Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Geothermal Systems”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Code Modifications for Modeling Chemical Tracers and Embedded Natural Fractures at EGS Collab

The EGS Collab SIGMA-V project is a multi-lab and university collaborative research project that is being undertaken at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) in South Dakota. The project consists of studying stimulation, fluid-flow, and heat transfer processes at a scale of 10-20 m, which is readily amenable to detailed characterization and monitoring. One objective of the project is to establish circulation from injector to producer by hydraulically fracturing the injector. Data generated during these experiments is to be compared with predictions from coupled thermal, hydrological, mechanical, and chemical simulators. One such a simulator, TOUGH2-CSM, has been enhanced in order to simulate EGS Collab SIGMA-V project experiments. These modifications include adding tracers, the capability to model tracer sorption, and an embedded fracture formulation. A set of example problems validate our conservative tracer transport and sorption formulations. We then simulated tracer transport and thermal breakthrough for the first EGS Collab SIGMA-V experiment.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

Predicting Hydraulic Fracture Trajectory Under the Influence of a Mine Drift in EGS Collab Experiment I

Experiment I of the EGS Collab project entails drilling largely horizontal wellbores in phyllite of the Precambrian Poorman formation, at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF), located at the former Homestake Gold Mine, in Lead, South Dakota, and creating/stimulating hydraulic fractures from one of the wellbores. The stimulation well was drilled from the old mine drift at the 4850 level (4850 feet deep from ground surface) along the minimum in situ principal stress direction and the fracture initiation point is approximately 40 m from the drift. An essential component of the experiment design is to predict the trajectory of the hydraulic fractures so that the production and monitoring wells can be drilled accordingly and precautionary measures can be taken to prevent the fracture from intersecting the drift. Through thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) coupled simulation of the cooling and drainage history experienced by the drift, we calculate the temperature, pore pressure, and stress distributions around the drift. The calculated temperature is validated against measurements along existing vertical wells. The simulation results suggest that the cooling of the rock around the drift has caused very significant thermal stress with magnitudes up to several MPas near the fracture initiation point. The minimum principal stress decreases rapidly from this point toward the drift. A fully coupled hydraulic fracturing simulation indicates that the fracture would have a strong tendency to propagate toward the drift, driven by the radial gradient of the minimum principal stress. The fracture will remain planar until it curves and becomes parallel to the drift when the fracture front is a few meters from the drift. The role of these simulation results is twofold in the EGS Collab experiment: they guide experiment designs and will be used to validate the simulation codes against the actual experiment results.

Hydraulic fracturing, enhanced geothermal system, ↗
DOE OSTI2012

Raft River EGS Project: A GIS-Centric Review of Geology

The Raft River thermal anomaly is located on the northern margin of the Great Basin. This area has undergone numerous studies due its juxtaposition with the Raft River and Albion metamorphic core complexes, associated low-angle detachment faults, and the presence of the thermal anomaly. Miocene movement along the Raft River detachment displaced a large mass of Paleozoic and Mesozoic rock about 24 km to the east unroofing the shear zone and creating the Raft River Valley. The rocks in the Raft River detachment footwall/shear zone are Archean and Proterozoic in age and are overlain by late Miocene/Pliocene ash-flow tuff, tuffaceous sediments, rhyolite, and mixed Quaternary sediments. Work described here supports the DOE/U.S. Geothermal, Inc. supported Raft River EGS project which is aimed toward improving permeability in well RRG-9. A GIS data suite was developed from historical data and new data produced by this study to help underpin this project. The GIS includes well survey, lithologic, mineralogic, and geophysical data that were incorporated from disparate datasets ranging from scanned images to tabular data in spreadsheets. This data has been visualized and analyzed using GIS-based tools to help build a better understanding of the study area geology. Finally, this includes a possible structural explanation of ground water/geothermal fluid compartmentalization.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Reservoir Response to Thermal and High-Pressure Well Stimulation Efforts at Raft River, Idaho

An injection stimulation test begun at the Raft River geothermal reservoir in June, 2013 has produced a wealth of data describing well and reservoir response via high-resolution temperature logging and distributed temperature sensing, seismic monitoring, periodic borehole televiewer logging, periodic stepped flow rate tests and tracer injections before and after stimulation efforts. The hydraulic response demonstrates continually increasing injectivity, reflected in varying flow rate response to nearly constant injection pressure, but features of the hydraulic response provide information about different characteristics of the reservoir. Changes in injectivity immediately following high-flow rate tests suggest that hydro shearing has altered the near-well permeability structure, while pressure response during those tests indicates that near-well permeability is relatively homogeneous and low but that the well is near, but not well connected to, a zone of higher transmissivity. Long-term changes in injectivity are believed to reflect propagation of the injection cooling front through low permeability zones. Two dimensional flow and heat transport simulations are used to demonstrate how the timescale of pressure response may relate to length scales of permeability distribution.

Well stimulation, injectivity, enhanced geothermal↗
DOE OSTI2024

Leveraging Energy Sales Agreements (ESA) Under ESPC ENABLE and DOE's IDIQ Contract

There is an increasing interest in solar photovoltaics, battery energy storage systems, and geothermal heat pumps to help meet decarbonization and resilience goals. However, facility managers may not know that energy sales agreement (ESA) contracting can be an effective, efficient, and lower cost way to procure and install these projects. FEMP, national labs, and agency partners will discuss best practices and examples that attendees may be able to leverage at their own sites.

DOE FEMP↗
DOE OSTI2021

Geothermal Heat Recovery Complex: Large-Scale, Deep Direct-Use System in a Low-Temperature Sedimentary Basin (Final Report)

A feasibility study of using deep direct-use (DDU) geothermal energy to heat agricultural research facilities (ARFs) was conducted at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (U of IL) and its similar application to military facilities in the Illinois Basin (ILB). The geothermal energy system (GES) investigated utilizes low-temperature (30–90°C; 90–190°F) geothermal fluid (i.e., brine) from an extraction well that is part of a deep, two-well (doublet) system that extends to the bottom of the ILB. The geothermal reservoir modeled, the Mt. Simon Sandstone (MSS), is about 1,280 m (4,200 feet) deep and 457 m thick (1,500 feet) beneath the U of IL. The DDU GES surface infrastructure includes heat exchangers connected in-parallel to pipelines carrying the geothermal fluid and fresh cold and hot water. Analysis of the GES indicated that the MSS can provide a baseload of 2 MMBtu/hr to heat the ARFs by extracting 954 m³/d (6,000 barrels/day [bbl/d]) of geothermal fluid that has a temperature of 44–46 °C (111–115 °F). In addition to analyzing the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) and life cycle costs, the environmental effects of the DDU GES were evaluated, including reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water consumption. Multiple system designs were evaluated and then ranked based on their maximum heating performance, energy efficiency, and cost recovery. This feasibility study identified the key components of the fully-integrated DDU technology that can be implemented, both technically and economically. The results and information from this study provides end-users and policy makers with guidance for additional research on the specific components of DDU technology such that its widespread use can provide an uninterruptible energy source, increase resilience from extreme weather conditions, reduce U.S. dependency on fossil fuels, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The site-specific part of this study gives U of IL administrators a realistic and pragmatic assessment of the financial resources necessary to add a DDU GES in the MSS to the campus’ energy portfolio.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Geothermal Operational Optimization with Machine Learning

The Geothermal Operational Optimization with Machine Learning (GOOML) project has developed a generic and extensible component-based system modeling framework to study complex geothermal fields using a data-driven approach. Through building a digital twin of a geothermal steam field with the GOOML modeling framework, operators can analyze historical and forecasted power production, explore possible steam field configurations, and optimize real world operations, all in a cost-effective digital environment. The GOOML modeling software is based on a historical data-assimilation framework that uses first-principal thermodynamics to model steam field components using historical data, and a forecast framework that uses machine-learning-driven models of steam field components to predict future operations. This modeling framework creates countless new opportunities for digital exploration of steam field design and operations. To date, digital twins have been developed for several steam fields in New Zealand and the United States. These digital twins have been validated by comparing hindcast predictions against historical production data. Field design and operations have been explored using genetic optimization and reinforcement learning. Initial results show compelling and often surprising opportunities for improved design and operation of fields with 2 to 5 percent improvements in annual energy production. GOOML is driving a step-change in geothermal operations by applying state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms, comprehensive data analytics, and a first-of-its-kind intelligent geothermal systems model.

40 EE - Geothermal Technologies Office (EE-4G)↗
DOE OSTI2022

Consumer Guide to Residential Renewable Energy

Learn how installing residential renewable energy systems, such as geothermal heat pumps and wind or solar energy systems, can save energy, lower utility bills, and earn homeowners money. This fact sheet from Energy Saver includes information on how to start planning to install renewable energy systems at home.

residential renewable energy, geothermal heat pump↗
DOE OSTI2023

T2Well-ECO2NV2 v1.0 beta

T2Well-ECO2NV2 combines the T2Well code for simulating coupled well-reservoir fluid and heat flow with the ECO2N Version 2.0 equation of state module for calculating the fluid properties of water-CO2-salt mixtures at high temperatures. The combination of these two capabilities in T2Well-ECO2NV2 creates the capability of simulating injection and withdrawal of fluids in high-Temperature geothermal or geologic carbon sequestration systems. While the previously released T2Well-ECO2N Version 1.0 was useful for geologic carbon sequestration, the new T2Well-ECO2NV2 has capabilities for higher temperature and thereby allows the simulation of CO2-rich geothermal systems.

Oldenburg, CurtisM↗
DOE OSTI2015

Geothermal Retrofit of Illinois National Guard's State headquarters Building

The goal of this project was to assess the feasibility of utilizing mine water as a heat sink for a geothermal heat pump system to heat and cool the 74,000 sq. ft. Illinois National Guard State Headquarters’ building in Springfield Illinois. If successful, this type of system would be less expensive to install than a traditional closed loop geothermal (ground source) heat pump system by significantly reducing the size of the well field, thus shortening or eliminate the payback period compared to a conventional system. In the end, a conventional ground loop was used for the project.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Elko County School District (ECSD) Geothermal Evaluation: Basin College Direct Use Geothermal Demonstration Project

The system has been in continuous operation since October 1986 and serves various customers with approximately 180°F geothermal heating water for use at each facility as shown in Exhibit B. The system which is maintained by the school district consists of two main water loops. The system was designed for a large temperature difference instead of the normal 20°ΔT heating system. Using the design 80°ΔT, we yield 4+ times more energy with the same water flow. Loop 1 is the main geothermal water loop which flows from the production well through two main system heat exchangers and, after heat is extracted, to the disposal area. Loop 2, the customer heating loop, is heated in the main heat exchangers and then runs through approximately 5500 feet of buried supply piping and approximately 5500 feet of buried return piping to each customer facility where a facility heat exchanger is provided for each customers use. All piping on the customers’ side of each facility heat exchanger is the responsibility of the individual customer. Although originally designed to work with an 80ºΔT, this has deteriorated over the years and cannot achieve this at the present time. The system has operated over the last 29 years with minimal maintenance but is now starting to show its age with various corrosion issues, control problems, and several leaks. Some parts of the system are also located in areas where proposed building expansions will require piping relocations.This is the final technical report for the Great Basin College Direct Use Geothermal Demonstrationn Project, outlining the technical aspects of the User Group System.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

INGENIOUS - Great Basin Regional Dataset Compilation

This is the regional dataset compilation for the INnovative Geothermal Exploration through Novel Investigations Of Undiscovered Systems (INGENIOUS) project. The primary goal of this project is to accelerate discoveries of new, commercially viable hidden geothermal systems while reducing the exploration and development risks for all geothermal resources. These datasets will be used in INGENIOUS as input features for predicting geothermal favorability throughout the Great Basin study area. Datasets consist of shapefiles, geotiffs, tabular spreadsheets, and metadata that describe: 2-meter temperature probe surveys, quaternary faults and volcanic features, geodetic shear and dilation models, heat flow, magnetotellurics (conductance), magnetics, gravity, paleogeothermal features (such as sinter and tufa deposits), seismicity, spring and well temperatures, spring and well aqueous geochemistry analyses, thermal conductivity, and fault slip and dilation tendency. For additional project information, see the INGENIOUS project site linked in the submission. Terms of use: These datasets are provided "as is", and the contributors assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions. The user assumes the entire risk associated with their use of these data and bears all responsibility in determining whether these data are fit for their intended use. These datasets may be redistributed with attribution (see citation information below). Please refer to the license information on this page for full licensing terms and conditions.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Geothermally Coupled Well-Based Compressed Air Energy Storage

Previous work by McGrail et al. (2013, 2015) has evaluated the possibility of pairing compressed air energy storage with geothermal resources in lieu of a fossil-fired power generation component, and suggests that such applications may be cost competitive where geology is favorable to siting both the geothermal and CAES components of such a system. Those studies also note that the collocation of subsurface resources that meet both sets of requirements are difficult to find in areas that also offer infrastructure and near- to mid-term market demand for energy storage. This study examines a novel application for the compressed air storage portion of the project by evaluating the potential to store compressed air in disused wells by amending well casings to serve as subsurface pressure vessels. Because the wells themselves would function in lieu of a geologic storage reservoir for the CAES element of the project, siting could focus on locations with suitable geothermal resources, as long as there was also existing wellfield infrastructure that could be repurposed for air storage. Existing wellfields abound in the United States, and with current low energy prices, many recently productive fields are now shut in. Should energy prices remain stagnant, these idle fields will be prime candidates for decommissioning unless they can be transitioned to other uses, such as redevelopment for energy storage. In addition to the nation’s ubiquitous oil and gas fields, geothermal fields, because of their phased production lifetimes, also may offer many abandoned wellbores that could be used for other purposes, often near currently productive geothermal resources. These existing fields offer an opportunity to decrease exploration and development uncertainty by leveraging data developed during prior field characterization, drilling, and production. They may also offer lower-cost deployment options for hybrid geothermal systems via redevelopment of existing well-field infrastructure. This project assessed the technical and economic feasibility of implementing geothermally coupled well-based CAES for grid-scale energy storage. Based on an evaluation of design specifications for a range of casing grades common in U.S. oil and gas fields, a 5-MW CAES project could be supported by twenty to twenty-five 5,000-foot, 7-inch wells using lower-grade casing, and as few as eight such wells for higher-end casing grades. Using this information, along with data on geothermal resources, well density, and potential future markets for energy storage systems, The Geysers geothermal field was selected to parameterize a case study to evaluate the potential match between the proven geothermal resource present at The Geysers and the field’s existing well infrastructure. Based on calculated wellbore compressed air mass, the study shows that a single average geothermal production well could provide enough geothermal energy to support a 15.4-MW (gross) power generation facility using 34 to 35 geothermal wells repurposed for compressed air storage, resulting in a simplified levelized cost of electricity (sLCOE) estimated at 11.2 ¢/kWh (Table S.1). Accounting for the power loss to the geothermal power project associated with diverting geothermal resources for air heating results in a net 2-MW decrease in generation capacity, increasing the CAES project’s sLCOE by 1.8 ¢/kWh.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Geothermally Coupled Well-Based Compressed Air Energy Storage

Previous work by McGrail et al. (2013, 2015) has evaluated the possibility of pairing compressed air energy storage with geothermal resources in lieu of a fossil-fired power generation component, and suggests that such applications may be cost competitive where geology is favorable to siting both the geothermal and CAES components of such a system. Those studies also note that the collocation of subsurface resources that meet both sets of requirements are difficult to find in areas that also offer infrastructure and near- to mid-term market demand for energy storage. This study examines a novel application for the compressed air storage portion of the project by evaluating the potential to store compressed air in disused wells by amending well casings to serve as subsurface pressure vessels. Because the wells themselves would function in lieu of a geologic storage reservoir for the CAES element of the project, siting could focus on locations with suitable geothermal resources, as long as there was also existing wellfield infrastructure that could be repurposed for air storage. Existing wellfields abound in the United States, and with current low energy prices, many recently productive fields are now shut in. Should energy prices remain stagnant, these idle fields will be prime candidates for decommissioning unless they can be transitioned to other uses, such as redevelopment for energy storage. In addition to the nation’s ubiquitous oil and gas fields, geothermal fields, because of their phased production lifetimes, also may offer many abandoned wellbores that could be used for other purposes, often near currently productive geothermal resources. These existing fields offer an opportunity to decrease exploration and development uncertainty by leveraging data developed during prior field characterization, drilling, and production. They may also offer lower-cost deployment options for hybrid geothermal systems via redevelopment of existing well-field infrastructure. This project assessed the technical and economic feasibility of implementing geothermally coupled well-based CAES for grid-scale energy storage. Based on an evaluation of design specifications for a range of casing grades common in U.S. oil and gas fields, a 5-MW CAES project could be supported by twenty to twenty-five 5,000-foot, 7-inch wells using lower-grade casing, and as few as eight such wells for higher-end casing grades. Using this information, along with data on geothermal resources, well density, and potential future markets for energy storage systems, The Geysers geothermal field was selected to parameterize a case study to evaluate the potential match between the proven geothermal resource present at The Geysers and the field’s existing well infrastructure. Based on calculated wellbore compressed air mass, the study shows that a single average geothermal production well could provide enough geothermal energy to support a 15.4-MW (gross) power generation facility using 34 to 35 geothermal wells repurposed for compressed air storage, resulting in a simplified levelized cost of electricity (sLCOE) estimated at 11.2 ¢/kWh (Table S.1). Accounting for the power loss to the geothermal power project associated with diverting geothermal resources for air heating results in a net 2-MW decrease in generation capacity, increasing the CAES project’s sLCOE by 1.8 ¢/kWh.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗