Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FUEL TESTING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Determination of Average Burnup in AGR-3/4 Compacts 1-4 and 7-4

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program third and fourth irradiation experiments (AGR-3/4), originally planned as separate tests, were combined in one test train for irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The irradiation test began on December 14, 2011, and ended on April 12, 2014 (Collin 2016). The originally planned AGR-3 and AGR-4 irradiation experiments were both focused on obtaining data on fission product transport to support the improvement of modeling. The AGR-3 experimental plan was focused on gaseous and metallic fission product release from the kernels and diffusion in the coatings during irradiation and post-irradiation safety testing. The AGR-4 experimental plan was focused on diffusivities and sorptivities in the compact matrix and reactor graphite. These two goals were combined in the AGR-3/4 irradiation, which consisted of 12 independently monitored capsules that each contained four AGR-3/4 compacts in a single stack surrounded by an inner ring of matrix or graphite and an outer ring of graphite. Two capsule types were used: a standard capsule and a so-called fuel body, in which the outer graphite ring included a floor and cap that fully enclosed the fuel. The fuel body design supported post-irradiation safety testing of the intact fuel and ring assembly to provide data on fission product transport and release from the matrix and graphite at accident temperatures.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Radial Deconsolidation and Leach-Burn-Leach of AGR-3/4 Compact 1-4 and 10-4

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program third and fourth irradiation experiments (AGR-3/4), originally planned as separate tests, were combined in one test train for irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The irradiation test began on December 14, 2011 and ended on April 12, 2014 (Collin 2016). The originally planned AGR-3 and AGR-4 irradiation experiments were both focused on obtaining data on fission product transport to support the improvement of modeling. The AGR-3 experimental plan was focused on gaseous and metallic fission product release from the kernels and diffusion in the coatings during irradiation and postirradiation safety testing. The AGR-4 experimental plan was focused on diffusivities and sorptivities in the compact matrix and reactor graphite (Petti et al. 2005). These two goals were combined in the AGR-3/4 irradiation, which consisted of twelve independently monitored capsules that each contained four AGR-3/4 compacts in a single stack surrounded by an inner ring of matrix or graphite and an outer ring of graphite. There were two capsule types: a standard capsule and a “fuel body”, in which the outer graphite ring included a floor and cap that fully enclosed the fuel (Stempien et al. 2018a). The fuel body design supported post-irradiation safety testing of the intact fuel and ring assembly to provide data on fission product transport and release from matrix and graphite at accident temperatures (Demkowicz 2017).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Rapid prediction of fuel research octane number and octane sensitivity using the AFIDA constant-volume combustion chamber

Current research octane number (RON) and motor octane number (MON) gasoline performance characterization techniques use dated, complex engine testing methodology and limit researchers’ ability to easily characterize small volumes of experimental fuels. A novel methodology is presented that correlates measured ignition delay (ID) time to RON in an Advanced Fuel Ignition Delay Analyzer (AFIDA) constant-volume combustion chamber device at a single pressure/temperature condition, with an r2 of 0.99 and standard error (SE) of 1.0. The correlation of the slope of the ID time between two additional temperature points to octane sensitivity (S) produces an r2 of 0.97 and SE of 0.69; however, fuels with S>12 are indistinguishable. These results are based on methodology calibration using 31 primary and toluene reference fuels containing 0%-40% ethanol with RON values ranging from 85 to 113. Validation of these methods using a 102-sample fuel matrix spanning an array of base fuels and additive chemistry designed to test the robust applicability of the method, along with pump gasoline and high-octane surrogate blend samples, demonstrates an r2 of 0.94 and SE of 1.3 for the RON correlation over all samples, whereas the equivalent S correlation produces an r2 of 0.78 and SE of 1.2 by excluding two additives, 3-pentanone and diisobutylene, which displayed poor S correlation results. This novel AFIDA analysis method can be performed in 1 h and with 40 mL of fuel, offering significant improvements in time and volume requirements over traditional techniques.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Progress Report on SFR Metallic Fuel Data Qualification

This report summarizes the progress of SFR metallic fuel qualification related activities, which are focused on providing quality assurance relevant information applicable to experiments irradiated during the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) program. An overview of the metallic fuel performance data and the associated databases, including the EBR-II Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD), Out-of-Pile Transient Database (OPTD), and TREAT Experimental Relational Database (TREXR) is included. The legacy data in the databases, including as-built, post-irradiation examination (PIE), operating parameters, and out-of-pile experiment post-test data are introduced. The SFR metallic fuel Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) and its implementation to qualify these legacy data is described in detail. Important PIE data QA documents and the specifications of seven types of PIE measurements (contact profilometry, laser profilometry, neutron radiography, gamma scan, fission gas release fission gas chemistry, and metallography) are provided. Examples of the implementation of the QAPP to qualify each of those types of PIE data are provided.

Mo, Kun [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonn↗
DOE OSTI2024

Report on RIA Relevant Modified Burst Testing of ATF Cladding Materials

The mechanical performance of accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding candidates in light-water reactors (LWRs) must be similar to or better than that of current conventional nuclear fuel claddings to reduce dose to the public and ensure a that the core coolable geometry is maintained during a postulated reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) in light-water reactors (LWRs). During an RIA event, the rapid thermal expansion of nuclear fuel can deform the cladding once the fuel–cladding gap closes. In some cases, the pellet–cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) can induce mechanical failure in ATF candidates. Thus, the mechanical response of ATF cladding must be investigated by mimicking the conditions of RIA and potentially performing Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) experiments to establish or verify the safety envelope. The work presented in this report investigated the failure behavior of as-received, hydrided, and chromium-coated (Cr-coated) Zircaloy-4 (Zry-4) cladding tube under strain-driven mechanical conditions, mimicking postulated RIA loading conditions. Mechanical testing was performed at 300°C via modified burst test (MBT) equipment with pulse width control previously developed under the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Advanced Fuel Campaign (AFC). The mechanical strains were determined using 2D digital image correlation (DIC) techniques. The base Zry-4 acquired by Cameco Inc. was in stress-relieved annealed (SRA) condition. Because of the observed large deformation of the cladding tubes, the failure strain definition was updated for the MBT, which can also be applied to other tube tests where significant bulging (out-of-plane deformation) is present. The failure strain was determined to be affected by the speed of the test or the RIA event. As the RIA-like event duration decreased from 75 to 15 ms, the failure strain decreased 5, 7 and 1% for as-received, hydrided, and Cr-coated specimens, respectively. Fractography on the Cr-coated specimens indicated the presence of two failure mechanisms: (i) crenulation at the outer surface of the coating due to the tensile tractional forces along with coatings grain microstructure and (ii) formation of critical defect at the coating/cladding interface that initiated coating rupture after severe plastic deformation of the Zry- 4 substrate. Based on the MBT results and fractography observations, performing mechanical property testing at high strain rates—in particular on Cr-coated tubes—and semi-integral TREAT experiments are required future efforts to ensure ATF cladding performance during transients. The testing recommended would also inform the development of long-term generalized cladding technologies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Evaluation of ceria as a surrogate material for UO 2 in experiments on fuel cracking driven by resistive heating

A variety of normal operation and accident scenarios can generate thermal stresses large enough to cause cracking in light-water reactor (LWR) fuel pellets. Cracking of fuel pellets can lead to reduced heat removal, larger centerline temperatures, and localized stress in cladding all of which impact fuel performance. Furthermore, pellet cracking also contributes to a temperature reduction in the pellet since the pellet fragments tend to move towards the heat sink (cladding), and the heat flow remains predominantly radial despite the presence of cracks. It is important to understand the temperature profile on the pellet before and after cracking to improve cracking models in fuel performance codes However, in-reactor observation and measurement of cracking is very challenging owing to the harsh environment and design of fuel rods. Recently, an experimental pellet cracking test stand was developed for separate effects testing of normal operations and accident temperature conditions, using thermal imaging to capture the pellet surface temperature for evaluation of thermal stresses and optical imaging to capture the evolution of cracking in real time. Cracking experiments were initially performed using ceria (CeO 2 ) as a surrogate fuel material, which is useful for developing and demonstrating the experimental approaches but is also valuable in its own right for cracking model development and validation. A combination of induction and resistance heating was used for volumetric heat generation in the pellet creating a thermal gradient. The material properties of CeO 2 and UO 2 are reviewed and compared for use in model development. Simulations of the experiment were performed to evaluate the behavior of the surrogate (CeO 2 ) fuel in BISON. The measured temperature profiles from BISON models match reasonably well with the observed experiments for the ceria pellets before cracking. The findings from this work will help improve confidence in fracture models used for fuel pellets under similar in-reactor conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Demonstration of Electroreduction Technology to Convert GNF Uranium Oxide Powder to Metal

Global Nuclear Fuel – Americas LLC (GNF) has partnered with Argonne National Laboratory to demonstrate electroreduction of uranium oxides produced by deconversion of UF 6 to uranium metal through the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program under the U.S. Department of Energy to accelerate the domestic production of metallic advanced reactor fuels. Electroreduction of uranium oxide was first demonstrated and patented by Argonne in the early 2000s as a technology to convert used oxide nuclear fuel from light water reactors to metal for further fuel reprocessing. More recently, electroreduction has been proposed as a front-end technology for metallization of uranium oxides produced by deconversion of UF 6 and for scrap recovery of oxide materials. During the electroreduction process, UO 2 powder is contained in a stainless-steel mesh basket with a cathode lead located in the center of the UO 2 bed. The basket is immersed in lithium chloride molten salt electrolyte containing 1 wt% lithium oxide along with a platinum anode and a nickel/nickel oxide (Ni/NiO) reference electrode. Current is applied to the cell between the cathode and anode to reduce the UO 2 to metallic uranium via a solid-state reduction reaction. Oxide ions released from the UO 2 during reduction are transported through the salt to the anode where oxygen gas is evolved. Once reduction is complete, the basket containing the metallicized uranium is removed from the salt and can be processed to remove the salt and consolidate the uranium into an ingot for use in metallic fuel fabrication. This project was performed to provide evidence of the electroreduction technology readiness level for metallization of UO 2 powder, identify and retire technical risks for industrialization of electroreduction, and accelerate the path to commercialization for metallic fast reactor fuel production. To that end, five electroreduction tests were performed with UO 2 provided by GNF and the resulting product was analyzed for the extent of conversion to metal and for impurity contents of the metal product to verify that electroreduction does not introduce impurities that would prevent use of the product in metallic fuel fabrication.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

ANL Design Team Analysis: Transportable Modular Reactor by Balance of Plant Elimination

HolosGen LLC is developing “Holos-Quad” a transportable gas-cooled reactor, with integral load following power conversion systems equipping subcritical power modules (SPMs), fully comprised within standard transport containers. The design eliminates the Balance of Plant (BoP) and greatly simplifies the design layout. A closed-loop full Brayton gas thermodynamic cycle converts the fuel cartridges thermal energy into electricity. This ARPA-E project utilizes advanced reactor modeling tools and manufacturing-testing of a scaled SPM equipped with a surrogate fuel cartridge to eliminate the most significant technology gaps to accelerate commercialization. The Argonne Design Team contributes to the research by demonstrating feasibility of various aspects of the Holos-Quad design by performing high-fidelity neutronic modeling, and investigating various reactivity control systems. This work consists of two main tasks: evaluation of HolosGen’s design features and alternative options study for reactivity control.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Wabash Hydrogen Negative Emissions Technology Demonstration

The objectives of the Wabash Hydrogen Negative Emissions Technology Demonstration Project (Wabash Project) are to develop and design all aspects of the scope, cost, characteristics and investment case of a world class flexible gasification, net negative carbon, hydrogen co-products power plant. The outcome of this undertaking is a complete set of deliverables that has been produced by a preeminent team of engineers, constructors, operators, and developers, building upon previous technology, utilizing cutting edge technology, and thoroughly defining all aspects of this fully integrated 21st Century Powerplant. The Wabash Project encapsulates several cross-cutting initiatives within the US Department of Energy, such as 100% hydrogen powered combustion turbine, geological carbon sequestration, coal with biomass gasification and hydrogen energy storage. The flexible gasifier at the Wabash Valley Resources plant is a slurry-fed, entrained flow, high-temperature, oxygen-blown gasifier that has been proven commercially to operate successfully on various coals and petroleum coke (petcoke). The ability to be fuel flexible and feed various biomass (woody biomass and agriculture residue) and petroleum waste (plastics) was evaluated during BP 1 (BP1). This involved the preparation and testing of feedstocks into slurries to determine what fuels can be fed to the gasifier. By utilizing a flexible oxygen-blown gasifier, the ability to address operational issues common to lower temperature biomass gasification, such as the handling of tars, can be mitigated. The overall goal is to achieve a design capable of carbon-negative emissions while leveraging the substantial investments made and operating experience already gained at the Wabash site.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of Nuclear Spent Fuel Disposal in Clay-Bearing Rock - Process Model Development and Experimental Studies

The DOE R&D program under the Spent Fuel Waste Science Technology (SFWST) campaign has made key progress in modeling and experimental approaches towards the characterization of chemical and physical phenomena that could impact the long-term safety assessment of heat-generating nuclear waste disposition in deep clay/shale/argillaceous rock. International collaboration activities such as heater tests and postmortem analysis of samples recovered from these have elucidated key information regarding changes in the engineered barrier system (EBS) material exposed to years of thermal loads. Chemical and structural analyses of sampled bentonite material from such tests has as well as experiments conducted on these are key to the characterization of thermal effects affecting bentonite clay barrier performance and the extent of sacrificial zones in the EBS during the thermal period. Thermal, hydrologic, and chemical data collected from heater tests and laboratory experiments has been used in the development, validation, and calibration of THMC simulators to model near-field coupled processes. This information leads to the development of simulation approaches (e.g., continuum vs. discrete) to tackle issues related to flow and transport at various scales of the host-rock and EBS design concept. Consideration of direct disposal of large capacity dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) as part of the back-end SNF waste disposition strategy has generated interest in improving our understanding of the effects of elevated temperatures on the EBS design. This is particularly important for backfilled repository concepts where temperature plays a key role in the EBS behavior and long-term performance. This report describes multiple R&D efforts on disposal in argillaceous geologic media through development and application of coupled THMC process models, experimental studies on clay/metal/cement barrier and host-rock (argillite) material interactions, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of water transport during (swelling) clay dehydration, first-principles studies of metaschoepite (UO 2 corrosion product) stability, and advances in thermodynamic plus surface complexation database development. Drift-scale URL experiments provides key data for testing hydrological-chemical (HC) model involving strong couplings of fluid mixing and barrier material chemical interactions. The THM modeling focuses on heater test experiments in argillite rock and gas migration in bentonite as part of international collaboration activities at underground research laboratories (URLs). In addition, field testing at an URL involves in situ analysis of fault slip behavior and fault permeability. Pore-scale modeling of gas bubble migration is also being investigated within the gas migration modeling effort. Interaction experiments on bentonite samples from heater test under ambient and elevated temperatures permit the evaluation of ion exchange, phase stability, and mineral transformation changes that could impact clay swelling. Advances in the development, testing, and implementation of a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) degradation model coupled with canister corrosion focus on the effects of hydrogen gas generation and its integration with Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA). GDSA integration activities includes evaluation of groundwater chemistries in shale formations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Complete Survey of Fuel Candidates for Microreactor Purposes

This report summarizes various fuel types that may be applicable to several microreactor concepts, which are defined as (1) very high temperature reactors (VHTR), (2) sodium fast reactors (SFR), (3) system for nuclear auxiliary power (SNAP) reactors, (4) gas fast reactors (GFR), and (5) molten salt reactors (MSR). The fuel systems that were assessed include: uranium mononitride (UN), uranium monocarbide (UC), uranium dioxide (UO 2 ), uranium oxycarbide (UCO) Tristructural Isotropic (TRISO), UN TRISO, mixed oxide (MOX), metallic fuels, and metal hydrides. While UCO TRISO has undergone significant testing through the advanced gas reactor (AGR) program, the very high cost necessitates consideration of other fuel types. UN and UC were identified as fuels that should receive further investigation due to their thermophysical and mechanical properties. Minimal irradiation performance data shows that these fuels are good candidate fuels for microreactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Bench-Scale Electrolytic Dissolution of Quarter-Scale FCA Cans

In 2016, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) led, in support of and under sponsorship of the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3), the removal and transfer of the plutonium based Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) fuel from the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Tokai facility to the Savannah River Site (SRS). The team also included JAEA, multiple organizations in Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), International Nuclear Services, and many other entities. The FCA fuel removal project completion was a key deliverable for M3 to the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit and constituted the largest inventory of weapons-usable plutonium removed under the nonproliferation program. The FCA materials consist of thousands of stainless steel (SS) clad plates and hundreds of SS clad rods. The FCA fuel elements were packaged in a carrier can and stored at SRS pending disposition of the fuel. Following an assessment of candidate disposition options, SRNS identified electrolytic dissolution (ED) as the most promising disposition option for the FCA plates and their preferred option was endorsed by DOE. This option entails electrochemically dissolving the entire FCA carrier can with fuel elements and was based on bench-scale laboratory testing and historical work on processing SS-clad and zirconium-clad uranium-based fuel in the H-Canyon electrolytic dissolver (last operated in 1980). The FCA plate consists of a plutonium-aluminum metal alloy core hermitically sealed in SS cladding.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Mechanical Loads on Spent Nuclear Fuel in the General 30 cm Package Drop Scenario

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Spent Fuel and Waste Science & Technology (SFWST) research program is guided by the high-level goal of closing prioritized knowledge gaps related to spent nuclear fuel (SNF) storage and transportation, which are summarized by Saltzstein et al. (2020). One of the high-priority knowledge gaps is the identification and quantification of mechanical loads that are expected to affect SNF during normal conditions of transportation and storage to inform the range of physical SNF test programs. This report uses modeling and analysis methods to estimate the mechanical loads on spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the general 30 cm package drop scenario. The drop scenario assumes impact limiters are in place in the transportation configuration and the impact surface is perfectly rigid. The goal of this analysis is to consider the universe of potential mechanical loading conditions that can happen to SNF and present the results in a manner that is useful for materials testing, decision making, and regulatory rule making purposes. This study uses validated finite element models and methods to perform a broad parametric study of key variables that can affect the mechanical loads on SNF during a hypothetical package free drop scenario. Physical drop test data from a cask and fuel assembly drop test campaign is the basis for model validation. Additionally, the results of the parametric study are used to inform a damage model, which uses multiple nonlinear regression to estimate the relationships between input variables and output response. The parametric finite element analyses consider thousands of input variable combinations, while the damage model estimates millions of combinations. The breadth of this study provides confidence that the potential range of mechanical loads that SNF might experience during the general 30 cm package drop scenario are characterized well enough to consider this knowledge gap closed. While this report documents the overall peak values calculated in this study, the 95 th percentile values, the histograms, and the observed trends are equally important. This study covered a large range of SNF temperatures, room temperature to 300°C, and burnups, 10 GWd/MTU to 62 GWd/MTU. Each temperature and burnup combination has a different cladding yield strain, so it is more meaningful to summarize the calculated cladding strain response as its factor of safety, which is defined relative to the yield strain. The factor of safety is calculated as the yield strain divided by the peak cladding strain. A factor of safety greater than unity indicates that the cladding remains below yield, whereas a value less than unity is indicative of plastic deformation. In all cases of this study a safety factor over 1.0 was calculated, although in the most limiting case at 300°C the safety factor was only 1.01, which suggests that yielding could occur when additional loads like rod internal pressure are included. When the temperature is restricted to 200°C the limiting safety factor increases to 1.28, which has significant margin to accommodate internal pressure and potential local cladding defects that could cause a local stress concentration. An important trend in the calculated fuel rod mechanical loads is that the 2 nd highest loaded fuel rod in an assembly tends to be significantly lower than the highest loaded rod. The implication is that even if one rod in an assembly experiences a failure the loads would have to be significantly higher to cause two or more rods to fail.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparison between PARFUME and Bison Using the AGR-2 Irradiation Experiment

This report documents comparisons between Fuel Model (PARFUME) model predictions versus Bison for selected compacts from the second irradiation test of the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program that occurred from June 2010 to October 2013 in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). PARFUME is a fuel performance analysis and modeling code, used for evaluating gas-reactor tristructural isotropic (TRISO) coated particle fuel for prismatic, pebble bed, plate, and cylindrical type fuel geometries. PARFUME is an integrated mechanistic computer code that evaluates the thermal, mechanical, and physico-chemical behavior of TRISO coated-fuel particles and the probability for fuel failure given the particle-to-particle statistical variations in physical dimensions and material properties that arise during the fuel fabrication process. Bison is a nuclear fuel performance application built using the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) finite element library (Permann 2020). Bison is capable of modeling multiple fuel forms in a wide variety of dimensions and geometries. It solves coupled nonlinear partial differential equations, including heat conduction, mechanics, fission product species transport etc., in a fully implicit manner. Comparisons between PARFUME and Bison were performed using four compacts from the AGR-2 experiment. Selected outputs were chosen based on their impact on the probability of the SiC layer failing. In general there was good agreement between PARFUME and Bison with the exception of predicting the gap formed between the buffer and IPyC. Further comparisons between PARFUME and Bison are planned to further develop Bison’s capabilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Radial Deconsolidation and Leach-Burn-Leach of AGR-3/4 Compacts 8-4 and 7-4

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program’s third and fourth irradiation experiments (AGR-3/4), originally planned as separate tests, were combined into one test train for irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The irradiation test began on December 14, 2011, and ended on April 12, 2014 (Collin 2016). The originally planned AGR-3 and AGR-4 irradiation experiments were both to be focused on obtaining fission product transport data to support improvements in modeling. The AGR-3 experimental plan was focused on gaseous and metallic fission product release from the kernels and diffusion in the coatings during irradiation and postirradiation safety testing. The AGR-4 experimental plan was focused on diffusivities and sorptivities in the compact matrix and reactor graphite (Petti et al. 2005). These goals were combined in the AGR-3/4 irradiation experiment, which consisted of twelve independently monitored capsules that each contained four AGR-3/4 compacts in a single stack surrounded by an inner ring of matrix or graphite and an outer ring of graphite. There were two capsule types: a standard capsule and a fuel body, in which the outer graphite ring included a floor and cap to fully enclose the fuel (Stempien et al. 2018a). The fuel body design supported post-irradiation safety testing of the intact fuel and ring assembly to obtain data on fission product transport and release from matrix and graphite at accident temperatures (Demkowicz 2017).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Radial Deconsolidation and Leach-Burn-Leach of AGR-3/4 Compacts 1-3, 4-3, 10-1, and 10-2

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program’s third and fourth irradiation experiments (AGR-3/4), originally planned as separate tests, were combined into one test train for irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The irradiation test began on December 14, 2011 and ended on April 12, 2014 (Collin 2016). The originally planned AGR-3 and AGR-4 irradiation experiments were both focused on obtaining data on fission product transport to support modeling improvement. The AGR-3 experimental plan was focused on gaseous and metallic fission product release from the kernels and diffusion in the coatings during irradiation and post-irradiation safety testing. The AGR-4 experimental plan was focused on diffusivities and sorptivities in the compact matrix and reactor graphite (Petti et al. 2005). These two goals were combined in the AGR-3/4 irradiation, which consisted of twelve independently monitored capsules that each contained four AGR-3/4 compacts in a single stack surrounded by an inner ring of matrix or graphite and an outer ring of graphite. There were two capsule types: a standard capsule and a fuel body in which the outer graphite ring included a floor and cap that fully enclosed the fuel (Stempien et al. 2018a). The fuel body design supported post-irradiation safety testing of the intact fuel and ring assembly to provide data on fission product transport and release from matrix and graphite at accident temperatures (Demkowicz 2017)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

ACCELERATING MICROREACTOR DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT THROUGH JOINT PUBLIC TEST BEDS AND PRIVATE ADVANCED REACTOR DEVELOPMENT

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has funded the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) to accelerate the development and commercialization of small modular reactors and other advanced reactor technologies. As part of this effort NIRC is building two strategic assets at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to facilitate public-private partnerships for the development and testing of advanced nuclear microreactors and Small Modular Reactors (SMR). One will provide a safe, secure, and affordable location for High-Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fueled reactors and a second for Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) fueled reactors. Together these testbeds fill a nuclear testing infrastructure gap. The availability of such comprehensive testing facilities at the national labs eliminates the significant financial and operational burdens associated with each developer building and licensing their own test facilities. Consequently, this approach will not only accelerate technological innovation and reduce time-to-market for advanced nuclear solutions but it also underscores the DOE's commitment to fostering an ecosystem where nuclear energy will thrive as a clean, reliable, and efficient source of power. The Demonstration of Microreactor Experiments (DOME) and Laboratory for Operations and Testing in the United States (LOTUS) have planned availability in 2026, and 2027 respectively.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Primer for OTERR Core Reloading Optimization

OTERR (Optimization of Test Reactor Reloading) is a software tool which assists in finding optimal fuel assembly reloading patterns for nuclear reactors. It was created specifically to support the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) program, but its functionality is general enough to be applied to most fast spectrum reactors which use hexagonal prismatic fuel elements. This document is meant to be a primer for new users of OTERR to walk through example workflows for core reloading optimization cases. Simple cases are followed step-by-step to discuss what needs to be done to complete a reloading optimization sequence. Note that the intent of this document is to provide practical examples for users to follow along with so they can quickly start using OTERR and then make changes to fit their own modeling needs. Detail is limited in terms of addressing additional features not used in these examples and especially lacking in discussion of theory used in the code. To better address these points, users are highly encouraged to refer to the OTERR User Manual and the OTERR Theory Manual.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗