Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Radiation protection”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Big data health physics: a case study in operational health physics

This paper, written as a two part project as required by Illinois Institute of Technology’s Phys597 Reading & Special Problems class and health physics professional master’s program, focuses on the results of a prototype data collection process implemented at a Los Alamos National Laboratory facility. In particular, this paper examines the data in a statistical context in an effort to optimize operational health physics processes at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2020

TA55-PMDS Programmatic Maintenance [Slides]

DOE Order 433.1B states: “The contractor must maintain real property assets in a manner that promotes operational safety, worker health, environmental compliance, property preservation and cost-effectiveness while meeting the program mission”. P950 Conduct of Maintenance serves as LANL’s Nuclear Maintenance Management Program specific to M/L 1 and M/L 2 SSC. PA-AP-01108 Maintenance Requirements for Programmatic Equipment defines the process for determining maintenance requirements, as defined in a maintenance plan, for all programmatic equipment owned by the Associate Directorate for Plutonium Science and Manufacturing (ADPSM) utilizing a formal, graded approach to maximize the reliability of permanently-installed programmatic equipment that does not perform a safety function. It bridges the gap between P950 and program equipment.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Scan of an Unpublished Report: "Fission Product Behavior During Severe LWR Accidents: Recommendations for the MELCOR Code System"

This document provides a scanned version of a 1987 SAND report that was never formally published. However, this report was referenced within the MELCOR Reference Manual and, therefore, provides historical information and technical basis for the MELCOR code. This document is being made available to permit users of the MELCOR code access to the information. The title page has been edited to prevent any confusion with regards to the possible documentation identifiers, such as the SAND report number or the intended date of publication. Beyond these modifications, a cover, distribution, and back cover are prepended and appended to the document to conform to modern SAND report style guidelines. The first four chapters of this report were updated and released under the title "Fission Product Behavior During Severe LWR Accidents: Recommendations for the MELCOR Code System. Volume I" and were made available by the U.S. NRC through the Adams database under accession number ML19227A327. No prior release of the remaining content of this report has occurred.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

MCNP modelling of the Thermo SPA3 with Tungsten (Rees model) collimator

A Thermo Model SPA3 2”x2” NaI probe fitted with a Tungsten collimator has been modelled using MCNP6. The collimator was assumed to be machinable Tungsten which typically includes Ni and Fe. Various ratios of these additives are used in industry and for the purposes of these calculations the collimator was assumed to contain 7% Ni and 3% Fe with a density of 17.0 g/cm 3 . The dimensions of the collimator were based on measurements taken by Mike Fanning. The above detector model was used, in a manner similar to the approach described in LA-UR-19-32358, to calculate photopeak count rates per unit activity per unit area (i.e. cpm per pCi/cm 2 ) conversion factors for various contamination scenarios.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Dose Calculations from Source Models and Gamma-Ray Spectra

Gamma-ray dose rates computed by two radiation source model-based methods and five measured spectrum-based methods are compared. With the exception of a Detective DX-100, which reported dose rates that are about 25% less than the mean, dose rates are generally within 10% of mean values. Methods for computation of dose rates employed by the Gamma Detector Response and Analysis Software (GADRAS) are described and critically evaluated. Results are presented for a feasibility evaluation that seeks to use spectra recorded inside vehicles to estimate the minimum dose outside the vehicles.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hanford Site Disposition Baseline for Composite Analysis

An updated version of the Hanford Site Disposition Baseline (HSDB) was prepared to document the evolution of conditions for 637 waste sites within Central Plateau of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford Site. The HSDB provides information that will be used to evaluate post-closure radiological dose in the updated composite analysis (CA).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hotspot 2.07.1 doses (FGR-13) from releases of 1 g Pu-239 (SBK Calcs)

This calculation is to be used for accident analysis at B239, B331, B332, and B334. The objective of this analysis is to determine: The dose per gram of Pu-239 Solubility Class S (FGR-13) for various release heights, receptor heights and distances from 100 to 1000 meters. This calculation can be used to evaluate particulate plume dispersion releases for the co-located worker and public receptors.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Radioactive Plume Avoidance and Aircraft Decontamination – Best Practices

Response to an incident involving the release of radioactive material will most likely involve aircraft for disaster relief and radiological monitoring. Aircraft flying into a radiologically contaminated area risk becoming contaminated, and in the worst cases having to be removed from service. Contamination is avoidable, and decontamination is possible, but both require planning and forethought.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Site 300 B-851 Permit: Radiological Assumptions and Source Term - Air Dispersion Modeling for Radiological Dose Assessment

The following modeling assumptions and source term that is provided in the attachments to this document are meant to serve as a guide to the presentation delivered on April 23rd, 2020, to the San Joaquin Air District Permit Services slides. This analysis is in response to the District’s “Project Incompleteness Letter” (Facility Number: N-472 and Project Number: N-1173492) regarding the potential for depleted uranium (DU) to be resuspended from areas of contaminated soil at Site 300 as a result of high explosive (HE) experiments increased to a requested permitted maximum of 1,000 pound detonations with an annual HE throughput not to exceed 7,500 pounds per year. LLNL has taken every step in the radiological health risk concerns in the modeling assumptions and final source term to be at a level of maximum conservativeness. As an example, forty soil samples were taken in the B-851 area (LLNL-AR-738708 – 2018) and assayed for uranium-234, uranium-235, and uranium-238 concentrations. The maximum uranium soil concentrations were used in the assumptions (potential for resuspended dust occurring from detonation experiments) and not the use of median uranium soil concentrations – a more realistic outcome. Additionally, these uranium soil concentrations were considered to be at 100% uptake in the vegetation for prescribed burns; vegetation uptake factors were not used as that would lower the final source term. This level of conservativeness was maintained throughout the modeling assumptions.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2020

Otowi Well No. 4 Analytical Results

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) collected soil samples near Otowi Well No. 4 on behalf of Los Alamos County (LAC) to address health and safety concerns related to potential radioactive contamination in Los Alamos canyon. Oil had spilled from Otowi Well No. 4 and sampling was to determine if radiological contamination in the soils to be excavated in response to that spill presented a health or safety risk to LAC personnel who would be involved in the cleanup. Results of the sampling event are attached to this memo.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Overview of PFAS at LANL [Slides]

This presentation addresses these questions. What are the potential uses and sources of PFAS at LANL? What are the emerging issues? What are federal and state agencies doing regarding PFAS? Where are we monitoring PFAS at LANL? What are the preliminary findings of PFAS monitoring? What do the data suggest? Where do we go from here?

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Calculation for T Plant Estimated PTE with Receipt of K Basin Sludge and Filter Media

The purpose of this environmental calculation is to: (1) show compliance with the WAC 173-400-110, New Source Review (NSR) for Sources and Portable Sources requirements and (2) provide the methodology, assumptions and calculation used to estimate the potential to emit (PTE) and Total Effective Dose Equivalent to the Maximally Exposed Individual (TEDE to the MEI) radionuclide airborne emissions associated with the receipt of K Basin sludge and filter media for storage at T Plant.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Independent Review of Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Freon Release Authorized Limits and Evaluation of Corresponding Radiological Doses

The Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO) proposes to use the American National Standard Institute (ANSI)/Health Physics Society (HPS) N13.12 (ANSI 2013) volumetric screening levels as Authorized Limits (ALs) for the release of cryofluorane R-114 (Freon) at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) in Paducah, Kentucky. A review of the proposed ALs document indicated that potential exposure scenarios from the release of Freon are adequately discussed therein. However, questions arose regarding the assumptions made for the ANSI N13.12 clearance values, and whether or not all pathway doses were adequately considered in the Authorized Limits Request. For example, PPPO used the inverse square rule to estimate dose to the truck driver. A more appropriate evaluation would have considered the material as a cylindrical source for this pathway. In addition, the inverse square rule was inadequately applied to the inhalation and ingestion pathways. Furthermore, while the ANSI N13.12 volumetric clearance values are used in the ALs, questions arose concerning whether the values are appropriate for materials of greater than 1 metric ton, and whether or not the ANSI N13.12 standard could be used for liquids that are sent to an incinerator. For these reasons, dose modeling was conducted to demonstrate that using ANSI/HPS N13.12 screening levels as ALs for release of PGDP Freon meets the dose criteria set in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 458.1. This report provides a bounding dose analysis using scenarios described in PPPO document. Realistic parameters, such as the incinerator characteristics data, are used when available.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

GADRAS Batch Inject Tool User Guide

Gamma Detector Response and Analysis Software (GADRAS) is used by the radiation detection and emergency response community to perform modeling and spectral analysis for gamma detector systems. Built into GADRAS is the ability to define a detector, geometry, background characteristics and source composition to generate synthetic spectra for drills and exercises (injects). Consequence Management is currently in development of a sample result data simulator tool in which a deposition model is probed for source conditions at moments in time and locations in space. These values are used to generate realistic sample results for use in drills and exercises. In addition to sample results, there is a need to simulate the actual spectra that would be observed in the field by downlooking HPGe instruments given a deposition activity. This way, the FRMAC Gamma Spectroscopist can practice their process of generating quantified results from spectra on realistic data as well. Recognizing the decades of work done in GADRAS to accurately generate synthetic spectra, this team decided to build a link between the new simulator and GADRAS to generate these spectra quickly and easily. The simulator tool will generate a file that specifies the name of the spectra, its location, date/time of measurement, duration of measurement, height off the ground, and the deposition activity and age for every radionuclide in the simulation. Then, a new tool within the Inject Tab of GADRAS was developed to read in this file given a detector selection and generate In-Situ spectra for each row in the file in any file format the user chooses. This way, simulation cell staff can take these files and then upload them to the appropriate data system (RAMS or RadResponder) for use during drills and exercises. An advanced feature of this tool allows for generating any spectra given an appropriate model and mapping of source to model layer in the batch inject tool. This way, spectra from field sample counts, mobile laboratories, or even fixed laboratories can be generated in bulk given an estimate of the radioactivity concentration or total radioactivity in an import file. This expands the capabilities of this tool a great deal and will make it a more useful tool for CM and others to help estimate detector response for nearly any situation. This user guide will explain the steps needed to perform a batch inject file generation.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparison of Modeled to Measured Spectra using MCNP and GADRAS to Benchmark and Contrast Modeling Limitations

The desire to improve nuclear material detection through portal monitors and other low resolution detectors has led to interest in benchmarking the performance of radiation transport codes. These codes can be used to generate a variety and quantity of spectra that may be cost prohibitive to measure directly. Particular characteristics of typical detection scenarios were isolated to compare the performance of radiation transport codes to laboratory experiments. These benchmark experiments were performed to validate simulations in a number of key areas. These experiments included high areal density configurations in both one- and three-dimensional configurations. In addition, off-angle measurements were conducted to investigate the impact of detector response assumptions on complex geometries, for example where an unknown source is not physically collocated with an apparent hot spot. Furthermore, by examining both simple shielding and backscatter configurations, isolation of the scatter emanating from the object and environmental background scatter contributions to the spectra could be elucidated. A series of experiments were performed in which the order of shielding layers and the thickness were evaluated to examine the ability of the simulations to address these variables. Experiments with increasing thickness of polyethylene around a neutron source also allows for examinations of the ability of the transport simulations to properly model n,γ reactions. Finally, depleted uranium (DU) measurements have more complicated spectra than the cobalt-60 and consequently allow for investigations into the ability of transport simulations to model self-shielding. In each case, the results of the experiments were compared to MCNP simulations to judge the performance of the code, as was done previously with GADRAS 18.7.9 simulations [7]. All of the benchmark measurements were taken with a liquid nitrogen cooled 140% high purity germanium (HPGe) detector with a bismuth collimator that had the front tin filter removed. The measurement location and detector configuration were subsequently used for all experimental configurations. The remainder of this report details the experimental measurements, Section 2 and the MCNP model, Section 3. Comparisons between the experimental results and MCNP-generated spectra are performed, Section 4. Section 5 compares the results obtained with MCNP with the previously reported results obtained with GADRAS [2]. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Evaluating Precision of Measured Radionuclide Ambient Air Concentrations

According to AIRNET – Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Radiological Air Sampling Network, SOP-5140, Revision 2 (to become EPC-CP-PIP-5140): “The regulation 40 CFR Part 61.93 requires that the system be able to readily detect a dose of 1.0 mrem above background. Following statistical principles and assuming 95% confidence for such a measurement, we require that 95% of all measurements must fall within two standard deviations of the mean. This represents the minimum acceptable precision for decision making.” An independent assessment of the Rad-NESHAP program completed in early 2019 found that no documentation existed proving that the Airnet data meets the precision defined above. Therefore, to address this particular finding, Airnet concentration data was pulled from the Environmental Information Management (EIM), a cloud-based database maintained by Locus Technologies, for analysis.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

WIPP MLU Incoming Vehicles Survey Document

The following SNL document contains requested radiological survey information, as part of the documentation for the TRU-waste shipment being performed by the LANL MLU team. The surveys were performed in TA-5, on July 20th, 2020: Incoming WIPP TRU-Pact trailers survey: 1-20200720-4, and, Incoming MLU trailer and mobile crane survey: 1-20200720-8 The first survey was of 2 WIPP trailers carrying 2 empty TRU Half-Pacts each. The second survey was for a trailer with the MLU team's equipment, and for the contracted mobile crane that be used for loading Half-Pacts. All information contained was completed, reviewed, and approved by SNL RP personnel, and is released for receipt and use by the LANL MLU Team and WIPP personnel at their discretion.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗