of the total convective heating uncertainty was due to uncertainty in the N2catalytic rate on the surface, while the remainder of the uncertainty was attributed to the turbulent Schmidt number and the wall roughness uncertainties.

Thomas K West IV↗

An Overview of Experiments in The Entry Systems Modeling Project

The Entry Systems Modeling (ESM) project has invested in experiments designed to enhance understanding of salient interactions between thermal protection materials (TPS) and mission-relevant planetary entry environments. An arc-jet campaign has been carried out at the Aerodynamic Heating Facility (AHF) to investigate the spallation of fiber particles as a function of gas composition and to measure the effect of pyrolysis gas flow on the in-depth temperature response of phenolic impregnated carbon ablator (PICA). Moreover, fundamental insights into the pyrolysis and oxidation mechanisms of the phenolic binding agent of FiberForm will be discussed. Finally, two new apparatus developed at NASA will be presented that were designed to interrogate phenomena associated with the production of gases and particles generated under simulated flight conditions.

Varcum↗

Entry, Descent, and Landing Communications for the Mars 2020 Lander Mission

The Mars 2020 mission was launched on July 30, 2020 and successfully landed in Jezero Crater on February 18, 2021. The challenging Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) sequence was observed by ground stations on Earth and by orbiters at Mars. This paper discusses the design of the launch and arrival period to ensure maximum Earth visibility, the details of phasing the orbiting assets, and the development of the entry relay targets needed to ensure robust spacecraft telecommunications during EDL.

Abilleira, Fernando↗

Mars 2020 Perseverance Entry Descent and Landing Simulation Statistical Analysis and Operations

On February 18, 2021, the Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter demonstra- tion landed at Jezero Crater. The Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) architecture, largely the same used to land Curiosity at Gale Crater on August 6, 2012, required high-fidelity flight dynamics simulation with two independent tools to verify per- formance. The process for creating the EDL simulation using the Dynamics Sim- ulator for Entry, Descent and Surface landing (DSENDS) tool will be discussed, along with its use for for independent verification of the EDL statistical analy- sis results and reference trajectory simulation. Analysis and usage details both in development and cruise, along with post-landing assessment of the prediction performance of the simulation, will also be discussed.

"O'Farrell, Clara"↗

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing System Software Implementation

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 project's Perseverance Rover successfully touched down on the Martian surface after nearly eight years of development. The Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) System largely leveraged heritage from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) EDL System while employing targeted technological advancements. The landing process is autonomously directed by a software behavior implemented in the rover's primary flight computer called the EDL Timeline that assumes control of the vehicle six days before atmospheric entry. This paper first walks through the basics of the EDL Timeline mechanics and how the behavior is designed to account for internal system variations and environmental unknowns. It then summarizes the interactions between the EDL timeline and other high-level system behaviors like spacecraft mode transitions and system fault protection, focusing on the complications that arise when passing spacecraft control between executive functions. Although the MSL-inherited EDL System is reliable and capable, targeted updates and a thorough verification and validation program were required for Mars 2020. This paper discusses changes made to close vulnerabilities discovered during both MSL and Mars 2020 development cycles, landing system capability enhancements that were enabling for Mars 2020's mission, and how these updates were integrated with the heritage system. It then describes how both analysis and testing campaigns were utilized to verify and validate all aspects of EDL and system behaviors that run during the six days before landing, as well as the operational workarounds that were needed to address problems found during the development and commissioning process. Finally, this paper imparts lessons learned from Mars 2020 EDL development, implementation, and operations, emphasizing how systems designed to conduct time-critical mission events with low margin of error can be improved in the future.

Stehura, Aaron↗

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing as Observed by Radio Science Techniques at UHF and X-band Frequencies

On February 18, 2021, NASA’s Mars 2020 Rover “Perseverance” conducted the Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) sequence to land safely on the surface of Mars at Jezero Crater. Due to the criticality of the EDL sequence, redundant telecommunications strategies were utilized to observe the event. The rover transmitted an X-band (8.4 GHz) signal encoded with Multiple Frequency Shift Keying tones direct-to-Earth and a UHF (401.5 MHz) signal with 8 kbps encoded telemetry to orbiters, which relayed the signal back to Earth at X-band. NASA’s Deep Space Network complexes at Goldstone, California and Madrid, Spain received the direct-to-Earth X-band signal. Two of the largest steerable radio telescopes in the world, the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia and the Effelsberg 100-meter Radio Telescope in Germany also received the UHF carrier signal on Earth. During the EDL event, full spectrum recordings of the UHF and X-band signals were captured at these observatories using open-loop receivers. Real-time and post-processing signal analysis to determine power level, received frequency, and Doppler shift allowed determination of the spacecraft’s health and safety state during critical sequences, including event detection such as atmospheric entry, plasma blackouts, and parachute deployment. Simultaneous observations of the UHF and X-band radio links allow for redundancy in the event of a fault and greatly improve confidence in Doppler event detection.

Gladden, Roy↗

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Software Implementation

On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 project's Perseverance Rover successfully touched down on the Martian surface after nearly eight years of development. The Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) System largely leveraged heritage from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) EDL System while employing targeted technological advancements. The landing process is autonomously directed by a software behavior implemented in the rover's primary flight computer called the EDL Timeline that assumes control of the vehicle six days before atmospheric entry. In addition to performing the critical function of landing the rover on the Martian surface, the EDL timeline behavior must co-exist in a non-partitioned software and system environment with other high-level functions that accomplish the goals for the rest of the mission. Due to the criticality of EDL, the potential for loss of mission, and a need for complete system autonomy, the standard for how the EDL Timeline interacts with other functions in the system is highly constrained. This paper first walks through the basics of the EDL Timeline mechanics and how the behavior is designed to account for internal system variations and environmental unknowns. It then summarizes the interactions between the EDL timeline and other high-level system behaviors like spacecraft mode transitions and system fault protection, focusing on the complications that arise when passing spacecraft control between executive functions. Although the MSL-inherited EDL System is reliable and capable, targeted updates and a thorough verification and validation program were required for Mars 2020. This paper discusses changes made to close vulnerabilities discovered during both MSL and Mars 2020 development cycles, landing system capability enhancements that were enabling for Mars 2020's mission, and how these updates were integrated with the heritage system. It then describes how both analysis and testing campaigns were utilized to verify and validate all aspects of EDL and system behaviors that run during the six days before landing, as well as the operational workarounds that were needed to address problems found during the development and commissioning process. Finally, this paper imparts lessons learned from Mars 2020 EDL development, implementation, and operations, emphasizing how systems designed to conduct time-critical mission events with low margin of error can be improved in the future.

Stehura, Aaron↗

Overview of Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Analysis Process for Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System

Introduction: Micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk analyses for the Mars Sample Return (MSR) Earth Entry System (EES) have been significantly more rigorous than previously flown missions because of its categorization as a Class V restricted return mission. This means the returned samples present significant concern for biogenic contamination. These analyses seek to determine if a micrometeoroid or orbital debris strike would result in loss of containment assurance and are summarized in the flowchart in Fig. 1. Methodology: The mission is considered in two MMOD phases: a pre-release phase where the EES is protected by a Micrometeoroid Protection System (MMPS) and a post-release phase called “free-flight” where the EES is exposed directly to the MMOD environment. These phases correspond to interplanetary cruise and imminent re-entry, respectively. To inform the MMPS design, a 30-shot high velocity impact testing (HVIT) series on candidate configurations at NASA White Sands Test Facility was completed in the summer of 2022. Sample post-shot images are shown in Fig 2 [1]. These data are used to baseline the MMPS design and to tune the hydrocode simulations. ALE3D, CTH, and SPHC are the hydrocodes that simulate physics of high-speed impacts [2]. Results generated with these populate a penetration depth versus energy space beyond the testable velocity regime of HVIT (~7 km/s). The penetration depth versus energy space data are used to define a critical projectile diameter function called a Ballistic Limit Equation (BLE), where the projectile “criticality” is determined by zone dependent failure criteria defined a-priori [3]. For example, the nose of the heatshield has a failure criterion of 50% TPS penetration, assigned because the landing loads are concentrated on that region and no substructure damage is permitted. The BLEs for each vehicle material zone are input into the BUMPER 3 code, along with the vehicle surface mesh and the corresponding space environment model, to calculate a probability of penetration or number of penetrations. The environment models, MEM3 for MM and ORDEM 3.2 for OD, simulate the meteoroid environment from 0.2 to 2 au based on the Grün flux equation, and the debris environment up to 40,000 km altitude from Earth surface, respectively [4,5]. Presentation Focus: The presentation or poster will present the results to-date focusing on the full risk analysis process flow seen in Fig. 1. Details on the derivation of the failure criteria will be discussed, along with HVIT results and how these influenced the MMPS configuration baseline decision. Further, results of hydrocode simulations will be presented and the tuning to HVIT outputs will be described. Finally, the strategies that direct the BLE formulation will be reviewed, specifically, for the EES elements that are most exposed to the MMOD environment.

mmod↗

An Overview of the Aerothermodynamic Database for the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle

The Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System (MSR-EES) is a capsule that is part of the Mars Sample Return mission that will return Martian soil samples to Earth in 2033. Due to the steep flight path angle and relatively large vehicle size, the MSR-EES capsule will experience the highest peak heating rate of any previous Earth entry vehicle. The aerothermal database for MSR-EES is primarily characterized by numerical CFD, DSMC, and radiation simulations. Margins are applied to the convective and radiative heating rates. Surface roughness effects and margins are also included in the database formulation. The aerothermal database can be used to extract information at any body point location, perform trade studies in trajectory space, and provide inputs for material response simulations.

Mars↗

AERACEPT (Aerosol Rapid Analysis Combined Entry Probe/sonde Technology): Enabling Technology for Missions to the Venus Clouds

AERACEPT (AErosol Rapid Analysis Combined Entry Probe/sonde Technology) is an early-stage technology allowing a single aeroshell body to act as both an entry vehicle and aerosol-sampling passive descent sonde. AERACEPT does not require heat shield separation, deployable parachutes, or descent control, thus reducing the mass, volume, and complexity of planetary aerosol sampling. AERACEPT is particularly well suited for a Venus mission, where the particles of greatest interest are within the subsonic descent regime. AERACEPT uses the aeroshell’s own velocity to drive aerosol capture and separation through a series of embedded inlets. It takes advantage of recently developed thermal protection materials (3D-CC and HEEET) in combination with heritage aerosol sampling technologies from both planetary and airborne science (high-speed inlets and particle separation). The trade space for a given descent trajectory includes the particle capture efficiency for a given size, the bias introduced in the sampled particle size and concentration distributions, and the thermal alteration experienced by the particles during their brief exposure to the internal flow environment. AERACEPT is included in the Nephele mission concept study for a small spacecraft targeting the Venus middle and lower cloud layers. Nephele complements larger missions targeting Venus atmospheric gas analysis, such as DAVINCI and Venera-D, by specifically targeting cloud and haze particles. Because of the short lifetime of the probe in the lower atmosphere, Nephele requires a fast cadence of analysis of the captured particles, and includes the VOLTR dual optical spectrometer (SERS/LIBS) as part of its notional payload. Preliminary modeling based on the Nephele trajectory at 63 km to 39 km indicates AERACEPT can limit sample heating to 30-60 K above ambient. A modified particle tracking model has been implemented to estimate capture efficiency of particles larger than 0.1 µm and total sample volume as part of an inlet and interal flow path geometry trade study. Further modeling and empirical testing is underway to improve these estimates.

AERACEPT↗

Analysis of Mars 2020 Entry with Coupled Material Response and CFD

When computing the response of an ablating thermal protection system during entry, the aerothermal environment and material response are traditionally computed independently, with the introduction of a blowing correction term in the material response model to account for the outgassing of char and pyrolysis gases. This study presents an approach, where the pyrolysis blowing gases, calculated within the PATO material response code [1], are integrated into the DPLR hypersonic CFD code [2] via a blowing boundary condition. This methodology employs an iterative process, whereby the blown pyrolysis gas products from PATO are incorporated into DPLR, refining surface heating predictions. The NEQAIR code is used to compute radiative heating [3]. The method is applied in computing 3D material response of the Mars 2020 entry. When compared with uncoupled material response, the coupled simulations show a lower surface heat flux initially and a higher heat flux at peak heating as shown in Fig. 1. This is in agreement with previous work using a sphere case with environments from MSL [4].

Heat Transfer↗